Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Bisphenol a increases risk for presumed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Hispanic adolescents in NHANES 2003–2010

Environmental Health201817:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0356-3

  • Received: 23 October 2017
  • Accepted: 23 January 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a ubiquitous chemical and recognized endocrine disruptor associated with obesity and related disorders. We explored the association between BPA levels and suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Methods

Unweighted analyses were used to study the relationship between urinary BPA levels and suspected NAFLD (alanine aminotransferase (ALT).

> 30 U/L, body mass index (BMI) Z-score > 1.064 and evidence of insulin resistance) using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (2003–2010) on 12–19 year olds. Unweighted and weighted analyses were used to evaluate the risk with only elevated ALT.

Results

We included 944 adolescents with urinary BPA and fasting laboratory tests from a total of 7168 adolescents. Risk of suspected NAFLD was increased in the second quartile of BPA levels (1.4–2.7 ng/mL) when compared to the first (< 1.4 ng/mL) (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.44–12.41). The ORs for the third and second quartiles were positive but did not reach statistical significance. The association was stronger in Hispanics (n = 344) with BPA levels in the second (OR 6.12, 95% C.I. 1.62–23.15) quartile and when limiting the analyses to overweight/obese adolescents (n = 332), in the second (OR 5.56, 95% C.I. 1.28–24.06) and fourth BPA quartiles (OR 6.85, 95% C.I. 1.02–46.22) compared to the first quartile. BPA levels were not associated with ALT elevation.

Conclusions

The risk of suspected NAFLD is increased in participants in higher quartiles of BPA exposure, particularly in those of Hispanic ethnicity. Further studies are required to fully understand the potential role of BPA in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Keywords

  • NAFLD
  • BPA
  • Insulin resistance
  • Obesity
  • National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in children and adolescents in the United States [14] with up to 38% of obese children affected [5]. Prevalence increases with age, reaching approximately 17.5% in adolescents [5], and with 5 times the risk of fatty liver in Hispanics [57]. Although it is a histologic diagnosis, NAFLD is clinically suspected when steatosis is identified in imaging studies or with elevation of transaminases in otherwise healthy children, particularly in overweight children or those with evidence of insulin resistance [8]. While genetics clearly play some role in NAFLD [9, 10], environmental exposures may also be inciting or exacerbating factors [11, 12].

Bisphenol-A (BPA) is a ubiquitous chemical and likely endocrine disruptor [13]. It was first synthesized in the 1940s as a synthetic estrogen and is now used in thermal receipt paper as well as coatings that prevent metal corrosion of food and beverage containers [14]. In vitro and animal studies have shown that BPA contributes to de novo fatty acid synthesis [15], stimulates the accumulation of triacylglycerol in adipocytes and human hepatocellular carcinoma cells [16] and up- regulates gene expression involved in lipid metabolism and insulin resistance (IR) [17, 18]—all mechanisms that may contribute to NAFLD. In humans, obesity and diabetes have been associated with serum and urine concentrations of some environmental chemicals, leading to the hypothesis that these chemicals interfere with aspects of metabolism [1921]. In adults, exposure to BPA is associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease, and increased serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase levels [22, 23]. Dose responsive associations have been reported between urinary BPA and fasting blood glucose and metabolites of oxidative stress [24, 25], which also contribute to the development of NAFLD. Although previous cross-sectional studies have found that urinary BPA concentration was significantly associated with obesity in children and adolescents [2628], the association between elevated BPA and NAFLD has not been studied.

The aim of this study is to specifically explore the relationship between BPA exposure in US adolescents and suspected NAFLD defined as elevated ALT levels, overweight or obesity and evidence of insulin resistance. Secondary aims include stratification of the above relationship according to race/ethnicity given the high prevalence of NAFLD in Hispanic adolescents, and assessing the relationship between BPA exposure in US adolescents and ALT elevation.

Methods

Study design

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [29] is a nationally representative survey of the civilian non-institutionalized U.S. population carried out by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Survey cycles from 2003–2004 to 2009–2010 were used to obtain the questionnaire, laboratory, diet and physical examination components for our analysis. Previous cycles that did not include urinary BPA levels and posterior cycles where fasting laboratory levels had not been published at the time of the analysis were excluded. NHANES is approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board, and written informed consent and child assent (as appropriate) were obtained from participants. The Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco (Committee for Human Research) exempted the present study from review.

