- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction to: Response to Juberg et al
Environmental Health volume 19, Article number: 76 (2020)
The Original Article was published on 03 April 2019
Correction to: Environ Health 18, 29 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0466-6
In the Letter to Editor Response [1], we made a statement that the article by Bond and Dietrich [2], referred to by Juberg et al. [3], was supported by American Chemistry Council (ACC). It has been brought to our attention that the current wording suggests that the particular work by Bond and Dietrich [2] received financial or other support from ACC, which was not the intention of the authors. The statement was intended to acknowledge that the ACC has expressed its support of their paper [4]. We wish to amend our published response as follows in order to clarify this:
Juberg et al. [3] claim that “many experts do not agree” with a recent assessment of developmental neurotoxicity in humans and refer to an article by Bond and Dietrich (2017) [2].
References
Mie, et al. Response to Juberg et al. Environ Health. 2019;18:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0466-6.
Bond G, Dietrich DR. Human cost burden of exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals. A critical review. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(8):2745–62.
Juberg D, Hoberman AM, Marty S, Picut CA, Stump DG. Letter to the editor re: commentary in environmental health titled “safety of safety evaluation of pesticides: developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl” by Mie et al; 2018.
The University of Konstanz. Trasande-led human health impact and cost estimates attributed to endocrine disrupting chemical exposure completely unfounded, researchers show. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.endocrinescience.org/news-release/trasande-led-human-health-impact-cost-estimates-attributed-endocrine-disrupting-chemical-exposure-completely-unfounded-researchers-show/. Accessed 14 Jan 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Mie, A., Rudén, C. & Grandjean, P. Correction to: Response to Juberg et al. Environ Health 19, 76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00633-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00633-7