Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of basic characteristics, job exposure, and protective equipment usage between low and high respirable crystalline silica exposure groups

From: Dose-response relationship between lung function and chest imaging response to silica exposures in artificial stone manufacturing workers

 

Low exposure

High exposure

P value

n = 28

n = 37

Age, mean ± SD, yr

44.0 ± 14.0

39.9 ± 9.2

0.153

Male, n (%)

16 (57.1)

35 (94.6)

0.0003

Body mass index, mean ± SD

24.6 ± 4.2

26.6 ± 4.9

0.126

Education attainment > = 13 yrs, n (%)

23 (82.1)

18 (48.7)

0.006

Tobacco smoking, n (%)

  

0.051

 Never

19 (67.9)

20 (54.1)

 

 Ex-smoker

0 (0)

7 (18.9)

 

 Current smoker

9 (32.1)

10 (27.0)

 

Cumulative smoking amount, mean ± SD, pack*yr

9.1 ± 10.3

7.4 ± 8.5

0.699

Tenure, year, mean ± SD

6.0 ± 6.8

6.0 ± 4.3

0.989

Weighting factor, mean ± SD

1.3 ± 0.9

5.1 ± 3.2

< 0.0001

Weighting factor > median (2), n (%)

4 (12.1)

29 (87.9)

< 0.0001

Weighted tenure, mean ± SD, year

6.9 ± 10.1

26.6 ± 20.9

< 0.0001

Cumulative RCS exposure, mean ± SD, mg/m3-year

0.15 ± 0.33

6.23 ± 9.06

< 0.0001

Best respiratory PPE used at work

  

< 0.0001

 No or regular flat mask, n (%)

3 (10.7)

1 (2.7)

 

 N95, n (%)

18 (64.3)

5 (13.5)

 

 Half-face mask, n (%)

2 (7.1)

10 (27.0)

 

 Full-face mask, n (%)

2 (7.1)

15 (40.5)

 

 PAPR, n (%)

3 (10.7)

6 (16.2)

 

Fit test experience, n (%)

0 (0)

8 (21.6)

0.008

  1. Abbreviations: PAPR, powered air-purifying respirator; PPE, personal protective equipment; RCS, respirable crystalline silica; SD, standard deviation
  2. Cumulative smoking amount was only calculated for people ever having smoking habits
  3. p values were calculated by for Chi-square Fisher’s exact test, or Mann-Whitney test