Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and reduced birth size: a prospective birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain

  • Ferran Ballester1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Marisa Estarlich2, 1,
  • Carmen Iñiguez1, 2,
  • Sabrina Llop2, 1,
  • Rosa Ramón2, 4,
  • Ana Esplugues1, 2,
  • Marina Lacasaña5, 2 and
  • Marisa Rebagliato6, 2
Environmental Health20109:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-6

Received: 23 October 2009

Accepted: 29 January 2010

Published: 29 January 2010

Abstract

Background

Maternal exposure to air pollution has been related to fetal growth in a number of recent scientific studies. The objective of this study was to assess the association between exposure to air pollution during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth in a cohort in Valencia, Spain.

Methods

Seven hundred and eighty-five pregnant women and their singleton newborns participated in the study. Exposure to ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was estimated by means of land use regression. NO2 spatial estimations were adjusted to correspond to relevant pregnancy periods (whole pregnancy and trimesters) for each woman. Outcome variables were birth weight, length, and head circumference (HC), along with being small for gestational age (SGA). The association between exposure to residential outdoor NO2 and outcomes was assessed controlling for potential confounders and examining the shape of the relationship using generalized additive models (GAM).

Results

For continuous anthropometric measures, GAM indicated a change in slope at NO2 concentrations of around 40 μg/m3. NO2 exposure >40 μg/m3 during the first trimester was associated with a change in birth length of -0.27 cm (95% CI: -0.51 to -0.03) and with a change in birth weight of -40.3 grams (-96.3 to 15.6); the same exposure throughout the whole pregnancy was associated with a change in birth HC of -0.17 cm (-0.34 to -0.003). The shape of the relation was seen to be roughly linear for the risk of being SGA. A 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 during the second trimester was associated with being SGA-weight, odds ratio (OR): 1.37 (1.01-1.85). For SGA-length the estimate for the same comparison was OR: 1.42 (0.89-2.25).

Conclusions

Prenatal exposure to traffic-related air pollution may reduce fetal growth. Findings from this study provide further evidence of the need for developing strategies to reduce air pollution in order to prevent risks to fetal health and development.

Background

In recent years a growing body of epidemiological research has focused on the potential impact of prenatal exposure to air pollution on birth outcomes. Several outcomes have been related to exposure to air pollution during pregnancy, including low birth weight, reduced birth size, and intrauterine growth retardation [14]. Moreover, reduction in fetal growth has been associated with poor neurological development as well as with an increased risk for chronic diseases later in life [5, 6].

A cohort study is the design of choice for evaluating the impact of air pollution on fetal growth as pregnancy is a process in which the relationship between a given type of exposure and an associated effect may be observed in a limited period of time [7]. Some of the studies carried out on this topic have included large populations using birth data from health care registries [810] whereas other cohort studies had smaller samples, but more detailed, primary data [1113]. Authors of recent methodological reviews [7, 1416] agree that new prospective studies should allow for adequate assessment of air pollution exposure, consider different time windows of exposure, and collect sufficient information on confounding variables.

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is the air pollutant most frequently used as a surrogate for traffic-related pollution in prospective studies, both in adults and in children [17, 18]. This is due to the fact that outdoor NO2 levels correlate well with pollutants generated by traffic, they can be easily measured using passive samplers, and they are routinely measured by air quality networks, which allows for correction for seasonality.

The INMA study (Spanish Children's Health and Environment) is a prospective multi-centre pregnancy and birth cohort study that seeks to evaluate the role of the environment on fetal development and children's health in the general population in Spain [19]. The objective of this report is to assess the association between residential exposure to outdoor NO2 during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.

Methods

Study design and population

The present study was based on data from the INMA cohort in Valencia. Between November 2003 and June 2005, 855 pregnant women attending the prenatal population-based screening program at the reference hospital were included in the study. Thirty-five of these women had a spontaneous abortion or fetal death, 33 withdrew from the study or were lost to follow up, and 787 delivered a live, singleton infant. Exposure to outdoor NO2 was assessed for 785 of the 787 mother-child pairs in the study, thus making up the final study population. Deliveries took place between May 2004 and February 2006. The study area covered the home addresses of all participants. Approximately 10% lived in a typically urban zone (city of Valencia), 50% lived in the metropolitan zone, 35% in a semi-urban zone, and the rest in a typically rural zone. The study area covers 1372 km2 including 34 municipalities and has a reference population of almost 300,000 inhabitants with a broad socio-demographic and environmental heterogeneity. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the reference hospital and informed consent was obtained from every participating woman. The mothers' recruitment and follow up procedures have been previously reported [19].

