Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A birth cohort study to investigate the association between prenatal phthalate and bisphenol A exposures and fetal markers of metabolic dysfunction

  • Jillian Ashley-Martin1,
  • Linda Dodds1Email author,
  • Tye E Arbuckle2,
  • Adrienne S Ettinger3,
  • Gabriel D Shapiro4, 5,
  • Mandy Fisher2,
  • Anne-Sophie Morisset5,
  • Shayne Taback6,
  • Maryse F Bouchard4,
  • Patricia Monnier7,
  • Renee Dallaire8 and
  • William D Fraser4, 5
Environmental Health201413:84

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-84

Received: 4 July 2014

Accepted: 14 October 2014

Published: 22 October 2014

Abstract

Background

Obesity and type-2 diabetes are on the rise and in utero exposure to environmental contaminants is a suspected contributing factor. Our objective was to examine associations between prenatal exposure to potential endocrine disrupting chemicals and markers of fetal metabolic dysfunction.

Methods

The Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals Study (MIREC) recruited 2001 women during the first trimester of pregnancy from 10 Canadian sites. First trimester maternal urine was measured for 11 phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A (BPA). Leptin and adioponectin measured in 1,363 available umbilical cord blood samples served as markers of metabolic function. Restricted cubic spline curves were used to assess the relationship between continuous measures of phthalate and BPA levels and cord blood adipokines. Polytomous logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between phthalates and BPA and both high (≥90th percentile) and low (≤10th percentile) fetal adiponectin and leptin, adjusting for confounding factors. Analyses were conducted for all subjects, overall, and separately by fetal sex.

Results

Leptin was significantly higher in female than male infants. We observed an inverse, non-linear relationship between BPA and adiponectin among males in the restricted cubic spline and linear regression analysis. Mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP) was associated with increased odds of high leptin among males in the polytomous logistic regression models (4th quartile OR = 3.5 95% CI: 1.1-11.6).

Conclusion

Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence examining the influence of early life exposure on metabolic regulation and function. Associations between maternal exposure to chemicals and markers of metabolic function appear to be potentially sex specific. However, further investigation is required to determine whether in utero and childhood exposure to BPA and phthalates are associated with metabolic dysfunctions later in life.

Keywords

PhthalatesBisphenol ALeptinAdiponectinPregnancyCohort studyCanada

Background

Rates of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome are on the rise globally and within Canada. Between the years of 1980 and 2008, the global prevalence of obesity doubled from 6.4% to 12.0% [1]. In Canada, nearly 20% of girls and boys between 12–17 years of age were reportedly overweight between 2009 and 2011 [2]. While obesity has been commonly linked to inadequate physical activity and excess caloric intake, recent research suggests that the etiology of the obesity epidemic is multi-factorial [3]. A growing body of evidence has contributed to the hypothesis that exposure to endocrine disruptor chemicals, such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA), may operate through complex causal pathways leading from in utero development to childhood and adult obesity. These chemicals are ubiquitous in the environment, have been detected in a majority of the US and Canadian population [4, 5], and have received recent attention for their potential obesogenic properties [6]. Specifically, experimental data has demonstrated that exposure to phthalates and BPA alters normal lipid metabolism and adipogenesis [7]. By binding to PPAR-γ receptors, a critical regulatory component of lipid metabolism and adipogenesis, phthalate exposure has the potential to promote weight gain [7, 8]. BPA exhibits its effects on metabolic function by inducing adipocyte formation, promoting insulin resistance, and inhibiting adiponectin [9, 10].

The fetal time period is a critical window of adipocyte development. Thus, chemical exposures during this time may alter an individual’s growth trajectory and increase risk of later life obesity and metabolic disorders [68, 11]. Despite the recognized importance of the in utero environment on child and adult health, detailed understanding of the effect of chemical exposures on newborn endocrine and adipocyte development is lacking [12].

Insight into the susceptibility of fetal development to the potential adverse effects of phthalates and BPA can be obtained by examining biomarkers of fetal metabolic function such as leptin and adiponectin. The physiologic role of these adipocyte-produced hormones in metabolic regulation and function has been recently recognized [13, 14]. Elevated leptin levels in adults are associated with increased body mass index (BMI) [15], and large for gestational age infants [16]. High cord blood leptin levels have been positively correlated with birth weight [17, 18] and insulin resistance [19], whereas low cord blood leptin levels have been associated with small for gestational age [20]. In adults, low adiponectin levels have been implicated in insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome [21]. Umbilical cord blood adiponectin levels, however, are positively associated with birth weight [21, 22].

While cross sectional studies have demonstrated positive associations between concurrent BPA exposure and anthropometric measures [23, 24], there is limited evidence regarding association between prenatal BPA exposure and cord blood adipokines [25, 26]. Literature regarding the association between phthalates and anthropometric profiles is limited to cross sectional analysis of childhood phthalate exposure and anthropometric measures [2729] and prospective analysis of prenatal exposures and anthropometric measures at birth [30, 31]. Thus, prospective investigations regarding the potential impact of prenatal exposure to phthalates and BPA on fetal markers of metabolic dysfunction is warranted.

The objective of the present study was to assess the association between prenatal exposure to phthalates and BPA and fetal levels of adiponectin and leptin using data collected in the Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) study, a multisite Canadian cohort study.

Methods

Study design

Details of the MIREC study have been previously reported [32]. Briefly, 2001 women were recruited from 10 Canadian sites from 2008–2011 during their first trimester of pregnancy and consented to provide urine and blood samples. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were <14 weeks gestation at time of recruitment, ≥18 years of age, able to communicate in French or English, and planning to deliver in a participating hospital. Women with known fetal or chromosomal anomalies in the current pregnancy and women with serious medical complications were excluded from the study [32]. The population in the present investigation included mothers who had a singleton, live, term birth (≥37 weeks) and a cord blood sample suitable for analysis. Pre-term infants were excluded as adiponectin and leptin levels were notably lower prior to 37 weeks gestation as has been previously reported [33].

Phthalate and bisphenol a exposure

BPA and 11 phthalate metabolites were measured in maternal urine collected during the 1st trimester as shown in Table 1 and as previously described [34]. Briefly, chemical analysis of urine samples was carried out at the Laboratoire de Toxicologie, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (Québec, QC, Canada), accredited by the Standards Council of Canada. Phthalates in urine were analyzed by LC-MS/MS with an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer and Quattro Premier XE following enzymatic deconjugation. Total BPA in urine was measured with a GC-MS-MS instrument with a GC Agilent 6890 N (Agilent Technologies; Mississauga, ON, Canada) coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer Quattro Micro GC (Waters; Milford, Massachusetts, USA). An enzymatic hydrolysis freed the conjugated compounds in the urine, the samples were then derivatized and the derivatives extracted and analyzed. Specific details on lab methodologies and quality assurance methods have been previously described [3537].
Table 1

Geometric mean (SD) of phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A by high and low levels of cord blood leptin and adiponectin (MIREC study, n = 1237)

   

Leptin

Adiponectin

   

High (≥90th percentile)

Low (<90th percentile)

High (≥90th percentile)

Low (<90th percentile)

Chemical (μg/L)

LOD

% >LOD

Geometric mean (SD)

Geometric mean (SD)

Geometric mean (SD)

Geometric mean (SD)

Mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP)

0.5

99.8

45.8 (4.2)

37.3 (4.0)

42.1 (3.7)

37.6 (4.1)

Monobutyl phthalate (MBP)

0.2

99.7

12.5 (2.2)

13.23 (2.33)

11.6 (2.2)

13.3 (2.3)

Mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP)

0.2

99.5

7.1 (2.8)

5.83 (2.67)

5.7 (2.8)

6.0 (2.7)

Mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP)

0.2

83.9

1.0 (2.9)

0.94 (2.92)

1.0 (3.1)

0.9 (2.9)

Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate ( MEHP)

0.2

98.3

2.6 (2.4)

2.6 (2.5)

2.7 (2.5)

2.6 (2.5)

Mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) (MEHHP)

0.4

99.3

10.6 (2.2)

10.6 (2.5)

10.4 (2.5)

10.6 (2.5)

Mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) (MEOHP)

0.2

99.7

7.4 (2.1)

7.4 (2.4)

7.1 (2.4)

7.4 (2.3)

Bisphenol A (BPA)

0.2

86.6

0.8 (2.5)

0.9 (2.8)

0.9 (2.5)

0.9 (2.8)

Mono cyclohexyl phthalate (MCHP)

0.2

7.4

    

Mono-n-octyl phthalate (MOP)

0.6

3.0

    

Mono-isononyl phthalate (MNP)

0.4

1.1

    

Mono-methyl phthalate (MMP)

5

14.0

    

Fetal markers of metabolic function

Leptin and adiponectin were measured in plasma from 1363 umbilical cord blood samples. Analysis was done by ELISA at Mt. Sinai Laboratory (Toronto, ON, Canada) using assay kits from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) (Rockville, MD, USA). Analysis was repeated for all samples with coefficients of variation (CV) greater than 15%. The inter- and intra-assay CVs were 11.8% and 9.3% respectively for leptin and 8% and 9% respectively for adiponectin. All samples were in the range of detection.

Covariates

Data on covariates were extracted from questionnaires and hospital charts by trained research nurses and staff. We examined the following variables as potential confounders; maternal age at delivery (≤24, 25–29, 30–34 ,≥35 y), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) according to WHO guidelines [38], parity (nulliparous, parous), maternal education (high school diploma or less, some college or trade school, undergraduate university degree, graduate university degree), household income ($ ≤30,000, 30,001-50,000, 50,001-100,000, ≥100,000), ethnicity (Caucasian/non-Caucasian), and maternal smoking (never or quit before pregnancy, quit when knew pregnant, current smoking).

Statistical analysis

Umbilical cord blood levels of leptin and adiponectin were categorized into the top 90th percentile and bottom 10th percentile. Previous literature has shown that low as well as high levels of both of these biomarkers are associated with potentially adverse outcomes [18, 20, 21]. Due to differing leptin levels among male and female infants, the binary leptin variable was derived using sex specific cut-off points (10th percentile males 1.87 ng/mL, females 3.37 ng/mL; 90th percentile males 31.7 ng/mL, females 59.3 ng/mL). However, as adiponectin levels did not vary by sex, sex-specific cut-offs were not necessary (median for males = 16.7 μg/mL; females = 16.6 μg/mL).

Descriptive statistics for maternal demographics, and pregnancy characteristics were calculated according to levels of leptin and adiponectin using frequency distributions and chi-square tests of significance for the difference between the low (≤10th percentile), moderate (10th-90th percentile) and elevated (≥90th percentile) leptin and adiponectin groups.

Maternal urinary measures of eleven phthalate metabolites and BPA collected from a 1st trimester spot urine sample were available in the MIREC study. Four phthalate metabolites (MCHP, MOP, MNP, MMP) were not examined in multivariate analysis due to the low proportion of values above the limit of detection (LOD) (% > LOD MCHP = 7.4, MOP = 3.0, MNP = 1.1, MMP = 14.0). Three of the phthalates metabolites are primary (MEHP) and secondary (MEHHP, MEOHP) metabolites of the parent compound Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) [39]. Considering the high correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.9) between these metabolites, they were not analyzed individually, but rather the metabolite concentrations were summed to create an index of DEHP metabolite [40].

As the distribution of phthalates and BPA were non-normal, concentrations were log-transformed prior to calculation of descriptive statistics. In order to control for differences in urine dilution, concentrations of phthalate metabolites and BPA were adjusted for specific gravity according to the following formula Pc = Pi [(SGm- 1)/(SGi - 1)] where: P c  = SG adjusted metabolite concentration (μg/ml), P i = observed metabolite concentration, SG i = specific gravity of the urine sample, and SGm = median SG for the cohort [41]. This formula was applied to phthalate and BPA concentrations in the descriptive statistic analysis but not the multivariate analysis where specific gravity was included as a covariate (described below). Geometric means (GM) and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for the phthalates and BPA according to high and low levels of leptin and adiponectin. Samples below the LOD were imputed as LOD/2 for all analyses.

Given previous evidence of sex differences in the relationship between BPA and adipokines [25], as well as the differences in leptin levels among male and female infants, all analyses were presented for the total population as well as stratified by infant sex. We included variables in the multivariate models that were either selected a priori for inclusion or were significantly associated with leptin or adiponectin at a p-value <0.1 level. This strategy was employed to facilitate identification of a common set of potential confounders across all phthalate metabolites and BPA. In the multivariate models, specific gravity was included as a covariate to account for heterogeneity in urinary dilution as previously described [34] and as done in previous analyses of prenatal endocrine disruptor exposures [42, 43]. By including specific gravity as a covariate, we were able to easily examine unadjusted vs. adjusted results. In addition, in order to determine whether the observed associations between the contaminants of interest and adipokines were independent of birth weight, we conducted an analysis adjusting for birth weight z-score.

Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to examine the nature of relationship between maternal urinary levels of phthalate and BPA exposures and cord blood adipokine levels [44]. Both exposure and outcome variables were log-transformed in this analysis to account for the skewed distribution of the data. Exposures significantly associated with leptin or adiponectin at a p-value <0.05 were further examined in a multivariate generalized linear regression model of log-transformed exposures and outcomes in order to provide a magnitude of effect. Those exposures associated with adipokine levels in a non-linear fashion (p-value < 0.05) were modeled with a quadratic term.

Polytomous logistic regression [45, 46] was employed to examine the relationship between quartiles of environmental chemical exposures and the odds of high (≥90th percentile) and low (≤10th percentile) adiponectin and leptin levels, using those between 10th-90th percentiles as the group without the outcome. These cut-offs were chosen to identify those subjects with notably elevated or depressed adipokine levels. Polytomous logistic regression was used as a feasible means of calculating odds ratios for two outcome groups in comparison to a group without the outcome. In recognition of the rather arbitrary nature of the cut-off points in the polytomous logistic regression, we also conducted a sensitivity analysis with outcome categories defined at the 25th and 75th percentiles (and, similarly, using those between 25th-75th percentiles as the group without the outcome). Of the seven metabolites included in the multivariate statistical analysis, no chemical had more than 25% below the LOD, so all samples below the LOD were included in the lowest quartile of exposure.

This study received ethical approval from the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, NS), Health Canada, and Ste. Justine’s Hospital (Montreal, QC).

Results

From the 2001 women recruited into the MIREC study, 18 withdrew and asked that all their data and biospecimens be destroyed. Of the remaining 1983 subjects, 1363 infants born to these women had a cord blood sample. Of these 1363 infants, 126 were excluded for multiple birth, pre-term birth, cord blood samples unsuitable for analysis, missing data on all chemicals of interest, or unknown sex resulting in a final sample size of 1237.

Median (IQR) leptin levels (ng/mL) were significantly higher among female infants (16.0 (26.3)) than males (8.7 (13.7)) and ranged from 0.086 to 243. Median (IQR) adiponectin levels (μg/mL) did not differ by sex (males =16.7 (12.9); females =16.6 (12.6)) and ranged from 0.19 to 239. Study population characteristics according to percentiles of leptin and adiponectin are provided in Table 2. Pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, and cord blood adiponectin levels were associated with leptin. Education and cord blood leptin levels were associated with adiponectin (p < 0.1) (Table 2).
Table 2

Maternal and infant characteristics according to percentiles of cord blood leptin (ng/mL) and adiponectin (μg/mL) a

  

Leptin (Row%)

Adiponectin (Row%)

  

Percentiles

 

Percentiles

 

Characteristic

N

≤10th

10th-90th

≥90th

p-value

≤10th

10th-90th

≥90th

p-value

Age (yr)

         

≤24

53

11.3

81.1

7.6

0.50

9.4

81.1

9.4

0.92

25-29

265

9.8

77.7

12.5

 

10.6

77.7

11.7

 

30-34

448

7.8

83.4

8.7

 

9.4

81.3

9.4

 

≥35

472

11.7

78.0

10.4

 

9.8

80.1

10.2

 

BMI

         

Underweight (<18.5)

27

22.2

70.4

7.4

<0.01

22.2

70.4

7.4

0.22

Normal (18.5 to 24.9)

707

12.8

80.0

7.5

 

11.0

78.5

10.5

 

Overweight (25 to 29.9)

266

3.8

83.8

12.4

 

8.3

80.8

10.9

 

Obese (≥30)

170

5.9

75.9

18.2

 

7.7

83.5

8.8

 

Parity

         

Nulliparous

520

9.0

77.1

13.9

0.01

9.0

79.6

11.4

0.17

Parous

715

10.5

82.1

7.4

 

10.6

80.0

9.4

 

Education

         

High school diploma or less

105

10.5

78.1

11.4

0.51

10.5

80.1

8.6

0.10

Some college, or trade school

351

10.3

77.2

12.5

 

11.7

79.2

9.1

 

Undergraduate univ. degree

470

9.8

81.7

8.5

 

9.2

80.9

10.0

 

Graduate university degree

309

9.4

81.2

9.4

 

9.1

78.6

12.3

 

Household income ($CAD)

         

≤30,000

87

12.6

75.9

11.5

0.50

12.6

79.3

8.1

0.27

30,001-50,000

114

5.3

83.3

11.4

 

7.9

84.2

7.9

 

50,001-100,000

506

10.7

77.9

11.5

 

11.1

77.3

11.7

 

≥100,000

481

9.2

82.3

8.5

 

8.1

82.1

9.8

 

Ethnicity

         

Caucasian

1064

9.6

80.5

10.0

0.80

10.3

78.8

10.9

0.53

Not Caucasian

173

11.6

77.58

11.0

 

7.5

86.7

5.8

 

Maternal smoking

         

Never or quit before pregnancy

1091

9.8

80.8

9.4

0.27

9.9

80.0

10.2

0.74

Quit when knew pregnant

86

9.3

75.6

15.1

 

11.6

80.2

8.1

 

Current smoker

60

11.7

73.3

15.3

 

8.3

78.3

13.3

 

Infant sex

         

Male

677

10.1

79.6

10.3

0.94

9.5

81.7

8.8

0.40

Female

586

9.6

80.5

9.9

 

10.4

77.7

11.8

 

Cord blood adiponectin (μg/ml)

         

≤10%

123

43.1

50.4

6.5

<0.01

--

--

--

--

10-90%

988

6.7

84.3

9.0

     

≥90%

126

2.4

75.4

22.2

     

Cord blood leptin (ng/mL)

         

≤10%

122

--

--

--

--

43.4

54.1

2.5

<0.01

<90%

990

    

6.3

84.4

9.6

 

≥90%

125

    

6.4

71.2

22.4

 

aDue to missing covariate data, subgroup totals may not sum to the total sample population.

The geometric mean and standard deviation of the phthalate metabolites and BPA according to high and low levels of leptin and adiponectin are provided in Table 1. Eighty-four subjects were missing data on MEP, MBP, MCPP, MEOHP, and MEHHP, eighty five were missing data on MBzP, and ninety-three were missing data on MEHP. No subjects were missing data on BPA exposure. The Pearson correlation coefficients of log-transformed phthalate metabolites and bisphenol A ranged from 0.3 (between MEP and BPA) to 0.6 (between MBP and DEHP metabolites).

Multivariate leptin models were adjusted for maternal age at delivery, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, and specific gravity. Multivariable adiponectin models were adjusted for maternal age at delivery, education, and specific gravity.In the restricted cubic spline analysis, maternal urinary BPA concentrations were significantly associated with adiponectin levels (p < 0.05) in a non-linear fashion (p < 0.01) among male but not female infants (Figure 1). In a multivariate regression model, BPA was inversely associated with adiponectin among males (β = −0.02; 95% CI: −0.07-0.03 per one unit increase in BPA). The negative parameter coefficient for the quadratic term (β = −0.10; 95% CI: −0.16- -0.05) is consistent with the slightly inverted U-shape of the spline curve (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Restricted cubic spline analysis (95% CI) of log 10 BPA and log 10 adiponectin among male infants. Legend *Adjusted for: age, education, specific gravity. Knots indicated by dots at 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles.

In the polytomous logistic regression leptin models, MBzP exposure was associated with an increased odds of high leptin, particularly in the third quartile (OR = 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9-3.7) (Table 3). The third quartile of MBzP exposure was associated with an elevated odds of high leptin among females (OR = 2.7 95% CI: 0.9-7.8). The association among females became significant after adjustment for birth weight z-score (OR = 3.2 95% CI: 1.1-9.5). This effect estimate indicates that subjects with moderately elevated levels of maternal MBzP exposure had increased odds of having high leptin levels relative to those individuals with low MBzP exposure. Subjects with moderate adipokine levels make up the group without the outcome in the polytomous regression analysis. MCPP exposure was associated with a significantly increased odds of high leptin in all quartiles among males only (4th quartile OR = 3.5; 95% CI: 1.1-11.6) (Table 3). There were no significant associations between any of the other phthalate metabolites in the leptin models. Other than the change noted in the MBzP model, adjustment for birth weight z-score for these results did not produce any notable changes in significance or direction of effect. Effect estimates in the sensitivity analyses of the 25th and 75th percentiles tended to attenuate effects toward the null. However, the highest quartile of MCPP exposure remained significantly associated with high leptin (OR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4).
Table 3

Prenatal exposure to phthalate metabolites (quartiles) and odds of low (≤10th percentile) and high (≥90th percentile) and cord blood leptin levels

 

Low leptina

High leptina

Phthalate metabolites

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

MEP

    

Total (n =1089)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

0.8 (0.5-1.3)

0 8 (0.5-1.4)

0.7 (0.4-1.4)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

  29- ≤ 82

0.5 (0.3-1.0)

0.5 (0.3-1.0)

1.1 (0.7-2.0)

1.1 (0.6-2.1)

  >82

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

1.0 (0.6-1.8)

0.9 (0.5-1.7)

Males (n = 578)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.9 (0.4-2.1)

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

  29- ≤ 82

0.4 (0.2-0.9)

0.4 (0.2-0.9)

1.4 (0.7-3.1)

1.6 (0.7-3.7)

  >82

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

1.4 (0.6-3.0)

1.4 (0.6-3.4)

Females (n = 511)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

1.0 (0.5-2.0)

1.0 (0.5-2.4)

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

  29- ≤ 78

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

0.7 (0.3-1.8)

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

1.1 (0.5-2.5)

  >78

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

0.6 (0.2-1.5)

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

0.6 (0.2-1.6)

MBP

    

Total (n =1089)

    

  ≤4.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >5- ≤ 12

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0.6 (0.3-1.1)

1.0 (0.6-1.8)

1.0 (0.5-1.8)

  13- ≤ 23

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

1.0 (0.6-1.8)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

  >23

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

1.0 (0.5-2.3)

1.0 (0.5-1.7)

0.8 (0.4-1.9)

Males (n =578)

    

  ≤5

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >5- ≤ 12

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

1.0 (0.4-2.2)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

1.2 (0.5-2.8)

  13- ≤ 23

0.4 (0.2-1.0)

0.6 (0.2-1.7)

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

0.9 (0.4-2.5)

  >23

1.2 (0.6-2.4)

1.9 (0.7-5.5)

0.8 (0.3-1.9)

0.6 (0.2-2.1)

Females (n =511)

    

  ≤4.8

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >4.9- ≤ 11.8

0.4 (0.2-1.0)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

0.9 (0.4-2.3)

  11.9- ≤ 23

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

0.8 (0.3-2.3)

0.9 (0.4-2.1)

1.0 (0.3-2.9)

  >23

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.8 (0.2-2.5)

1.1 (0.5-2.5)

1.2 (0.4-4.0)

MBzP

    

Total (n =1088)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

1.5 (0.8-2.8)

1.6 (0.8-3.1)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

0.9 (0.5-1.7)

1.6 (0.9-3.0)

1.8 (0.9-3.7)

  >11

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

1.5 (0.8-2.8)

1.7 (0.8-3.6)

Males (n =577)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

1.6 (0.7-3.5)

1.5 (0.7-3.6)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.9 (0.4-2.3)

1.4 (0.6-3.2)

1.7 (0.7-4.2)

  >11

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

1.1 (0.4-2.8)

1.3 (0.6-2.9)

1.4 (0.5-3.9)

Females (n = 511)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

0.6 (0.2-1.2)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

1.8 (0.7-4.7)

2.2 (0.8-5.8)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

1.1 (0.4-2.9)

2.3 (0.9-5.9)

2.7 (0.9-7.8)

  >11

0.6 (0.2-1.3)

0.8 (0.3-2.3)

1.9 (0.8-5.0)

2.3 (0.7-7.2)

MCPP

    

Total (n =1089)

    

  ≤0.28

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.29- ≤ 0.85

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

0.5 (0.3-1.0)

1.6 (0.9-2.9)

1.7 (0.9-3.2)

  0.86- ≤ 2.0

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

0.5 (0.3-1.0)

1.4 (0.7-2.5)

1.6 (0.8-3.2)

  >2.0

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

0.7 (0.4-1.5)

1.5 (0.8-2.7)

1.7 (0.8-3.8)

Males (n =578)

    

  ≤0.29

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.3- ≤ 0.87

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

3.6 (1.4-9.4)

4.3 (1.6-11.6)

  0.88- ≤ 2.0

0.3 (0.1-0.7)

0.3 (0.1-0.7)

2.7 (1.0-7.1)

3.6 (1.2-10.8)

  >2.0

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

2.4 (0.9-6.5)

3.5 (1.1-11.6)

Females (n =511)

    

  ≤0.29

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.3- ≤ 0.82

0.5 (0.2-1.1)

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

1.2 (0.5-2.7)

1.2 (0.5-3.0)

  0.83- ≤ 1.8

0.8 (0.4-1.8)

1.1 (0.4-2.7)

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

1.0 (0.4-2.8)

  >1.8

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.9 (0.3-2.8)

1.3 (0.6-3.0)

1.3 (0.4-4.1)

∑ DEHP

    

Total (n =1080)

    

  ≤7.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  8.0- ≤ 18.1

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

0.8 (0.5-1.5)

1.3 (0.7-2.4)

1.4 (0.7-2.6)

  18.2- ≤ 36.0

0.8 (0.4-1.4)

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

1.6 (0.9-2.8)

1.8 (0.9-3.6)

  >36.0

0.8 (0.4-1.3)

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

0.9 (0.5-1.7)

1.0 (0.4-2.3)

Males (n =576)

    

  ≤7.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  8.0-- ≤ 18.1

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

1.4 (0.6-3.2)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

1.3 (0.5-2.9)

  18.2- ≤ 36.0

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

1.3 (0.5-3.2)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

1.3 (0.5-3.5)

  >36.0

0.8 (0.4-1.8)

1.0 (0.3-2.9)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.5 (0.2-1.8)

Females (n =504)

    

  ≤7.4

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  7.5-- ≤ 16.4

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

0.5 (0.2-1.3)

1.5 (0.6-3.8)

1.7 (0.7-4.6)

  16.4- ≤ 33.0

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

0.5 (0.2-1.4)

1.8 (0.8-4.5)

2.3 (0.8-6.7)

  >33.0

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.7 (0.2-2.2)

1.5 (0.6-3.8)

2.0 (0.6-7.1)

aModerate adipokine levels (10-90th percentile) represent those without the outcome.

bAdjusted for: maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, specific gravity, parity.

In the polytomous logistic regression adiponectin models, the third quartile of MCPP exposure was associated with a significantly reduced odds of low adiponectin among males only (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) (Table 4). BPA was significantly inversely associated with high adiponectin in the third quartile of the unadjusted analysis only (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8) (Table 5). As with the leptin models, these results were not changed by adjustment for birth weight z-score and results were slightly attenuated towards the null in the sensitivity analysis. There were no significant associations between cord blood leptin levels and prenatal exposure to BPA (Table 5).
Table 4

Prenatal exposure to phthalate metabolites (quartiles) and odds of low (≤10th percentile) and high (≥90th percentile) cord blood adiponectin levels, overall and by sex

 

Low adiponectina

High adiponectina

Phthalate metabolites

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

MEP

    

Total (n =1148)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

1.1 (0.6-1.8)

1.2 (0.7-2.0)

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

1.1 (0.6-1.9)

  29- ≤ 82

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

0.8 (0.4-1.5)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

1.2 (0.7-2.2)

  >82

1.1 (0.6-1.9)

1.2 (0.7-2.2)

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

1.5 (0.8-2.7)

Males (n = 608)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

1.2 (0.5-2.5)

1.3 (0.6-2.9)

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

1.3 (0.5-3.0)

  29- ≤ 82

1.0 (0.4-2.1)

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

1.0 (0.4-2.1)

1.6 (0.7-3.8)

  >82

1.2 (0.6-2.6)

1.4 (0.6-3.3)

0.9 (0.4-2.1)

1.7 (0.7-4.3)

Females (n = 540)

    

  ≤11

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  12- ≤ 28

1.1 (0.6-2.3)

1.2 (0.5-2.5)

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

  29- ≤ 82

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

  >82

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

1.1 (0.5-2.6)

1.2 (0.6-2.5)

1.7 (0.8-3.9)

MBP

    

Total (n =1148)

    

  ≤5

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >5- ≤ 12

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0.6 (0.3-1.1)

1.0 (0.6-1.6)

1.1 (0.7-1.9)

  13- ≤ 23

0.5 (0.3-0.8)

0.5 (0.3-1.0)

0.4 (0.3-0.8)

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

  >23

1.0 (0.6-1.6)

1.0 (0.4-2.2)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0.9 (0.4-2.1)

Males (n =608)

    

  ≤5

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >5- ≤ 12

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

0.8 (0.4-1.8)

  13- ≤ 23

0.4 (0.2-1.0)

0.5 (0.2-1.3)

0.5 (0.2-1.0)

0.4 (0.2-1.2)

  >23

1.0 (0.5-1.9)

1.0 (0.4-3.1)

0.2 (0.1-0.6)

0.2 (0.1-0.8)

Females (n =540)

    

  ≤5

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  >5- ≤ 12

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

1.1 (0.5-2.2)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

  13- ≤ 23

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

0.6 (0.2-1.6)

0.4 (0.2-1.0)

0.7 (0.2-1.9)

  >23

0.9 (0.5-1.9)

1.0 (0.4-3.0)

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

2.1 (0.8-5.7)

MBzP

    

Total (n =1147)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

1.0 (0.6-1.8)

1.1 (0.6-1.9)

1.1 (0.7-1.9)

1.4 (0.8-2.3)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.8 (0.4-1.3)

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

1.0 (0.5-1.9)

  >11

1.0 (0.6-1.7)

1.0 (0.5-2.0)

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

1.1 (0.6-2.3)

Males (n =607)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

1.3 (0.6-2.9)

1.4 (0.6-3.2)

1.2 (0.6-2.5)

1.5 (0.7-3.2)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

1.0 (0.4-2.5)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

1.0 (0.4-2.5)

  >11

1.2 (0.6-2.6)

1.4 (0.5-3.6)

0.3 (0.1-0.9)

0.5 (0.2-1.7)

Females (n = 540)

    

  ≤2.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  2.3- ≤ 5.0

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.8 (0.4-1.8)

1.0 (0.5-2.1)

1.2 (0.6-2.6)

  5.1- ≤ 11.0

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

1.0 (0.4-2.5)

  >11

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.8 (0.3-2.1)

1.1 (0.5-2.2)

1.9 (0.7-4.8)

MCPP

    

Total (n =1148)

    

  ≤0.29

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.3- ≤ 0.87

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

1.3 (0.8-2.3)

1.6 (0.9-2.7)

  0.88- ≤ 2.0

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

0.6 (0.3-1.1)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

1.1 (0.6-2.2)

  >2.0

0.8 (0.4-1.3)

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

1.6 (0.8-3.4)

Males (n =608)

    

  ≤0.29

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.3- ≤ 0.87

1.0 (0.5-1.9)

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

1.3 (0.6-2.7)

1.5 (0.7-3.2)

  0.88- ≤ 2.0

0.4 (0.2-0.9)

0.3 (0.1-0.7)

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

0.8 (0.3-2.2)

  >2.0

0.7 (0.3-1.4)

0.4 (0.2-1.2)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

1.1 (0.4-3.1)

Females (n =540)

    

  ≤0.29

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.3- ≤ 0.87

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.8 (0.4-1.8)

1.6 (0.7-3.3)

1.9 (0.9-4.2)

  0.88- ≤ 2.0

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

1.8 (0.7-4.5)

  >2.0

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.9 (0.3-2.5)

1.3 (0.6-2.8)

2.9 (1.0-7.8)

∑ DEHP

    

Total (n =1139)

    

  ≤7.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  8.0- ≤ 18.1

1.1 (0.6-1.8)

1.1 (0.6-1.9)

0.6 (0.3-1.0)

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

  18.2- ≤ 36.0

1.2 (0.7-2.0)

1.2 (0.6-2.3)

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

  >36.0

0.6 (0.4-1.2)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

Males (n =606)

    

  ≤7.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  8.0- ≤ 18.1

1.5 (0.7-3.3)

1.6 (0.7-3.6)

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.8 (0.4-1.9)

  18.2- ≤ 36.0

1.3 (0.6-2.9)

1.5 (0.6-3.8)

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

1.0 (0.4-2.6)

  >36.0

0.8 (0.4-2.0)

0.9 (0.3-2.9)

0.6 (0.3-1.2)

1.2 (0.4-3.5)

Females (n =533)

    

  ≤7.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  8.0- ≤ 18.1

0.6 (0.3-1.4)

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

1.0 (0.4-2.1)

  18.2- ≤ 36.0

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

0.7 (0.3-1.8)

0.7 (0.4-1.6)

1.0 (0.4-2.5)

  >36.0

0.5 (0.2-1.1)

0.3 (0.1-1.1)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

1.2 (0.4-3.4)

aModerate adipokine levels (10-90th percentile) represent those without the outcome.

bAdjusted for: maternal age, specific gravity, education.

Table 5

Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A (quartiles) and odds low (≤10th percentile) and high (≥90th percentile) cord blood adipokines, overall and by sex

 

Low leptina

High leptina

Contaminant

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted ORb

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

BPA

    

Total (n =1165)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

1.2 (0.7-2.0)

1.3 (0.8-2.3)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

1.1 (0.6-1.8)

1.3 (0.7-2.5)

1.2 (0.7-2.0)

1.1 (0.6-2.0)

  >1.7

0.9 (0.5-1.6)

1.3 (0.7-2.6)

1.1 (0.6-1.8)

0.9 (0.5-1.8)

Males (n =626)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

0.9 (0.4-2.0)

1.0 (0.5-2.3)

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

1.0 (0.5-2.3)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

1.0 (0.5-2.0)

1.1 (0.5-2.6)

1.2 (0.6-2.6)

1.2 (0.5-2.9)

  >1.7

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

1.0 (0.4-2.4)

1.2 (0.6-2.4)

1.0 (0.4-2.4)

Females (n =539)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

1.6 (0.3-1.6)

1.8 (0.8-4.1)

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

0.7 (0.3-1.6)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

1.2 (0.5-2.8)

1.6 (0.6-4.4)

1.1 (0.5-2.3)

1.0 (0.4-2.4)

  >1.7

1.1 (0.5-2.7)

1.8 (0.6-5.1)

1.0 (0.5-2.2)

0.8 (0.3-2.2)

 

Low adiponectin a

High adiponectin a

 

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted OR c

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted OR c

 

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

BPA

    

Total (n =1232)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

0.9 (0.5-1.5)

0.7 (0.4-1.2)

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

0.7 (0.4-1.3)

0.8 (0.4-1.4)

0.7 (0.4-1.1)

1.0 (0.5-1.8)

  >1.7

0.8 (0.5-1.4)

0.9 (0.4-1.6)

0.6 (0.4-1.1)

1.0 (0.5-1.9)

Males (n =660)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

0.9 (0.4-1.8)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

0.6 (0.3-1.3)

0.8 (0.3-1.6)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

0.7 (0.3-1.7)

0.3 (0.1-0.8)

0.5 (0.2-1.2)

  >1.7

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.8 (0.3-2.0)

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

Females (n =572)

    

  ≤0.34

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

  0.35- ≤ 0.81

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

0.8 (0.4-1.6)

0.9 (0.4-1.9)

  0.82- ≤ 1.7

0.8 (0.3-1.6)

0.8 (0.3-2.0)

1.1 (0.6-2.3)

1.7 (0.8-3.8)

  >1.7

0.8 (0.4-1.7)

0.9 (0.3-2.2)

0.7 (0.3-1.5)

1.1 (0.5-2.8)

aModerate adipokine levels (10-90th percentile) represent those without the outcome.

bAdjusted for: maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, specific gravity, parity.

cAdjusted for: maternal age, specific gravity, education.

Discussion

In this longitudinal birth cohort study of Canadian women, we evaluated the relationship between maternal urinary levels of phthalate and BPA and umbilical cord blood levels of leptin and adiponectin. We observed an inverse, non-linear relationship between BPA and adiponectin among males in the restricted cubic spline and linear regression analysis. We also observed a significantly increased risk of high (≥90th percentile) leptin among male subjects with moderate and elevated MCPP maternal exposure levels. The relationship between MCPP and leptin, however, was not significant in the spline analysis (p = 0.2) and was attenuated towards the null in the sensitivity analysis. Moreover, the wide confidence intervals in some analyses indicate a high level of imprecision in the observed odds ratios.

One previous study reported that prenatal BPA exposure was associated with changes in fetal cord blood adipokine levels [25] with contrasted findings depending on infant’s sex. Authors of this study reported that the highest quartile of maternal BPA exposure was significantly associated with odds of low adiponectin, positively in males and negatively in females and with increased odds of high cord blood leptin levels both in males and females [25]. The authors report a U-shaped relationship between BPA and leptin among females in this study and there was no clear dose–response relationship among males. High adiponectin was not considered as an outcome in this study [25]. Whereas the MIREC cohort is a primarily Caucasian Canadian population, the Chou birth cohort is Taiwanese [25]. Genetic differences in metabolism between different ethnic groups may be a partial explanation for the varying findings. Further, Chou et al. [25] measured BPA in plasma (GM = 2.5, range 0.3-29.4 ng/mL) while MIREC used urine, which makes comparisons difficult. Therefore, differences in the study population and sample matrix used for BPA analysis may account for the differences in results between our study and the study by Chou et al. [25].

Though minimizing contamination in BPA analysis necessitates stringent quality assurance practices in all analyses [47], urinary measurements of BPA are thought to be more robust to contamination than plasma or serum [48]. Fetal levels of adiponectin in the present analysis (18.23 μg/mL) and as reported by Chou et al. (21.3 ug/mL) [25] were similar. However, mean leptin levels in the present analysis (19.8 ng/mL) were notably higher than the mean level of 4.6 ng/mL reported in the Taiwanese cohort [25]. The reason for the discrepancy in leptin levels is not clear. It is not explained by mean pre-pregnancy BMI, which was comparable in the Taiwanese study (25.2) and the MIREC study (24.9), nor was it due to differences in analytical technique as both studies used cord blood plasma analyzed by ELISA. MIREC cord blood leptin levels are, however, comparable to those reported in a pregnancy cohort from Montreal, Canada (mean leptin = 39.8 ng/mL) [49].

Though no previous prospective analysis of the relationship between prenatal phthalate exposure and fetal adipokine levels has been reported, previous birth cohort studies in Japan [30] and New York city [31] and a French case–control study [50] have reported no significant associations or monotonic relationships between prenatal phthalate exposure and size at birth. Previous cross-sectional analysis of the association between childhood phthalate levels and anthropometric measures have reported both positive associations [28, 29] and no association in children [27]. Though there was no association between childhood urinary levels of any phthalate metabolite studied and BMI in the NHANES cross sectional analysis from 1999–2002, a significant dose–response relationship between quartiles of MBzP levels among males ages 20–59 and BMI was observed [27]. Maternal urinary MBzP and MEP levels in the MIREC cohort (MBzP GM = 5.94 μg/l, MEP GM = 38.0 μg/l) are lower than those reported among US pregnant women from the 2003–2004 NHANES study (MBzP GM = 15.12 μg/l, MEP GM = 79.0 μg/l) [4]. The lower levels observed in the MIREC study are consistent with a temporal trend towards decreasing levels of a subset of phthalates in the North American population [51].

Interpretation of our findings warrants consideration of the trajectory of these adipokines from birth to childhood. Leptin concentrations tend to either remain stable or to increase with age [52]. Thus, a trend towards high leptin levels at birth could potentially translate into adverse metabolic outcomes at a later age. In contrast to leptin, adiponectin levels are higher at birth than in childhood and adulthood and lower levels are associated with greater risk of metabolic disorders in adulthood [21]. In a recent analysis of adipokine levels from birth to childhood, Volberg et al. [52] identified three different adiponectin trajectories; stable, moderately decreasing, and rapidly decreasing then rebounding. Thus, further exploration of the determinants of fetal and childhood adiponectin trajectories and resulting childhood anthropometric measures will help elucidate the implications of elevated adiponectin levels in cord blood.

One of the primary strengths of this study was the rich covariate and exposure data collected prospectively in the MIREC study. We were able to control for notable confounders and were not reliant on proxy measures of exposure, such as self-reported use of products containing phthalates. In addition, the MIREC study population was drawn from 10 different sites across Canada and thus represents some of the diverse geographic regions of the country. Furthermore, the study sample size is larger than previous prospective cohort analysis of the association between prenatal exposures and fetal adipokines.

Despite these strengths, this study has some limitations common to observational studies. First, the use of one measure of exposure during the 1st trimester of pregnancy assumes that this measurement is representative of exposure during the critical window of adipocyte development and regulation. Yet, due to the short half life and rapid elimination of these chemicals, the body burden of phthalates and BPA may vary on a daily basis [53]. Though this potential misclassification would most likely be non-differential, it is not possible to completely predict the direction of resulting bias on the effect estimates. In pregnant women, the reported intraclass correlation (ICCs) for BPA has been very low, ranging from 0.11-0.24 [5457]. Phthalate metabolites MBzP and MBP were reported to be moderately reproducible based on an ICC of 0.41 and 0.42, respectively, for measures in samples collected at three time points in pregnant women [58]. Second, though the MIREC study had a rich set of covariate data, the role of residual confounding in our findings cannot be ruled out. Third, due to the number of comparisons conducted in this analysis, it is possible that a statistically significant finding was identified by chance. However, due to the lack of previous literature in this area and to the hypothesis generating nature of this investigation, we decided to examine each individual chemical in a separate model and not adjust for multiple comparisons. Fourth, considering that our analysis was restricted to the subset of women with cord blood samples, it is possible that our results are subject to potential selection bias. Since, however, distribution of key characteristics (e.g. age, weight, exposure levels) were similar between our analytic sample and the full study population, it is unlikely that this posed a material threat to internal validity. Last, we cannot rule out the influence of unmeasured co-exposures, such as other endocrine disrupting chemicals, on the relationship between phthalates, BPA and cord blood adipokine levels. Furthermore, considering that the MIREC study population is largely Caucasian, more educated and of a higher income group than the Canadian population at large, generalization to other ethnic and socioeconomic populations should be done with caution.

Conclusions

This prospective longitudinal cohort study is one of the first to examine associations between prenatal exposures to common environmental contaminants and fetal measures of metabolic function. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence examining the influence of early life exposure on metabolic regulation and function [59, 60]. Further investigation is required to determine whether in utero and childhood exposure to these endocrine disrupting chemicals are associated with metabolic dysfunctions later in life. Further investigation is also required to enhance understanding of the potential sex-specific nature of the association between certain chemicals and markers of metabolic function. The need for such follow-up is evidenced by findings from a longitudinal study that reported significant associations between maternal urinary BPA levels measured during pregnancy and blood leptin levels in nine year old children [26]. Future follow-up of the MIREC cohort will facilitate exploration of the associations between maternal urinary contaminant levels and childhood growth measures.

Abbreviations

BPA: 

Bisphenol A

MIREC: 

Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals

ELISA: 

Enzyme linked immunoassay

CV: 

Coefficients of variations

BMI: 

Body mass index

WHO: 

World Health Organization

MCHP: 

Mono cyclohexyl phthalate

MOP: 

Mono-n-octyl phthalate

MNP: 

Mono-isononyl phthalate

MMP: 

Mono-methyl phthalate

MEHP: 

Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate

MEHHP: 

Mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl)

MEOHP: 

Mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl)

DEHP: 

Di(2-ethyl hexyl) phthalate

GM: 

Geometric mean

SD: 

Standard deviation

LOD: 

Limit of detection

IQR: 

Interquatile range

ICC: 

Intraclass correlation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by a grant from the Canadian Diabetes Association. We would like to acknowledge the MIREC Study Group and the MIREC Biobank, as well as the MIREC study participants and staff for their dedication. The MIREC Study was sponsored by the Chemicals Management Plan of Health Canada, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Grant number # MOP – 81285), and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Dr. Fraser was the recipient of a CIHR Canada Research Chair.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, Dalhousie University
(2)
Health Canada
(3)
Yale University
(4)
University of Montreal
(5)
CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre
(6)
University of Manitoba
(7)
McGill University
(8)
Laval University, Quebec City

References

  1. Stevens GA, Singh GM, Lu Y, Danaei G, Lin JK, Finucane MM, Bahalim AN, McIntire RK, Gitierrez HR, Cowan M, Paciorek CJ, Farzadfar F, Riley L, Ezzati M: Global burden of metabolic risk factor of chronic disease collaborating group (body mass index) national, regional, and global trends in adult overweight and obesity prevalences. Popul Health Metr. 2012, 10: 1-16. 10.1186/1478-7954-10-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Roberts K, Shields M, De Groh M, Aziz A, Gilbert J: Overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: results from the 2009 to 2011 Canadian health measures survey. Health Rep. 2012, 82-003.http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2012003/article/11706-eng.pdf,Google Scholar
  3. Keith S, Redden D, Katzmarzyk PT, Boggiano MM, Hanlon EC, Benca RM, Ruden D, Peitrobelli A, Barger JL, Fontaine KR, Wang C, Aronne LJ, Wright SM, Baskin M, Dhurandar NV, Lijoi MC, Grilo CM, DeLuca M, WestFall AO, Allison DB: Putative contributors to the secular increase in obesity: exploring the roads less traveled. Int J Obes. 2006, 30: 1585-1594. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Woodruff TJ, Zota AR, Schwartz JM: Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 878-885. 10.1289/ehp.1002727.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Health Canada: Report on Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals in Canada.http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/contaminants/chms-ecms/section8-eng.php#n8_1_2,
  6. Newbold R, Padilla-Banks E, Jefferson W: Environmental estrogens and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304: 84-89. 10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Grün F, Blumberg B: Endocrine disrupters as obesogens. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304: 19-29. 10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Newbold R, Padilla-Banks E: Developmental exposure to endocrine disruptors and the obesity epidemic. Reprod Toxicol. 2007, 23: 290-296. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.12.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hugo ER, Brandebourg TD, Woo JG, Loftus J, Alexander JW: Bisphenol A at environmentally relevant doses inhibits adiponectin release from human adipose tissue explants and adipocytes. Mol Cell Endocrin. 2008, 87406: 1642-1648.Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Jonathan N, Hugo E, Brandebourg T: Effects of bisphenol A on adipokine release from human adipose tissue: implications for the metabolic syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304: 49-54. 10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hatch E, Nelson J: Association of endocrine disruptors and obesity: perspectives from epidemiological studies. Int J Androl. 2010, 33: 324-332. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01035.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Thayer KA, Heindel JJ, Bucher JR, Gallo MA: Role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and obesity: A national toxicology program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect. 2012, 120: 779-789. 10.1289/ehp.1104597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Trujillo ME, Scherer PE: Adiponectin–journey from an adipocyte secretory protein to biomarker of the metabolic syndrome. J Intern Med. 2005, 2: 167-175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmquist JK, Flier JS, Neuroscience: The fat-brain axis enters a new dimension. Science. 2004, 5667: 63-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Monti V, Carlson JJ, Hunt SC, Adams TD: Relationship of ghrelin and leptin hormones with body mass index and waist circumference in a random sample of adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006, 106: 822-828. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.03.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Retnakaran R, Ye C, Hanley A: Effect of maternal weight, adipokines, glucose intolerance and lipids on infant birth weight among women without gestational diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J. 2012, 184: 1353-1360. 10.1503/cmaj.111154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sivan E, Lin WM, Homko CJ, Reece E, Boden G: Leptin is present in human cord blood. Diabetes. 1997, 46: 917-919. 10.2337/diab.46.5.917.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Karakosta P, Chatzi L: Leptin levels in cord blood and anthropometric measures at birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011, 25: 150-63. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01163.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Walsh JM, Byrne J, Mahony RM, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM: Leptin, fetal growth and insulin resistance in non-diabetic pregnancies. Early Hum Dev. 2014, 90: 271-274. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.03.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Romano ME, Savitz DA, Braun JM: Challenges and future directions to evaluating the association between prenatal exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and childhood obesity. Curr Epidemiol Reports. 2014, doi:10.1007/s40471-014-0007-3Google Scholar
  21. Mazaki-Tovi S, Kanety H, Sivan E: Adiponectin and human pregnancy. Curr Diab Rep. 2005, 5: 278-281. 10.1007/s11892-005-0023-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mantzoros CS, Rifas-shiman SL, Williams CJ, Jessica L, Kelesidis T, Gillman MW: Cord blood leptin and adiponectin as predictors of adiposity in children at 3 years of Age. Pediatrics. 2009, 123: 682-689. 10.1542/peds.2008-0343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Trasande L, Attina TM, Blustein J: Association between urinary bisphenol A concentration and obesity prevalence in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2012, 308: 1113-1121. 10.1001/2012.jama.11461.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li D, Miao M, Zhou Z, Wu C, Shi H, Liu X: Urine Bisphenol-A level in relation to obesity and overweight in school-age children. PLoS One. 2013, 8: 11-13.Google Scholar
  25. Chou W, Chen J, Lin C, Chen Y: Biomonitoring of bisphenol A concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood in regard to birth outcomes and adipokine expression: a birth cohort study. Environ Health. 2011, 10: 1-11. 10.1186/1476-069X-10-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Volberg V, Harley K, Calafat A: Maternal bisphenol a exposure during pregnancy and its association with adipokines in Mexican-American children. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2013, 54: 621-628. 10.1002/em.21803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hatch E, Nelson J, Qureshi M: Association of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations with body mass index and waist circumference: a cross-sectional study of NHANES data, 1999–2002. Environ Health. 2008, 15: 1-15.Google Scholar
  28. Teitelbaum SL, Mervish N, Moshier EL, Vangeepuram N, Galvez MP, Calafat AM, Silva MJ, Brenner BL, Wolff MS: Associations between phthalate metabolite urinary concentrations and body size measures in New York City children. Environ Res. 2012, 112: 186-193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang H, Zhou Y, Tang C, Wu J, Chen Y, Jiang Q: Association between bisphenol A exposure and body mass index in Chinese school children : a cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2012, 11: 1-9. 10.1186/1476-069X-11-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Suzuki Y, Niwa M, Yoshinaga J, Mizumoto Y, Serizawa S, Shiraishi H: Prenatal exposure to phthalate esters and PAHs and birth outcomes. Environ Int. 2010, 36: 699-704. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Wolff MS, Engel SM, Berkowitz GS, Ye X, Silva MJ, Zhu C, Wetmur J, Calafat AM: Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008, 116: 1092-1097. 10.1289/ehp.11007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Arbuckle TE, Fraser WD, Fisher M, Davis K, Liang CL, Lupien N, Bastien S, Velez MP, von Dadelszen P, Hemmings DG, Wang J, Helewa M, Taback S, Sermer M, Foster W, Ross G, Fredette P, Smith G, Walker M, Shear R, Dodds L, Ettinger AS, Weber JP, D'Amour M, Legrand M, Kumarathasan P, Vincernt R, Luo ZC, Platt RW, Mitchell G: Cohort profile: the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals research platform. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013, 27: 415-425. 10.1111/ppe.12061.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kajantie E, Hytinantti T: Cord plasma adiponectin: a 20-fold rise between 24 weeks gestation and term. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 4031-4036. 10.1210/jc.2004-0018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Arbuckle TE, Davis K, Marro L, Fisher M, Legrand M, Leblanc A, Gaudreau E, Foster WG, Choeurng V, Freaser WD, MREC Study Group: Phthalate and bisphenol a exposure among pregnant women in Canada - results from the MIREC study. Environ Int. 2014, 68: 55-65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Provencher G, Bérubé R, Dumas P, Bienvenu J-F, Gaudreau E, Bélanger P, Ayotte P: Determination of bisphenol A, triclosan and their metabolites in human urine using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014, 1348: 97-104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Langlois É, Leblanc A, Simard Y, Thellen C: Accuracy investigation of phthalate metabolite standards. J Anal Toxicol. 2012, 36: 270-279. 10.1093/jat/bks016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Langlois É, Saravanabhavan G, Arbuckle TE, Giroux S: Correction and comparability of phthalate metabolite measurements of Canadian biomonitoring studies (2007–2012). Env Int. 2014, 64: 129-133.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. World Health Organization: BMI Classification. 2006,http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html,Google Scholar
  39. Hauser R, Calafat A: Phthalates and human health. Occup Environ Med. 2005, 62: 806-818. 10.1136/oem.2004.017590.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoppin JA, Jaramillo R, London SJ, Bertelsen RJ, Salo PM, Sandler DP, Zeldin DC: Phthalate exposure and allergy in the U.S. population: results from NHANES 2005–2006. Environ Health Perspect. 2013, 121: 1129-1134.Google Scholar
  41. Just AC, Adibi JJ, Rundle AG, Calafat AM, Camann DE, Hauser R, Silva MH, Whyatt RM: Urinary and air phthalate concentrations and self-reported use of personal care products among minority pregnant women in New York city. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010, 20: 625-633. 10.1038/jes.2010.13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Meeker JD, Ehrlich S, Toth TL, Wright DL, Calafat AM, Trisini AT, Ye X, Hauser R: Semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary bisphenol A among men from an infertility clinic. Reprod Toxicol. 2010, 30: 532-539. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.07.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Meeker JD, Calafat AM, Hauser R: Urinary bisphenol A concentrations in relation to serum thyroid and reproductive hormone levels in men from an infertility clinic. Env Sci Technol. 2010, 44: 1458-1463. 10.1021/es9028292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Desquilbet L, Mariotti F: Dose–response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research. Stat Med. 2010, 29: 1037-1057.Google Scholar
  45. Ananth CV, Kleinbaum DG: Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26: 1323-1333. 10.1093/ije/26.6.1323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. 2000, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ye X, Zhou X, Hennings R, Kramer J, Calafat AM: External contamination with Bisphenol A and other ubiquitous organic environmental chemicals during biomonitoring analysis : An elusive laboratory challenge. Environ Health Perspect. 2013, 121: 283-287. 10.1289/ehp.1206093.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Koch HM, Kolossa-gehring M, Angerer CSJ, Brüning T: Bisphenol a in 24 h urine and plasma samples of the German environmental specimen bank from 1995 to 2009 : a retrospective exposure evaluation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012, 22: 610-616. 10.1038/jes.2012.39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo Z-C, Nuyt A-M, Delvin E, Fraser WD, Julien P, Audibert F, Girard I, Shatenstein B, Deal C, Grenier E, Garofalo C, Levy E: Maternal and fetal leptin, adiponectin levels and asssociations with fetal insulin sensitivity. Obesity. 2012, 21: 210-216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Philippat C, Mortamais M, Chevrier C, Petit C, Calafat AM, Ye X: Exposure to phthalates and phenols during pregnancy and offspring size at birth. Environ Health Perspect. 2012, 120: 464-471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Zota AR, Calafat AM, Woodruff TJ: Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2001–2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2014, 122: 235-241.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Volberg V, Heggeseth B, Harley K, Huen K, Yousefi P, Davé V, Tyler K, Vedar M, Eskenazi B, Holland N: Adiponectin and leptin trajectories in mexican-american children from birth to 9 years of age. PLoS One. 2013, 8: 1-8.Google Scholar
  53. Ye X, Wong L, Bishop AM, Calafat AM: Variability of urinary concentrations of bisphenol A in spot samples, first morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 983-989. 10.1289/ehp.1002701.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Bernert JT, Ye X, Silva MJ, Barr DB, Sathyanarayana S, Lanphear BP: Variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol A concentrations during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2011, 119: 131-137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Meeker JD, Cantonwine DE, Rivera-gonzález LO, Ferguson KK, Mukherjee B, Calafat AM, Ye X, Anzalota Del Toto LV, Crespo-Hernandez N, Jimenez-Velez B, Alshawabkeh AN, Cordero JF: Distribution, variability and predictors of urinary concentrations of phenols and parabens among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. Environ Sci Technol. 2013, 47: 3439-3447.Google Scholar
  56. Quirós-Alcalá L, Eskenazi B, Bradman A, Ye X, Calafat AM, Harley K: Determinants of urinary bisphenol A concentrations in Mexican/Mexican–American pregnant women. Environ Int. 2013, 59: 152-160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Salehi F, Turner M, Phillips K, Wigle D, Krewski D, Aronson K: Review of the etiology of breast cancer with special attention to organochlorines as potential endocrine disruptors. J Toxicol Env Heal Part B. 2008, 11: 276-300. 10.1080/10937400701875923.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Cantonwine DE, Cordero JF, Rivera-González LO, Anzalota Del Toro LV, Ferguson KK, Mukherjee B, Calafat AM, Crespo N, Jiminez-Velez B, Padilla IY, Alshawabkeh AN, Meeker JD: Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations among pregnant women in Northern Puerto Rico: distribution, temporal variability, and predictors. Environ Int. 2014, 62: 1-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Inadera H: Developmental origins of obesity and type 2 diabetes: molecular aspects and role of chemicals. Environ Health Prev Med. 2013, 18: 185-197. 10.1007/s12199-013-0328-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, Thornburg KL: Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 61-73. 10.1056/NEJMra0708473.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ashley-Martin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement