Skip to main content

Prenatal and perinatal analgesic exposure and autism: an ecological link



Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are complex neurodevelopmental disorders. Susceptibility is believed to be the interaction of genetic heritability and environmental factors. The synchronous rises in autism/ASD prevalence and paracetamol (acetaminophen) use, as well as biologic plausibility have led to the hypothesis that paracetamol exposure may increase autism/ASD risk.


To explore the relationship of antenatal paracetamol exposure to ASD, population weighted average autism prevalence rates and paracetamol usage rates were compared. To explore the relationship of early neonatal paracetamol exposure to autism/ASD, population weighted average male autism prevalence rates for all available countries and U.S. states were compared to male circumcision rates – a procedure for which paracetamol has been widely prescribed since the mid-1990s. Prevalence studies were extracted from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Summary of Autism/ASD Prevalence Studies database. Maternal paracetamol usage and circumcision rates were identified by searches on Pub Med.


Using all available country-level data (n = 8) for the period 1984 to 2005, prenatal use of paracetamol was correlated with autism/ASD prevalence (r = 0.80). For studies including boys born after 1995, there was a strong correlation between country-level (n = 9) autism/ASD prevalence in males and a country’s circumcision rate (r = 0.98). A very similar pattern was seen among U.S. states and when comparing the 3 main racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. The country-level correlation between autism/ASD prevalence in males and paracetamol was considerably weaker before 1995 when the drug became widely used during circumcision.


This ecological analysis identified country-level correlations between indicators of prenatal and perinatal paracetamol exposure and autism/ASD. State level correlation was also identified for the indicator of perinatal paracetamol exposure and autism/ASD. Like all ecological analyses, these data cannot provide strong evidence of causality. However, biologic plausibility is provided by a growing body of experimental and clinical evidence linking paracetamol metabolism to pathways shown to be important in autism and related developmental abnormalities. Taken together, these ecological findings and mechanistic evidence suggest the need for formal study of the role of paracetamol in autism.

Peer Review reports


Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a severe developmental disorder defined by social deficits, communication deficits, repetitive behaviors and fixated interests that appear in early childhood [1, 2]. Despite a large and rapidly expanding body of literature, the etiology of ASD remains poorly understood. There is substantial evidence implicating oxidative stress, inflammation and immune dysregulation, although no single coherent explanation has emerged [3]. Recent twin studies provide evidence that susceptibility to ASD may have significant environmental components, in addition to genetic heritability [4, 5].

Several lines of evidence suggest that medication use in pregnancy and early childhood may play a role in ASD etiology. Specifically, Torres and, Becker and Schultz, have hypothesized that paracetamol (acetaminophen, N-acetyl-p-aminophenol, or APAP) has increased ASD risk [6, 7]. It has been shown that autistic children have a decreased capacity to sulfate paracetamol, which is the primary metabolic route for children [8]. When paracetamol is metabolized through the alternative routes it has been shown in humans to induce oxidative stress and immune dysregulation [9]. A recent investigation found transcriptomic changes in full-genome human miRNA expression indicating, for the first time, immune modulating effects and oxidative stress responses to paracetamol even at low doses [10]. Studies in animals have shown paracetamol to induce apoptosis and neurotoxicity [11, 12]. Several studies hypothesize increased apoptosis in the autistic brain [1316].

Paracetamol is one of the most common antipyretic analgesic medicines worldwide. In 1980, after sufficient evidence emerged of an association between salicylates and Reyes syndrome, paracetamol essentially replaced aspirin as the primary treatment of fever in children and pregnant women [17, 18]. Since that date, paracetamol consumption throughout the world has increased dramatically [19]. Paracetamol sales in the United States (US) have had a continual upward trend. In 1982, US paracetamol sales were approximately $400 million; by 2008 they had risen to $2.6 billion [20, 21]. Although prevalence data for autism and ASD are of uncertain accuracy, many authors report strong increases in prevalence over this same time period. Theoharides and colleagues for example reported prevalence prior to 1980 as approximately 4/10,000 and Baio et al. estimated that US autism/ASD prevalence to have risen to about 110/10,000 today [22, 23].

Observing the correlation between two parallel time trends is of limited inferential utility; however the paracetamol – ASD link is strengthened by an observation first made by Becker and Schultz [7]. In 1982 and again in 1986, product tampering led to a few bottles of a leading brand of paracetamol tablets being contaminated with cyanide. In each case, a rapid and brief decline in paracetamol sales occurred, with the long term upward trend recovering within a year. In three populations for which good data are available, Becker and Schultz noted that brief dips in the rising autism prevalence curves mirrored these sales anomalies. The prevalence curves continued their upward trend after 1988.

Study aims

Several lines of evidence suggest that the etiologically relevant period for the development of ASD may be in utero or possibly in early infancy [24, 25]. We sought additional evidence to test the hypothesis that use of paracetamol in pregnancy or in early childhood might be a risk factor for ASD. Studies have reported population variation in prescribing patterns and usage rates which has allowed us an opportunity to investigate the correlation between prenatal exposure to paracetamol and autism spectrum disorder prevalence.

Additionally, we noted that analgesic prescribing habits for neonates and infants changed in the mid 1990’s with a shift in perspective on neonatal pain which has afforded us an additional opportunity to look at population variation in analgesic use [26]. Research beginning in the 1980’s documented the negative consequences associated with inadequate treatment of pain in children [2729]. Pain guidelines specifically for children were established in 1992 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, in 1998 by the World Health Organization and in 2001 by the American Academy of Pediatrics [3033].

A common neonatal medical procedure is circumcision, which typically occurs during the postpartum hospital stay, within the first two days of life for a vaginal delivery and first four days for a cesarean section [34]. Prior to the 1990’s circumcision was generally performed without analgesics. A 1994 study by Howard et al. found that when paracetamol is given regularly every 6 hours for at least the first 24-hour postoperative period, infants demonstrated decreased responses to pain [35]. This study lead to the development of circumcision pain management guidelines by the American Academy of Pediatrics [36] and others [3739]. These guidelines include the suggestion of a first dose of paracetamol two hours prior to the procedure, and doses every 4–6 hours for 24 hours following the procedure. Thus newborn males often receive 5–7 doses of paracetamol during the developmentally vulnerable initial days of life. Variations in circumcision frequency in different populations allowed us an additional approach to investigate the correlation between paracetamol use and ASD prevalence. This hypothesis seemed particularly relevant in light of the approximately 4.6 times higher prevalence of autism in males compared to females [23].


Two separate analyses were conducted. The first examined the association between prenatal paracetamol exposure and ASD prevalence using maternal usage data as a proxy for prenatal exposure. The second analysis investigated the association between circumcision rates as a proxy for early life paracetamol exposure in males and ASD prevalence.

Data for investigating prenatal paracetamol exposure and autism prevalence

To investigate the relationship of ASD to prenatal exposure to paracetamol, population maternal paracetamol usage rates were compared to population autism prevalence rates for as many countries as available data permitted. The population autism prevalence rates utilized were from studies reported in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Autism Prevalence Summary Table [40]. The maternal paracetamol usage rates by country were drawn from studies identified by a systematic search of the peer reviewed medical literature using the National Library of Medicine’s Pub Med database.

Autism prevalence rates

The Autism Prevalence Summary Table from the Center for Disease Control website [40] summarized the results of 59 prevalence studies conducted worldwide. This table recorded the author, year published, country, time period studied, age range studied, number of children in the population, the identification criteria, the methodology used and the prevalence. The oldest and youngest birth years in each study were calculated based on the time period and age range studied. Each study was extracted to verify the table results and to identify the ratio of males to females to calculate the male prevalence of autism/ASD. Generally, the CDC Prevalence Summary Table reported the more narrowly defined autism rate rather than the more inclusive diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The CDC Prevalence Summary reported the ASD rate for the Kim 2011 study in South Korea; however for consistency with all other results, the more narrowly defined autism rate was extracted and utilized in this analysis [41]. Two older studies referred to in the CDC table could not be located and were excluded (Lotter et al. 1966) (Brask et al. 1970). Two additional study were excluded, the first because of incomplete case ascertainment [42] and the second because of lack of total population data [43]. A total of 55 studies from the CDC summary were utilized in this analysis (Additional file 1).

Prenatal paracetamol usage rates

Maternal paracetamol usage rates were extracted from studies examining the use of paracetamol in pregnancy and relationships to other outcomes. A search of the English language literature on Pub Med was conducted for the past 20 years with a search date of April 18, 2012 using the terms prenatal, maternal, pregnancy, acetaminophen, paracetamol, medication, drugs, analgesic, pain relief, over the counter, and the different country names. Various combinations of the terms were used to maximize the results. If a study appeared to be relevant it was extracted and reviewed to identify a maternal paracetamol usage rate. If data were found only for overall analgesics, nervous system drugs, all over the counter medications or all western pharmaceuticals an assumption was made that paracetamol use represented 80%, 80%, 70% and 60%, respectively. These proportions were established a priori, conservatively approximated based on the findings of the US National Birth Defects Prevention Study and used for all studies regardless of country [18]. This literature search yielded 33 studies with medication usage rates for 14 out of 17 countries with autism prevalence rates. Two studies were excluded because they were subsets of two included studies to yield a total of 31 studies [44, 45]. If multiple studies were identified for a country a summary usage rate was calculated using the weighted average by study population size. The characteristics of the prenatal medication usage studies are summarized in Additional file 2.

Because of concerns of changing autism prevalence rate over time, an a priori decision was made to restrict the analysis to include autism prevalence studies in which the range of birth years had at least one year of overlap with the range of birth years of the prenatal paracetamol usage studies. If multiple autism prevalence studies met this criterion for a given country, a weighted average based on study population size was calculated. This reduced the number of prenatal exposure studies used in this analysis to 20. There were inadequate data available to conduct a U.S. state level analysis.

Data for investigating early life exposure to paracetamol for circumcision and autism prevalence

To investigate the relationship of early life paracetamol exposure for male neonates to autism spectrum disorder, population circumcision rates were compared to male population autism prevalence rates for two time periods. Male autism prevalence rates calculated from studies reported by the Center for Disease Control in the Summary of Autism/ASD Prevalence Studies (described above) were compared to male circumcision rates from studies identified by a systematic search of the peer reviewed medical literature using the National Library of Medicine’s Pub Med database. An additional U.S. state level analysis was done with available data (limited to the more recent time period) by comparing state and time period stratified male autism prevalence rates from the U.S. studies from the CDC Autism Prevalence Summary Table to newborn circumcision rates from the Health Care Utilization Project [46].

Circumcision rates

The circumcision rates were obtained by systematic search of the peer reviewed medical literature using the National Library of Medicine’s Pub Med database. A search of the English language literature on Pub Med was conducted using the terms circumcision and the different country names. The circumcision rates utilized the best identified information. If infant circumcision rates were available, they were utilized over national rates. If changing rates were presented, the rates for years closest to the study birth years were utilized. When a published paper was not available the rate was estimated. The estimation was calculated using the same methodology as the World Health Organization and the Circumcision Independent Reference and Commentary Service, calculated from the sum of the numbers of Jewish and Muslim males [47, 48]. Data for the percentage of Jews by country were obtained from the Jewish Virtual Library [49]. Data for the percentage of Muslims by country were obtained from a Pew Forum report [50]. While most Jewish and Muslim males are circumcised, true circumcision rates are unknown and circumcision rates based upon religion are only an approximation. Both the World Health Organization and the Circumcision Independent Reference and Commentary Service indicated that this would likely underestimate the true prevalence (see Additional file 3). Annual U.S. state level infant circumcision rates were available for eight years between 1997 and 2006 from the Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Thirteen states had complete data for this eight year period and an additional seventeen states had partial data [46, 51].

For the data analysis, the studies of autism prevalence were divided into two time periods. The first consisted of all prevalence studies in which all subjects were born before 1995 (35 country level studies). The assumption is that during this time period paracetamol would not generally have been administered during the circumcision procedure. The second, post-1995 cohort includes prevalence studies in which some subjects were born after 1994 (1995+), (20 country level studies) when circumcision pain was first recognized and treated. The assumption is that during this time period some portion of the cohort would have been administered paracetamol during the circumcision procedure. For countries with multiple studies in a time period, a summary prevalence was calculated using a weighted average based on study population size (Additional file 3). An additional U.S. state level analysis was conducted for the post-1995 cohort. Similarly, for states with multiple studies in a time period, a summary prevalence was calculated using a weighted average based on study population size. State level circumcision data were not available to conduct a pre-1995 analysis [Additional file 4]. Each of the data sets was checked for normality using standard graphical and statistical methods. Within the limits of these small datasets, the normality assumption was not seriously violated and so Pearson’s parametric correlation coefficient was used with an information weighted (1/variance) linear regression model.


Prenatal exposure

For the country-level analyses, synchronous data were available from 8 countries. A country’s average prenatal paracetamol consumption was found to be correlated with its autism/ASD prevalence (r = 0.80, Figure 1 and Additional file 5). The trend among the 8 countries indicates that a change of 10% in population prenatal paracetamol usage was associated with an increased autism population prevalence of 0.53/1000 persons (95% CI: 0.13 to 0.93) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Graph of country-level data on Autism/ASD prevalence and average prenatal paracetamol usage. The Autism/ASD prevalence and the prenatal paracetamol usage rates are both population weighted averages of all the respective studies for a country. (See Additional files 2 and 5).

Early life exposure

A strong correlation (r = 0.98) was found in the country-level data between circumcision and autism spectrum disorder prevalence rates for boys born after 1995 (when circumcision guidelines began recommending analgesics). The slope of this trend for the 9 countries with available data indicates that a change of 10% in the population circumcision rate was associated with an increase in autism/ASD prevalence of 2.01/1000 persons (95% CI: 1.68 to 2.34) (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Graph of country and U.S. state- level data on Autism/ASD and circumcision prevalence rates. All studies in which at least some cohort members were born after 1995. This graph includes country-level studies with the U.S. stratified to state-level studies for the post-1995 cohort (no overall U.S. data point). The assumption is that, due to changes in neonate prescribing practices in the mid-1990s, some cohort members in each study would likely be exposed to paracetamol at the time of circumcision. Autism rates are population weighted averages of all studies for a country or U.S. state. (See Additional files 1, 3, 4 and 5).

Data were available for 12 countries for boys born before 1995 (Figure 3), and the trend in the data was weaker; the correlation between circumcision prevalence and autism/ASD prevalence was still good (r = 0.89), but the slope of the trend was only a sixth of that for the later period for a 10% change in circumcision rate, there was an increase in autism/ASD prevalence of 0.35/1000 persons (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.47).

Figure 3

Graph of country-level data on Autism/ASD and circumcision prevalence rates. All studies in which all cohort members were born before 1995. The assumption is that all of the cohort members in each study would not likely be exposed to paracetamol at the time of circumcision. U.S. state level data was not available for this pre-1995 cohort. Autism rates are population weighted averages of all studies for a country. (See Additional files 1 and 3).

Across all country-level studies prior to the widespread use of paracetamol for circumcision (all born prior to 1995), the weighted average autism/ASD male to female prevalence ratio was 3.9 to 1. For the post 1995 cohort, this ratio increased to 5.6 to 1.

Available data allowed a parallel analysis of U.S. states post-1995, but not for the earlier period. The data for the 14 U.S. states with available data show a remarkably similar pattern to the 8 countries (this set of countries does not include the U.S. to avoid double counting) for the same time period (Figure 2, r = 0.95).


These ecological analyses identified positive correlations between autism/ASD prevalence and indicators of both prenatal and very early life paracetamol exposures. If these patterns are confirmed in formal epidemiologic studies, the use of paracetamol during pregnancy and at the time of circumcision may help to explain autism/ASD prevalence variations between the sexes, among countries, and within U.S. states and ethnic groups. The close to six-fold difference in rate of change in autism/ASD prevalence before and after the recognition of pain at the time of circumcision is suggestive of a possible effect caused by the shift to the use of paracetamol. The change in the overall time period average male to female autism/ASD prevalence ratio (weighted by study size) from 3.9 to 1 in the unexposed time period to 5.6 to 1 in the second time period with a probable paracetamol exposure may also be suggestive an effect from this exposure.


It is important to acknowledge that this analysis has numerous and significant limitations. First and foremost, correlation is not causation and as such no causal inference is intended. Homogeneity of exposure and prevalence assessment methodologies among the studies has been assumed, but each may be subject to misclassification, confounding and bias. The change in autism/ASD prevalence, circumcision prevalence and paracetamol usage rates over time may not have been adequately addressed. Circumcision rates are presented as a proxy for an early male neonatal exposure to paracetamol. However, this assumption is not without significant limitations. The timeline for the actual implementation of child pain management protocols and the utilization of paracetamol with circumcision is not known. Additionally, pain management guidelines suggest that paracetamol alone is not sufficient to manage circumcision pain so a nerve block or local anesthesia may also be administered, which may be confounding factors. In general, this type of ecologic study has significant limitations that severely limit causal inference. Ecologic bias or the failure of ecological associations to correspond to biologic effects at the individual level is a concern. It has been shown that the relations seen in country level data may poorly reflect the relationships that exist on an individual basis [52]. Despite these limitations, the consistent patterns reported here support the need to further investigate this potentially important hypothesis.