Birth outcome assessment

Outcome variables were birth weight (in grams), birth length and head circumference (in centimetres). Birth weight was measured by the midwife that attended the birth, whereas birth length and head circumference were measured by a nurse when the newborn arrived in the hospital ward within the first twelve hours of life. The three measures were standardized for gestational age and sex using the residuals method [20]. An early ultrasound of the crown-rump length was also available and used for gestational dating when the difference with the last menstrual period was equal to or greater than 7 days. This happened in 11.9% of the cases. We defined small for gestational age (SGA) as a birth weight or length below the 10th percentile according to standard percentile charts for sex and gestational age in the Spanish population [21]. We did not classify SGA in terms of head circumference because our measurement procedure was different from that used in the published charts. Of all the births, 6.4% were classified as preterm births (i.e. gestational age < 37 weeks) in the studied cohort.

Assessment of air pollution exposure

A procedure was designed to assess individual exposure to NO2 as a marker of outdoor air pollution considering both spatial and temporal variations on exposure. Ambient NO2 concentrations for 93 sampling points covering the study area were obtained using radial symmetry passive samplers (Radiello®, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Padua/Italy) which remained exposed for four sampling periods of 7 days each. The campaigns took place in April, June, and November 2004 and February 2005. The passive samplers were distributed over the area according to geometrical criteria, taking into account the expected pollution gradients and the expected number of births (Figure 1). For obtaining estimates of the NO2 spatial distribution in the study area, a two step approach was used. First, universal kriging was used to predict NO2 levels at unmonitored sites, i.e. the women's residences. Then, geographical information system (GIS) data (traffic, i.e. vehicle density and distance to a main road, land use, and altitude) were used to improve predictions with the aid of land use regression (LUR).
Figure 1

Spatial distribution of the NO 2 levels in the study area and addresses of the women in the cohort.

In addition, in order to take into account temporal variations in exposure, we used daily information from seven stations of the monitoring network within 5 km or less of the study area to adjust NO2 spatial estimations to correspond with the pregnancy period for each woman. Thus, the NO2 spatial estimation for each woman's residence was multiplied by the ratio between the NO2 monitoring network average during the pregnancy period of that particular woman divided by the NO2 monitoring network average for the entire study period. In order to explore critical exposure windows, an air pollution exposure indicator for each trimester of pregnancy was constructed using the same procedure as that utilized for the entire pregnancy. Address changes were taken into consideration when they accounted for a relevant fraction of each exposure window (>2/9). The methodology and results for assignment of personal air pollution exposure have been described elsewhere [22].

Covariates and potential confounders

The mothers completed a detailed questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, environmental exposures, and life style variables twice during their pregnancy (weeks 10-13 and 28-32). The questionnaires were administered during personal interviews by previously trained interviewers. Potential confounders included maternal variables (see Additional file 1), infant's sex, paternal height, and season of delivery. Body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain were further classified following the Institute of Medicine guidelines [23]. Socio-economic status (SES) was classified using an adaptation of the British SES classification. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure was assessed as both passive exposure at home and global exposure.

Statistical Methods

We first performed bivariate analysis to determine parental and pregnancy characteristics associated with birth outcomes. We also examined individual NO2 levels and maternal and pregnancy characteristics. Association between exposure to residential outdoor NO2 and anthropometric measures was assessed by means of linear regression for continuous variables and logistic regression for SGA. In order to avoid excessive influence of extreme values, robust methods were applied. For continuous variables, we checked for the shape of the relation using graphical smoothing techniques. The height of both parents showed a linear relation and was therefore included as a continuous variable in the models. The rest of the continuous variables were categorized to account for non-linear associations. Covariates were retained in the final model if they were related to the outcome based on likelihood ratio (LR) tests with a p value of < 0.10 or if they changed effect estimates for the exposure of interest by > = 10% when excluded from the model. The mother's age was included in all models in spite of its statistical significance. Zone of residence was not included in the multivariate analyses because it was highly correlated with NO2 levels. To assess the shape of the relationship between measures at birth and NO2 levels, we used adjusted GAM models to evaluate the linearity of the relation between NO2 levels and the reproductive outcomes, comparing models with NO2 levels in a linear and non-linear manner (a cubic smoothing spline with 2, 3, and 4 degrees of freedom) by means of graphical examination and an LR test (p < 0.05).

Results

Characteristics of the newborns, the mothers and their pregnancy, and the fathers' height in relation to size measures and SGA are described in Additional file 1. In brief, older mothers, mothers who had higher pre-pregnancy weight and/or BMI, who were taller, of higher social class, non-smokers, and of Latin American origin had infants with a higher birth weight and a lower proportion of SGA (in weight) babies. Primiparous mothers, those with low weight gain, those with only primary school education, and those who still smoked at week 12 had infants with a lower birth weight and a higher proportion of SGA (in weight) babies. Boys weighed more than girls. Similar patterns were found for birth length and head circumference adjusted for gestational age, and for SGA (in length) except that there were no differences by country of origin, and in the case of length, no differences by either social class or education were observed. Finally, taller fathers had bigger babies and a lower proportion of SGA babies.

The spatial distribution of NO2 levels throughout the study area showed a gradient from the urban zone to the rural one with the two motorways crossing the area playing an important role (Figure 1). The mean residential outdoor NO2 level corresponding to the 785 pregnancy periods was 36.9 μg/m3 (Table 1). For 43.2% of the women, the outdoor NO2 levels at their residences during the pregnancy period were above 40 μg/m3, the World Health Organization guideline for annual NO2 concentration [24]. Individual NO2 levels for each trimester correlated well with NO2 levels for the whole pregnancy, and moderately between themselves (Table 1).
Table 1

Descriptive statistics of the estimates of individual exposure to ambient NO2 during the different pregnancy periods.

Pregnancy period

Mean (μg/m3)

Percentiles (μg/m3)

Pearson's correlation (r) between periods

  

25

50

75

First trimester

Second trimester

Third trimester

First trimester

37.9

28.2

38.1

48.5

   

Second trimester

35.9

26.5

35.2

44.2

0.69*

  

Third trimester

37.0

27.3

37.0

46.1

0.34*

0.65*

 

Whole pregnancy

36.9

29.4

37.9

45.6

0.80*

0.92*

0.83*

*p < 0.001

INMA-Valencia cohort, 2003-2006

Air pollution exposure and anthropometric measures

Unadjusted analysis considering the variables in their continuous form showed a negative relationship between individual exposures to ambient NO2 and anthropometric measures at birth (Table 2). This relation was statistically significant for first trimester exposure and for both birth length and head circumference, as well as for second trimester exposure and head circumference. After adjustment for covariates and potential confounders, the same temporal pattern persisted (Table 2). Although 95% confidence intervals yielded results that do not reject the null hypothesis, birth head circumference and NO2 exposure in the first trimester were marginally associated. Specifically, an increase in 10 μg/m3 in NO2 levels during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with a decrease in head circumference by -0.07 cm (95% CI: -0.14 to 0.005).
Table 2

Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*

 

Birth weight (in g)a

(n:785)

Birth length (in cm)a

(n:784)

Birth head circumference (in cm)a

(n:782)

NO2 exposure period

β

(95% CI)

Linearity (df)b

β

(95% CI)

Linearity (df)b

β

(95% CI)

Linearity (df)b

Unadjusted

         

First trimester

-3.564

(-23.698;16.570)

L

-0.092

(-0.177;-0.008)

NL (4)

-0.069

(-0.133;-0.004)

L

Second trimester

-4.464

(-25.175;16.248)

NL (3)

-0.050

(-0.137;0.037)

NL (2)

-0.071

(-0.137;-0.004)

L

Third trimester

-5.740

(-26.553;15.072)

L

-0.010

(-0.096;0.077)

NL (4)

-0.017

(-0.084;0.049)

L

Whole pregnancy

-5.792

(-30.065;18.481)

NL (3)

-0.063

(-0.165;0.038)

L

-0.074

(-0.152;0.003)

L

Adjusted c

         

First trimester

-12.782

(-34.537;8.972)

NL (3)

-0.066

(-0.149;0.017)

NL (4)

-0.066

(-0.137;0.005)

L

Second trimester

-9.961

(-32.594;12.671)

NL (4)

-0.040

(-0.125;0.044)

NL (3)

-0.060

(-0.133;0.014)

NL (3)

Third trimester

-4.294

(-25.923;17.335)

L

-0.005

(-0.089;0.079)

NL (2)

-0.028

(-0.099;0.042)

L

Whole pregnancy

-9.729

(-33.218;13.760)

L

-0.047

(-0.146;0.052)

NL(2)

-0.058

(-0.134;0.018)

NL (3)

* Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures for a 10 μg/m3 increase in the mean NO2 levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.

a Standardized for gestational age.

b Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO2 in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).

c Adjusted for:

-Birth weight = maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.

-Birth length = maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the first trimester, country of origin, and sex of the infant.

-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.

When the shape of the relation between NO2 exposure and anthropometric measures was assessed, a non-linear relationship was observed. In most cases in the multivariate analysis, the best fit was obtained when NO2 was introduced as a cubic smoothing spline with 3 or 4 degrees of freedom (Table 2). Graphic examination of the relation between NO2 exposure during the first trimester and birth weight and length, and between NO2 exposure during the second trimester and head circumference suggested a change in slope around 40 μg/m3 (Figure 2). For this reason, the association between NO2 exposure and weight, length, and head circumference at birth was also analyzed considering NO2 as a categorical variable, i.e. >40 μg/m3 versus ≤40 μg/m3 (Table 3). Results of the multivariate analysis indicated that NO2 exposure above 40 μg/m3 during the first trimester was associated with a reduction in birth length of -0.27 cm (95%CI -0.51 to -0.03). Birth weight was just marginally associated with NO2 exposure; i.e. a reduction of -40.3 grams in birth weight (95%CI: -96.3 to 15.6) for the same comparison. Also a significant reduction in head circumference was found for exposures above 40 μg/m3 throughout the entire pregnancy.
Table 3

Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 >40 μg/m3 in different time periods during pregnancy and anthropometric measures at birth.*

 

Birth weight (in g)a

(n:785)

Birth length (in cm)a

(n:784)

Birth head circumference (in cm)a

(n:782)

NO2 exposure period

β

(95% CI)

β

(95% CI)

β

(95% CI)

Unadjusted

      

First trimester

-24.309

(-78.256; 29.638)

-0.300

(-0.526; -0.075)

-0.104

(-0.276; 0.069)

Second trimester

-9.648

(-65.156; 45.860)

-0.100

(-0.333; 0.133)

-0.173

(-0.352; 0.005)

Third trimester

28.325

(-26.475; 83.126)

0.150

(-0.079; 0.379)

0.051

(-0.123; 0.226)

Whole pregnancy

-16.912

(-71.233; 37.410)

-0.170

(-0.398; 0.058)

-0.152

(-0.326; 0.022)

Adjusted b

      

First trimester

-40.349

(-96.267; 15.568)

-0.271

(-0.514; -0.028)

-0.074

(-0.257; 0.108)

Second trimester

-37.546

(-96.231; 21.140)

-0.190

(-0.447; 0.066)

-0.177

(-0.368; 0.014)

Third trimester

26.656

(-28.239; 81.551)

0.077

(-0.161; 0.315)

0.011

(-0.167; 0.190)

Whole pregnancy

-33.292

(-84.874; 18.290)

-0.199

(-0.424; 0.027)

-0.171

(-0.339; -0.003)

*Estimates are expressed as the change in birth anthropometric measures comparing NO2 exposure levels >40 μg/m3 vs. exposure levels ≤40 μg/m3 at each woman residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.

a Standardized for gestational age.

b Adjusted for:

-Birth weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.

-Birth length: maternal age, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal working status in the first trimester, smoking during pregnancy, country of origin, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.

-Birth head circumference: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, working status in the third trimester, sex of the infant, and season of last menstrual period.

Figure 2

Relationship between individual NO 2 exposure during the first trimester and anthropometric measures at birth. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). (A). Birth weight (gr) and NO2 exposure (3 df) B). Birth length (cm) and NO2 exposure (4 df). (C). Birth head circumference (cm) and NO2 exposure (4 df). Footnote for Figure 2(C): For birth head circumference the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.

Analysis of the relationship with small for gestational age (SGA)

In the bivariate analysis, although all the odds ratios (OR) were higher than 1, no significant association was found for either of the two measures of SGA and exposure to NO2 during pregnancy (Table 4). After adjustment for potential confounders, a clearer association emerged with the second trimester being the most relevant window of exposure. A 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 during the second trimester was thus associated with the risk of SGA-weight, OR: 1.37 (95%CI: 1.01-1.85). For SGA-length the association estimate for the same comparison was OR: 1.42 (95%CI: 0.89-2.25). No significant improvement in the model was obtained with non-linear models for SGA (Figure 3); therefore, we have only included the results for the relationship with NO2 exposure as a continuous variable (Table 4).
Table 4

Association between individual exposure to ambient NO2 in different time periods during pregnancy and Small for Gestational Age (SGA).*

 

SGA - weight

(n: 785)

SGA - length

(n:784)

NO2 exposure period

OR

(95% CI)

Linearity (df)a

OR

(95% CI)

Linearity (df)a

Unadjusted

      

First trimester

1.013

(0.992; 1.035)

L

1.001

(0.968; 1.035)

L

Second trimester

1.013

(0.992; 1.034)

L

1.006

(0.972; 1.041)

L

Third trimester

1.004

(0.983; 1.026)

L

1.013

(0.979; 1.049)

L

Whole pregnancy

1.014

(0.988; 1.040)

L

1.010

(0.970; 1.052)

L

Adjusted b

      

First trimester

1.182

(0.894; 1.563)

L

1.137

(0.741; 1.744)

L

Second trimester

1.369

(1.013; 1.849)

L

1.416

(0.890; 2.254)

L

Third trimester

1.186

(0.906; 1.552)

L

1.103

(0.750; 1.623)

L

Whole pregnancy

1.281

(0.942; 1.743)

L

1.230

(0.778; 1.945)

L

*Estimates are expressed as the change in odds for SGA (birth weight) and SGA (birth length) for a 10 μg/m3 increase in the mean NO2 levels at each woman's residence during the corresponding period. Unadjusted and adjusted models.

a Shape of the relationship after contrast between model with NO2 in non-linear vs. linear form; L: linear; NL: non-linear (and degrees of freedom of the selected model).

b Adjusted for:

-SGA in weight: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, paternal height, gestational weight gain, parity, maternal education, country of origin, smoking during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.

-SGA in length: maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy weight, maternal education, parity, smoking during pregnancy, gestational weight gain, country of origin, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and season of last menstrual period.

Figure 3

Relationship between individual NO 2 exposure during the second trimester and small for gestational age, in birth weight and in birth length in a multivariate analysis. Graphical estimation of the association and 95% confidence intervals for the non-linear model with lower AIC (degrees of freedom: df). A). Logit of small for gestational age in birth weight and NO2 exposure (2 df). Footnote for Figure 3(A): For SGA (in birth weight) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model. (B). Logit of small for gestational age in birth length and NO2 exposure (2 df). Footnote for Figure 3(B): For SGA (in birth length) the model with the best adjustment was the linear model.

Discussion

Results from this mother and child cohort living in a large, heterogeneous area in Valencia, Spain, suggest an association between maternal exposure to outdoor air pollution and birth outcomes. The odds of being SGA-weight increased by 37% when ambient NO2 levels increased 10 μg/m3 during the second trimester of pregnancy. For anthropometric measures in continuous form, an association with air pollution appeared for women living in zones with ambient NO2 levels above 40 μg/m3. The first and second trimesters seem to be the relevant window of exposure.

Results for the different air pollutants varied in the different studies. Besides particulate matter (PM) [either of diameter <10 μm -PM10- or <2.5 μm -PM2.5-] and carbon monoxide (CO), NO2 appears as one of the pollutants more frequently associated with birth outcomes. In a previous review [2] we identified six articles reporting associations between NOx or NO2 with either birth weight, low birth weight (LBW, measured as birth weight <2500 g), or SGA. The three articles that included nitrogen oxides (NOx) were ecological in design and used data from central monitors. None of them found an association between NOx and birth weight. For NO2, results from the literature reviewed suggested some association with birth weight, but were still not conclusive [8, 25, 26]. In recent years a considerable number of articles have been published in this field. We have identified 12 articles studying the association of NO2 exposure with birth weight that were published after our previous review (Additional file 2) [10, 12, 2736]. Of the four studies analyzing birth weight, an association was found in three of them: Bell et al. in Massachusetts and Connecticut (USA) [10], Mannes et al. in Sydney (Australia) [32], and Gouveia and cols in Brazil [29], but no relationship was observed in the Children's Health Study [31]. Interestingly, all but one of the articles [36] studying SGA found an association with NO2; in the study in question, however, NO2 was the only pollutant studied to be associated with head circumference. As an example, in their study in Vancouver, Brauer et al. [35] estimated residential exposures to air pollution and the risk of SGA. Of the seven air pollutants studied, the association with NO2 was the most robust. On the other hand, only three studies found an association between LBW and NO2 [10, 28, 35]. This discrepancy may be due to the fact that the number of cases of SGA is greater than that of LBW term babies, which gives the study more statistical power. Moreover, the use of SGA, calculated for each week of gestation, enables the effect of gestational length to be more effectively controlled than LBW, which is estimated simply by selecting births that take place after a certain period of gestation (i.e. between weeks 37- 44).

Few studies have examined the relation between air pollution exposure during pregnancy and other anthropometric indicators such as birth length or head circumference (HC). Studies of two cohorts of pregnant women in Poland and in New York described a relationship between prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and fetal growth [37]. Regarding prenatal NO2 exposure and birth length or HC, a birth register-based study assessed birth length and HC among 26,617 term births in Brisbane, Australia [36]. An IQR range increase in NO2 (11.1 μg/m3), but not in other pollutants, during the third trimester was associated with a reduction in crown-heel length: -0.15 cm (95%CI: -0.25 to -0.05). Moreover, in the French Eden cohort [38] a reduction of -0.31 cm in HC at birth was found when comparing NO2 exposure in the highest tertile (>31.4 μg/m3) to that in the lowest tertile. Our results are consistent with the findings of these two studies.

Up to now a clear window of susceptibility for growth retardation has not been identified. In our study we found that exposure during the first trimester is most closely related to a decrease in birth weight and length. In the case of SGA (both, in weight and in length) however, the strongest relationship was found with exposure in the second trimester. Regarding reduced HC, when exposure was evaluated above vs. below 40 μg/m3, exposure throughout the pregnancy was the most clearly related. This may indicate that exposure during the entire pregnancy plays the most important role for reduction in the growth of the infant head.

Very few studies have completely assessed the shape of the relationship between air pollution exposure and reproductive outcomes. Instead, most have analyzed the relation using air pollution variables in the continuous form or comparing only two levels. Some have attempted to examine the shape using tertiles or quartiles and observed an increased risk of LBW at higher quartiles [12, 28]. Regarding NO2 exposure and birth weight, only Ha et al. [25] examined this relationship using GAM models, as did we in the present study. In the former study, although the authors considered the relationship to be relatively linear, a change in the slope may be observed in the figures, with a higher negative gradient after NO2 values of around 32 ppb (60 μg/m3). In our study, we found some indication of a reduction in birth length starting at a threshold of approximately 40 μg/m3. For HC and the risk of SGA we found a monotonic relationship with air pollution exposure.

The biological mechanisms by which air pollutants may affect fetal growth are still unclear. There is some evidence that NO2 alters fetal growth and thus may play a causal role. NO2 is a potent oxidant and increased lipid peroxidation in the maternal and/or fetal compartment has been found in preterm births [39]. Tabacova et al. investigated the relationship between exposure to nitrogen-oxidizing species and pregnancy complications in an area in Bulgaria highly polluted by oxidized nitrogen compounds [40]. Methemoglobin, a biomarker of individual exposure, was determined, and glutathione balance and lipid peroxide levels were used as measures of oxidant/antioxidant status. A high percentage of women suffered from pregnancy complications, the most common being anaemia (67%), threatened abortion/premature labour (33%), and signs of preeclampsia (23%). Methemoglobin was significantly elevated in all three conditions, in comparison with normal pregnancies. Reduced:total glutathione, an indicator of maternal antioxidant reserves, decreased, whereas cell-damaging lipid peroxide levels increased. More recently, Mohoroviz found similar results for methemoglobin in a polluted area of Croatia [41]. These results suggest that maternal exposure to environmental oxidants can increase the risk of pregnancy complications through stimulation of methemoglobin formation, which may lead to hypoxia and hypoxemia in pregnant women and has an important influence on maternal health as well as on placental and fetal development.

Our study has several limitations. The number of women participating in the study is small compared with that in other studies. Subsequently, the power of the study is fairly low and the estimates have wide confidence intervals. In addition, we had no information available on other important pollutants such as PM10, PM2.5, sulphur dioxide (SO2), and CO, for which some associations with fetal growth have been described in other studies. Consequently, we cannot affirm that NO2 is the air pollutant definitively associated with birth measurements. Due to the colinearity between pollutants, NO2 may simply be a proxy for other toxins. Still, NO2 has been shown to be a marker of air pollution from road traffic [42] and could be a reasonable marker of ultrafine particulates or PAH from this source. Unfortunately, we did not have information on indoor levels of air pollutants. However we did have information on environmental tobacco smoke exposure, an important source of indoor air pollution, and we controlled for this.

Notwithstanding the aforementioned weaknesses, our study has several important strengths. In this prospective study we followed a pregnant cohort from early pregnancy and assessed exposure, health outcomes, and covariates in great detail. In addition, the statistical approach using GAM models allows us to examine the shape of the relationship while the use of robust methods permits the minimization of the influence of extreme values. Moreover, we developed a protocol combining measurements from NO2 passive samplers, kriging, and LUR in order to obtain estimates of individual exposure to ambient NO2 for each woman. We also performed four different campaigns to assess the stability over time of the spatial NO2 distribution in the study area, as recommended by Ritz and Wilhelm [15]. Our method allowed us to address local heterogeneity in order to assign an individual estimate of the exposure, a problem that has been reported to affect other studies [15, 30]. Lastly, our study had access to detailed information about each woman's residence throughout pregnancy, including changes of location and address.

Conclusions

Findings from this mother and birth cohort study in Valencia, Spain, suggest that prenatal exposure to outdoor air pollution, measured as NO2, affects the anthropometric development of the fetus, reducing its length and head circumference and increasing the risk of having a small for gestational age (in weight) baby.

We found an association between exposure to levels of NO2 above 40 μg/m3 during the first trimester of pregnancy and a reduction in birth weight. This association was only marginal for birth length.

For head circumference (HC) reduction and the risk of SGA, a monotonic relationship with air pollution exposure was observed. The relevant period of exposure for the risk of SGA was the second trimester. Exposure throughout the pregnancy played the most important role in decreased HC.

Compared with other recent studies, NO2 levels in the study area occupy an intermediate position; therefore, the results are not due to extreme exposure conditions. Taking into account the relationship between fetal growth reduction and child development and health, strategies should be developed to reduce air pollution in order to prevent these risks.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

BSP: 

Black smoke particles

CI: 

confidence interval

CO: 

carbon monoxide

GAM: 

generalized additive models

GIS: 

geographical information system

HC: 

head circumference

INMA: 

Spanish Children's Health and Environment study

IQR: 

Interquartile range

LR: 

likelihood ratio

LUR: 

land use regression

NO2

nitrogen dioxide

NOx

nitrogen oxides

OR: 

odds ratio

PAH: 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

PM: 

particulate matter

ppb: 

parts per billion

PR: 

prevalence ratio

SES: 

socio-economic status

SGA: 

small for gestational age

SO2

sulphur dioxide.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors give special thanks to the families in the study as well as to the professionals that gave their support to this study.

Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (G03/176), FIS-FEDER 03/1615, 04/1509, 04/1112 and 06/1213, and the Conselleria de Sanitat Generalitat Valenciana; all in Spain.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Public Health Research (CSISP), Conselleria de Sanitat
(2)
Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)
(3)
School of Nursing, Universitat de València
(4)
General Directorate of Public Health. Conselleria de Sanitat
(5)
Adalusian School of Public Health (EASP)
(6)
Department of Public Health, Rey Juan Carlos University

References

  1. Sram RJ, Binkova B, Dejmek , Bobak M: Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature. Environ Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 375-382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lacasana M, Esplugues A, Ballester F: Exposure to ambient air pollution and prenatal and early childhood health effects. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005, 20: 183-199. 10.1007/s10654-004-3005-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, Jaakkola JJ: A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal growth. Environ Res. 2004, 95: 106-115. 10.1016/j.envres.2004.01.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli T, Howel D: Particulate air pollution and fetal health: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology. 2004, 15: 36-45. 10.1097/01.ede.0000101023.41844.ac.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Richards M, Hardy R, Kuh D, Wadsworth ME: Birth weight, postnatal growth and cognitive function in a national UK birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 342-348. 10.1093/ije/31.2.342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker DJ: The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007, 261: 412-417. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Darrow LA, Slama R, Bell ML, Choi H, Glinianaia S, Hoggatt KJ, Karr CJ, Lobdell DT, Wilhelm M: Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and reproductive health. Environ Res. 2009, 109: 311-320. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wilhelm M, Ritz B: Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994-1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 207-216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Parker JD, Woodruff TJ, Basu R, Schoendorf KC: Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California. Pediatrics. 2005, 115: 121-128.Google Scholar
  10. Bell ML, Ebisu K, Belanger K: Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115: 1118-1124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, Bernert T, Garfinkel R, Tu YH, Diaz D, Dietrich J, Whyatt RM: Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 201-206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Slama R, Morgenstern V, Cyrys J, Zutavern A, Herbarth O, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J: Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring's term birth weight: a study relying on a land-use regression exposure model. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115: 1283-1292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Perera FP: Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 658-665.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Basu R, Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Saulnier L, Schoendorf KC: Comparing exposure metrics in the relationship between PM2.5 and birth weight in California. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004, 14: 391-396. 10.1038/sj.jea.7500336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ritz B, Wilhelm M: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008, 102: 182-190.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Slama R, Darrow L, Parker J, Woodruff TJ, Strickland M, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Glinianaia S, Hoggatt KJ, Kannan S, Hurley F, Kalinka J, Srám R, Brauer M, Wilhelm M, Heinrich J, Ritz B: Meeting report: atmospheric pollution and human reproduction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 791-798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jerrett M, Shankardass K, Berhane K, Gauderman WJ, Kunzli N, Avol E, Gilliland F, Lurmann F, Molitor JN, Molitor JT, Thomas DC, Peters J, McConnell R: Traffic-related air pollution and asthma onset in children: a prospective cohort study with individual exposure measurement. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 1433-1438.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Brunekreef B: Health effects of air pollution observed in cohort studies in Europe. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007, 17 (Suppl 2): S61-S65. 10.1038/sj.jes.7500628.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ribas-Fito N, Ramon R, Ballester F, Grimalt J, Marco A, Olea N, Posada M, Rebagliato M, Tardon A, Torrent M, Sunyer J: Child health and the environment: the INMA Spanish Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006, 20: 403-410. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00745.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindsay RS, Hanson RL, Bennett PH, Knowler WC: Secular trends in birth weight, BMI, and diabetes in the offspring of diabetic mothers. Diabetes Care. 2000, 23: 1249-1254. 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrascosa A, Yeste D, Copil A, Almar J, Salcedo S, Gussinye M: [Anthropometric growth patterns of preterm and full-term newborns (24-42 weeks' gestational age) at the Hospital Materno-Infantil Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona)(1997-2002]. An Pediatr (Barc). 2004, 60: 406-416. 10.1157/13059643.Google Scholar
  22. Iñiguez C, Ballester F, Estarlich M, Fernandez-Patier R, Aguirre-Alfaro A, Esplugues A, INMA Study group Valencia: Estimation of personal NO2 exposure in a cohort of pregnant women. Sci Total Environ. 2009, 15: 6093-6099. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Abrams B, Altman SL, Pickett KE: Pregnancy weight gain: still controversial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 71 (Suppl 5): S1233-S1241.Google Scholar
  24. World Health Organization: . WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. 2006, Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 15-Google Scholar
  25. Ha EH, Hong YC, Lee BE, Woo BH, Schwartz J, Christiani DC: Is air pollution a risk factor for low birth weight in Seoul?. Epidemiology. 2001, 12: 643-648. 10.1097/00001648-200111000-00011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Maroziene L, Grazuleviciene R: Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Environ Health. 2002, 1: 6-10.1186/1476-069X-1-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Burnett RT: Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 1773-1778.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee BE, Ha EH, Park HS, Kim YJ, Hong YC, Kim H, Lee JT: Exposure to air pollution during different gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight. Hum Reprod. 2003, 18: 638-643. 10.1093/humrep/deg102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gouveia N, Bremner SA, Novaes HM: Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 11-17. 10.1136/jech.58.1.11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilhelm M, Ritz B: Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA. Environ Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 1212-1221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Salam MT, Millstein J, Li YF, Margolis HG, Gilliland FD: Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children's Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2005, 113: 1638-1644.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mannes T, Jalaludin B, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, Corbett S: Impact of ambient air pollution on birth weight in Sydney, Australia. Occup Environ Med. 2005, 62: 524-530. 10.1136/oem.2004.014282.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT: Association between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007, 17: 426-432. 10.1038/sj.jes.7500503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, Simpson R: Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia. BJOG. 2006, 113: 935-941. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01010.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C: A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 680-686.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, Simpson R: Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia. Environ Res. 2007, 103: 383-389. 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J, Camann DE, Whyatt RM, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Perera FP: International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect. 2006, 114: 1744-1750.Google Scholar
  38. Slama RS, Sinno-Teller S, Thiébaugeorges O, Goua V, Forhan A, Ducot B, Annesi-Maesano I, Heinrich J, Schweitzer M, Magnin G, Bouyer J, Kaminski M, Charles MA, Eden Study Group: Relation between atmospheric pollutants and head circumference in utero and at birth: a cohort study relying on ultrasound imaging during pregnancy. Epidemiology. 2006, 17: S129-S130. 10.1097/01.ede.0000221781.15114.88.Google Scholar
  39. Moison RM, Palinckx JJ, Roest M, Houdkamp E, Berger HM: Induction of lipid peroxidation of pulmonary surfactant by plasma of preterm babies. Lancet. 1993, 341: 79-82. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92557-A.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabacova S, Balabaeva L, Little RE: Maternal exposure to exogenous nitrogen compounds and complications of pregnancy. Arch Environ Health. 1997, 52: 341-347. 10.1080/00039899709602209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohorovic L: The level of maternal methemoglobin during pregnancy in an air-polluted environment. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 1902-1905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Clougherty JE, Wright RJ, Baxter LK, Levy JI: Land use regression modeling of intra-urban residential variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants. Environ Health. 2008, 7: 17-10.1186/1476-069X-7-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ballester et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement