Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Susceptibility to heat wave-related mortality: a follow-up study of a cohort of elderly in Rome

  • Patrizia Schifano1Email author,
  • Giovanna Cappai1,
  • Manuela De Sario1,
  • Paola Michelozzi1,
  • Claudia Marino1,
  • Anna Maria Bargagli1 and
  • Carlo A Perucci1
Environmental Health20098:50

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-8-50

Received: 10 March 2009

Accepted: 12 November 2009

Published: 12 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Few studies have identified specific factors that increase mortality during heat waves. This study investigated socio-demographic characteristics and pre-existing medical conditions as effect modifiers of the risk of dying during heat waves in a cohort of elderly residents in Rome.

Methods

A cohort of 651,195 residents aged 65 yrs or older was followed from 2005 to 2007. During summer, heat wave days were defined according to month-specific thresholds of maximum apparent temperature. The adjusted relative risk of dying during heat waves was estimated using a Poisson regression model including all the considered covariates. Risk differences were also calculated. All analyses were run separately for the 65-74 and 75+ age groups.

Results

In the 65-74 age group the risk of dying during heat waves was higher among unmarried subjects and those with a previous hospitalization for chronic pulmonary disease or psychiatric disorders. In the 75+ age group, women, and unmarried subjects were more susceptible to heat. Furthermore, a higher susceptibility to heat among those with previous hospitalization for diabetes, diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), psychiatric disorders and cerebrovascular diseases resulted from risk differences.

Discussion

Results showed a higher susceptibility to heat among those older than seventy-five years, females and unmarried. Pre-existing health conditions play a different role among the two considered age groups. Moreover, compared with previous studies the pattern of susceptibility factors have slightly changed over time. For the purposes of public health programmes, susceptibility should be considered as time, space and population specific.

Introduction

High temperatures and heat waves have been associated with short term increases in mortality worldwide. In Europe, the exceptionally long and severe heat wave of summer 2003 found local communities substantially unprepared to cope with such an extreme event. Epidemiological research and public health efforts have been focused to better understand the health impact of heat and of the individual factors that confer susceptibility to heat stress. Several countries throughout Europe have put into place a series of preventive measures, but only few are specifically targeted to high-risk individuals [1].

During heat waves the greatest burden in terms of mortality and morbidity is in specific population subgroups more susceptible to the effect of heat; they are represented by people with impaired physiological and behavioural responses to heat due to their old age [25], to the presence of chronic illnesses [37], to limited social contacts [6], to living alone [5, 8], to low socio-economic conditions [3, 5], and limited access to air conditioning [6]. While for some of these factors, such as old age, there is strong evidence and physiological plausibility for their role in increasing the vulnerability to heat waves, for others, like specific health conditions and factors as social, behavioural and environmental conditions, evidence is still not conclusive and somewhat controversial, and more research is needed.

Under a public health point of view a clear understanding of these factors is important to ensure the effectiveness of prevention programs.

Until now, most of the evidence regarding factors that modify the health effects of heat waves derives from case-control studies [6, 9], and, more recently, from case-only and case-crossover studies [5, 1013]. However, in such studies the design itself doesn't allow to estimate comparable relative risks of dying during heat waves for different subgroups of interest [14].

Under a public health point of view a clear understanding of factors affecting heat wave related mortality is important to properly target prevention programs. Moreover after the 2003 heat wave in Europe the introduction of prevention programs may have modified the determinants of the population's susceptibility to high temperature [15, 16].

In Italy the National Department of Civil Protection and the Ministry of Health implemented a national heat prevention program [17], and national guidelines for the prevention of heat health effects have been defined, targeted to high risk subgroups http://www.ccm-network.it. In Lazio, the region surrounding Roma, the heat response plan is centered on active surveillance of high risk elders (65+ years), identified using available health information systems [18].

As a part of the Lazio prevention program for summer 2008, we carried out a longitudinal analysis of heat wave mortality between 2005 and 2007 with the primary aim of identifying susceptibility factors. The inclusion of the most recent years was to account for the possible changes in the spectrum of susceptibility factors, as well as changes in the impact of heat waves on mortality due to the effect of the heat prevention plan. We describe the results of these analyses, and discuss possible public health implications.

Materials and methods

Study Population

We analyzed a cohort of residents in Rome aged 65 yrs or older as of the 1st of May 2005; this cohort was followed up for the subsequent two years, until the 15th of September 2007. Each year new residents aged 65 years and older were added to the cohort, and subjects who died or changed residence by the 1st of May were removed. Information on resident's age, gender, and marital status was extracted from the Population Registry of the Roma Municipal Office. A small area-based (census tract) socio-economic status indicator using 2001 census data was also used [19].

Health Status

We selected a list of 13 groups of diagnoses, known to be associated with an increased mortality risk from high temperatures (Table 1) [3, 5, 7, 12, 20]. Information about the prevalence of past hospitalizations for each of these conditions in the study population was extracted by linking the regional hospital discharge files (Regional Hospital Information System) (HIS) [21], and the Municipality Population Registry, using individual social security numbers as the linkage key. We considered hospitalizations or day-hospital visits for each diagnostic group, reported either as primary causes of admission or as contributing diagnoses. Subjects were classified using 13 dichotomous variables, each one indicating if they sought medical treatment for one of the 13 diagnoses or not.
Table 1

Person years and number of deaths by population characteristics and age groups.

 

All 65+ ages

65-74 ages

75+ ages

 

Person yrs

Deaths

Person yrs

Deaths

Person yrs

Deaths

 

(n = 641147)

18609

(n = 348015)

4139

(n = 293132)

14470

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

Age

      

65-74

54.3

4139

    

75-84

34.4

7599

    

85-94

9.8

5781

    

95+

1.6

1090

    

Gender

      

Female

59.1

10112

55.6

1700

63.3

8412

Male

40.9

8497

44.4

2439

36.7

6058

Marital Status

      

Married

56.2

8090

68.5

2825

41.5

5265

Not married, widowed, divorced

43.8

10519

31.5

1314

58.5

9205

SES

      

Medium/High

81.9

15126

80.5

3144

83.6

11982

Low

17.1

3323

18.6

954

15.4

2369

Missing

1.0

160

0.9

41

1.0

119

HDD (Hospitalization Diagnosed Disease)

      

(ICD9-CM)

      

Malignant neoplasm

3.9

4510

3.7

1840

4.1

2670

(140-208)

      

Diabetes mellitus

3.9

2237

3.4

576

4.5

1661

(250)

      

Other CNS disorders

1.9

1530

1.2

335

2.7

1195

(330-349)

      

Ischaemic heart diseases

4.1

2445

3.3

521

5.1

1924

(410-414)

      

Conduction disorders

1.1

580

0.6

105

1.5

475

(426)

      

Cardiac dysrhythmias

3.5

2557

2.3

437

4.9

2120

(427)

      

Heart failure

1.5

1846

0.8

301

2.4

1545

(428)

      

Other cardiovascular diseases

11.5

5476

9.3

1221

14.2

4255

(390-429 exept 410-414;426;427;428)

      

Chronic pulmonary diseases

3.1

2344

2.2

495

4.2

1849

(490-496)

      

Acute and chronic liver diseases

0.7

593

0.7

229

0.7

364

(570-572)

      

Renal failure

1.3

1689

0.7

319

1.9

1370

(584-588)

      

Psychiatric disorders

1.2

837

0.8

150

1.6

687

(290-299;300.4;301.1;309.0;309.1;311)

      

Cerebrovascular diseases

3.9

2591

2.4

445

5.6

2146

(430-438)

      

Number of HDD for any other causes

      

0-1

97.6

17774

97.6

3864

97.6

13910

2-3

2.2

715

2.2

213

2.3

502

4+

0.2

120

0.2

62

0.2

58

For each subject, the number of Hospitalization Diagnosed Disease (HDD) over the previous two years for any cause, other than those specified on our list, was also considered as an indicator of general health status.

Exposure

The exposure of interest was a heat wave episode, defined using maximum apparent temperature (Tappmax), an index of discomfort based on air and dew point temperatures [22]. Tappmax was defined as the maximum daily value of apparent temperatures.

A heat wave episode was defined when Tappmax rises above the monthly threshold, defined by the Heat Health Watch Warning System (HHWWS) [17], (May: 28.5, June: 32.5°C; July: 33.5°C; August/September: 34.5°C). for two or more consecutive days. Daily weather data from Ciampino airport station were obtained from the Italian Air Force Meteorological Service, during summer (1st of May until the 15th of September).

Outcome

Vital status was determined each year, for each subject through a record linkage with the Regional Registry of Causes of Death (Regional Mortality Register) [23] using individual social security numbers. We considered all deaths from non-injury causes (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision [ICD-9]: 1-799).

The outcome of interest was every death occurred during a heat episode or in the following three days; the three extra days were considered to account for the lag effect of heat on mortality.

Statistical Analysis

We assumed that age modifies the set of factors that interact with the heat-mortality relationship. Hence we analyzed the 65-74 and the over 74 year old separately.

We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the adjusted relative risk of mortality during heat wave days versus not heat wave days. We run a model including an indicator variable for heat wave days, age, gender, socio-economic status, civil status, presence or absence of each of the selected groups of diagnosis and the number of hospitalizations for conditions not included in the previous list.

Through a manual backward stepwise procedure we then selected a model including only variables significantly associated with mortality. Age, gender and presence/absence of heat wave were forced into the model. Interaction terms between each of the included covariates and heat-wave were added afterwards.

We calculated the relative risks (RR) of dying on heat wave and non heat wave days for each of the modalities of the covariates and the REM (Relative Effect Modification) index. REM index was the ratio of the relative risks of dying during a heat wave for each of the covariates considered, comparing each category to the reference one [5]. A significant REM index (p-value lesser than 0.20) means that the specific covariate acts as an effect modifier of the heat-mortality relationship. Risk differences (RD) were computed as the difference between the model estimates of absolute risks of mortality in the presence and absence of heat wave for each modality of the considered covariates. A comparison between RDs relative to different modalities of the same variable was performed to evaluate a possible effect modification on an additive scale. The analysis was performed using SAS [24].

Results

We enrolled a total of 651,195 subjects over the three-year period, 574,192 of which were included in the first year. A total of 26,634 subjects (5%) were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete civil status information. The excluded subjects were comparable to the study population, except for a higher percentage of subjects over 95 years of age; no deaths were observed in this subgroup. The analyzed cohort represented 203,626 person-years of heat wave exposure (including the three post heat wave lag days) and 437,520 person-years of non heat wave exposure. Table 1 reports the population characteristics. About 50% of the analyzed population was older than 75 and about 40% were male.

There were more females and a higher percentage of unmarried people in the over 75-year-old group than in the younger group. The 75+ group also had a higher prevalence of previous hospitalizations for all the considered diseases compared to the 65-74 age group. We observed 4,139 deaths in the 65-74 age group and 14,470 deaths among the over 74 year olds.

Table 2 reports the average Tappmax observed in the study period.
Table 2

Temperature distribution and number of days by month and heat wave (years 2005-2007).

 

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

 

Heat wave

Heat wave

Heat wave

Heat wave

 

no

yes

no

yes

no

yes

no

yes

min

14.3

28.8

17.3

31.2

24.4

32.6

20.8

32.9

max

27.3

33.5

32.4

38.4

34.2

39.1

34.3

39.7

20 pct

18.7

29.2

20.6

33.4

27.8

34.4

26.4

34.3

50 pct

21.1

29.9

26.7

34.6

29.9

35.3

28.8

35.5

90 pct

25.7

30.9

31.0

38.1

33.1

38.5

32.3

39.1

n(dd)

82

11

68

22

51

42

80

13

On average there was an 8°C difference between the median temperature on heat wave and non heat wave days in May and June, about a 5°C difference in July, and 6°C in August. There were no heat waves, and therefore no results reported for the month of September in the years we studied. According to the exposure definition single days with Tappmax over the monthly threshold were included in the "non heat waves days". This contributed to a slight overlap of temperatures observed between heat wave and non heat wave days.

The heat wave effect

We observed a crude relative risk of dying during heat waves compared to non heat waves of 1.08 (IC95%: 1.02-1.16) in the 65-74 age group, and of 1.15 (IC95%: 1.11-1.18) in the over 74 age group.

65-74 age group

Results suggested that the excess in mortality during heat waves was higher among those who were previously hospitalized for a chronic pulmonary disease, and to a smaller extent, for psychiatric disorders and among those not married, widowed or divorced (Tables 3 and 4). For these same factors we observed also an increased excess in the absolute numbers of deaths during heat wave days compared to non heat wave days. Subjects previously hospitalized for malignant neoplasm, cardiac arhythmias and renal failure had lower relative risks of dying during heat wave days. Although not statistically significant, having been previously hospitalized for diabetes, ischemic diseases or liver diseases showed a similar protective effect; while socio-economic status does not modify the relationship under study.
Table 3

Mortality rate (MR), risk difference (RD), adjusted mortality relative risk (RR) and relative effect modification (REM) index for socio-demographic covariates modalities by heat wave. 65-74 and 75+ age groups.

 

65-74 ages

75+ ages

 

Deaths

MR *1000

RD *1000

(95% IC)

RR

(95% IC)

REM Index

p-value

Deaths

MR *1000

RD *1000

(95% IC)

RR

(95% IC)

REM Index

p-value

 

Heat wave

Heat wave

      

Heat wave

Heat wave

      
 

no

yes

no

yes

      

no

yes

no

yes

      

Total

2753

1386

11.6

12.6

1.0

(0.2; 1.8)

1.08

(1.02 - 1.16)

  

9427

5043

47.2

54.1

6.9

(5.1; 8.7)

1.15

(1.11 - 1.18)

  

Age

                    

75-84

          

5004

2595

33.2

37.0

3.8

(2.1; 5.5)

1.11

(1.06 - 1.17)

1.00

 

85-94

          

3733

2048

87.8

102.4

14.7

(9.4; 19.9)

1.17

(1.11 - 1.23)

1.05

0.196

95+

          

690

400

101.7

124.9

23.3

(8.9; 37.7)

1.23

(1.08 - 1.39)

1.10

0.149

Gender

                    

Female

1124

576

8.5

9.4

0.9

(0.0; 1.8)

1.11

(1.00 - 1.22)

1.00

 

5406

3006

42.7

50.9

8.2

(6.1; 10.3)

1.19

(1.14 - 1.24)

1.00

 

Male

1629

810

15.4

16.5

1.1

(-0.3; 2.5)

1.07

(0.99 - 1.17)

0.96

0.666

4021

2037

54.8

59.5

4.6

(1.5; 7.7)

1.08

(1.03 - 1.14)

0.91

0.008

Marital Status

                    

Married

1891

934

11.6

12.3

0.7

(-0.3; 1.6)

1.06

(0.98 - 1.15)

1.00

 

3494

1771

42.2

45.5

3.3

(0.7; 5.8)

1.07

(1.02 - 1.14)

1.00

 

Not married, widowed, divorced

862

452

11.5

13.1

1.6

(0.2; 3.0)

1.14

(1.02 - 1.28)

1.08

0.323

5933

3272

50.7

60.2

9.5

(7.1; 12.0)

1.18

(1.13 - 1.24)

1.10

0.008

SES

                    

Medium/High

2088

1056

10.9

11.9

1.0

(0.1; 1.8)

1.09

(1.01 - 1.18)

1.00

 

7807

4175

46.7

53.5

6.8

(4.9; 8.8)

1.14

(1.10 - 1.19)

1.00

 

Low

634

320

14.4

15.6

1.3

(-0.8; 3.3)

1.09

(0.95 - 1.25)

1.00

0.999

1531

838

49.7

58.1

8.4

(3.7; 13.1)

1.17

(1.07 - 1.27)

1.03

0.668

Missing

31

10

13.7

9.5

-4.2

(-11.8; 3.4)

0.69

(0.34 - 1.40)

0.64

0.202

89

30

46.6

33.6

-13

(-28.4; 2.5)

0.72

(0.48 - 1.10)

0.63

0.031

Table 4

Results on the 65-74 age group.

 

65-74 ages

 

Deaths

MR *1000

RD *1000

(95% IC)

RR

(95% IC)

REM Index

p-value

 

Heat wave

Heat wave

      
 

no

yes

no

yes

      

HDD

          

Malignant neoplasm

          

no

1503

796

6.6

7.5

0.9

(0.3; 1.5)

1.14

(1.05 - 1.24)

1.00

 

yes

1250

590

141.9

143.7

1.8

(-12.2; 15.8)

1.02

(0.93 - 1.13)

0.89

0.092

Diabetes mellitus

          

no

2363

1200

10.3

11.3

1.0

(0.2; 1.7)

1.10

(1.02 - 1.17)

1.00

 

yes

390

186

47.7

48.9

1.2

(-7.3; 9.6)

1.03

(0.87 - 1.23)

0.94

0.550

Other CNS disorders

          

no

2534

1270

10.8

11.7

0.9

(0.1; 1.6)

1.08

(1.01 - 1.16)

1.00

 

yes

219

116

75.2

87.0

11.7

(-7.0; 30.4)

1.15

(0.92 - 1.44)

1.07

0.615

Ischaemic heart diseases

          

no

2396

1222

10.4

11.5

1.0

(0.3; 1.8)

1.10

(1.03 - 1.18)

1.00

 

yes

357

164

45.0

44.6

-0.4

(-8.7; 7.9)

1.01

(0.84 - 1.21)

0.92

0.398

Conduction disorders

          

no

2683

1351

11.4

12.3

1.0

(0.2; 1.7)

1.08

(1.02 - 1.16)

1.00

 

yes

70

35

45.7

49.7

4.0

(-15.7; 23.6)

1.09

(0.73 - 1.61)

1.00

0.992

Cardiac dysrhythmias

          

no

2443

1259

10.5

11.7

1.2

(0.4; 1.9)

1.11

(1.04 - 1.19)

1.00

 

yes

310

127

57.2

50.5

-6.7

(-17.6; 4.1)

0.90

(0.73 - 1.10)

0.81

0.055

Heart failure

          

no

2552

1286

10.8

11.7

0.9

(0.2; 1.7)

1.09

(1.02 - 1.16)

1.00

 

yes

201

100

106.9

115.0

8.2

(-18.8; 35.1)

1.10

(0.87 - 1.40)

1.01

0.892

Other cardiovascular diseases

          

no

1935

983

9.0

9.8

0.8

(0.1; 1.6)

1.09

(1.01 - 1.18)

1.00

 

yes

818

403

37.0

39.4

2.4

(-2.2; 7.0)

1.06

(0.95 - 1.2)

0.97

0.697

Chronic pulmonary diseases

          

no

2435

1209

10.5

11.2

0.7

(0.0; 1.5)

1.07

(1.00 - 1.15)

1.00

 

yes

318

177

59.9

72.8

12.9

(0.3; 25.5)

1.23

(1.03 - 1.48)

1.15

0.155

Acute and chronic liver diseases

          

no

2595

1315

11.0

12.0

1.0

(0.2; 1.8)

1.09

(1.02 - 1.17)

1.00

 

yes

158

71

95.7

93.1

-2.7

(-28.9; 23.6)

1.00

(0.76 - 1.33)

0.92

0.567

Renal failure

          

no

2529

1291

10.7

11.8

1.1

(0.3; 1.8)

1.10

(1.03 - 1.18)

1.00

 

yes

224

95

127.7

115.7

-12.0

(-40.6; 16.7)

0.93

(0.73 - 1.18)

0.85

0.177

Psychiatric disorders

          

no

2658

1331

11.3

12.2

0.9

(0.1; 1.7)

1.08

(1.01 - 1.15)

1.00

 

yes

95

55

47.2

59.2

12.0

(-6.3; 30.2)

1.27

(0.91 - 1.77)

1.18

0.350

Cerebrovascular diseases

          

no

2455

1239

10.6

11.5

0.9

(0.2; 1.7)

1.09

(1.02 - 1.17)

1.00

 

yes

298

147

51.8

54.9

3.1

(-7.5; 13.8)

1.08

(0.88 - 1.31)

0.99

0.907

Number of HDD for any other causes

          

0-1

2555

1309

11.0

12.1

1.1

(0.4; 1.9)

1.11

(1.04 - 1.18)

1.00

 

2-3

151

62

29.4

26.2

-3.2

(-11.2; 4.8)

0.89

(0.66 - 1.20)

0.80

0.161

4+

47

15

98.4

68.9

-29.5

(-74.3; 15.3)

0.68

(0.38 - 1.21)

0.61

0.099

Mortality rate (MR), risk difference (RD), adjusted mortality relative risk (RR) and relative effect modification (REM) index for hospitalization diagnosed diseases (HDD) modalities by heat wave.

75+ age group

Relative risks showed that the excess in mortality during heat waves is significantly higher in females, and for all those not married, widowed or divorced (Table 3). Rate ratios showed that the effect of heat on mortality increases with age and is greater for those who had four or more hospitalizations for other causes in the previous two years, although they were not statistically significant. However, having had four or more hospitalizations was associated to a higher absolute number of deaths, as shown by RDs (Table 5).
Table 5

Results on the 75+ age group.

 

75+ ages

 

Deaths

MR *1000

RD *1000

(95% IC)

RR

(95% IC)

REM Index

p-value

 

Heat wave

Heat wave

      
 

no

yes

no

yes

      

HDD

          

Malignant neoplasm

          

no

7627

4173

39.8

46.7

6.9

(5.2; 8.5)

1.17

(1.13 - 1.21)

1.00

 

yes

1800

870

217.4

224.3

6.9

(-11.0; 24.9)

1.03

(0.95 - 1.12)

0.88

0.006

Diabetes mellitus

          

no

8340

4469

43.7

50.1

6.5

(4.7; 8.2)

1.15

(1.10 - 1.19)

1.00

 

yes

1087

574

122.2

137.8

15.6

(2.2; 29.0)

1.12

(1.02 - 1.24)

0.98

0.734

Other CNS disorders

          

no

8657

4618

44.5

50.9

6.4

(4.6; 8.1)

1.14

(1.10 - 1.18)

1.00

 

yes

770

425

144.8

171.4

26.6

(7.4; 45.9)

1.18

(1.04 - 1.32)

1.04

0.625

Ischaemic heart diseases

          

no

8126

4420

42.8

49.9

7.1

(5.3; 8.8)

1.16

(1.12 - 1.20)

1.00

 

yes

1301

623

127.6

131.3

3.7

(-8.7; 16.1)

1.03

(0.94 - 1.13)

0.89

0.020

Conduction disorders

          

no

9107

4888

46.3

53.2

6.9

(5.2; 8.7)

1.15

(1.11 - 1.19)

1.00

 

yes

320

155

104.0

108.6

4.6

(-15.9; 25.2)

1.04

(0.86 - 1.26)

0.91

0.337

Cardiac dysrhythmias

          

no

7999

4351

42.1

49.0

7.0

(5.2; 8.7)

1.16

(1.12 - 1.21)

1.00

 

yes

1428

692

147.3

152.7

5.4

(-8.3; 19.2)

1.03

(0.94 - 1.13)

0.89

0.019

Heart failure

          

no

8385

4540

43.0

49.9

6.9

(5.2; 8.6)

1.16

(1.12 - 1.20)

1.00

 

yes

1042

503

215.7

221.7

6.1

(-17.3; 29.5)

1.03

(0.92 - 1.14)

0.89

0.035

Other cardiovascular diseases

          

no

6643

3572

38.8

44.6

5.9

(4.2; 7.6)

1.15

(1.11 - 1.20)

1.00

 

yes

2784

1471

97.9

110.9

13.0

(6.2; 19.7)

1.13

(1.07 - 1.20)

0.98

0.643

Chronic pulmonary diseases

          

no

8186

4435

42.8

49.6

6.9

(5.1; 8.6)

1.16

(1.11 - 1.20)

1.00

 

yes

1241

608

146.1

154.7

8.6

(-6.1; 23.4)

1.06

(0.96 - 1.17)

0.91

0.095

Acute and chronic liver diseases

          

no

9172

4934

46.2

53.3

7.0

(5.3; 8.8)

1.15

(1.11 - 1.19)

1.00

 

yes

255

109

188.4

172.5

-15.8

(-55.6; 24.0)

0.91

(0.73 - 1.14)

0.79

0.041

Renal failure

          

no

8503

4597

43.4

50.2

6.9

(5.2; 8.6)

1.16

(1.12 - 1.20)

1.00

 

yes

924

446

243.3

249.6

6.3

(-21.7; 34.3)

1.03

(0.92 - 1.15)

0.89

0.048

Psychiatric disorders

          

no

8980

4803

45.7

52.3

6.7

(4.9; 8.4)

1.14

(1.10 - 1.18)

1.00

 

yes

447

240

136.5

158.2

21.7

(-2.0; 45.4)

1.16

(0.99 - 1.35)

1.02

0.894

Cerebrovascular diseases

          

no

8033

4291

42.6

48.7

6.2

(4.4; 7.9)

1.14

(1.10 - 1.19)

1.00

 

yes

1394

752

125.5

144.3

18.8

(6.6; 31.1)

1.15

(1.05 - 1.26)

1.00

0.896

Number of HDD for any other causes

          

0-1

9061

4849

46.5

53.3

6.8

(5.0; 8.6)

1.14

(1.10 - 1.18)

1.00

 

2-3

331

171

72.4

81.5

9.1

(-5.4; 23.6)

1.11

(0.92 - 1.34)

0.97

0.772

4+

35

23

93.2

134.5

41.3

(-21.7; 104.4)

1.44

(0.85 - 2.44)

1.27

0.388

Mortality rate (MR), risk difference (RD), adjusted mortality relative risk (RR) and relative effect modification (REM) index for hospitalization diagnosed diseases (HDD) modalities by heatwave. 75+ age groups.

We observed more deaths attributable to heat waves among those who had a previous hospitalization for diabetes, diseases of the central nervous system, psychiatric disorders and cerebrovascular diseases.

Conversely, there was a protective effect observed among subjects with a previous hospitalization for a wide range of conditions, including malignant neoplasm, ischemic diseases, hearth rhythm disorders, heart failure, chronic pulmonary diseases, liver diseases and renal failure. As in the 65-74 age group, socio-economic status did not modify the effect.

Discussion

This study analysed factors associated to heat related mortality in a cohort of elderly subjects in the summers of 2005-2007 in Roma. In these years prevention programs for the effects of heat on health were active in the city. The analysis was performed separately for the 65-74 and the 75+ age group. Overall, the impact of heat wave on mortality was higher in the older age group; moreover, females and unmarried subjects resulted to be more susceptible to heat waves effects.

Results from the 65-74 age group identified only previous hospitalizations for chronic pulmonary disease as a significant effect modifier; however, subjects with at least one hospitalization for psychiatric disorders showed a higher excess in mortality during heat wave days. In the 75+ age group, a higher susceptibility to heat was observed among those with previous hospitalization for diabetes, diseases of the central nervous system, psychiatric disorders and cerebrovascular diseases, but only from the risk differences analysis. Our results confirmed that age acts as an effect modifier of the associations under study, and suggested that the underlying mechanisms that determine degrees of susceptibility to heat waves might vary with age.

As far as we know, this is one of the few studies to analyze a prospective cohort with individual socio-demographic and health information on the elderly, stratified by age.

Compared to the more widely used case crossover design, our study has the advantage of allowing us to estimate comparable relative risk of dying during heat waves for different covariates of interest. Estimates were obtained from the interaction term of a model including the heat wave effect, the covariate effect and the interaction term, and adjusted for a pool of covariates. Furthermore, this study design allowed us not only to compute the relative risk such as in a cross-over design but also the absolute risk. As a consequence we could evaluate both the multiplicative effect modification of the factors considered as well as the impact in terms of absolute number of excess of deaths during a heat wave. This has enabled us to identify a series of health conditions that modify the heat-mortality relationship on an additive scale but not on a multiplicative scale.

The higher relative risk of mortality during heat waves in subjects with previous hospitalizations for a chronic respiratory illness is supported by previous case-only, case-crossover and time-series studies [10, 12, 25, 26]. In patients with COPD an exposure to extreme heat might induce hyperventilation leading to dyspnea and to mechanical and cardiovascular effects [27]; furthermore, some heat-induced physiological changes such as dehydration might represent a risk factor of broncho-pulmonary disorders [28]. Such mechanism offers an explanation of the higher rates of hospitalization for respiratory causes observed by a European multicity study [29]. The higher risk of dying among people with psychiatric disorders is supported by previous studies [3, 12], and may be explained by the inability of these people to care for themselves [3], and by the side effects of some neuroleptic drugs [30].

In this as in other studies [4, 5, 12], the effect of heat waves results stronger among those older than 75 years. This can be attributed to concurrent factors such as pre-existing chronic diseases, physical fitness level, and attenuated physiological responses to heat such as lower sweat gland outputs, decreased skin blood flow and reduced cardiac outputs [31].

Results from both age groups showed that those who were hospitalized in the previous two years had a smaller risk of dying during heat waves than non previously hospitalized subjects. For some specific health conditions, such as cancer or other severe chronic illnesses, this lower mortality risk could be due to the fact that these patients received greater medical attention. On the other hand, it has been suggested that the lower risk of dying during heat waves for pre-hospitalized people should be interpreted more as an additive than a multiplicative effect, since the absolute risk of dying among those who had an hospitalization during the previous two years is presumably higher than in the not hospitalized group [6].

As reported by previous studies [5], we did not observe any effect modification by socio-economic conditions in either of the two considered age groups. It should be noted that our indicator of socio-economic status is derived from a census tract level study [19], therefore misclassification of individual exposure may have affected our findings toward the null.

The comparison of our results with previous studies on risk factors for heat related mortality in the 65+ age group in Rome before 2003 [5, 12] shows a slight change in the pattern of the concurrent clinical conditions associated to a higher susceptibility to heat. Heart failure and heart conduction disorders were not currently identified as risk modifiers as they had been previously [5, 12], whereas diabetes and diseases of the CNS were identified in this study as having a higher number of deaths during heat waves. These changes may have resulted from the implementation of prevention programs targeted to high risk population in Rome in recent years [17, 18].

Some limitations of this study need to be discussed. Even if we have considered a three-year period cohort of all the residents in Rome, the high number of covariates included in the model determine a problem of power in the analysis. Among the 65-74 years old in particular we might not have had enough power to detect all the effect modifiers.

We used cause-specific hospital admissions as markers of specific diseases. This has some intrinsic limitations since not all conditions considered result in a hospital admission and in this case the use of additional sources of health data (i.e. outpatient care, pharmaceutical care) could have provided a more accurate measure of the prevalence of the disease in our population. Furthermore, it should be noted that the use of hospital admissions could provide a biased picture of morbidity since it reflects not only morbidity levels but also provider-specific factors and the availability of primary care and out-patient services [32].

In this study, we used "population-averaged" temperatures collected at a single monitor (the nearest airport), but no potential measurement error should have affected our effect estimates since it was possibly of the same entity in heat wave and non-heat wave days and cancelled by comparisons. Possible sources of exposure bias are however the micro-urban variations in heat effect that are influenced by the underlying socio-economic conditions and the summer migratory patterns that finds the elderly and ill people and those of low socio-economic status more often in the city. This bias is difficult to quantify and to be adjusted for from the available data.

Conclusion

Our study is one of the few to analyze the potential modification effects of a wide range of health conditions and of socio-demographic factors in a large cohort of elderly subjects in the years following the introduction of prevention programs aimed to prevent the health effects of heat waves. Results suggest that prevention programs should mainly target people over 74 years of age, women and unmarried people. Specifically, in the 65-74 years old age group people with chronic pulmonary diseases should be particularly monitored during heat waves, while further analysis should be done to better understand the role of previous hospitalizations for cerebrovascular, CNS, psychiatric disorders and diabetes among those older than 75 years. In conclusion, for the purposes of public health programmes susceptibility should be considered time, space and population specific, and the identification of prognostic factors should be performed repeatedly over time.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the following institutions that provided the datasets used in the analysis: the Municipal Office of the City of Rome, the Agency for Public Health of Lazio Region, the Italian Air Force Meteorological Service, the LAit (Lazio Technological Innovation) S.p.a., and the Health Councillor of Lazio Region.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, Local Health Authority Rome E

References

  1. Kovats RS, Ebi KL: Heatwaves and public health in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2006, 16: 592-599. 10.1093/eurpub/ckl049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnson H, Kovats RS, McGregor G, Stedman J, Gibbs M, Walton H: The impact of the 2003 heat wave on daily mortality in England and Wales and the use of rapid weekly mortality estimates. Euro Surveill. 2005, 10: 168-171.Google Scholar
  3. Michelozzi P, de'Donato F, Bisanti L, Russo A, Cadum E, DeMaria M, D'Ovidio M, Costa G, Perucci CA: The impact of the summer 2003 heat waves on mortality in four Italian cities. Euro Surveill. 2005, 10: 161-165.Google Scholar
  4. Fouillet A, Rey G, Laurent F, Pavillon G, Bellec S, Ghihenneuc-Jouyaux C, Clavel J, Jougla E, Hémon Denis: Excess mortality related to the August 2003 heat wave in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006, 80: 16-24. 10.1007/s00420-006-0089-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stafoggia M, Forastiere F, Agostini D, Biggeri A, Bisanti L, Cadum E, Caranci N, de'Donato F, De Lisio S, De Maria M, Michelozzi P, Miglio R, Pandolfi P, Picciotto S, Rognoni M, Russo A, Scarnato C, Perucci CA: Vulnerability to heat-related mortality: a multicity, population-based, case-crossover analysis. Epidemiology. 2006, 17: 315-323. 10.1097/01.ede.0000208477.36665.34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Vandentorren S, Bretin P, Zeghnoun A, Mandereau-Bruno L, Croisier A, Cochet C, Ribe' ron J, Siberan I, Declercq B, Ledrans M: August 2003 heat wave in France: risk factors for death of elderly people living at home. Eur J Publ Health. 2006, 16: 583-591. 10.1093/eurpub/ckl063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Conti S, Masocco M, Meli P, Minelli G, Palummeri E, Solimini R, Toccaceli V, Vichi M: General and specific mortality among the elderly during the 2003 heat wave in Genova (Italy). Environ Res. 2007, 103: 267-274. 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Canoui-Poitrine F, Cadot E, Spira A: Groupe regional Canicule: Excess deaths during the August 2003 heat wave in Paris, France. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005, 54: 127-135. 10.1016/S0398-7620(06)76706-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Naughton MP, Henderson A, Mirabelli MC, Kaiser R, Wilhelm JL, Kieszak SM, Rubin CH, McGeehin MA: Heat-related mortality during a 1999 heat wave in Chicago. Am J Prev Med. 2002, 22: 221-227. 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00421-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Schwartz J: Who is sensitive to extremes of temperature? A case-only analysis. Epidemiology. 2005, 16: 67-72. 10.1097/01.ede.0000147114.25957.71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Medina-Ramon M, Schwartz J: Temperature, temperature extremes, and mortality: a study of acclimatisation and effect modification in 50 US cities. Occup Environ Med. 2007, 64: 827-833.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stafoggia M, Forastiere F, Agostini D, Caranci N, de'Donato F, Demaria M, Michelozzi P, Miglio R, Rognoni M, Russo A, Perucci CA: Factors affecting in-hospital heat-related mortality: A multi-city case-crossover analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008, 62: 209-215. 10.1136/jech.2007.060715.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell ML, O'Neill MS, Ranjit N, Borja-Aburto VH, Cifuentes LA, Gouveia NC, Bell ML: Vulnerability to heat-related mortality in Latin America: a case-crossover study in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Santiago, Chile and Mexico City, Mexico. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 37: 796-804.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Skrondal A: Interaction as departure from additivity in case-control studies: a cautionary note. Am J Epidemiol. 2003, 158: 251-258. 10.1093/aje/kwg113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tan J, Zheng Y, Song G, Kalkstein LS, Kalkstein AJ, Tang X: Heat wave impacts on mortality in Shangai, 1998 and 2003. Int J Biometeorol. 2007, 51: 193-200. 10.1007/s00484-006-0058-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Fouillet A, Rey G, Wagner V, Laaidi K, Empereur-Bissonnet P, Tertre AL, Frayssinet P, Bessemoulin P, Laurent F, Crouy-Chanel PD, Jougla E, Hémon D: Has the impact of heat waves on mortality changed in France since the European heat wave of summer 2003? A study of the 2006 heat wave. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 37: 309-317. 10.1093/ije/dym253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. de'Donato FK, Michelozzi P, Bargagli AM, Di Gennaro M, D'Ippoliti D, Leonardi M, Marino C, Schifano P, Perucci CA: The Italian heat/health warning system for prevention of heat health effects: Evaluation of Summer 2008 [Abstracts: ISEE 20th Annual Conference, Pasadena, California, October 12-16, 2008: Contributed Abstracts]. Epidemiology. 2008, 19 (Supplement): S287-S288.Google Scholar
  18. Bargagli A, Michelozzi P, De Sario M, Chierchini P, Casali V, Cervelli S, Barcaioli E, Tanfetti S, Perucci CA: Summer 2007 heat waves in Rome: Results of the prevention programme based on general practitioner surveillance [Abstracts: ISEE 20th Annual Conference, Pasadena, California, October 12-16, 2008: Contributed Abstracts]. Epidemiology. 2008, 19 (Supplement): S245-Google Scholar
  19. Cesaroni G, Agabiti N, Rosati R, Forastiere F, Perucci CA: An index of socioeconomic position based on 2001 Census, Rome [Article in Italian]. Epidemiol Prev. 2006, 30: 352-357.Google Scholar
  20. Semenza JC, McCullough JE, Flanders WD, McGeehin MA, Lumpkin JR: Excess hospital admissions during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. Am J Prev Med. 1999, 16: 269-277. 10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00025-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Regione Lazio. DGR 2 dicembre n. 9158. Riorganizzazione del sistema informativo ospedaliero (SIO). Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Lazio n. 6 parte 1, 28 febbraio. 1994Google Scholar
  22. Kalkstein LS, Valimont KM: An evaluation of summer discomfort in the United States using a relative climatological index. Bull Am Meteorolog Soc. 1986, 67: 842-848. 10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<0842:AEOSDI>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Regione Lazio. Direttive e Modalità di Attuazione di un Nuovo Sistema Informativo di Mortalità. Istituzione presso le USL di un Registro Nominativo delle Cause di Morte.Google Scholar
  24. SAS Statistical Software for Linux, release 8.02.02. 1999, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Diaz J, Jordán A, Garcia R, López C, Alberdi JC, Hernández E, Otero A: Heat waves in Madrid 1986-1997: effects on the health of the elderly. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002, 75: 163-170. 10.1007/s00420-001-0290-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishigami A, Hajat S, Kovats RS, Bisanti L, Rognoni M, Russo A, Paldy A: An ecological time-series study of heat related mortality in three European cities. Environ Health. 2008, 7: 5-10.1186/1476-069X-7-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sprung CL: Heat Stroke: Modern approach to an ancient disease. Chest. 1980, 77: 461-462. 10.1378/chest.77.4.461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalhoff H: Mild dehydration: a risk factor of broncho-pulmonary disorders?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003, 57 (Suppl 2): S81-87. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601906.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Michelozzi P, Accetta G, De Sario M, D'Ippoliti D, Marino C, Baccini M, Biggeri A, Anderson HR, Katsouyanni K, Ballester F, Bisanti L, Cadum E, Forsberg B, Forastiere F, Goodman PG, Hojs A, Kirchmayer U, Medina S, Paldy A, Schindler C, Sunyer J, Perucci CA, on behalf of the PHEWE collaborative group: High temperature and hospitalizations for cardiovascular and respiratory causes in 12 European cities. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009, 179: 383-389. 10.1164/rccm.200802-217OC.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilbourne EM, Choi K, Jones S, Thacker SB, The Field Investigation Team: Risk factors for heatstroke - A case-control study. JAMA. 1982, 47: 3332-3336. 10.1001/jama.247.24.3332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kenney WL, Munce TA: Invited review: Aging and human temperature regulation. J Appl Physiol. 2003, 95: 2598-2603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hansell A, Bottle A, Shurlock L, Aylin P: Accessing and using hospital activity data. J Public Health Med. 2001, 23: 51-56. 10.1093/pubmed/23.1.51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Schifano et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.