Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

The effect of primary organic particles on emergency hospital admissions among the elderly in 3 US cities

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 3
Environmental Health201312:68

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-68

©  Kioumourtzoglou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 28 May 2013
  • Accepted: 21 August 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Fine particle (PM2.5) pollution related to combustion sources has been linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes. Although poorly understood, it is possible that organic carbon (OC) species, particularly those from combustion-related sources, may be partially responsible for the observed toxicity of PM2.5. The toxicity of the OC species may be related to their chemical structures; however, few studies have examined the association of OC species with health impacts.

Methods

We categorized 58 primary organic compounds by their chemical properties into 5 groups: n-alkanes, hopanes, cyclohexanes, PAHs and isoalkanes. We examined their impacts on the rate of daily emergency hospital admissions among Medicare recipients in Atlanta, GA and Birmingham, AL (2006–2009), and Dallas, TX (2006–2007). We analyzed data in two stages; we applied a case-crossover analysis to simultaneously estimate effects of individual OC species on cause-specific hospital admissions. In the second stage we estimated the OC chemical group-specific effects, using a multivariate weighted regression.

Results

Exposures to cyclohexanes of six days and longer were significantly and consistently associated with increased rate of hospital admissions for CVD (3.40%, 95%CI = (0.64, 6.24%) for 7-d exposure). Similar increases were found for hospitalizations for ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction. For respiratory related hospital admissions, associations with OC groups were less consistent, although exposure to iso-/anteiso-alkanes was associated with increased respiratory-related hospitalizations.

Conclusions

Results suggest that week-long exposures to traffic-related, primary organic species are associated with increased rate of total and cause-specific CVD emergency hospital admissions. Associations were significant for cyclohexanes, but not hopanes, suggesting that chemical properties likely play an important role in primary OC toxicity.

Keywords

  • Emergency hospital admissions
  • Fine particles
  • Medicare
  • Primary organic particles

Background

Organic carbon (OC) particles are directly emitted in the atmosphere (primary OC) or formed as a result of photooxidation processes (secondary OC). Both primary and secondary OC are mainly sub-micrometer particles, with a bimodal mass distribution peaking at 0.2 μ m and 1 μ m[1].

In polluted areas, total OC contributes 10-40% to PM2.5 mass[1]. In a study in Los Angeles, total OC contributed 25-45% to PM2.5 and 55-75% to ultrafine particle (UFP) mass, across seasons and sites[2]. In general, combustion sources play a major role in the primary OC emissions[3–6], with motor vehicles the main source of many OC compounds, such as hopanes, steranes and cyclohexanes[3, 7, 8]. For instance, motor vehicle OC comprised approximately 14% of total OC and 5% of PM2.5 in Toronto and Vancouver, Canada[9]. Biogenic contributions are also important for the ambient concentrations of specific alkane and PAH species[10, 11].

Epidemiologic studies have shown that OC modifies previously reported associations between PM2.5 and specific health outcomes[12], suggesting a role for OC in PM2.5-related toxicity. Furthermore, given recently published associations between combustion sources-related PM2.5 and adverse health impacts[13–15], primary OC compounds and their chemical groups specifically, such as hopanes and traffic-related PAHs, have become the focus of health studies[16, 17]. This focus is enhanced by findings from toxicological studies showing impacts of diesel exhaust and UFP on oxidative stress to be mediated by adsorbed organic chemicals rather than the particles themselves[18]. Although these findings suggest that traffic-related organic species play a significant role in the observed PM2.5-related toxicity, further research is needed to understand whether and through which species OC may impact human health.

To address this issue, we accessed OC monitoring data from the Aerosol Research and Inhalation Epidemiology Study (ARIES) and Texas ARIES ambient monitoring sites, located in Atlanta, GA, Birmingham, AL, and Dallas, TX. At these sites, a large number (∼120) of individual OC species were measured over multiple years. We grouped the individual OC species by their chemical structures, as these govern their chemical properties[1], to reduce the number of exposure-health comparisons and identify potentially biological relevant chemical properties. We then examined the association between primary OC species as grouped by their chemical structures and cause-specific emergency hospital admissions among Medicare enrollees.

Methods

Our study was conducted under a protocol approved by the Harvard School of Public Health Human Subjects Committee. Study data did not include individual identifiers and thus consent was not obtained from individuals.

Data collection

Cause-specific hospital admissions data

Data on daily emergency hospital admissions were obtained from billing claims of Medicare enrollees for Atlanta, GA (2006–2009) and Birmingham, AL (2006–2009) and for Dallas, TX (2006–2007). Data for hospitals within Clayton, Cobb, De Kalb, Fulton and Gwinnett counties in Atlanta, Jefferson and Shelby counties in Birmingham and Dallas county in Dallas were included in the analyses. Only admissions that occurred through the emergency department were included, as scheduled admissions are likely not related to short-term air pollution exposures.

Each billing claim contains information on the date of hospitalization, age, residence county and primary diagnoses. Using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9 Revision (ICD-9; Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2008), we considered hospital admissions for all CVD conditions (codes 390–429), for all respiratory outcomes (codes 460–519), and for specific CVD or respiratory conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF; code 428), myocardial infarction (MI; code 410), ischemic heart disease (IHD; codes 410–414), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; codes 490–492, 494–496) and pneumonia (codes 480–487). Outcomes were selected based on findings from previous air pollution health studies[12, 19, 20].

Air pollution and meteorologic data

In each city, we obtained daily data for ∼120 non-polar compounds by thermal desorption GC/MS, OC by IMPROVE protocol thermal optical reflectance and PM2.5 (measured using 24-hr integrated Federal Reference Methods) measured as part of the ARIES and Texas ARIES studies. The analytical methods are well-accepted and have been previously published[21–23]. Data on temperature and dew point were obtained from Atlanta and Birmingham monitoring sites and the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using the R Statistical Software, version 2.14.1 (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Univariate analyses

We characterized OC particle concentrations using time-series plots, histograms and summary statistics. We further assessed seasonal differences in concentrations, with October–March as the cold period and April–September as the warm period.

OC species were included in further analyses if ≥50% of their observations were above their limit of detection (LOD), ≥75% of the observations were non-missing, and their IQR/median ratio was above 0.30, in all cities. The IQR/median ratio was used instead of the coefficient of variation, given its lower vulnerability to extreme observations. Pollutants with IQR/median ratios ≤0.30 were excluded, as they were not sufficiently variable to allow effect estimation with sufficient power[24].

Characterization of primary organic compounds

Primary OC compounds were classified by their chemical structures, as these govern their properties, reactivity and behavior[1]. We categorized OC into six chemical groups: PAHs, n-alkanes, hopanes, steranes, iso-/anteiso-alkanes and cyclohexanes (Additional file1: Table A-1).

Although not used in the health analyses, the seasonal variability of the organic constituents was also examined, to provide insight in their potential sources. N-alkanes and hopanes were further classified by their sources using well-accepted methods. For alkanes, we estimated city-specific monthly Carbon Preference Index (CPI), as the prevalence of odd to even numbered carbon species, to assess the relative importance of anthropogenic or biogenic sources. For our analyses, CPI values greater than 2 indicated plants and other biogenic sources as the primary n-alkane source, while values near 1 were consistent with anthropogenic sources[25, 26]. To identify anthropogenic sources further[3, 4, 6, 10], we also conducted exploratory factor analyses in each city, with the number of factors determined based on (a) identified factors having ≥3 species with a correlation ≥0.30 and (b) a solution that explained ≥90% of the species common variance.

We classified hopane sources in each city using the moretane ratio, with higher ratios indicating greater maturity of the hopanes[26]. This ratio is based on the fact that with increasing thermal maturity, unstable hopanes with hydrogen atoms at the β β-position are transformed to moretanes (β α-hopanes) and further to more stable α β-hopanes. Ratios greater than 0.9 indicated that hopanes originated from crude oil, near 0.1 from lignite coal smoke, and 0.4-0.6 from cleaner coals[26].

Health models

To assess the effect of primary OC compounds on hospital admissions we used a 2-stage hierarchical regression modeling approach[27], as has been used in studies of dietary exposures and breast cancer[28]. Hierarchical approaches have been widely used in air pollution epidemiology to combine health effects across cities[15, 29, 30], and more recently across multiple pollutants, such as associations between chemical properties of multiple air pollutants and hospital admissions[24].

In the first stage we fit a case-crossover analysis to the data from all cities. In a case-crossover design, each case acts as their own control, thus eliminating confounding by any personal characteristics that do not change over time[31]. The effect of the exposure on the outcome is then assessed by comparing the distribution of exposures on the days when the case occurred versus the days when the subject did not have the outcome (control days). We modified the time-stratified approach that was proposed by Lumley and Levy[32], employing an ignorable and localizable design[33], choosing control days bidirectionally for subjects within the same city, on the same year and month of the emergency hospital admission, but leaving 3 days between each control day instead of also matching on day of week. By doing so we increased the number of control days, increasing power to detect any effects and by leaving the 3-d buffer we avoided choosing control days too close to the exposure period, which may lead to confounding due to serial correlation[34]. Choosing control days close in time to the admission, furthermore, limits confounding by seasonality and long-term trends[35].

We ran conditional logistic regressions by cause-specific hospital admissions, including simultaneously all eligible primary organic compounds, with their concentrations scaled by their IQR, and adjusted linearly for same day temperature, same day dew point, 1- to 3-day averaged temperature, and day of week. We additionally adjusted for PM2.5, as it has been associated with the health outcomes and differentially correlated with the pollutants included in the model as well as with other pollutants not included in the model that could act as confounders[36].

In the second stage we used a multivariate weighted regression model using the coefficient estimates from the first stage as the dependent variables and the variance-covariance matrix of these coefficients as weights. Let k denote the number of primary organic compounds in the model and g denote the number of pollutant groups, according to their chemical structure:
β ̂ = Z π + ε ,

where β ̂ k × 1 are the coefficient estimates from the first stage, Z k × g contains the chemical structure groups (0/1 dummy variables), π g × 1 contains the effect estimates of interest, i.e. the coefficients representing pollutant group effects on the outcome, with each individual coefficient representing the average log rate ratio associated with an IQR increase in that pollutant class, ε k × 1 are independent random variables with zero mean and pre-specified variance τ 2, with k = 58 and g = 5. Since the second stage includes all chemical structure groups in which the organic compounds we used belong, the existence of any residual associations seems unlikely and we therefore set the τ 2 to a modest value, i.e. τ 2 = 2.6 × 10−5. Because 100 × [exp(2 × 1.96×τ) − 1] ≈ 2, if τ = 0.0051, our selected value for τ 2 corresponds to expectations that 95% of the % changes would fall within a 2-fold range.

We examined associations between cause-specific emergency hospital admissions and weekly (7-d) exposures to primary organic compounds, with exposure windows chosen based on previous literature[17]. We also examined same day exposures and moving averages of 2-, 4-, and 6-days. We call statistically significant effects those whose 95% confidence intervals do not include 0.

We examined potential multicollinearity among the groups using the eigenvalues of the variance-covariance matrix of the second stage effects. Based on this examination, sterane effects were found to be highly correlated with hopane (r = -0.69), n-alkane (r = 0.78) and cyclohexane (r = -0.88) effects and were thus excluded from further analysis.

Sensitivity analyses

We conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results.

Limit of detection

We ran two-stage models for total CVD and respiratory emergency hospital admissions, including species with at least 75% of observations above the limit of detection, to examine sensitivity of our results to LOD exclusion criteria. For this analysis a total of 40 species were included, as compared to 58 in the main analysis: 14 n-alkanes, 2 PAHs, 4 iso-/anteiso-alkanes, with the same number of cyclohexanes (2) and hopanes (18) as in the main analysis.

Effect estimate stability

We assessed the stability of the effect estimates (as % change in group effects and width of confidence intervals) by excluding individual chemical groups from the analysis one-by-one and assessing change in the results.

We also assessed the sensitivity of our results to the inclusion of PM2.5 in the health models, by repeating analyses omitting PM2.5.

Sensitivity of our results to the choice of the τ 2 value

We assessed the dependence of our results for total CVD and total respiratory admissions on our pre-specified value of τ 2, by exploring different values for τ 2. Specifically, we also examined τ 2 = 0, allowing the variability of the second stage effects to only depend on the variance-covariance matrix of the first stage coefficients, and also τ 2 = 0.0001, corresponding to expectations that 95% of the % changes would fall within a 4-fold range.

Temperature effects

Given observed associations between extreme temperatures and adverse health[37, 38], we examined whether our findings were affected by extreme temperatures. We did so by excluding the 99th and 1st percentiles of daily temperatures from our health models.

Results

City-specific summary statistics for the primary organic compounds used in our analyses are presented in Additional file1: Tables A-2, A-3 and A-4. Primary organic compounds in our analyses accounted for 14.5%, 17.6%, and 10.8% of the total measured OC (both primary and secondary) mass concentration in Atlanta, Birmingham, and Dallas, respectively. City-specific summary statistics for total CVD and respiratory, and cause-specific, hospitalizations are presented in Additional file1: Table A-5.

Characterization of primary organic particle concentrations

n-Alkanes

Of the primary organic compounds, n-alkanes generally had the highest concentrations in all three cities. In Atlanta and Dallas, concentrations of n-alkanes were higher during the colder period (October–March) as compared to warmer months. Similar seasonal patterns were found in Birmingham for all primary organic compounds except those with 24-29 carbons (i.e. C 24– C 29), for which no seasonal variation was found. For all n-alkanes, the highest and most variable concentrations were observed in Birmingham, while the lowest and least variable were found in Dallas.

In all three cities, the CPI ranged approximately between 1.5 to 2.6 (Figure1), indicating mixed anthropogenic and biogenic sources of n-alkanes. CPI values varied seasonally, with peaks in May and June, suggesting increased plant contributions during these months. Correspondingly, we found three sources of n-alkanes using factor analyses, consistent with vehicular emissions, tire debris and plant contributions (Additional file1: Table A-6).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Monthly CPI and moretane ratios for (a) Atlanta, (b) Birmingham and (c) Dallas.

Iso-/anteiso-alkanes

Concentrations of iso- (2-methyl) and anteiso- (3-methyl) alkanes, which are considered as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) markers in urban air[39], were highest during colder months in all three cities. Concentrations were highest in Atlanta and lowest in Dallas.

Cyclohexanes

Concentrations of cyclohexanes were generally low, with only two cyclohexanes, heptadecylcyclohexane and nonadecylcyclohexane, having more than 50% of their observations above their LODs in each city. Both cyclohexanes, which are emitted from gasoline-powered motor vehicles[8] and diesel fuel[7], had higher cold-period concentrations in all cities. Concentrations of heptadecylcyclohexane were similar across all cities, while of nonadecylcyclohexane were highest in Birmingham and lowest in Dallas.

Hopanes

Hopane concentrations were also higher in each city during the colder months. The highest concentrations of hopanes were observed in Birmingham and the lowest in Dallas. Monthly moretane ratios in all three cities were greater than 0.85 in Atlanta and Birmingham and than 0.90 in Dallas (Figure1). Ratios near one, together with the higher cold-period concentrations, are consistent with motor vehicles being the primary hopane source.

PAHs

14 PAHs had more than 50% of their observations above their corresponding LOD in the three cities. Cold-period concentrations of these PAHs were higher than those during warmer months. All PAH concentrations were highest and more variable in Birmingham and lowest in Dallas, except from retene concentrations that were similar in both Birmingham and Atlanta and lower in Dallas.

Relationship of primary OC compounds with emergency hospital admissions

Emergency hospital admissions for total CVD

The associations between CVD admissions and PM2.5, total OC (both primary and secondary) and EC are shown in Additional file1: Table A-7.

Figure2 shows associations between chemical property groups and total CVD-related emergency hospital admissions. Overall, significant associations were observed for longer moving averages and more specifically for the 6-, and 7-d moving averaged exposures (Additional file1: Table A-8).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Percent change in total CVD hospital admissions per IQR increase in pollutant group for all exposure windows – same day exposures and 2-, 4-, 6-, and 7-d moving averages (M.A.).

Cyclohexanes were overall positively associated with CVD admissions, with increasing effects observed with increasing exposure durations. An IQR increase in the 7-d exposure to cyclohexanes was associated with a 3.40% (0.64, 6.24%) increase in the rate of CVD admissions. Increased rate of CVD admissions were also significantly associated with 6-d (2.90% (0.37, 5.49%)) moving averaged exposures. There was no evidence of an association between n-alkanes, iso-/anteiso-alkanes, hopanes and PAH and CVD-related hospital admissions; we saw null associations between all other groups and rate of hospitalizations for all exposure windows.

Emergency hospital admissions for total respiratory outcomes

The associations between respiratory admissions and PM2.5, total OC and EC are shown in Additional file1: Table A-7.

The associations between exposures to primary OC particle groups and rate of respiratory-related emergency hospital admissions are presented in Figure3 for all exposure windows. As with cardiovascular associations, we saw increasing effect estimates at longer moving averaged exposures (Additional file1: Table A-8). We observed increased rate of respiratory hospitalizations after 4-d exposures to iso-/anteiso-alkanes (0.70% (0.12, 1.29%)), with similar increases for 6- and 7-d exposures (0.67% (0.02, 1.32%) for weekly exposures). Overall, there was consistent evidence that the iso-/anteiso-alkanes are positively associated with respiratory hospital admissions for all exposure windows, with increasing effects for longer exposures. Negative, albeit not significant, associations were found for hopanes, with higher effects observed for 7-d (-0.35% (-0.73, 0.03%)) exposures.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Percent change in total respiratory hospital admissions per IQR increase in pollutant group for all exposure windows – same day exposures and 2-, 4-, 6-, and 7-d moving averages (M.A.).

Cause-specific admissions

The associations between primary organic compounds and hospitalizations for the specific cardiovascular-related causes IHD, MI, and CHF are shown in Figure4 and in Additional file1: Figure A-1 and Additional file1: Table A-8.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Percent change in cause specific hospital admissions per IQR increase in pollutant group for weekly exposures.

Results for IHD and MI were similar to those for total CVD. For both outcomes, we saw positive associations between increased rate of hospital admissions and weekly exposures to cyclohexanes; 6-d exposures were associated with a 3.65% (-0.36, 7.83%) rate of IHD hospital admissions and 3.21% (-2.10, 8.81%) rate for MI admissions. In addition, we observed a negative, albeit insignificant, association between rate of IHD and MI hospitalizations and exposures to iso-/anteiso-alkanes. For CHF, we found associations between same day cyclohexane exposures and increased rate of hospitalizations (1.58% (-0.60, 3.80%)). Similar increases were also observed for 6- and 7-d exposures. Association with CHF admissions were not detected for other chemical groups, other than a negative association with weekly hopane exposures (-0.45% (-0.95, 0.06%)).

The results for weekly exposures and cause specific respiratory admissions are presented in Figure4, Additional file1: Table A-8, and Additional file1: Figure A-2.

We saw consistent associations between cyclohexane exposures and COPD admissions, which increased with longer exposure windows (4.73% (-1.13, 10.94%) for 7-d exposures). In contrast, we observed consistently negative, mostly insignificant, associations between rate of pneumonia and exposure to cyclohexanes, with stronger effects for 4-d moving averages (-3.65% (-7.04, -0.13%)).

Similarly to total respiratory admissions, we observed increased rate of pneumonia hospitalizations and increased exposures to iso-/anteiso-alkanes for all exposure windows (1.07% (0.22, 1.93%) for 6-d and 1.20% (0.30, 2.11%) for 7-d exposures). Moreover, we found an increased rate of pneumonia admissions after 4-d exposure to n-alkanes (0.38% (-0.15, 0.92%)). We did not detect any association between either hopanes or PAHs and rate for cause-specific respiratory-related hospital admissions.

Sensitivity analyses

Limit of detection

Analyses including species with at least 75% of the observations above the LOD showed similar results for CVD admissions to those from the main analyses, except for those for PAHs, for which associations were now negative, although not significant (Additional file1: Figure A-3). Furthermore, confidence intervals for PAH were substantially wider, reflecting the inclusion of only two species instead of 14.

For total respiratory admissions, the effects of cyclohexanes and hopanes were similar as in the main analysis. The associations with PAHs were now negative and with n-alkanes positive, albeit still not significant. Finally, we observed positive, but insignificant, associations with iso-/anteiso-alkanes, for all exposure windows (Additional file1: Figure A-3), in contrast to the significant positive results in the main analysis.

Effect estimate stability

When steranes were included in the analysis, effect estimates were similar, but with wider confidence intervals due to collinearity. When chemical groups were excluded from our analyses either individually or in groups, our results were stable, indicating that no multicollinearity among the chemical groups was present after exclusion of steranes. The effect estimates and their variability also did not change when we omitted PM2.5 from the health models.

Sensitivity of our results to the choice of the τ 2 value

Overall, we saw no differences in the second stage effect estimates for different τ 2 values. As, expected, with increasing values for τ 2 we observed wider confidence intervals. For total CVD admissions the increase of the widths of the confidence intervals was small and the effect estimates remained stable (Additional file1: Figure A-4). In contrast, the increase of the widths of the confidence intervals was larger for total respiratory hospital admissions, but also the effect estimates did not appear as stable (Additional file1: Figure A-5).

Temperature effects

Our results did not change when we excluded the 1st and 99th percentiles of daily temperatures from our analyses (results not shown).

Discussion

We conducted a large, multi-year, multi-city, exploratory study to investigate exposures to primary OC compounds and the association between their chemical classes and emergency hospital admissions among an elderly population. Using a hierarchical two-stage modeling approach, we found consistent associations between grouped primary OC compounds and cause-specific hospital admissions. Our most consistent associations were found between cyclohexane and iso-/anteiso-alkane exposures and CVD- and respiratory-related admissions, respectively. Since the primary sources of cyclohexanes are motor vehicles, our results provide support for the growing literature showing motor vehicle-associated adverse CVD effects[14, 40], as main sources of cyclohexanes are motor vehicles. At the same time, however, we saw either null or negative associations for hopanes, also markers of motor vehicle pollution, suggesting that the OC chemical structure might be important to toxicity. Moreover, our findings of positive associations between total respiratory and pneumonia admissions and iso-alkanes, a group that has not otherwise been examined in epidemiologic studies, are consistent with previous studies that found community-acquired pneumonia to be associated with inhalation of tobacco smoke[41]. Given the lack of studies examining the relation of these OC classes and health, our findings should be viewed as preliminary and should be validated in additional studies.

Despite this, our findings of adverse cyclohexane impacts are supported by toxicologic studies, which have linked traffic-related particles with numerous adverse outcomes. There is evidence that the redox chemistry of organic particles plays an important role in the biological effects of ambient PM2.5[42]. Nel et al.[43], for instance, found organic compounds from diesel exhaust to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells, as well as apoptosis and necrosis in the epithelial cells in the bronchial region. Furthermore, Li et al.[16] showed that expression of heme oxygenase-1, a marker for oxidative stress, is directly correlated with high organic carbon content of UFPs. Although there have been no studies examining the toxicological effects of cyclohexanes, it is possible that cyclohexanes may lead to adverse health effects through similar biological processes, since they, like PAHs, can also be transformed by photochemical reactions into more polar products[44, 45]. If so, it is possible that cyclohexanes are acting as surrogates of atmospheric processed, oxidized compounds.

Few studies have examined health impacts from specific organic carbon chemical classes, with these studies focusing on PAHs and hopanes. In a Los Angeles cohort of 60 elderly subjects with coronary artery disease, Delfino et al.[17] found significant associations between intermediate markers of inflammation and weekly exposures to PAHs and hopanes. Kraus et al.[46] reported significant associations between exposures to hopanes and PAH and shortness of breath and between PAH and increased C-reactive protein in a cohort of MI survivors in Germany. These findings differ from those in our study, as we found null associations between PAHs and hopanes and increased hospital admissions. The contrasting findings likely result from several key differences in our studies. The earlier studies used different study designs and focused on different health outcomes and examined potentially more susceptible populations, for which primary OC-mediated health risks may differ. In addition, the earlier studies measured a larger number of traffic-related PAHs, e.g. 24[17], which may provide more power to detect associations.

Support for our findings is provided by the consistent trends found across exposure windows, with larger associations for both cyclohexanes and iso-/anteiso-alkanes found at exposure windows of 6-days and longer. These longer exposure windows may reflect biological processes, such as inflammation, which have been shown to occur over week-long time periods[47]. Alternately or in addition, significance at longer exposure windows may reflect increased classical error associated with shorter averaging times[48]. The wider CIs at longer moving averages could also reflect loss of power; as the averaging period increases the variability in pollutant concentrations decreases.

The robustness of our findings is further supported by consistent findings from our sensitivity analyses. When we restricted our inclusion criteria to species with ≥75% observations above the LOD, results for cyclohexanes and hopanes were similar, while results for PAHs and n-alkanes became negative and positive, respectively, and associations between iso-alkanes and total respiratory admissions became insignificant. The exclusion of species with lower concentrations could result in either decreased noise, as in the case of the PAHs and n-alkanes, or decreased power, as in the case of the iso-alkanes, depending on how conservative the LOD is and the fraction of observations below the LOD. It is also likely, nonetheless, that the exclusion of several species will make the results non-interpretable as a group. For example, in the sensitivity analysis, we only included one softwood and biomass combustion marker (retene) and a general combustion marker (fluoranthene) in the PAH group. It is likely that these two components are not representative of the PAH group, since more condensed PAHs with a wider range of molecular weights and sources were excluded.

Our sensitivity analysis on the choice of the τ 2 provides further insight in our results. For total CVD admissions, our results were stable and did not vary with τ 2. In contrast, our results for total respiratory hospitalizations were less stable, as evidenced by the second stage effect estimates and their confidence interval widths that differed widely across different values of τ 2.

Our study has several limitations. First, ambient measurements were made at a single monitoring site in each city. All pollutants measured are emitted from local sources and thus expected to be spatially heterogeneous. The resulting exposure error, nonetheless, is likely to bias our results toward the null[49]. There might still remain some residual confounding by time-varying variables; this is unlikely, however, given our use of a case-crossover design[33, 34]. Furthermore, many species did not meet our inclusion criteria and thus were not included in the analyses. Additionally, we only included particulate OC species. As a result, chemical groups were incompletely represented, as the chemical groups also include species in the gaseous phase. It is likely, however, that gases and particles exert different toxicities. Also, to increase power, we selected our controls leaving 3 days between control days, resulting in overlapping exposure periods between the cases and controls for the longer moving averages examined, and thus potential bias toward the null[33]. Our results are limited by the number of compounds measured and included in the analysis and should be, therefore, interpreted in light of these limitations.

To our knowledge, this has been the first study to examine association between primary organic compounds and hospital admissions. Overall, our results suggest that primary OC compounds, such as cyclohexanes, alkanes and iso-/anteiso-alkanes, may play an important role in PM2.5 toxicity and lend some support for previous findings of associations between hospitalizations and mobile sources. Furthermore, our findings add to the current research, provide insight for pollutant groups that have not previously been studied and guidance for the design of future epidemiologic and toxicologic studies.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that mobile source effects on CVD hospitalizations could be linked to cyclohexanes, a pollutant group that has not been studied before in any epidemiological or toxicological setting. We saw consistent associations between exposure to particulate cyclohexanes and increased rate of total and cause-specific CVD emergency hospital admissions. This approach should be replicated in more cities and using more compounds in each group to assess the robustness of our findings.

Abbreviations

CHF: 

Congestive heart failure

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

EC: 

Elemental carbon

ETS: 

Environmental tobacco smoke

IHD: 

Ischemic heart disease

MI: 

Myocardial infarction

OC: 

Organic carbon

PAH: 

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This article was partially developed under STAR Fellowship Assistance Agreement no. FP-9172890-01 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This work was funded by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), with additional funds provided by the EPA (RD 83479801 and R834894), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES012054 and T32 ES007069), the National Institute of Health (R01 ES019560, R21 ES020152 and R21 ES021427) and the Health Effects Institute (HEI 4909).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
(2)
Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
(3)
Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

References

  1. Seinfeld J, Pandis S: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air Pollution to Climate Change. 2006, Wiley-Interscience: HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho AK, Sioutas C, Miguela AH, Kumagai Y, Schmitz DA, Singh M, Eiguren-Fernandez A, Froines JR: Redox activity of airborne particulate matter at different sites in the Los Angeles Basin. Environ Res. 2005, 99: 40-47. 10.1016/j.envres.2005.01.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 2. Noncatalyst and catalyst-equipped automobiles and heavy-duty diesel trucks. Environ Sci Technol. 1993, 27: 636-651. 10.1021/es00041a007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 3. Road dust, tire debris, and organometallic brake lining dust: roads as sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol. 1993, 27: 1892-1904. 10.1021/es00046a019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 5. Natural gas home appliances. Environ Sci Technol. 1993, 27: 2736-2744. 10.1021/es00049a012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 8. boilers burning no. 2 distillate fuel oil. Environ Sci Technol. 1997, 31: 2731-2737. 10.1021/es9609563.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schauer JJ, Kleeman MJ, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 2. C1 through C30 organic compounds from medium duty diesel trucks. Environ Sci Technol. 1999, 33: 1578-1587. 10.1021/es980081n.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Schauer JJ, Kleeman MJ, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 5. C1–C32 organic compounds from gasoline-powered motor vehicles. Environ Sci Technol. 2002, 36: 1169-1180. 10.1021/es0108077.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Brook JR, Graham L, Charland JP, Cheng Y, Fan X, Lu G, Li SM, Lillyman C, MacDonald P, Caravaggio G, MacPhee JA: Investigation of the motor vehicle exhaust contribution to primary fine particle organic carbon in urban air. Atmos Environ. 2007, 41: 119-135. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 4. Particulate abrasion products from leaf surfaces of urban plants. Environ Sci Technol. 1993, 27: 2700-2711. 10.1021/es00049a008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 9. pine, oak, and synthetic log combustion in residential fireplaces. Environ Sci Technol. 1998, 32: 13-22. 10.1021/es960930b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zanobetti A, Franklin M, Koutrakis P, Schwartz J: Fine particulate air pollution and its components in association with cause-specific emergency admissions. Environ Health. 2009, 8: 58-10.1186/1476-069X-8-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tolbert P, Klein M, Peel J, Sarnat S, Sarnat J: Multipollutant modeling issues in a study of ambient air quality and emergency department visits in Atlanta. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007, 17: S29-S35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarnat J, Marmur A, Klein M, Kim E, Russell A, Sarnat S, Mulholland J, Hopke P, Tolbert P: Fine particle sources and cardiorespiratory morbidity: an application of chemical mass balance and factor analytical source-apportionment methods. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 459-466.Google Scholar
  15. Peng R, Bell M, Geyh A, McDermott A, Zeger S, Samet J, Dominici F: Emergency admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and the chemical composition of fine particle air pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 2009, 117: 957-963. 10.1289/ehp.0800185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, Wang M, Oberley T, Froines J, Nel A: Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 455-460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Delfino R, Staimer N, Tjoa T, Arhami M, Polidori A, Gillen D, Kleinman M, Schauer J, Sioutas C: Association of biomarkers of systemic inflammation with organic components and source tracers in quasi-ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 756-762. 10.1289/ehp.0901407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Xia T, Korge P, Weiss JN, Li N, Venkatesen MI, Sioutas C, Nel A: Quinones and aromatic chemical Compounds in particulate matter induce mitochondrial dysfunction: implications for ultrafine particle toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 2004, 112: 1347-1358. 10.1289/ehp.7167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bell M, Ebisu K, Peng R, Samet J, Dominici F: Hospital Admissions and chemical composition of fine particulate air pollution. Am J REspir Crit Care Med. 2009, 179: 1115-1120. 10.1164/rccm.200808-1240OC.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Dominici F, Peng R, Bell M, Pham L, McDermott A, Zeger S, Samet J: Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA. 2006, 295: 1127-1134. 10.1001/jama.295.10.1127.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho S, Yu J: n-Injection port thermal desorption and subse-quent gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-Alkanes in atmospheric aerosol samples. J Chromatogr A. 2004, 1059: 121-129. 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen DA, Edgerton E, Hartsell B, Jansen J, Burge H, Koutrakis P, Rogers C, Suh H, Chow J, Zielinska B, McMurry P, Mulholland J, Russell A, Rasmussen R: Air quality measurements for the aerosol research and inhalation epidemiology study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006, 56: 1445-1458. 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464549.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chow JC, Watson JG, Chen LWA, Chang MO, Robinson NF, Trimble D, Kohl S: The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007, 57: 1014-1023. 10.3155/1047-3289.57.9.1014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Suh HH, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J, Coull BA: Chemical properties of air pollutants and cause-specific hospital admissions among the elderly in Atlanta, Georgia. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 1421-1428. 10.1289/ehp.1002646.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogge WF, Mazurek MA, Hildemann LM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Quantification of urban organic aerosols at a molecular level: identification, abundance and seasonal variation. Atmos Environ. 1993, 27A: 1309-1330.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Schnelle-Kreis J, Sklorz M, Orasche J, Stölzel M, Peters A, Zimmerman R: Semi volatile organic compounds in ambient PM2.5. seasonal trends and daily resolved source contributions. Environ Sci Technol. 2007, 41: 3821-3828. 10.1021/es060666e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Everson PJ, Morris CN: Inference for multivariate normal hierarchical models. J R Stat Soc, Ser B. 2000, 62: 399-412. 10.1111/1467-9868.00239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Witte JS, Greenland S, Haile RW, Bird CL: Hierarchical regression analysis applied to a study of multiple dietary exposures and breast cancer. Epidemiol. 1994, 5: 612-621. 10.1097/00001648-199411000-00009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dominici F, Samet JM, Zeger SL: Combining evidence on air pollution and daily mortality from the 20 largest US cities: a hierarchical modelling strategy. J R Stat Soc, Ser A. 2000, 163: 263-302. 10.1111/1467-985X.00170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz J, Laden F, Zanobetti A: The concentration-response relation between PM2.5 and daily deaths. Environ Health Perspect. 2002, 110: 1025-1029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Maclure M: The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991, 133: 144-153.Google Scholar
  32. Lumley T, Levy D: Bias in the case-crossover design: implications for studies of air pollution. Environmetrics. 2000, 11: 689-704. 10.1002/1099-095X(200011/12)11:6<689::AID-ENV439>3.0.CO;2-N.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Janes H, Sheppard L, Lumley T: Case-crossover analyses of air pollution exposure data: referent selection strategies and their implications for bias. Epidemiology. 2005, 16: 717-726. 10.1097/01.ede.0000181315.18836.9d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz J: The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: a multi-city case crossover analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2004, 61: 956-961. 10.1136/oem.2003.008250.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bateson T, Schwartz J: Selection bias and confounding in case-crossover analyses of environmental time-series data. Epidemiology. 2001, 12: 654-661. 10.1097/00001648-200111000-00013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mostofsky E, Schwartz J, Coull BA, Koutrakis P, Wellenius GA, Suh HH, Gold DR, Mittleman MA: Modeling the association between particle constituents of air pollution and health outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2012, 176: 317-26. 10.1093/aje/kws018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bobb JF, Dominici F, Peng R: A Bayesian model averaging approach for estimating the relative risk of mortality associated with heat waves in 105 U.S. cities. Biometrics. 2011, 67: 1605-1616. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01583.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ostro B, Rauch S, Green R, Malig B, Basu R: The effects of temperature and use of air conditioning on hospitalizations. Am J Epidemiol. 2010, 172: 1053-1061. 10.1093/aje/kwq231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogge WF, Hildemann LM, Mazurek MA, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 6. cigarette smoke in the urban atmosphere. Environ Sci Technol. 1994, 28: 1375-1388. 10.1021/es00056a030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Lall R, Ito K, Thurston G: Distributed lag analyses of daily hospital admissions and source apportioned fine particle air pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 455-460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Almirall J, Bolíbar I, Serra-Prat M, Roig J, Hospital I, Carandell E, Agustí M, Ayuso P, Estela A, Torres A: New evidence of risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2008, 31: 1274-1284. 10.1183/09031936.00095807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Li N, Wang M, Bramble LA, Schmitz DA, Schauer JJ, Sioutas C, Harkema JR, Nel AE: The Adjuvant Effect of Ambient Particulate Matter Is Closely Reflected by the Particulate Oxidant Potential. Environ Health Perspect. 2009, 117: 1116-1123.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Nel AE, Diaz-Sanchez D, Li N: The role of particulate pollutants in pulmonary inflammation and asthma: evidence for the involvement of organic chemicals and oxidative stress. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2001, 7: 20-26. 10.1097/00063198-200101000-00004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zielinska B, Samy S, McDonald JD, Seagrave J: Atmospheric Transformation of Diesel Emissions. 2010, Boston: Health Effects InstituteGoogle Scholar
  45. Tkacik DS, Presto AA, Donahue NM, Robinson AL: Secondary organic aerosol formation from intermediate-volatility organic compounds: cyclic, linear, and branched Alkanes. Environ Sci Technol. 2012, 46: 8773-8781. 10.1021/es301112c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Kraus U, Breitner S, Schnelle-Kreis J, Cyrys J, Lanki T, Rückerl R, Schneider A, Brüske I, Gu J, Devlin R, Wichmann HE, Zimmermann R, Peters A: Particle-associated organic compounds and symptoms in myocardial infarction survivors. Inhal Toxicol. 2011, 23: 431-447. 10.3109/08958378.2011.580471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Bind MA, Baccarelli A, Zanobetti A, Tarantini L, Suh H, Vokonas P, Schwartz J: Air pollution and markers of coagulation, inflammation, and endothelial function: associations and epigene-environment interactions in an elderly cohort. Epidemiol. 2012, 23: 332-340. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824523f0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Malloy EJ, Morris JS, Adar SD, Suh H, Gold DR, Coull BA: Wavelet-based functional linear mixed models: an application to measurement error-corrected distributed lag models. Biostat. 2010, 11: 432-452. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Zeger S, Thomas D, Dominici F, Samet J, Schwartz J, Dockery D, Cohen A: Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect. 2000, 108: 419-426. 10.1289/ehp.00108419.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kioumourtzoglou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement

Environmental Health

ISSN: 1476-069X