Inclusion criteria

Adolescent participants between the ages of 12 and 19 were selected for inclusion in this study. Urinary BPA levels were available for a random third and fasting laboratory results were available for a separate random half of participants (both randomly selected by NHANES [30]). Only those included in both random subsets were included in our overall analysis. Participants who were pregnant or known to have Hepatitis B or C, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), known liver disease, or known exposure to hepatotoxic medication (see Supplementary Table 1) were excluded from the analysis. The inclusion process is detailed in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Population Included in Analysis

Method for BPA concentration assessment

A randomly selected subsample had total urinary BPA concentration measured in a urine sample for each participant [31, 32]. Concentrations were obtained using high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy [30]. A value of 0.28 ng/mL was substituted when urinary BPA concentrations were below the level of detection, as is routinely assigned by the NHANES [33]. One hundred patients (3.5%) had urinary concentrations below this level. Urinary creatinine was included in all multivariate models to correct for urinary dilution, as done in previous publications [34, 35]. Our primary predictor was BPA level categorized into quartiles. Log-transformed total concentrations of BPA levels were also estimated and used independently as a predictor in the analyses.

Definition of suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

Our primary study outcome was the presence or absence of suspected NAFLD. Participants were determined to have suspected NAFLD if they had elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) (ALT ≥30 U/L) in combination with overweight [BMI z score of 1.036 or greater (85th percentile for age and sex)] or obesity [BMI z- score 1.064 or greater (95th percentile for age and sex)] and evidence of insulin resistance [Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥3.16]. HOMA-IR was calculated by dividing the product of fasting insulin (mU/L) times fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) by 22.5 [36]. BMI z-scores were derived using the norms suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [37]. Secondary analyses were conducted using elevated ALT (ALT ≥30 U/L) [38] as an outcome. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a higher cutoff for ALT (> 50 U/L in boys, > 44 U/L in girls) as a more specific marker for identifying obese children at high risk for NAFLD [39].

Definition and inclusion of potential confounders

Potential confounders were identified in the current literature [2628, 40]. Statistical modeling was used to determine causal relationships. Variables that were identified as possible confounders and were available in NHANES included age, gender, race/ethnicity, country of birth, poverty to income ratio, survey cycle year exposure to tobacco using serum cotinine as a surrogate, and total caloric intake in 24 h. Race/ethnicity were categorized based on self-report by caregivers in participants under 16 years of age, and by participants in those over 17 years of age. Given that exposure to tobacco smoke is a risk factor for metabolic syndrome in adolescence, serum cotinine level was included in all multivariate models as a continuous variable. A variable characterizing survey cycle year was included in all multivariable models since median urinary BPA levels were not uniform across survey cycles. Urinary BPA in the 2003–2004 cycle had a median of 4.3 ng/mL (IQR 2–7.5), while levels for the 2005–2006, 2007–2008, and 2009–2010 cycles were 2.4 ng/mL, 2 ng/mL, and 2.1 ng/mL respectively.

Statistical analysis

Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted using Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station TX) following NCHS recommendations. Following the practice of Trasande [41] and Stahlhut [42], unweighted analyses were used as our primary analytic approach since the studied population consisted of two overlapping NHANES subsamples. Although there are subsample weights for each, combining these would decrease the sample size ultimately resulting in unstable and unreliable statistical estimates. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed. For the secondary analysis of ALT elevation, we performed both an unweighted analysis for comparison with our primary outcome, and a weighted analysis following the NCHS guidelines to adjust for the complex survey structure of NHANES. All multivariate models were adjusted for urinary creatinine concentrations to account for dilution of urinary BPA.

Results

In the four NHANES cycles studied (2003–2010), 7168 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 were evaluated. Urinary BPA concentrations were obtained in 2238 (31.2%). Fasting laboratory values needed to compute HOMA-IR (insulin and glucose) were available in a second randomized subsample of 976 participants (43.6%). Thirty-two participants (3.3%) were excluded due to pregnancy (n = 21), exposure to hepatotoxic medications (n = 9), or evidence of hepatitis B or C (n = 2). None had HIV or other known liver disease. Our primary, unweighted analysis thus included 944 adolescents from 12 to 19 years of age with both fasting bloodwork and urinary BPA concentrations. The population selected is illustrated in Fig. 1.

For the analysis of ALT elevation, 2105 participants had available BPA concentrations and ALT. Of these, 1978 participants were included in secondary weighted and unweighted analyses after exclusions for pregnancy (n = 38), hepatitis B or C (n = 5), and exposure to hepatotoxic medications (n = 30).