Prenatal exposure trends

Previous research has identified paracetamol usage trends that curiously coincide with the rise in prevalence and population demographics of autism/ASD. In the US Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects study paracetamol was the most commonly used medication amongst all subjects with usage higher during pregnancy than before pregnancy. In the early 1980’s about 42% of women used paracetamol during the first trimester of pregnancy. The rate climbed to over 65% in the early 1990’s, where it has essentially remained through 2004 [18]. Maternal viral infection requiring hospitalization during the first trimester and maternal bacterial infection in the second trimester have been associated with diagnosis of ASD in the offspring (Hazard ratios 2.98 (95% CI: 1.29 to7.15) and 1.42 (95% CI: 1.08 to1.87), respectively) [53]. In a recent study, maternal self-reported influenza was associated with a twofold increased risk of infantile autism and a febrile episode lasting more than seven days was associated with a threefold increased risk [54]. Each of these maternal infections or a prolonged febrile episode would likely increase the exposure to paracetamol.

In the U.S., usage of paracetamol by pregnant women mirrors the population demographics of women whose children develop autism spectrum disorder, by race, age and education [18, 55, 56]. The population demographics for mothers who circumcise their children are also very similar, with rates increasing with socio-economic status and insurance coverage rates [5759]. Studies have shown that a parent’s own usage rates of paracetamol and other medications correlate with what they give to their children, so a similar demographic usage pattern would be expected for childhood exposure [60, 61]. This synchronous U.S. pattern may be suggestive of an additive nature of both prenatal and early life exposure to paracetamol and a relationship to autism/ASD (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Comparison of U.S. demographic characteristics. Comparison of U.S. autism prevalence rates, circumcision rate and prenatal paracetamol usage rates by maternal race, education level and age.

Early life exposure trends

Paracetamol is the most common drug administered to US children and the predominant analgesic/antipyretic drug among children up to 24 months of age [62]. Paracetamol is suggested for pain management following vaccinations. In 1983 the average U.S. child received 8 immunizations before age 2. In 2011, the average was 25, a 313% increase [63, 64]. From the perspective of the current hypothesis, these represent increased opportunities for paracetamol exposure in pain management (although administering several vaccines at once means analgesia may not increase proportionally).

A recent study representing one-fifth of all pediatric hospital admissions in the U.S., identified paracetamol as the most common drug administered to children over one year of age and the second most common drug administered for those under one year; more than 40% of hospital stays in both groups include paracetamol [65]. Hospitalization of children and neonates for infection as well as non-infectious disease have been associated with increased risk of ASD in a large Danish cohort (hazard ratios 1.38 (95% CI: 1.31 to 1.43) and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.68 to 1.86), respectively) [66].

Biologic plausibility

Paracetamol has four important metabolic pathways (Figure 5). The two main pathways are glucuronidation and sulfation. Paracetamol is mainly metabolized in the liver via conjugation with glucuronide and sulfate and then excreted. Both these metabolic routes yield inactive, non-toxic final products. Glucuronidation is the primary metabolic pathway in adults and sulfation is the primary pathway for paracetamol metabolism until age 10–12 years [67]. Neonates, in general, have lower capacity to metabolize drugs due to the underdevelopment of the glucuronidation pathway and inefficiency and immaturity in renal function [68]. Three studies of neonates with postnatal age ranging from 1–3 days obtained a glucuronidation/sulfation (G/S) ratio between 0.12 and 0.28 [6971]. This is in contrast to 11 month old children with a significantly higher G/S ratio of about 0.7 and adults with a G/S ratio approaching 2.0 [71, 72]. Low birth weight and bilirubinemia have also been found to reduce glucuronidation capacity, both of which have been associated with autism [7376]. Autistic children have been shown to have abnormal sulfate capacity and have been shown to have a specific inability to sulfate paracetamol [8, 77, 78]. Parents of autistic children have also been shown to have abnormal transsulfuration metabolism [79]. When the capacity to metabolize through the primary pathways is depleted or saturated, the fraction of the dose converted to reactive metabolites increases and the secondary metabolic pathways become increasingly involved [80].

Figure 5

Metabolic pathway model for paracetamol.

One of the two secondary pathways is cytochrome P-450 (CYP P-450) mediated, forming a highly reactive metabolite, n-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI) which reacts with cellular glutathione (GSH) to form a non-toxic conjugate, which is subsequently excreted. Once GSH is exhausted, NAPQI binds to cellular proteins, including mitochondrial proteins reducing the ability to detoxify, which can lead to oxidative stress, immune system activation, hepatocellular death, nephropathy and asthma [10, 19, 81, 82]. It has been shown that paracetamol treatment induces greater glutathione depletion in male mice [11, 83]. Alterations in GSH homeostasis have been a consistent observation among autistic children and their mothers [8487]. Also, decreased glutathione levels have been associated with preeclampsia [88]. In the Danish Birth Cohort, women who used paracetamol during the third trimester of pregnancy had increased risk of preeclampsia RR = 1.40 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.58) [89]. In two studies, maternal preeclampsia has been associated with increased risk of having a child with ASD (OR = 1.69 (p = .0005) and RR = 1.64 (95% CI: 1.08 to 2.49), respectively) [90, 91]. Additionally, during pregnancy a women’s sulfation capacity is reduced which may precipitate activation of immune responses, via this P-450 pathway [92, 93]. The activation of immune response and pro- inflammatory cytokine interleukin signaling has recently been detected even at therapeutic doses of paracetamol [10, 94]. Converging evidence highlights the important role of many of the same cytokines in mediating maternal immune activation effects on the neurodevelopment of autistic offspring [95105].

A fourth metabolic pathway, accounting for about 6% of paracetamol metabolism, has been identified that is believed to be related to the mechanism of analgesic action [106]. This pathway involves deacetylation of paracetamol in the liver producing p-aminophenol that conjugates with arachidonic acid in the brain and in the spinal cord [107, 108]. P-aminophenol is recognized to be involved in paracetamol nephrotoxicity [81, 109]. More recently, P-aminophenol has been shown to produce a significant loss in mouse cortical neuron viability at therapeutic concentrations [12]. This suggests another possible pathway for a neurotoxic effect of paracetamol when the principle metabolic routes are exhausted.

In summary, there are several lines of evidence that suggest that prenatal and or early life paracetamol exposure may adversely affect neurodevelopment. Prenatal exposure may trigger maternal immune activation with possible effects on fetal brain development. In early life, maturational compromises to the glucuronidation pathway at the time of the circumcision related exposure, in combination with the compromises to the sulfation pathway that typify autistic children, may lead to utilization of the suboptimal secondary metabolic routes with the potential for adverse neurological effects in susceptible individuals [110112].


In this hypothesis generating exploratory analysis, several lines of evidence support the plausibility of a relationship between prenatal and early life exposure to paracetamol and autism spectrum disorder. It is proposed that the use of paracetamol in pregnancy and/or early childhood may alter immune processes increasing the risk of autism spectrum disorder in susceptible individuals. In an ecologic analysis, with all the previously discussed limitations, a correlation was found between maternal prenatal use of paracetamol and autism spectrum disorder. Additionally, a correlation was identified for the first time between neonatal circumcision with a probable paracetamol exposure and autism spectrum disorder. These relationships along with the synchronous rise in use of paracetamol and ASD, the convergence of the potential biologic mechanisms and the identification of plausible causes of increased male susceptibility provide consistent evidence of an association. Large scale population based epidemiologic studies are needed to confirm or disprove this association.



Autism Spectrum Disorder


Center for Disease Control,, Circumcision Independent Reference and Commentary Service






Glutathione, AM404, N-arachidonoylphenolamine






  1. 1.

    Angley M, Young R, Ellis D, Chan W, McKinnon R: Children and autism–Part 1– recognition and pharmacological management. Aust Fam Physician. 2007, 36: 741-744.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Johnson CP, Myers SM: American academy of pediatrics council on children with disabilities. Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics. 2007, 120: 1183-1215. 10.1542/peds.2007-2361.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rossignol DA, Frye REA: Review of research trends in physiological abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders: immune dysregulation, inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and environmental toxicant exposures. Mol Psychiatry. 2011, 17: 389-401.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ronald A, Hoekstra RA: Autism spectrum disorders and autistic traits: a decade of new twin studies. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2011, 156B: 255-274.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hallmayer J, Cleveland S, Torres A, Phillips J, Cohen B, Torigoe T, Miller J, Fedele A, Collins J, Smith K, Lotspeich L, Croen LA, Ozonoff S, Lajonchere C, Grether JK, Risch N: Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011, 68: 1095-1102. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Torres AR: Is fever suppression involved in the etiology of autism and neurodevelopmental disorders?. BMC Pediatr. 2003, 3: 9-10.1186/1471-2431-3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Becker KG, Schultz ST: Similarities in features of autism and asthma and a possible link to acetaminophen use. Medical Hypotheses. 2010, 74: 7-11. 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.08.033.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Alberti A, Pirrone P, Elia M, Waring RH, Romano C: Sulphation deficit in “low-functioning”autistic children: a pilot study. Biol Psychiatry. 1999, 46: 420-424. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00337-0.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Antoine DJ, Jenkins RE, Dear JW, Williams DP, McGill MR, Sharpe MR, Craig DG, Simpson KJ, Jaeschke H, Park BK: Molecular forms of HMGB1 and Keratin-18 as mechanistic biomarkers for mode of cell death and prognosis during clinical acetaminophen hepatotoxicity. J Hepatol. 2012, 56: 1070-1079. 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.019.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jetten MJ, Gaj S, Ruiz-Aracama A, de Kok TM, van Delft JH, Lommen A, van Someren EP, Jennen DG, Claessen SM, Peijnenburg AA, Stierum RH, Kleinjans JC: Omics analysis of low dose acetaminophen intake demonstrates novel response pathways in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012, 259: 320-328. 10.1016/j.taap.2012.01.009.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Posadas I, Santos P, Blanco A, Muñoz-Fernández M, Ceña V: Acetaminophen induces apoptosis in rat cortical neurons. PLoS One. 2010, 5: 15360-10.1371/journal.pone.0015360.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schultz S, Desilva M, Gu TT, Qiang M, Whang K: Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. Effects of the analgesic acetaminophen (paracetamol) and its para-aminophenol metabolite on viability of mouse-cultured cortical neurons. 2011, Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fatemi SH, Earle JA, McMenomy T: Hippocampal CA4 Reelin-positive neurons. Mol Psychiatry. 2000, 5: 571-10.1038/

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Araghi-Niknam M, Fatemi SH: Levels of Bcl-2 and P53 are altered in superior frontal and cerebellar cortices of autistic subjects. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003, 23: 945-952.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sheikh AM, Li X, Wen G, Tauqeer Z, Brown WT, Malik M: Cathepsin D and apoptosis related proteins are elevated in the brain of autistic subjects. Neuroscience. 2010, 165: 363-370. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.035.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Malik M, Sheikh AM, Wen G, Spivack W, Brown WT, Li X: Expression of inflammatory cytokines, Bcl2 and cathepsin D are altered in lymphoblasts of autistic subjects. Immunobiology. 2011, 216: 80-85. 10.1016/j.imbio.2010.03.001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sullivan JE, Farrar HC: Fever and antipyretic use in children. Section on clinical pharmacology and therapeutics; committee on drugs. Pediatrics. 2011, 127: 580-587. 10.1542/peds.2010-3852.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Werler MM, Mitchell AA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Honein MA: Use of over-the-counter medications during pregnancy. The national birth defects prevention study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 193: 771-777. 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.100.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Farquhar H, Stewart A, Mitchell E: The role of paracetamol in the pathogenesis of asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010, 40: 32-41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Food and Drug Administration - Acetaminophen Background and Overview. 2009,,

  21. 21.

    Tylenol sales.,

  22. 22.

    Theoharides TC, Kempuraj D, Redwood L: Autism an emerging ‘neuroimmune disorder’ in search of therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009, 10: 2127-2143. 10.1517/14656560903107789.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Baio Wingate M, Mulvihill B, Kirby RS, Pettygrove S, Cunniff C, Meaney F, Schulz E, Miller L, Robinson C, Quintana G, Kaiser MY, Lee LC, Landa R, Newschaffer C, Constantino J, Fitzgerald R, Zahorodny W, Daniels J, Giarelli E, Pinto-Martin J, Levy SE, Nicholas J, Charles J, Zimmerman J, Maenner MJ: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders–autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 14 sites, united states, 2008. Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network surveillance year 2008 principal investigators. Centers for disease control and prevention. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012, 61: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Newschaffer CJ, Fallin D, Lee NL: Heritable and nonheritable risk factors for autism spectrum disorders. Epidemiol Rev. 2002, 24: 137-153. 10.1093/epirev/mxf010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kolevzon A, Gross R, Reichenberg A: Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for autism: a review and integration of findings. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161: 326-333. 10.1001/archpedi.161.4.326.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schechter NL: From the ouchless place to comfort central: the evolution of a concept. Pediatrics. 2008, 122: S154-S160. 10.1542/peds.2008-1055h.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mather L, Mackie J: The incidence of postoperative pain in children. Pain. 1983, 15: 271-282. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90062-3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Anand KJ, Sippell WG, Aynsley-Green A: Randomised trial of fentanyl anaesthesia in preterm babies undergoing surgery: effects on the stress response. Lancet. 1987, 1: 62-66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Fletcher AB: Pain in the neonate. N Engl J Med. 1987, 317: 1347-1348. 10.1056/NEJM198711193172110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    AHCPR -Agency for Health Care Policy and Research: Acute pain management in infants, children and adolescents: operative and medical procedures. Am Fam Physician. 1992, 46: 469-479.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Anand KJ: Consensus statement for the prevention and management of pain in the newborn. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001, 155: 173-180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    American Academy of Pediatrics: Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health: American pain society, task force on pain in infants children and adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: 793-797.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    WHO: Normative Guidelines for Pain Management. 2007,,

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liu Z, Dow WH, Norton EC: Effect of drive-through delivery laws on postpartum length of stay and hospital charges. J Health Econ. 2004, 23: 129-155. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.07.005.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Howard CR, Howard FM, Weitzman ML: Acetaminophen analgesia in neonatal circumcision: the effect on pain. Pediatrics. 1994, 93: 641-646.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision policy statement task force on circumcision. Pediatrics. 1999, 103: 686-693.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Geyer J, Ellsbury D, Kleiber C, Litwiller D, Hinton A, Yankowitz J: An evidence-based multidisciplinary protocol for neonatal circumcision pain management. JOGNN. 2002, 31: 403-410. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00062.x.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Macke JK: Analgesia for circumcision: effects on newborn behavior and mother/infant interaction. JOGNN. 2001, 30: 507-514. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01570.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E: Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. 2005, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Center for Disease Control: Autism Prevalence Studies.,

  41. 41.

    Kim YS, Leventhal BL, Koh YJ, Fombonne E, Laska E, Lim EC, Cheon KA, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee H, Song DH, Grinker RR: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a total population sample. Am J Psychiatry. 2011, 168: 904-912. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10101532.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Al-Farsi YM, Al-Sharbati MM, Al-Farsi OA, Al-Shafaee MS, Brooks DR, Waly MI: Brief report: prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders in the sultanate of Oman. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 821-825. 10.1007/s10803-010-1094-8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gurney JG, Fritz MS, Ness KK, Sievers P, Newschaffer CJ, Shapiro EG: Analysis of prevalence trends of autism spectrum disorder in Minnesota. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003, 157: 622-627. 10.1001/archpedi.157.7.622.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Feldkamp ML, Meyer RE, Krikov S, Botto LD: Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and risk of birth defects: findings from the national birth defects prevention study. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 115: 109-115. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c52616.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gunawardana L, Zammit S, Lewis G, Gunnell D, Hollis C, Wolke D, Harrison G: Examining the association between maternal analgesic use during pregnancy and risk of psychotic symptoms during adolescence. Schizophr Res. 2011, 126: 220-225. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.10.021.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US).,

  47. 47.

    Circumcision Independent Reference and Commentary Service.,

  48. 48.

    WHO : Library: Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability.,

  49. 49.

    Jewish Virtual Library. The Jewish Population of the World.,

  50. 50.

    Pew Forum. Mapping the Global Muslim Population.,

  51. 51.

    Incidence of Circumcision by State.,

  52. 52.

    Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash T: Modern Epidemiology. Edited by: Seigafuse S. 2008, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 511-531. 3

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Atladottir H, Thorsen P, Ostergaard L, Schendel D, Lemcke S, Abdallah M, Parner E: Maternal infection requiring hospitalization during pregnancy and autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010, 40: 1423-1430. 10.1007/s10803-010-1006-y.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Atladóttir HÓ, Henriksen TB, Schendel DE, Parner ET: Autism after infection, febrile episodes, and antibiotic use during pregnancy: an exploratory study. Pediatrics. 2012, 2012: e1447-e1454. Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2010, 40:1423–1430

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kogan MD, Blumberg SJ, Schieve LA, Boyle CA, Perrin JM, Ghandour RM, Singh GK, Strickland BB, Trevathan E, van Dyck PC: Prevalence of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder among children in the US, 2007. Pediatrics. 2009, 124: 1395-1403. 10.1542/peds.2009-1522.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sandin S, Hultman CM, Kolevzon A, Gross R, Maccabe JH, Reichenberg A: Advancing maternal age is associated with increasing risk for autism: a review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012, 51: 477-486. 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.02.018.

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nelson CP, Dunn R, Wan J, Wei JT: The increasing incidence of newborn circumcision: data from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol. 2005, 173: 978-981. 10.1097/01.ju.0000145758.80937.7d.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cheng D, Hurt L, Horon IL: Neonatal circumcision in Maryland: a comparison of hospital discharge and maternal postpartum survey data. J Pediatr Urol. 2008, 4: 448-451. 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.06.007.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Xu F, Markowitz LE, Sternberg MR, Aral SO: Prevalence of circumcision and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in men in the United States: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999–2004. Sex Transm Dis. 2007, 34: 479-484.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Rasmussen F, Smedby B: Physician visits and prescribed drugs among young children and their mothers. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1987, 5: 225-231. 10.3109/02813438709018100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Jensen JF, Tønnesen LL, Söderström M, Thorsen H, Siersma V: Paracetamol for feverish children: parental motives and experiences. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010, 28: 115-120. 10.3109/02813432.2010.487346.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Vernacchio L, Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Mitchell AA: Medication use among children <12 years of age in the United States: results from the Slone Survey. Pediatrics. 2009, 124: 446-454. 10.1542/peds.2008-2869.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Center for Disease Control. 1983, 1983 vaccine schedule, vaccine schedule

  64. 64.

    Center for Disease Control. 2011, vaccine schedule 2011 vaccine schedule

  65. 65.

    Feudtner C, Dai D, Hexem KR, Luan X, Metjian TA: Prevalence of polypharmacy exposure among hospitalized children in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012, 166: 9-16. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.161.

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Atladóttir HO, Thorsen P, Schendel DE, Østergaard L, Lemcke S, Parner ET: Association of hospitalization for infection in childhood with diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders: a Danish cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010, 164: 470-477. 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.9.

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Schultz ST: Can autism be triggered by acetaminophen activation of the endocannabinoid system?. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2010, 70: 227-231.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Allegaert K, de Hoon J, Verbesselt R, Vanhole C, Devlieger H, Tibboel D: Intra- and interindividual variability of glucuronidation of paracetamol during repeated administration of propacetamol in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2005, 94: 1273-1279.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Van Lingen RA, Deinum JT, Quak JM, Kuizenga AJ, van Dam JG, van Dam JG, Anand KJ, Tibboel D, Okken A: Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of rectally administered paracetamol in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1999, 80: F59-F63. 10.1136/fn.80.1.F59.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Levy G, Khanna NN, Soda DM, Tsuzuki O, Stern L: Pharmacokinetics of acetaminophen in the human neonate: formation of acetaminophen glucuronide and sulfate in relation to plasma bilirubin concentration and D-glucaric acid excretion. Pediatrics. 1975, 55: 818-825.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Miller RP, Roberts RJ, Fischer LJ: Acetaminophen elimination kinetics in neonates, children and adults. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976, 19: 284-294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Van der Marel CD, Anderson BJ, Van Lingen RA, Holford NH, Pluim MA, Jansman FG, van den Anker JN, Tibboel D: Paracetamol and metabolite pharmacokinetics in infants. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 59: 243-251. 10.1007/s00228-003-0608-0.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Allegaert K, van den Anker J: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous acetaminophen in neonates. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011, 4: 713-718. 10.1586/ecp.11.50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Allegaert K, Palmer GM, Anderson BJ: The pharmacokinetics of intravenous paracetamol in neonates: size matters most. Arch Dis Child. 2011, 96: 575-580. 10.1136/adc.2010.204552.

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Gardener H, Spiegelman D, Buka SL: Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for autism: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2011, 128: 344-355. 10.1542/peds.2010-1036.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Amin SB, Smith T, Wang H: Is neonatal jaundice associated with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 1455-1463. 10.1007/s10803-010-1169-6.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Kern JK, Ramsden DB, Grannemann BD, Garver CR: Abnormal Sulfation Chemistry in Autism. Trends in Autism Research. Edited by: Ryaskin OT. 2004, New York: Nova Biomedical Books, 211-

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Yap IK, Angley M, Veselkov KA, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Nicholson JK: Urinary metabolic phenotyping differentiates children with autism from their unaffected siblings and age-matched controls. J Proteome Res. 2010, 9: 2996-3004. 10.1021/pr901188e.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    James SJ, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Hubanks A, Rose S, Gaylor DW: Abnormal transmethylation/transsulfuration metabolism and DNA hypomethylation among parents of children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008, 38: 1966-1975. 10.1007/s10803-008-0591-5.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zhao L, Pickering G: APAP metabolism and genetic differences. Drug Metab Rev. 2011, 43: 41-52. 10.3109/03602532.2010.527984.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Louis J, Curtis D, John B: Toxic Responses of the Liver. Casarett and Doull’s Essentials of Toxicology- The Basic Science of Poisons. 7th. Edited by: Klaassen CD. 2008, New York: McGraw-Hill, 569-571.

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Dimova S, Hoet PHM, Dinsdale D, Newery B: Acetaminophen decreases intercellular glutathione levels and modulate cytokine production in human alveolar macrophages and type II pneumocytes in vitro. Int J Bio Chem Cell Biol. 2004, 37: 1727-1737.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    McConnachie LA, Mohar I, Hudson FN, Ware CB, Ladiges WC, Fernandez C, Chatterton-Kirchmeier S, White CC, Pierce RH, Kavanagh TJ: Glutamate cysteine ligase modifier subunit deficiency and gender as determinants of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Toxicol Sci. 2007, 99: 628-636. 10.1093/toxsci/kfm165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Williams TA, Mars AE, Buyske SG, Stenroos ES, Wang R, Wang R, Factura-Santiago MF, Lambert GH, Johnson WG: Risk of autistic disorder in affected offspring of mothers with a glutathione S-transferase P1 haplotype. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007, 161: 356-361.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Ballatori N, Krance SM, Notenboom S, Shi S, Tieu K, Hammond CL: Glutathione dysregulation and the etiology and progression of human diseases. Biol Chem. 2009, 390: 191-214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Bowers K, Li Q, Bressler J, Avramopoulos D, Newschaffer C, Fallin MD: Glutathione pathway gene variation and risk of autism spectrum disorders. J Neurodev Disord. 2011, 3: 132-143. 10.1007/s11689-011-9077-4.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Maher P: Methylglyoxal, advanced glycation end products and autism: is there a connection?. Med Hypotheses. 2012, 78: 548-552. 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.01.032.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Oken E, Ning Y, Rifas-Shiman SL, Rich-Edwards JW, Olsen SF, Gillman MW: Diet during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia or gestational hypertension. Ann Epidemiol. 2007, 17: 663-668. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.003.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Rebordosa C, Zelop CM, Kogevinas M, Sørensen HT, Olsen J: Use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia, hypertensive and vascular disorders: a birth cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010, 23: 371-378. 10.3109/14767050903334877.

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Mann JR, McDermott S, Bao H, Hardin J, Gregg A: Pre-eclampsia, birth weight, and autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010, 40: 548-554. 10.1007/s10803-009-0903-4.

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Buchmayer S, Johansson S, Johansson A, Hultman CM, Sparén P, Cnattingius S: Can association between preterm birth and autism be explained by maternal or neonatal morbidity?. Pediatrics. 2009, 124: e817-e825. 10.1542/peds.2008-3582.

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Davies MH, Ngong JM, Yucesoy M, Acharya SK, Mills CO, Weaver JB, Waring RH, Elias E: The adverse influence of pregnancy upon sulphation: a clue to the pathogenesis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?. J Hepatol. 1994, 21: 1127-1134. 10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80630-0.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lee JK, Abe K, Bridges AS, Patel NJ, Raub TJ, Pollack GM, Brouwer KL: Sex-dependent disposition of acetaminophen sulfate and glucuronide in the in situ perfused mouse liver. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009, 37: 1916-1921. 10.1124/dmd.109.026815.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wright G, Shawcross D, Olde Damink SW, Jalan R: Brain cytokine flux in acute liver failure and its relationship with intracranial hypertension. Metab Brain Dis. 2007, 22: 375-388. 10.1007/s11011-007-9071-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Deverman BE, Patterson PH: Cytokines and CNS development. Neuron. 2009, 64: 61-78. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.002. Review

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Abdallah MW, Larsen N, Grove J, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Thorsen P, Mortensen EL, Hougaard DM: Amniotic fluid inflammatory cytokines: potential markers of immunologic dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011, Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Goines PE, Croen LA, Braunschweig D, Yoshida CK, Grether J, Hansen R, Kharrazi M, Ashwood P, Van de Water J: Increased midgestational IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-5 in women bearing a child with autism: a case–control study. Mol Autism. 2011, 2: 13-10.1186/2040-2392-2-13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Jyonouchi H, Sun S, Le H: Proinflammatory and regulatory cytokine production associated with innate and adaptive immune responses in children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental regression. J Neuroimmunol. 2001, 120: 170-179. 10.1016/S0165-5728(01)00421-0.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA: Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. Ann Neurol. 2005, 57: 67-81. 10.1002/ana.20315. Erratum in: Ann Neurol 2005, 57:304

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Li X, Chauhan A, Sheikh AM, Patil S, Chauhan V, Li XM, Ji L, Brown T, Malik M: Elevated immune response in the brain of autistic patients. J Neuroimmunol. 2009, 207: 111-116. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.12.002.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Cai Z, Pan ZL, Pang Y, Evans OB, Rhodes PG: Cytokine induction in fetal rat brains and brain injury in neonatal rats after maternal lipopolysaccharide administration. Pediatr Res. 2000, 47: 64-72. 10.1203/00006450-200001000-00013.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Bell MJ, Hallenbeck JM: Effects of intrauterine inflammation on developing rat brain. J Neurosci Res. 2002, 70: 570-579. 10.1002/jnr.10423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Shi L, Fatemi SH, Sidwell RW, Patterson PH: Maternal influenza infection causes marked behavioral and pharmacological changes in the offspring. J Neurosci. 2003, 23: 297-302.

    Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Patterson PH: Immune involvement in schizophrenia and autism: etiology, pathology and animal models. Behav Brain Res. 2009, 204: 313-321. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.016.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Shi L, Tu N, Patterson PH: Maternal influenza infection is likely to alter fetal brain development indirectly: the virus is not detected in the fetus. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005, 23: 299-305. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.05.005.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Högestätt ED, Jönsson BA, Ermund A, Andersson DA, Björk H, Alexander JP, Cravatt BF, Basbaum AI, Zygmunt PM: Conversion of acetaminophen to the bioactive N-acylphenolamine AM404 via fatty acid amide hydrolase-dependent arachidonic acid conjugation in the nervous system. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 31405-31412. 10.1074/jbc.M501489200.

    Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Mallet C, Daulhac L, Bonnefont J, Ledent C, Etienne M, Chapuy E, Libert F, Eschalier A: Endocannabinoid and serotonergic systems are needed for acetaminophen-induced analgesia. Pain. 2008, 139: 190-200. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.03.030.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Bertolini A, Ferrari A, Ottani A, Guerzoni S, Tacchi R, Leone S: Paracetamol: new vistas of an old drug. CNS Drug Rev. 2006, 12: 250-275. 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2006.00250.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Gemborys MW, Mudge GH: Formation and disposition of the minor metabolites of acetaminophen in the hamster. Drug Metab Dispos. 1981, 9: 340-351.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Van den Anker JN: Pharmacokinetics and renal function in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1996, 85: 1393-1399. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb13942.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    McCarver DG, Hines RN: The ontogeny of human drug metabolizing enzymes: phase II conjugation enzymes and regulatory mechanisms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002, 300: 361-366. 10.1124/jpet.300.2.361.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowey DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE: Developmental pharmacology–drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 1157-1167. 10.1056/NEJMra035092.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Parner ET, Thorsen P, Dixon G, de Klerk N, Leonard H, Nassar N, Bourke J, Bower C, Glasson EJ: A comparison of autism prevalence trends in Denmark and Western Australia. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 1601-1608. 10.1007/s10803-011-1186-0.

    Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Williams E, Thomas K, Sidebotham H, Emond A: Prevalence and characteristics of autistic spectrum disorders in the ALSPAC cohort. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008, 50: 672-677. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03042.x.

    Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Icasiano F, Hewson P, Machet P, Cooper C, Marshall A: Childhood autism spectrum disorder in the Barwon region: a community based study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004, 40: 696-701. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00513.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ouellette-Kuntz H, Coo H, Lloyd JE, Kasmara L, Holden JJ: Trends in special education code assignment for autism: implications for prevalence estimates. J Autism Dev Disord. 2007, 37: 1941-1948. 10.1007/s10803-006-0326-4.

    Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Lauritsen MB, Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB: The incidence and prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders: a Danish population-based study. Psychol Med. 2004, 34: 1339-1346. 10.1017/S0033291704002387.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Chakrabarti S, Fombonne E: Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children. JAMA. 2001, 285: 3093-3099. 10.1001/jama.285.24.3093.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Baron-Cohen S, Scott FJ, Allison C, Williams J, Bolton P, Matthews FE, Brayne C: Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. Br J Psychiatry. 2009, 194: 500-509. 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059345. Erratum in: Br J Psychiatry: 195, 182

    Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Lingam R, Simmons A, Andrews N, Miller E, Stowe J, Taylor B: Prevalence of autism and parentally reported triggers in a north east London population. Arch Dis Child. 2003, 88: 666-670. 10.1136/adc.88.8.666.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Baird G, Charman T, Baron-Cohen S, Cox A, Swettenham J, Wheelwright S, Drew A: A screening instrument for autism at 18 months of age: a 6-year follow-up study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000, 39: 694-702. 10.1097/00004583-200006000-00007.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wong VC, Hui SL: Epidemiological study of autism spectrum disorder in China. J Child Neurol. 2008, 23: 67-72.

    Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Chien IC, Lin CH, Chou YJ, Chou P: Prevalence and incidence of autism spectrum disorders among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan from 1996 to 2005. J Child Neurol. 2011, 26: 830-834. 10.1177/0883073810393964.

    Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Rice C, Nicholas J, Baio J, Pettygrove S, Lee LC, Van Naarden Braun K, Doernberg N, Cunniff C, Newschaffer C, Meaney FJ, Charles J, Washington A, King L, Kolotos M, Mancilla K, Mervis CA, Carpenter L, Yeargin-Allsopp M: Changes in autism spectrum disorder prevalence in 4 areas of the United States. Disabil Health J. 2010, 3: 186-201. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.10.008.

    Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Pinborough-Zimmerman J, Bakian AV, Fombonne E, Bilder D, Taylor J, McMahon WM: Changes in the administrative prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: contribution of special education and health from 2002–2008. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 42: 521-530.

    Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Windham GC, Anderson MC, Croen LA, Smith KS, Collins J, Grether JK: Birth prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in the San Francisco Bay area by demographic and ascertainment source characteristics. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011, 41: 1362-1372. 10.1007/s10803-010-1160-2.

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Bertrand J, Mars A, Boyle C, Bove F, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Decoufle P: Prevalence of autism in a United States population: the Brick Township, New Jersey, investigation. Pediatrics. 2001, 108: 1155-1161. 10.1542/peds.108.5.1155.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Mulvihill B, Wingate M, Kirby RS, Pettygrove S, Cunniff C, Meaney FJ, Miller L, Robinson C, Quintana G, Kaiser MY, Lee LC, Landa R, Newschaffer C, Constantino J, Fitzgerald R, Daniels J, Giarelli E, Pinto-Martin J, Levy SE, Charles J, Nicholas J, Durkin M, Rice C, Baio J, Van Naarden BK, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Hepburn M, Garner N, Mancilla KC, Ratchford A: CDC ADDM -Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2006 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, United States, 200658:1–20. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009, 58: 1-20. Erratum in: MMWR Surveill Summ 59:956

    Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Montiel-Nava C, Peña JA: Epidemiological findings of pervasive developmental disorders in a Venezuelan study. Autism. 2008, 12: 191-202. 10.1177/1362361307086663.

    Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Bryson SE, Clark BS, Smith IM: First report of a Canadian epidemiological study of autistic syndromes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1988, 29: 433-445. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1988.tb00735.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Fombonne E, Zakarian R, Bennett A, Meng L, McLean-Heywood D: Pervasive developmental disorders in Montreal, Quebec, Canada: prevalence and links with immunizations. Pediatrics. 2006, 118: e139-150. 10.1542/peds.2005-2993.

    Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Kočovská E, Biskupstø R, Carina Gillberg I, Ellefsen A, Kampmann H, Stórá T, Billstedt E, Gillberg C: The rising prevalence of autism: a prospective longitudinal study in the faroe islands. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012, 42: 1959-66. 10.1007/s10803-012-1444-9.

    Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Wing L, Gould J: Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: epidemiology and classification. J Autism Dev Disord. 1979, 9: 11-29. 10.1007/BF01531288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Baird G, Simonoff E, Pickles A, Chandler S, Loucas T, Meldrum D, Charman T: Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet. 2006, 368: 210-215. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7.

    Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Fombonne E: Is there an epidemic of autism?. Pediatrics. 2001, 107: 411-412. 10.1542/peds.107.2.411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Powell JE, Edwards A, Edwards M, Pandit BS, Sungum-Paliwal SR, Whitehouse W: Changes in the incidence of childhood autism and other autistic spectrum disorders in preschool children from two areas of the West Midlands, UK. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000, 42: 624-628. 10.1017/S001216220000116X.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Webb EV, Lobo S, Hervas A, Scourfield J, Fraser WI: The changing prevalence of autistic disorder in a Welsh health district. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997, 39: 150-152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Kielinen M, Linna SL, Moilanen I: Autism in Northern Finland. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000, 9: 162-167. 10.1007/s007870070039.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Cialdella P, Mamelle N: An epidemiological study of infantile autism in a French department (Rhône): a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1989, 30: 165-175. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00775.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Fombonne E, Du Mazaubrun C, Cans C, Grandjean H: Autism and associated medical disorders in a French epidemiological survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997, 36: 1561-1569.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Fombonne E, du Mazaubrun C: Prevalence of infantile autism in four French regions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992, 27: 203-210. 10.1007/BF00789007.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Steinhausen HC, Göbel D, Breinlinger M, Wohlleben BJ: A community survey of infantile autism. Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1986, 25: 186-189. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60225-9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Magnússon P, Saemundsen E: Prevalence of autism in Iceland. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001, 31: 153-163. 10.1023/A:1010795014548.

    Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    McCarthy P, Fitzgerald M, Smith MA: Prevalence of childhood autism in Ireland. Ir Med J. 1984, 77: 129-130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Sugiyama T, Abe T: The prevalence of autism in Nagoya, Japan: a total population study. J Autism Dev Disord. 1989, 19: 87-96. 10.1007/BF02212720.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Matsuishi T, Shiotsuki Y, Yoshimura K, Shoji H, Imuta F, Yamashita F: High prevalence of infantile autism in Kurume City, Japan. J Child Neurol. 1987, 2: 268-271. 10.1177/088307388700200406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Tanoue Y, Oda S, Asano F, Kawashima K: Epidemiology of infantile autism in southern Ibaraki, Japan: differences in prevalence in birth cohorts. J Autism Dev Disord. 1988, 18: 155-166. 10.1007/BF02211943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Ishii T, Takahashi O: The epidemiology of autistic children in Toyota, Japan: Prevalence. Jpn J Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1983, 24: 311-321.

    Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Hoshino Y, Kumashiro H, Yashima Y, Tachibana R, Watanabe M: The epidemiological study of autism in Fukushima-ken. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1982, 36: 115-124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Honda H, Shimizu Y, Misumi K, Niimi M, Ohashi Y: Cumulative incidence and prevalence of childhood autism in children in Japan. Br J Psychiatry. 1996, 169: 228-235. 10.1192/bjp.169.2.228.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Sponheim E, Skjeldal O: Autism and related disorders: epidemiological findings in a Norwegian study using ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. J Autism Dev Disord. 1998, 28: 217-227. 10.1023/A:1026017405150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Gillberg C, Steffenburg S, Schaumann H: Is autism more common now than ten years ago?. Br J Psychiatry. 1991, 158: 403-409. 10.1192/bjp.158.3.403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Steffenburg S, Gillberg C: Autism and autistic-like conditions in Swedish rural and urban areas: a population study. Br J Psychiatry. 1986, 149: 81-87. 10.1192/bjp.149.1.81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Gillberg CJ: Infantile autism and other childhood psychoses in a Swedish urban region. Epidemiological aspects. Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1984, 25: 35-43. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1984.tb01717.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Bohman M, Bohman I, Björck P, Sjöholm E: Childhood psychosis in a Northern Swedish county: some preliminary findings from an epidemiological survey. Epidemiological approaches in child psychiatry II. Edited by: Schmidt MH, Remschmidt H. 1983, New York: Thieme-Stratton, 163-173.

    Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Arvidsson T, Danielsson , Forsberg , Gillberg : Autism in 3-6-year-old children in a suburb of Goteborg, Sweden. Autism. 1997, 1: 2163-2173.

    Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Kadesjö B, Gillberg C, Hagberg B: Brief report: autism and Asperger syndrome in seven-year-old children: a total population study. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999, 29: 327-331. 10.1023/A:1022115520317.

    Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Van Naarden BK, Schieve L, Daniels J, Durkin M, Giarelli E, Kirby RS, Lee LC, Newschaffer C, Nicholas J, Pinto-Martin J: Relationships between multiple births and autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy, and intellectual disabilities: autism and developmental disabilities monitoring (ADDM) network-2002 surveillance year. Autism Res. 2008, 1: 266-274. 10.1002/aur.41.

    Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Yeargin-Allsopp M, Rice C, Karapurkar T, Doernberg N, Boyle C, Murphy C: Prevalence of autism in a US metropolitan area. JAMA. 2003, 289: 49-55. 10.1001/jama.289.1.49.

    Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Ritvo ER, Freeman BJ, Pingree C, Mason-Brothers A, Jorde L, Jenson WR, McMahon WM, Petersen PB, Mo A, Ritvo A: The UCLA-University of Utah epidemiologic survey of autism: prevalence. Am J Psychiatry. 1989, 146: 194-199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Burd L, Fisher W, Kerbeshian J: A prevalence study of pervasive developmental disorders in North Dakota. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1987, 26: 700-703. 10.1097/00004583-198709000-00014.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Treffert DA: Epidemiology of infantile autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970, 22: 431-438. 10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01740290047006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Croen LA, Grether JK, Selvin S: The epidemiology of mental retardation of unknown cause. Pediatrics. 2001, 107: E86-10.1542/peds.107.6.e86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Stosic R, Dunagan F, Palmer H, Fowler T, Adams I: Responsible self-medication: perceived risks and benefits of over-the-counter analgesic use. Int J Pharm Prac. 2011, 4: 236-245.

    Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Werler MM, Louik C, Mitchell AA: Epidemiologic analysis of maternal factors and amniotic band defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Terato. 2003, 67: 68-72. 10.1002/bdra.10001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Jensen MS, Rebordosa C, Thulstrup AM, Toft G, Sørensen HT, Bonde JP, Henriksen TB, Olsen J: Maternal use of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and acetylsalicylic acid during pregnancy and risk of cryptorchidism. Epidemiology. 2001, 21: 779-785.

    Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Rebordosa C, Kogevinas N, Sorensen HT, Olsen J: Pre-natal exposure to acetaminophen and risk of wheezing and asthma in children: a birth cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care. 2008, 37: 583-590.

    Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Andersen AB, Farkas DK, Mehnert F, Ehrenstein V, Erichsen R: Use of prescription paracetamol during pregnancy and risk of asthma in children: a population-based Danish cohort study. Clin Epidemiol. 2012, 4: 33-40.

    Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Bisgaard H, Loland L, Holst KK, Pipper CB: Prenatal determinants of neonatal lung function in high-risk newborns. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009, 123: 651-657. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.036.

    Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Thulstrup AM, Sørensen HT, Nielsen GL, Andersen L, Barrett D, Vilstrup H, Olsen J: Fetal growth and adverse birth outcomes in women receiving prescriptions for acetaminophen during pregnancy. EuroMap Study Group. Am J Perinatol. 1999, 16: 321-326. 10.1055/s-2007-993879.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Shaheen SO, Newson RB, Henderson AJ, Headley JE, Stratton FD, Jones RW, Strachan DP, ALSPAC Study Team: Prenatal acetaminophen exposure and risk of asthma and elevated immunoglobulin E in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005, 35: 18-25. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02151.x.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Heikkilä AM, Erkkola RU, Nummi SE: Use of medication during pregnancy–a prospective cohort study on use and policy of prescribing. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1994, 208: 80-83.

    Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Lee HJ, Han JY, Yook JH, Choi JS, Ahn HK, Kim MY, Song IO, Yang JH, Nava-Ocampo AA: A prospective cohort study of pregnancy outcomes of women inadvertently exposed to methylephedrine in the 1st trimester of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaeco. 2010, 30: 563-566. 10.3109/01443615.2010.487577.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Goksör E, Thengilsdottir H, Alm B, Norvenius G, Wennergren G: Prenatal paracetamol exposure and risk of wheeze at preschool age. Acta Paediatr. 2011, 100: 1567-1571. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02403.x.

    Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Kang EM, Lundsberg LS, Illuzzi JL, Bracken MB: Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and asthma in children. Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 114: 1295-1306. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c225c0.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Persky V, Piorkowski J, Hernandez E, Chavez N, Wagner-Cassanova C, Vergara C, Pelzel D, Enriquez R, Gutierrez S, Busso A: Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and respiratory symptoms in the first year of life. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008, 101: 271-278. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60492-9.

    Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Perzanowski MS, Miller RL, Tang D, Ali D, Garfinkel RS, Chew GL, Goldstein IF, Perera FP, Barr RG: Prenatal acetaminophen exposure and risk of wheeze at age 5 years in an urban low-income cohort. Thorax. 2010, 65: 118-123. 10.1136/thx.2009.121459.

    Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Ognjanovic S, Blair C, Spector LG, Robison LL, Roesler M, Ross JA: Analgesic use during pregnancy and risk of infant leukaemia: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Br J Cancer. 2011, 104: 532-536. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606046.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Cleaves MA, Savell VH, Raj S, Zhao W, Correa A, Werler MM, Hobbs CA: National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Maternal use of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and muscular ventricular septal defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004, 70: 107-113. 10.1002/bdra.20005.

    Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R: Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2003, 327: 368-10.1136/bmj.327.7411.368.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Lacroix I, Hurault C, Sarramon MF, Guitard C, Berrebi A, Grau M, Albouy-Cossard C, Bourrel R, Elefant E, Montastruc JL, Damase-Michel C: Prescription of drugs during pregnancy: a study using EFEMERIS, the new French database. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009, 65: 839-846. 10.1007/s00228-009-0647-2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Lacroix I, Damase-Michel C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL: Prescription of drugs during pregnancy in France. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1735-1736. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03209-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Mikou S, Buire AC, Trenque T: Over the counter medication in pregnant women. Therapie. 2008, 63: 415-418. 10.2515/therapie/2008064.

    Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Beyens M-N: Prescription of drugs to pregnant women in France: the HIMAGE study. Therapie. 2003, 58: 505-10.2515/therapie:2003082.

    Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Crespin S, Bourrel R, Hurault-Delarue C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc JL, Damase-Michel C: Drug prescribing before and during pregnancy in south west France: a retrolective study. Drug Saf. 2011, 34: 595-604. 10.2165/11589170-000000000-00000.

    Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Egen-Lappe V, Hasford J: Drug prescription in pregnancy: analysis of a large statutory sickness fund population. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 60: 659-666. 10.1007/s00228-004-0817-1.

    Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Cleary BJ, Butt H, Strawbridge JD, Gallagher PJ, Fahey T, Murphy DJ: Medication use in early pregnancy-prevalence and determinants of use in a prospective cohort of women. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010, 19: 408-417.

    Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Bakkeheim E, Mowinckel , Carlsen , Håland , Lødrup Carlsen : Paracetamol in early infancy: the risk of childhood allergy and asthma. Acta Paediatr. 2010, 100: 90-96.

    Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Nordeng H, Ystrøm E, Einarson A: Perception of risk regarding the use of medications and other exposures during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 66: 207-214. 10.1007/s00228-009-0744-2.

    Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Ystrom E, Vollrath ME, Nordeng H: Effects of personality on use of medications, alcohol, and cigarettes during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012, 68: 845-851. 10.1007/s00228-011-1197-y.

    Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Chen YC, Tsai CH, Lee Y: Gestational medication use, birth conditions, and early postnatal exposures for childhood asthma. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012, 2012: 913426-

    Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Leung KY, Lee YP, Chan HY, Lee CP, Tang MH: Are herbal medicinal products less teratogenic than Western pharmaceutical products. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2002, 23: 1169-1172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Morris BJ: Circumcision in Australia: prevalence and effects on sexual health. Int J STD AIDS. 2007, 18: 69-70.

    Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Canadian Circumcision Rate- Mid. 1990,, ’s Canadian Institute for Health Information,

  195. 195.

    Morris BJ, Waskett JH, Gray RH: Does sexual function survey in Denmark offer any support for male circumcision having an adverse effect?. Int J Epidemiol. 2012, 41: 310-312. 10.1093/ije/dyr180.

    Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Rickwood AMK, Kenny SE, Donnell SC: Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice. Brit Med J. 2000, 321: 792-793. 10.1136/bmj.321.7264.792.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Leung M, Tang P, Chao N, Lui K: Hong Kong Chinese parents’ attitude towards circumcision. Hong Kong Med J. 2012, 18: 496-501.

    Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Kim D, Koo SA, Pang MG: Decline in male circumcision in South Korea. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12: 1067-10.1186/1471-2458-12-1067.

    Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Hsieh TF, Chang CH, Chang SS: Foreskin development before adolescence in 2149 schoolboys. Int J Urol. 2006, 13: 9680970-

    Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    National Hospital Discharge Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Estimated number of male newborn infants, and percent circumcised during birth hospitalization, by geographic region: United States. 1979,, –2008,

  201. 201.

    Wirth JL: Current circumcision practices: Canada. Pediatrics. 1980, 66: 705-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Frisch M, Friis S, Kjaer SK, Melbye M: Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943–90). BMJ. 1995, 311: 1471-10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Schoen EJ: Male circumcision. Male Sexual Dysfunction. Pathophysiology and Treatment. Edited by: Kandeel FR, Lue TF, Pryor JL, Swerdloff RS. 2007, New York: Informa, 95-107.

    Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    France Male Circumcision rate - Le site sante’ du Minist’ere des Affaires socials et del la Sante’.,

  205. 205.

    Kamtsiuris P, Bergmann E, Rattay P, Schlaud M: Use of medical services. Results of the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007, 50: 836-850. 10.1007/s00103-007-0247-1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Groves H, Bailie A, McCallion W: Childhood Circumcision in Northern Ireland: a barometer of the current practice of general paediatric surgery. Ulster Med J. 2010, 79: 80-81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Sharon Ayoob who identified the male neonate exposure to paracetamol at the time of circumcision. The authors are grateful to Dr. Manuel Cifuentes for contributions to the metabolic model design and data interpretation. The authors are also grateful to David Skinner for assistance with data collection and Dr. Rebecca Gore for contributions to the statistical analysis.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Z Bauer.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ contributions

AB conceived of the study, made substantial contributions to its design and coordination, acquired the data, performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. DK made substantial contributions to concept and design, and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content and data interpretation. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1:All Studies Reported in CDC Summary of Autism/ASD Prevalence Studies. Summary of CDC studies divided into two groups. The first group has some members born post-1995 (some likely to be exposed to paracetamol at time of circumcision) and the second group born pre-1995 (exposure unlikely). The chart displays the study author, country, year published, range of birth years, ratio of males to females, study population, and the overall and male ASD prevalence [113163]. (XLSX 20 KB)

Additional file 2:Prenatal Paracetamol Exposure Studies Summary. All prenatal paracetamol studies identified by a systematic search of the PubMed database. Studies without overlapping birth years with the autism prevalence studies are denoted with an “*” and were not utilized in the analysis. The chart displays the study author, country, year published, range of birth years, the study population, paracetamol usage rate, and study methodology [164192]. (XLSX 15 KB)

Additional file 3:Summary of Weighted average Autism studies and Circumcision Rates by Country. Country weighted averages of CDC autism studies from Additional file 1. Data is divided into the two cohorts, pre and post −1995. The chart displays the circumcision rates and sources for each country and the study weights. The data in this table is used for the country-level analysis and comparison between the pre and post −1995 cohorts [193206]. (XLSX 15 KB)

Additional file 4:U.S. Studies Stratified by State from CDC Summary of Autism/ASD Prevalence Studies. The six U.S. autism prevalence studies from Additional file 1 in the post 1995 cohort stratified by state. Chart displays the study author, country, year published, range of birth years, ratio of males to females, study population, the circumcision rates and sources, and the overall and male ASD prevalence. * Analysis restricted to 2006 data of 8 year olds. (XLSX 14 KB)

Additional file 5:Summary of Weighted average Autism Prevalence and Prenatal Exposure to Paracetamol Data. The Autism Prevalence Studies from Additional file 1 that had overlapping cohort birth years with the prenatal paracetamol studies in Additional file 2 are summarized. The study author, country, year published, range of birth years, population, overall ASD rate, the summary weighted average ASD rate by country, the weighted average APAP exposure rate,the APAP study range of birth years and the study weights. This data was used for Figure 1 and to calculate the prenatal correlation and trend. (XLSX 12 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, A.Z., Kriebel, D. Prenatal and perinatal analgesic exposure and autism: an ecological link. Environ Health 12, 41 (2013).

Download citation


  • Paracetamol
  • Acetaminophen
  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Sulfation
  • Glucuronidation
  • Pro-inflammatory cytokines