Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clinton White |
| 28 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gilman |
| 26 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Woodin |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 30 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Clinton White |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Gilman |
| 10 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Woodin |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mark Woodin |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1476-069X-10-93 |
You can find further information about peer review here.