Descriptive and bivariate analyses of urinary BPA quartiles and demographic, environmental, and dietary data for those included in the study (n = 944) are presented in Table 1. Median urinary BPA in the suspected NAFLD cohort was 2.6 ng/mL (interquartile range, IQR, 1.3–5.3 ng/mL). ALT was elevated in 8.4% n = 80), and suspected NAFLD, as defined above, was present in 4.8% (n = 44) (Table 1). For the secondary analysis (n = 1978) including the larger sample of those with ALT and BPA concentrations only, median urinary BPA was 4.73 (IQR 0.28–149) and ALT was elevated in 9.81% (n = 194) (results not shown).
Table 1

Demographic data by Bisphenol-A Quartile for NHANES Populationg

 

n (%)

Bisphenol-A quartile

 

0.28–1.3 ng/mL

1.4–2.7 ng/mL

2.8–5.4 ng/mL

≥5.5 ng/mL

p-value

n = 944

n = 250 (%)

n = 240 (%)

n = 225 (%)

n = 228

 

Age (years)f

15.5 ± 2.3

15.1 ± 2.2

15.5 ± 2.3

15.6 ± 2.3

15.6 ± 2.4

0.03

Gender (male)

523 (55.4)

141 (56.4)

134 (55.8)

118 (52.4)

130 (56.8)

0.78

Country of Birth

     

 United States

822 (87.1)

213 (85.2)

207 (86.3)

204 (90.7)

198 (86.5)

 

 Mexico

69 (7.3)

19 (7.6)

21 (8.8)

13 (5.8)

16 (7.0)

0.51

 Other

53 (5.6)

18 (7.2)

12 (5.0)

8 (3.6)

15 (6.6)

 

Poverty to Income Ratiof

2.07 + 1.51

2.11 ± 1.48

2.10 ± 1.49

2.00 ± 1.51

2.08 ± 1.56

0.87

Race/Ethnicity

     

 Non-Hispanic White

256 (27.1)

61 (24.4)

66 (27.5)

58 (25.8)

71 (31)

 

 Hispanic

344 (36.4)

117 (46.8)

98 (40.8)

74 (32.9)

55 (24)

< 0.001

 Non-Hispanic Black

297 (31.5)

54 (21.6)

67 (27.9)

82 (36.4)

94 (41.1)

 

 Other

47 (5.0)

18 (7.2)

9 (3.8)

11 (4.9)

9 (3.9)

 

Tobacco Exposure (by cotininelevel)

     

 Low (< 0.015 ng/mLa)

168 (18.0)

59 (23.7)

52 (21.8)

38 (17.1)

19 (8.4)

 

 Medium (0.015 to < 2 ng/mL)

603 (64.4)

159 (63.9)

150 (62.8)

140 (63.1)

154 (68.1)

< 0.001

 High (≥2 ng/mL)

165 (17.6)

31 (12.5)

37 (15.5)

44 (19.8)

53 (23.5)

 

Daily Caloric Intake (kilocalories)f

2270.9 ± 1030.3

2319.8  ± 1090.3

2347.8  ± 1069.8

2209.1  ± 940.0

2199.6  ± 1005.9

0.30

BMI Z-Score ≥ 1.036 (≥85th Percentile)

332 (35.6)

80 (32.3)

87 (36.9)

79 (3.3)

86 (38.4)

0.54

Metabolic Syndrome

101 (10.8)

29 (11.7)

23 (9.7)

22 (9.9)

27 (12.0)

0.80

 Hypertriglyceridemiab

97 (10.3)

23 (9.2)

23 (9.6)

23 (10.3)

28 (12.3)

0.70

 Low High Density Lipoproteinc

249 (26.6)

71 (28.5)

51 (21.3)

64 (28.8)

63 (28.0)

0.20

 Hypertensiond

260 (27.6)

62 (24.8)

61 (25.4)

62 (27.6)

75 (32.8)

0.20

 Waist Circumference > 90th

201 (21.8)

51 (20.6)

51 (21.9)

48 (21.8)

51 (23.1)

0.93

Percentile

     

 Impaired fasting glucose

189 (20)

59 (23.6)

57 (23.8)

36 (16.0)

37 (16.2)

0.04

Alanine Aminotransferase > 30 U/Le

80 (8.58)

18 (7.23)

29 (12.18)

14 (6.33)

19 (8.48)

0.11

Suspected Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

44 (4.8)

7 (2.83)

17 (7.3)

9 (4.1)

11 (5.1)

0.14

aTo convert cotinine to nmol/L multiply by 5.675, bSerum triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL (for conversion to mmol/L multiply by 0.0113), cHDL < 40 mg/dL (for conversion to mmol/L multiply by 0.259), dSystolic and/or diastolic blood pressure > 85th percentile for age/height, eTo convert to ukat/L multiply by 0.0167, fMean ± SD, gNHANES population limited to those with fasting lab draws and body mass index measurements in addition to BPA

For the smaller cohort with fasting labs and weights, BPA concentrations in Hispanic participants were lowest (median BPA 2.1 ng/mL, IQR 1–3.8), with slightly higher concentrations in non-Hispanic white participants (median BPA 2.8 ng/mL, IQR 1.4–6) and significantly higher concentrations in non-Hispanic black participants (median BPA 3.6 ng/mL, IQR 1.7–6.5) (results not shown). This difference in BPA concentrations among race/ethnicity categories is also reflected in the distribution of race/ethnicity among quartiles of urinary BPA (p < 0.001; see Table 1).

Urinary BPA and non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

In logistic regression models adjusting only for urinary creatinine, there were no no associations between suspected NAFLD and increasing BPA concentrations (Table 2). In multivariate models adjusting for all confounders, the odds of suspected NAFLD were increased in the second quartile of urinary BPA concentration [Odds Ratio (OR) 4.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.44–12.41] (Table 2). The association was not observed in the third and fourth quartiles of BPA concentrations.]
Table 2

Risk of Suspected Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

Risk of Suspected NAFLDa in total population

 

All races (n = 944)

Non-hispanic white (n = 256)

Hispanic (n = 344)

 

Unadjusted modeld

Adjusted modele

Adjusted modelf

Adjusted modelf

OR (95% C.I.)c

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

Urinary BPAb Category

 0.28–1.3 ng/mL

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

 1.4–2.7 ng/mL

2.66 (0.94–7.48)

0.064

4.23 (1.44–12.41)

0.010

1.69 (0.26–10.92)

0.571

6.12 (1.62–23.15)

0.009

 2.8–5.4 ng/mL

1.95 (0.57–6.71)

0.281

2.43 (0.57–10.43)

0.225

1.19 (0.09–15.63)

0.887

2.74 (0.42–17.70)

0.281

 ≥5.5 ng/mL

2.12 (0.58–7.72)

0.248

3.39 (0.78–14.80)

0.101

1.30 (0.06–27.62)

0.862

4.21 (0.74–24.11)

0.104

Log Transformed BPA

 

1.07 (0.69–1.67)

0.757

1.20 (0.75–1.91)

0.444

1.22 (0.48–3.12)

0.674

1.02 (0.61–1.72)

0.937

aNon-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, bBisphenol A, cOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval), dAdjusted for urinary creatinine, eAdjusted for urinary creatinine, gender, age, race, family income to poverty ratio, country of birth, total caloric intake in 24 h, cotinine levels, and survey cycle, fAdjusted for urinary creatinine, gender, age, total caloric intake in 24 h, cotinine levels, and survey cycle

Suspected NAFLD was present in 24 (7.04%) Hispanic, 12 (4.88%) non-Hispanic white, 6 (2.09%) non-Hispanic black, and 2 (4.55%) other race participants out of the 44 total (result not shown). Multivariate analysis in non-Hispanic White and Hispanic populations showed that Hispanic participants with urinary BPA in the second quartile of BPA concentrations were at higher risk for suspected NAFLD than those in the lowest quartile of BPA (Table 2). Suspected NAFLD was too rare in non-Hispanic black and other categories to evaluate the role of BPA quartile on suspected NAFLD in stratified analyses.

The analyses were repeated including only overweight and obese participants (Table 3). There was a stronger association between suspected NAFLD and the second quartile of BPA concentrations (OR 5.56, 95% C.I. 1.28–24.06) (Table 3). When limiting the analysis to overweight and obese Hispanic participants, there was an even higher risk of suspected NAFLD in the second BPA quartile (OR 5.00, 1.40–17.93; p = 0.015) (Table 3).
Table 3

Risk of Suspected Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Overweight/Obese Adolescents

Risk of Suspected NAFLDa in overweight/obese participants (BMIb Z-Score ≥ 1.064)

 

All races (n = 327)

Non-hispanic white (n=)

Hispanic (n = 126)

 

Unadjusted modeld

Adjusted modele

Adjusted modelf

Adjusted modelf

OR (95% C.I.)c

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

OR (95% C.I.)

p-value

Urinary BPAg Category

 0.28–1.3 ng/mL

Reference

 

Reference

   

Reference

 

 1.4–2.7 ng/mL

2.86 (0.98–8.29)

0.053

5.56 (1.28–24.06)

0.023

1.29 (0.12–13.89)

0.829

5.00 (1.40–17.93)

0.015

 2.8–5.4 ng/mL

2.20 (0.61–7.93)

0.224

3.39 (0.60–19.13)

0.162

1.42 (0.04–45.42)

0.841

1.98 (0.23–17.43)

0.527

 ≥5.5 ng/mL

2.31 (0.66–8.01)

0.181

6.85 (1.02–46.22)

0.048

0.87 (0.05–16.55)

0.926

5.20 (0.93–29.01)

0.060

Log Transformed BPA

 

1.11 (0.71–1.73)

0.644

1.41 (0.74–2.70)

0.285

1.28 (0.19–8.59)

0.787

1.04 (0.58–1.85)

0.896

aNon-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, bBody Mass Index, cOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval), dAdjusted for urinary creatinine, eAdjusted for urinary creatinine, gender, age, race, family income to poverty ratio, country of birth, total caloric intake in 24 h, cotinine levels, and survey cycle, fAdjusted for urinary creatinine, gender, age, total caloric intake in 24 h, cotinine levels, and survey cycle, gBisphenol A

Urinary BPA and elevated ALT

In our secondary analysis of weighted analyses elevated ALT alone, there were no significant associations with urinary BPA in the second (OR 1.34, 95% C.I. 0.57–3.11), third (OR 1.13, 95% C.I. 0.69–2.66), or fourth (OR 1.35, 95% C.I. 0.57–3.20) quartiles when compared to the first quartile in multivariate models. Additionally, no associations were found in univariate models, when evaluating BPA as a log-transformed continuous variable, after stratification for race/ethnicty or in any unweighted analyses using our standard cut-off limit for ALT (> 30 U/L) or after sensitivity analyses using higher cutoffs (data not shown).

Discussion

This is the first study to evaluate the association between BPA and suspected NAFLD. In a relatively large and well-characterized sample of US adolescents we found that the odds of suspected NAFLD were higher in the second quartile of BPA concentrations. Additionally, this association was higher in Hispanic adolescents. These associations persisted  after limiting analyses to only the Hispanic population. ALT elevation was not associated with BPA concentration.

We hypothesize that we had an improved ability to detect an association in Hispanic adolescents because the prevalence of NAFLD in Hispanic participants (7%) was higher than in non-Hispanic whites (4.8%), non-Hispanic blacks (2.1%) or other participants (4.6%) in our population. We suspect that low prevalence of elevated ALT and suspected NAFLD in the cohort may have made it harder to detect an association in the higher BPA quartiles. Furthermore, wide confidence intervals in these quartiles suggest that a small sample size hindered detection of an association between urinary BPA and suspected NAFLD in the upper BPA quartiles. Alternatively, a non-monotonic dose-response relationship, where the risk of disease is highest with low, constant doses, may exist with exposure to BPA. In animal studies, metabolic dysfunction has been identified with exposure to “low doses” (doses generally considered safe for human exposure) of BPA [25].

One prior publication explored the relationship between BPA and elevated serum transaminases in boys. In a small group (n = 39) of overweight and obese 3 to 8 year olds, elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was associated with increasing BPA concentrations [43] in male participants. In a population based adult study, serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevation was also associated with elevated BPA concentrations [22]. Neither of these studies excluded other causes of liver disease.

We focused our definition of suspected NAFLD with the aim of increasing the specificity of the diagnosis by excluding other causes of elevated ALT concentrations. The association between BPA and suspected NAFLD was positive in using the more specific definition including obesity and insulin resistance, but consistently negative when using elevated ALT alone as an outcome, which strengthens our hypothesis that BPA is associated with NAFLD.

Obesity has been associated with BPA in previous studies [2628, 44], independent of any liver disease, which raised the concern that the association with suspected NAFLD may be due to using BMI ≥85th percentile as part of the definition for suspected NAFLD. Limiting the analysis to overweight or obese participants allowed us to assess the strength of the association between BPA and NAFLD independent of weight categories. We found stronger associations between BPA and NAFLD among the overweight and obese than among the total cohort of 944. This suggests that BPA may be contributing to the development of NAFLD, particularly in Hispanics who are overweight/obese. Further studies should investigate a possible interaction between BPA consumption and higher weight categories and possible development of NAFLD.

This study’s limitations are similar to those of other studies of BPA and obesity or related outcomes. The bulk of the literature studying these associations consists of cross-sectional data [2628, 40, 4345], with the largest studied groups coming from NHANES [26, 28, 43]. All of the studies evaluating these associations use urinary concentrations of BPA to determine exposure. Urinary BPA concentrations are obtained from a single sample, which is thought to reflect recent (4-40 h) dietary intake and does not necessarily reflect chronically high (or low) concentrations [32, 46] or long term exposure. Moreover, studies have shown high variability within individuals [47], as well as detectable concentrations after fasting [48, 49], which suggest urinary BPA concentrations may also reflect non-dietary exposure or accumulation in tissue. Specifically, studies have shown that BPA has a strong affinity for adipose tissue with accumulation three times higher than in other tissues [49]. BPA is ubiquitous in the environment but it is difficult to evaluate long-term exposure with current techniques.

BPA and NAFLD both inhibit human hepatic metabolic activities [50, 51]. Additionally, BPA is subject to hepatic metabolism where it is converted to an inactive monoglucuronide form [50]. This is another important limitation to our study- BPA metabolism may be impaired in NAFLD due to defective hepatic glucuronidation increasing total BPA levels in urine. Studies in animal models, patients affected by liver disease of other etiologies and longitudinal studies in humans etiologies are necessary to clarify this conundrum.

The relationship between BPA and NAFLD identified in this large, nationally representative sample of adolescents should encourage further research on the effect of BPA and obesity related outcomes, particularly adequately sized longitudinal studies to study causality. Further longitudinal studies would help elucidate whether BPA concentrations are a risk factor for NAFLD or are increased in obese children because they have greater adipose stores of this lipophilic chemical. The association we found with NAFLD suggests that BPA concentrations may be tied to end-organ disease, not just co-existent with obesity.

Conclusion

In adolescents, particularly those of Hispanic ethnicity, there is an association between Bisphenol-A and suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, we are unable to establish true causality. Hispanics may be more prone to eating poor quality foodstuff with additional environmental toxins in addition to BPA which may have a cumulative impact on risk for NAFLD. Our study further indicated that there may important interactive effects between overweight, obesity and ingestion of BPA and development of NAFLD. It is possible that BPA accumulates in adipose tissues as other studies have indicated. Further longitudinal studies evaluating long-term exposure to BPA, are needed to fully understand the role of BPA and other environmental toxins in NAFLD, as well as possible mechanisms of injury.

Abbreviations

ALT: 

Alanine amino transferase

AST: 

Aspartate amino transferase

BPA: 

Bisphenol-A

CDC: 

Centers for disease control

CI: 

Confidence interval

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

NAFLD: 

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH: 

Non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis

NCHS: 

National Center for Health Statistics

NHANES: 

National Health and Nutrition E*** S***

OR: 

Odds Ratio

Declarations

Funding

Dr. Verstraete is partially funded by NIH Grant T32DK007762 and the UCSF Dean's Diversity Fund. Dr. Perito is supported by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Emmet B. Keeffe Career Development Award in Clinical or Translational Research in Liver Disease and a Pilot/Feasibility grant from the UCSF Liver Center (P30 DK026743). Dr. Wojcicki is supported by the NIDDK 080825 grant.

All funding bodies played no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data and writing of results.

Availability of data and materials

All data is available through the National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/

Authors’ contributions

SV, PR and JW conceived of the research and the paper. SV and EP completed the analyses. SV, PR, EP and JW interpreted the results. SV wrote the paper and all authors approved the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Exempt approval was obtained from the Committee on Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco

Consent for publication

Not applicable. There is no individual level data in our publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children’s Hospital San Francisco University of California San Francisco, Box 0136, 550 16th Street 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

References

  1. Wieckowska A, Feldstein AE. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the pediatric population: a review. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005;17:636–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Huang JS, Barlow SE, Quiros-Tejeira RE, Scheimann A, Skelton J, Suskind D, et al. Childhood obesity for pediatric gastroenterologists. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr NIH Public Access. 2013;56:99–109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the pediatric population. Clin Liver Dis. 2004;8:549–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Duncan M, Zong W, Biank VF, Hageman JR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in pediatrics. Pediatr Ann. 2016;45:E54–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwimmer JB, Deutsch R, Kahen T, Lavine JE, Stanley C, Behling C. Prevalence of fatty liver in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1388–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hassan K, Bhalla V, El Regal ME, A-Kader HH. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a comprehensive review of a growing epidemic. WJG. 2014;20:12082–101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Marzuillo P. Pediatric fatty liver disease: role of ethnicity and genetics. WJG Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. 2014;20:7347–55.Google Scholar
  8. Cali AMG, De Oliveira AM, Kim H, Chen S, Reyes-Mugica M, Escalera S, et al. Glucose Dysregulation and hepatic Steatosis in obese adolescents: is there a link? Hepatology. Wiley subscription services, inc. A Wiley Company. 2009;49:1896–903.Google Scholar
  9. Dongiovanni P, Anstee QM, Valenti L. Genetic predisposition in NAFLD and NASH: impact on severity of liver disease and response to treatment. Curr Pharm Des Bentham Science Publishers. 2013;19:5219–38.Google Scholar
  10. Ravi Kanth VV, Sasikala M, Sharma M, Rao PN, Reddy DN. Genetics of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from susceptibility and nutrient interactions to management. World J Hepatol. 2016;8:827–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelishadi R, Poursafa P. Obesity and air pollution: global risk factors for pediatric non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepat Mon. 2011;11:794–802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelishadi R, Poursafa P, Jamshidi F. Role of environmental chemicals in obesity: a systematic review on the current evidence. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. Hindawi. 2013;2013:896789–8.Google Scholar
  13. Yoon K, Kwack SJ, Kim HS, Lee B-M. Estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemicals: molecular mechanisms of actions on putative human diseases. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Taylor & Francis. 2014;17:127–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Center for Food Safety, nutrition a. Public health focus - Bisphenol a (BPA): use in food contact application. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition; 2014. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/newsevents/publichealthfocus/ucm064437.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  15. Marmugi A, Ducheix S, Lasserre F, Polizzi A, Paris A, Priymenko N, et al. Low doses of bisphenol a induce gene expression related to lipid synthesis and trigger triglyceride accumulation in adult mouse liver. Hepatology. Wiley subscription services, inc. A Wiley Company. 2012;55:395–407.Google Scholar
  16. Wada K, Sakamoto H, Nishikawa K, Sakuma S, Nakajima A, Fujimoto Y, et al. Life style-related diseases of the digestive system: endocrine disruptors stimulate lipid accumulation in target cells related to metabolic syndrome. J Pharmacol Sci The Japanese Pharmacological Society. 2007;105:133–7.Google Scholar
  17. Rochester JR. Bisphenol a and human health: a review of the literature. Reprod Toxicol. 2013;42:132–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Strakovsky RS, Wang H, Engeseth NJ, Flaws JA, Helferich WG, Pan Y-X, et al. Developmental bisphenol a (BPA) exposure leads to sex-specific modification of hepatic gene expression and epigenome at birth that may exacerbate high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015;284:101–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodman M, LaKind JS, Mattison DR. Do phthalates act as obesogens in humans? A systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Crit Rev Toxicol Taylor & Francis. 2014;44:151–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Khalil N, Chen A, Lee M. Endocrine disruptive compounds and cardio-metabolic risk factors in children. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;19:120–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Karoutsou E, Polymeris A. Environmental endocrine disruptors and obesity. Endocr Regul. 2012;46:37–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, Wallace RB, et al. Association of urinary bisphenol a concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA. 2008;300:1303–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ranciere F, Lyons JG, Loh VHY, Botton J, Galloway T, Wang T, et al. Bisphenol a and the risk of cardiometabolic disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence. Environ Health. 2015;14:46.Google Scholar
  24. Indumathi D, Jayashree S, Selvaraj J, Sathish S, Mayilvanan C, Akilavalli N, et al. Effect of bisphenol-a on insulin signal transduction and glucose oxidation in skeletal muscle of adult male albino rat. Hum exp Toxicol volume 32. 3rd ed. London: SAGE PublicationsSage UK; 2013. p. 960–71.Google Scholar
  25. Angle BM, Do RP, Ponzi D, Stahlhut RW, Drury BE, Nagel SC, et al. Metabolic disruption in male mice due to fetal exposure to low but not high doses of bisphenol a (BPA): evidence for effects on body weight, food intake, adipocytes, leptin, adiponectin, insulin and glucose regulation. Reprod Toxicol. 2013;42:256–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Trasande L, Attina TM, Blustein J. Association between urinary Bisphenol a concentration and obesity prevalence in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2012;308:1113–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bhandari R, Xiao J, Shankar A. Urinary bisphenol a and obesity in U.S. children. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177:1263–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Eng DS, Lee JM, Gebremariam A, Meeker JD, Peterson K, Padmanabhan V. Bisphenol a and chronic disease risk factors in US children. Pediatrics. 2013;132:E637–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jan 13]. Available from: https://cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  30. Centers for disease control prevention. Environmental phenols (EPH_F) [internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2009-2010/EPH_F.htm. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  31. Calafat AM. Laboratory procedure manual: Benzophenone-3, bisphenol a, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,5-dichlorophenol, methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and butyl parabens, triclosan [internet]. Centers for Disease Control Environmental health Available from: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2011-2012/labmethods/eph_g_met.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  32. Ye X, Wong L-Y, Bishop AM, Calafat AM. Variability of urinary concentrations of Bisphenol a in spot samples, first morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:983–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Calafat AM, Ye X, Silva MJ, Kuklenyik Z, Needham LL. Human exposure assessment to environmental chemicals using biomonitoring. Int J Androl Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2006;29:166–71. –discussion181–5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, Needham LL. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol a and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect National Institute of Environmental Health Science. 2005;113:391–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ, Needham LL, Pirkle JL. Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ. Health Perspect. National Institute of Environmental Health Science. 2005;113:192–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sargin M, Uygur-Bayramicli O, Sargin H, Orbay E, Yayla A. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with insulin resistance - is OGTT indicated in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37:399–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat. 2002;11:1–190.Google Scholar
  38. Schwimmer JB, Dunn W, Norman GJ, Pardee PE, Middleton MS, Kerkar N, et al. SAFETY study: Alanine Aminotransferase cutoff values are set too high for reliable detection of pediatric chronic liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1357–U197.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Molleston JP, Schwimmer JB, Yates KP, Murray KF, Cummings OW, Lavine JE, et al. Histological abnormalities in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and normal or mildly elevated Alanine Aminotransferase levels. J Pediatr. 2014;164:707–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wells EM, Jackson LW, Koontz MB. Association between bisphenol a and waist-to-height ratio among children: National Health and nutrition examination survey, 2003-2010. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24:165–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Trasande L, Spanier AJ, Sathyanarayana S, Attina TM, Blustein J. Urinary phthalates and increased insulin resistance in adolescents. Pediatrics American Academy of Pediatrics. 2013;132:e646–55.Google Scholar
  42. Stahlhut RW, van Wijngaarden E, Dye TD, Cook S, Swan SH. Concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with increased waist circumference and insulin resistance in adult US males. Environ. Health Perspect. National Institute of Environmental Health Science. 2007;115:876–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Khalil N, Ebert JR, Wang L, Belcher S, Lee M, Czerwinski SA, et al. Bisphenol a and cardiometabolic risk factors in obese children. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470-471:726–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang H-X, Zhou Y, Tang C-X, Wu J-G, Chen Y, Jiang Q-W. Association between bisphenol a exposure and body mass index in Chinese school children: a cross-sectional study. Environ health. 2nd ed; 2012. p. 11–79.Google Scholar
  45. Li D-K, Miao M, Zhou Z, Wu C, Shi H, Liu X, et al. Urine Bisphenol-a level in relation to obesity and overweight in school-age children. Votruba SB, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65399.Google Scholar
  46. Longnecker MP, Harbak K, Kissling GE, Hoppin JA, Eggesbo M, Jusko TA, et al. The concentration of bisphenol a in urine is affected by specimen collection, a preservative, and handling. Environ Res. 2013;126:211–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Stahlhut RW, Welshons WV, Swan SH. Bisphenol a data in NHANES suggest longer than expected half-life, substantial nonfood exposure, or both. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:784–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Csanady GA, Oberste-Frielinghaus HR, Semder B, Baur C, Schneider KT, Filser JG. Distribution and unspecific protein binding of the xenoestrogens bisphenol a and daidzein. Arch Toxicol. 2002;76:299–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Genuis SJ, Beesoon S, Birkholz D, Lobo RA. Human excretion of bisphenol a: blood, urine, and sweat (BUS) study. Journal of Environmental and Public Health Hindawi. 2012;2012:185731–10.Google Scholar
  50. Niwa T, Fujimoto M, Kishimoto K, Yabusaki Y, Ishibashi F, Katagiri M. Metabolism and interaction of bisphenol a in human hepatic cytochrome p450 and steroidogenic CYP17. Biol Pharm Bull. 2001;24:1064–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Merrell MD, Cherrington NJ. Drug metabolism alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Drug Metab Rev Taylor & Francis. 2011;43:317–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement