Trasande L, Shaffer RM, Sathyanarayana S. Food additives and child health. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2):e20181408.
Article
Google Scholar
Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1–150.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Balbus JM, Barouki R, Birnbaum LS, Etzel RA, Gluckman PD, Grandjean P, et al. Early-life prevention of non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9860):3–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Bennett D, Bellinger DC, Birnbaum LS, Bradman A, Chen A, Cory-Slechta DA, et al. Project TENDR: targeting environmental Neuro-developmental risks the TENDR consensus statement. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(7):A118–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Di Renzo GC, Conry JA, Blake J, DeFrancesco MS, DeNicola N, Martin JN Jr, et al. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics opinion on reproductive health impacts of exposure to toxic environmental chemicals. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(3):219–25.
Article
Google Scholar
Bergman Å, Heindel JJ, Kasten T, Kidd KA, Jobling S, Neira M, et al. The impact of endocrine disruption: a consensus statement on the state of the science. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(4):a104–6.
Article
Google Scholar
Maffini MV, Vandenberg LN. Closing the gap: improving additives safety evaluation to reflect human health concerns. Environ Risk Assess Remediat. 2017;1(3):26–33.
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN. Low dose effects challenge the evaluation of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;84:58–61.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Woodruff TJ, Zeise L, Axelrad DA, Guyton KZ, Janssen S, Miller M, et al. Meeting report: moving upstream-evaluating adverse upstream end points for improved risk assessment and decision-making. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(11):1568–75.
Article
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN, Pelch KE. Systematic review methodologies and endocrine disrupting chemicals: improving evaluations of the plastic monomer Bisphenol a. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2021; in press.
Pellizzari ED, Woodruff TJ, Boyles RR, Kannan K, Beamer PI, Buckley JP, et al. Identifying and prioritizing chemicals with uncertain burden of exposure: opportunities for biomonitoring and health-related research. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(12):126001.
Article
Google Scholar
Mantha A, Tang M, Pieper KJ, Parks JL, Edwards MA. Tracking reduction of water lead levels in two homes during the Flint Federal Emergency. Water Res X. 2020;7:100047.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Evans M, Palmer K, Aldy J, Fowlie M, Kotchen M, Levinson A. The role of retrospective analysis in an era of deregulation: lessons from the US mercury and air toxics standards. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2021;15(1):163–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Scherer LD, Maynard A, Dolinoy DC, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. The psychology of 'regrettable substitutions': examining consumer judgements of Bisphenol a and its alternatives. Health Risk Soc. 2014;16(7–8):649–66.
Article
Google Scholar
Lucas D, Petty SM, Keen O, Luedeka B, Schlummer M, Weber R, et al. Methods of responsibly managing end-of-life foams and plastics containing flame retardants: part I. Environ Eng Sci. 2018;35(6):573–87.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cordner A, Poudrier G, DiValli J, Brown P. Combining social science and environmental Health Research for community engagement. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3483.
Article
Google Scholar
Sass JB, Colangelo A. European Union bans atrazine, while the United States negotiates continued use. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2006;12(3):260–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
European Commission. The precautionary principle: decision-making under uncertainty. Sci Environ Policy. 2017:1–24.
National Research Council. Exposure science in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.
Google Scholar
US EPA. Facility level comparisons. In: Clean air markets; 2021. https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/facility-level-comparisons.
Google Scholar
US EPA: Technical support document EPA’s 2014 national air toxics assessment. 2018 Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-2009/documents/2014_nata_technical_support_document.pdf.
Google Scholar
Levy JI, Bennett DH, Melly SJ, Spengler JD. Influence of traffic patterns on particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in Roxbury, Massachusetts. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2003;13(5):364–71.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tuttle L, Meng Q, Moya J, Johns DO. Consideration of age-related changes in behavior trends in older adults in assessing risks of environmental exposures. J Aging Health. 2013;25(2):243–73.
Article
Google Scholar
US EPA. Exposure factors handbook 2011 edition (final). Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2011.
Google Scholar
Doherty BT, Koelmel JP, Lin EZ, Romano ME, Godri Pollitt KJ. Use of Exposomic methods incorporating sensors in environmental epidemiology. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2021;8(1):34–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Koelmel JP, Lin EZ, Guo P, Zhou J, He J, Chen A, et al. Exploring the external exposome using wearable passive samplers - the China BAPE study. Environ Pollut. 2021;270:116228.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Harada KH, Tanaka K, Sakamoto H, Imanaka M, Niisoe T, Hitomi T, et al. Biological monitoring of human exposure to neonicotinoids using urine samples, and neonicotinoid excretion kinetics. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146335.
Article
Google Scholar
Canova C, Cantarutti A. Population-based birth cohort studies in epidemiology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5276.
Article
Google Scholar
Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(8):1847–50.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Rappaport SM, Smith MT. Epidemiology. Environment and disease risks. Science. 2010;330(6003):460–1.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Schantz SL, Eskenazi B, Buckley JP, Braun JM, Sprowles JN, Bennett DH, et al. A framework for assessing the impact of chemical exposures on neurodevelopment in ECHO: opportunities and challenges. Environ Res. 2020;188:109709.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buckley JP, Barrett ES, Beamer PI, Bennett DH, Bloom MS, Fennell TR, et al. Opportunities for evaluating chemical exposures and child health in the United States: the environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO) program. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2020;30(3):397–419.
Article
Google Scholar
Padula AM, Monk C, Brennan PA, Borders A, Barrett ES, McEvoy CT, et al. A review of maternal prenatal exposures to environmental chemicals and psychosocial stressors—implications for research on perinatal outcomes in the ECHO program. J Perinatol. 2020;40(1):10–24.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Heindel JJ, Vandenberg LN. Developmental origins of health and disease: a paradigm for understanding disease etiology and prevention. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015;27(2):248–53.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Grandjean P, Abdennebi-Najar L, Barouki R, Cranor CF, Etzel RA, Gee D, et al. Timescales of developmental toxicity impacting on research and needs for intervention. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;125 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):70–80.
Article
Google Scholar
Calafat AM, Longnecker MP, Koch HM, Swan SH, Hauser R, Goldman LR, et al. Optimal exposure biomarkers for nonpersistent Chemicals in Environmental Epidemiology. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(7):A166–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Valic MS, Zheng G. Research tools for extrapolating the disposition and pharmacokinetics of nanomaterials from preclinical animals to humans. Theranostics. 2019;9(11):3365–87.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ, Jacobs DR Jr, Lee DH, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378–455.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sullivan J, Croisant S, Howarth M, Rowe GT, Fernando H, Phillips-Savoy A, et al. Building and maintaining a citizen science network with fishermen and fishing communities post Deepwater horizon oil disaster using a CBPR approach. New Solut. 2018;28(3):416–47.
Article
Google Scholar
Eggers MJ, Doyle JT, Lefthand MJ, Young SL, Moore-Nall AL, Kindness L, et al. Community engaged cumulative risk assessment of exposure to inorganic well water contaminants, crow reservation, Montana. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):76.
Article
Google Scholar
Hoover E. Cultural and health implications of fish advisories in a native American community. Ecol Process. 2013;2(1):1–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Hubbell BJ, Kaufman A, Rivers L, Schulte K, Hagler G, Clougherty J, et al. Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use. Sci Total Environ. 2018;621:886–94.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Singla S, Bansal D, Misra A, Raheja G. Towards an integrated framework for air quality monitoring and exposure estimation-a review. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190(9):562.
Article
Google Scholar
Thoma E, George I, Duvall R, Wu T, Whitaker D, Oliver K, et al. Rubbertown next generation emissions measurement demonstration project. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):2041.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Spalinger SM, von Braun MC, Petrosyan V, von Lindern IH. Northern Idaho house dust and soil lead levels compared to the Bunker Hill superfund site. Environ Monit Assess. 2007;130(1–3):57–72.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Spears BL, Hansen JA, Audet DJ. Blood lead concentrations in waterfowl utilizing Lake Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007;52(1):121–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
von Lindern I, Spalinger S, Petroysan V, von Braun M. Assessing remedial effectiveness through the blood lead:soil/dust lead relationship at the Bunker Hill superfund site in the silver valley of Idaho. Sci Total Environ. 2003;303(1–2):139–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Sheldrake S, Stifelman M. A case study of lead contamination cleanup effectiveness at Bunker Hill. Sci Total Environ. 2003;303(1–2):105–23.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
von Lindern IH, Spalinger SM, Bero BN, Petrosyan V, von Braun MC. The influence of soil remediation on lead in house dust. Sci Total Environ. 2003;303(1–2):59–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Moodie SM, Tsui EK, Silbergeld EK. Community- and family-level factors influence care-giver choice to screen blood lead levels of children in a mining community. Environ Res. 2010;110(5):484–96.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Moodie SM, Evans EL. Ethical issues in using children's blood lead levels as a remedial action objective. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S156–60.
Article
Google Scholar
Rosner D. A Lead poisoning crisis enters its second century. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(5):756–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Banwell C, Housen T, Smurthwaite K, Trevenar S, Walker L, Todd K, et al. Health and social concerns about living in three communities affected by per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a qualitative study in Australia. PLoS One. 2021;16(1):e0245141.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lanphear BP. Low-level toxicity of chemicals: no acceptable levels? PLoS Biol. 2017;15(12):e2003066.
Article
Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention. Interpreting and managing blood lead levels < 10 microg/dL in children and reducing childhood exposures to lead: recommendations of CDC's advisory Committee on childhood Lead poisoning prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56(Rr-8):1–16.
Google Scholar
Wang Z, Walker GW, Muir DC, Nagatani-Yoshida K. Toward a global understanding of chemical pollution: a first comprehensive analysis of national and regional chemical inventories. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(5):2575–84.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Persson L, Carney Almroth BM, Collins CD, Cornell S, de Wit CA, Diamond ML, et al. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:1510–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Choi J, Morck TA, Joas A, Knudsen E. Major national human biomonitoring programs in chemical exposure assessment. Environ Sci. 2015;2:782–802.
Google Scholar
Orešič M, McGlinchey A, Wheelock CE, Hyötyläinen T. Metabolic signatures of the Exposome-quantifying the impact of exposure to environmental chemicals on human health. Metabolites. 2020;10(11):454.
Article
Google Scholar
Cousins IT, DeWitt JC, Glüge J, Goldenman G, Herzke D, Lohmann R, et al. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020;22(12):2307–12.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Martin O, Scholze M, Ermler S, McPhie J, Bopp SK, Kienzler A, et al. Ten years of research on synergisms and antagonisms in chemical mixtures: a systematic review and quantitative reappraisal of mixture studies. Environ Int. 2021;146:106206.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sexton K, Linder SH. Cumulative risk assessment for combined health effects from chemical and nonchemical stressors. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(S1):S81–8.
Article
Google Scholar
National Research Council. Phthalates and cumulative risk assessment: the tasks ahead. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
Google Scholar
Committee on the Design and Evaluation of Safer Chemical Substitutions, Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council. A framework to guide selection of chemical alternatives. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2014.
Google Scholar
Sackmann K, Reemtsma T, Rahmberg M, Bunke D. Impact of European chemicals regulation on the industrial use of plasticizers and patterns of substitution in Scandinavia. Environ Int. 2018;119:346–52.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ye X, Wong LY, Kramer J, Zhou X, Jia T, Calafat AM. Urinary concentrations of Bisphenol a and three other Bisphenols in convenience samples of U.S. adults during 2000-2014. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(19):11834–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang Y, Zhu H, Kannan K. A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics. 2019;7(2):21.
Article
Google Scholar
Buckley JP, Kuiper JR, Bennett DH, Barrett ES, Bastain T, Breton CV, et al. Exposure to contemporary and emerging Chemicals in Commerce among pregnant women in the United States: the environmental influences on child health outcome (ECHO) program. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:6560–73.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, Diamond ML, Phillips A, Singla V, et al. Organophosphate Ester flame retardants: are they a regrettable substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl ethers? Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019;6(11):638–49.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Birnbaum LS, Staskal DF. Brominated flame retardants: cause for concern? Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(1):9–17.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Meironyté D, Norén K, Bergman A. Analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in Swedish human milk. A time-related trend study, 1972-1997. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1999;58(6):329–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Betts K. New flame retardants detected in indoor and outdoor environments. Washington, DC: ACS Publications; 2008.
Book
Google Scholar
Deegan D. Brominated flame retardants to be voluntarily phased out. In: Environmental news. Edited by US EPA; 2003. https://archive.epa.gov/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/26f9f23c42cd007d85256dd4005525d2.html.
Google Scholar
Cordner A. Toxic safety: flame retardants, chemical controversies, and environmental health. New York: Columbia University Press; 2016.
Book
Google Scholar
Cowell WJ, Sjödin A, Jones R, Wang Y, Wang S, Herbstman JB. Temporal trends and developmental patterns of plasma polybrominated diphenyl ether concentrations over a 15-year period between 1998 and 2013. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019;29(1):49–60.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zota AR, Linderholm L, Park J-S, Petreas M, Guo T, Privalsky ML, et al. Temporal comparison of PBDEs, OH-PBDEs, PCBs, and OH-PCBs in the serum of second trimester pregnant women recruited from San Francisco general hospital, California. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(20):11776–84.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stapleton HM, Allen JG, Kelly SM, Konstantinov A, Klosterhaus S, Watkins D, et al. Alternate and new brominated flame retardants detected in U.S. house dust. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(18):6910–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Covaci A, Harrad S, Abdallah MA, Ali N, Law RJ, Herzke D, et al. Novel brominated flame retardants: a review of their analysis, environmental fate and behaviour. Environ Int. 2011;37(2):532–56.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Callahan P, Roe S, Hawthorne M. Playing with fire. Chicago: Tribune; 2012.
Google Scholar
Davis A, Ryan PB, Cohen JA, Harris D, Black M. Chemical exposures from upholstered furniture with various flame retardant technologies. Indoor Air. 2021;31(5):1473–83.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Michaels D. Doubt is their product: how Industry's assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Google Scholar
Goldberg RF, Vandenberg LN. Distract, display, disrupt: examples of manufactured doubt from five industries. Rev Environ Health. 2019;34(4):349–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Goldberg RF, Vandenberg LN. The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health. Environ Health. 2021;20(1):33.
Article
Google Scholar
Brody JG, Morello-Frosch R, Brown P, Rudel RA, Altman RG, Frye M, et al. Improving disclosure and consent: "is it safe?": new ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(9):1547–54.
Article
Google Scholar
Cordner A, De La Rosa VY, Schaider LA, Rudel RA, Richter L, Brown P. Guideline levels for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water: the role of scientific uncertainty, risk assessment decisions, and social factors. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019;29(2):157–71.
Article
Google Scholar
Wattenberg EV, Bielicki JM, Suchomel AE, Sweet JT, Vold EM, Ramachandran G. Assessment of the acute and chronic health hazards of hydraulic fracturing fluids. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(9):611–24.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Singh K, Oates C, Plant J, Voulvoulis N. Undisclosed chemicals--implications for risk assessment: a case study from the mining industry. Environ Int. 2014;68:1–15.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Martin JW, Kannan K, Berger U, De Voogt P, Field J, Franklin J, et al. Peer reviewed: analytical challenges hamper Perfluoroalkyl research. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(13):248A–55A.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Benbrook CM. Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally. Environ Sci Europe. 2016;28:3.
Article
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN, Blumberg B, Antoniou MN, Benbrook CM, Carroll L, Colborn T, et al. Is it time to reassess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(6):613–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Perry MJ, Mandrioli D, Belpoggi F, Manservisi F, Panzacchi S, Irwin C. Historical evidence of glyphosate exposure from a US agricultural cohort. Environ Health. 2019;18(1):42.
Article
Google Scholar
Myers JP, Antoniou MN, Blumberg B, Carroll L, Colborn T, Everett LG, et al. Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environ Health. 2015;15:19.
Article
Google Scholar
Landrigan PJ, Belpoggi F. The need for independent research on the health effects of glyphosate-based herbicides. Environ Health. 2018;17(1):51.
Article
Google Scholar
Krimsky S, Gillam C. Roundup litigation discovery documents: implications for public health and journal ethics. J Public Health Policy. 2018;39(3):318–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Monsanto International sarl, Monsanto Europe SA. The agronomic benefits of glyphosate in Europe: review of the benefits of glyphosate per market use; 2010. p. 1–82. http://www.monsanto.com/products/documents/glyphosate-background-materials/agronomic%20benefits%20of%20glyphosate%20in%20europe.pdf
Google Scholar
Benbrook CM. Why regulators lost track and control of pesticide risks: lessons from the case of glyphosate-based herbicides and genetically engineered-crop technology. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5(3):387–95.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Benbrook CM, Davis DR. The dietary risk index system: a tool to track pesticide dietary risks. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):103.
Article
Google Scholar
Bolognesi C, Castle L, Cravedi JP, Engel KH, Fowler PAF, Franz R, et al. EFSA: scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol a (BPA) in foodstuffs – executive summary. EFSA J. 2015;13(1):3978.
Article
Google Scholar
Bernier MR, Vandenberg LN. Handling of thermal paper: implications for dermal exposure to bisphenol a and its alternatives. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178449.
Article
Google Scholar
Sathyanarayana S, Braun JM, Yolton K, Liddy S, Lanphear BP. Case report: high prenatal bisphenol a exposure and infant neonatal neurobehavior. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(8):1170–5.
Article
Google Scholar
Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K. Transfer of bisphenol a from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398(1):571–6.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zalko D, Jacques C, Duplan H, Bruel S, Perdu E. Viable skin efficiently absorbs and metabolizes bisphenol a. Chemosphere. 2011;82(3):424–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Liao C, Kannan K. Widespread occurrence of bisphenol a in paper and paper products: implications for human exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(21):9372–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Geens T, Goeyens L, Kannan K, Neels H, Covaci A. Levels of bisphenol-a in thermal paper receipts from Belgium and estimation of human exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435-436:30–3.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Demierre AL, Peter R, Oberli A, Bourqui-Pittet M. Dermal penetration of bisphenol a in human skin contributes marginally to total exposure. Toxicol Lett. 2012;213(3):305–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Weschler CJ, Bekö G, Koch HM, Salthammer T, Schripp T, Toftum J, et al. Transdermal uptake of diethyl phthalate and Di(n-butyl) phthalate directly from air: experimental verification. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(10):928–34.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Hegstad M. EPA seeks input on competing exposure methods for new TSCA reviews. Inside EPA's Risk Policy Rep. 2016;23(33):5–7.
Google Scholar
Neltner TG, Kulkarni NR, Alger HM, Maffini MV, Bongard ED, Fortin ND, et al. Navigating the US food additive regulatory program. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2011;10(6):342–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones HM, Mayawala K, Poulin P. Dose selection based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approaches. AAPS J. 2013;15(2):377–87.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Punt A, Peijnenburg A, Hoogenboom R, Bouwmeester H. Non-animal approaches for toxicokinetics in risk evaluations of food chemicals. Altex. 2017;34(4):501–14.
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN, Hunt PA, Myers JP, Vom Saal FS. Human exposures to bisphenol a: mismatches between data and assumptions. Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(1):37–58.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Clewell HJ, Campbell JL, Van Landingham C, Franzen A, Yoon M, Dodd DE, et al. Incorporation of in vitro metabolism data and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in a risk assessment for chloroprene. Inhal Toxicol. 2019;31(13–14):468–83.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Melnick RL, Sills RC, Portier CJ, Roycroft JH, Chou BJ, Grumbein SL, et al. Multiple organ carcinogenicity of inhaled chloroprene (2-chloro-1,3-butadiene) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice and comparison of dose-response with 1,3-butadiene in mice. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20(5):867–78.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Versar I. External peer review of a report on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling for chloroprene (Ramboll, 2020) and a supplemental analysis of metabolite clearance (U.S. EPA, 2020). In: Post-meeting peer review summary report; 2020.
Google Scholar
Abduljalil K, Badhan RKS. Drug dosing during pregnancy-opportunities for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020;47(4):319–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Verscheijden LFM, Koenderink JB, Johnson TN, de Wildt SN, Russel FGM. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for children: starting to reach maturation? Pharmacol Ther. 2020;211:107541.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Woodruff TJ, Zota AR, Schwartz JM. Environmental chemicals in pregnant women in the United States: NHANES 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):878–85.
Article
Google Scholar
Frank R, Sirons G. Atrazine: its use in corn production and its loss to stream waters in southern Ontario, 1975–1977. Sci Total Environ. 1979;12(3):223–39.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Premazzi G, Stecchi R. Evaluation of the impact of atrazine on the aquatic environment: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 1990.
Google Scholar
Hayes TB, Anderson LL, Beasley VR, de Solla SR, Iguchi T, Ingraham H, et al. Demasculinization and feminization of male gonads by atrazine: consistent effects across vertebrate classes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;127(1–2):64–73.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
US CDC. Atrazine and metabolites (UAM_E). In: National Health and nutrition examination survey: 007–2008 data documentation, codebook, and frequencies; 2015. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2007-2008/UAM_E.htm.
Google Scholar
Barr DB, Panuwet P, Nguyen JV, Udunka S, Needham LL. Assessing exposure to atrazine and its metabolites using biomonitoring. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(10):1474–8.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Blount BC, Silva MJ, Caudill SP, Needham LL, Pirkle JL, Sampson EJ, et al. Levels of seven urinary phthalate metabolites in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(10):979–82.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Kato K, Silva MJ, Reidy JA, Hurtz D, Malek NA, Needham LL, et al. Mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate and mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate as biomarkers for human exposure assessment to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(3):327–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wang L, Kannan K. Alkyl protocatechuates as novel urinary biomarkers of exposure to p-hydroxybenzoic acid esters (parabens). Environ Int. 2013;59:27–32.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Congress, U. S., & Congress, U. S. Public Law 114-182-Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. 2016.
Singla VI, Sutton PM, Woodruff TJ. The Environmental Protection Agency toxic substances control act systematic review method may curtail science used to inform policies, with profound implications for public health. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(7):982–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Kassotis CD, Vandenberg LN, Demeneix B, Porta M, Slama R, Trasande L. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: economic, regulatory, and policy implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(8):719–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vandenberg LN. Reform of the toxic substances control act (TSCA): an endocrine society policy perspective. Endocrinology. 2016;157(12):4514–5.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lallas PL. The Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants. Am J Int Law. 2001;95(3):692–708.
Article
Google Scholar
Schafer KS, Kegley SE. Persistent toxic chemicals in the US food supply. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(11):813–7.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Fang J, Nyberg E, Winnberg U, Bignert A, Bergman A. Spatial and temporal trends of the Stockholm convention POPs in mothers' milk -- a global review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(12):8989–9041.
Article
Google Scholar
Bogdal C, Niggeler N, Glüge J, Diefenbacher PS, Wächter D, Hungerbühler K. Temporal trends of chlorinated paraffins and polychlorinated biphenyls in Swiss soils. Environ Pollut. 2017;220(Pt B):891–9.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cordner A, Brown P. A multisector alliance approach to environmental social movements: flame retardants and chemical reform in the United States. Environ Sociol. 2015;1(1):69–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Tyrrell J, Melzer D, Henley W, Galloway TS, Osborne NJ. Associations between socioeconomic status and environmental toxicant concentrations in adults in the USA: NHANES 2001–2010. Environ Int. 2013;59:328–35.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Justice IoMCoE: Toward environmental justice: research, education, and health policy needs. 1999.
Google Scholar
Morello-Frosch R, Shenassa ED. The environmental “riskscape” and social inequality: implications for explaining maternal and child health disparities. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(8):1150–3.
Article
Google Scholar
O'Neill MS, Jerrett M, Kawachi I, Levy JI, Cohen AJ, Gouveia N, et al. Health, wealth, and air pollution: advancing theory and methods. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(16):1861–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Goin DE, Gomez AM, Farkas K, Duarte C, Karasek D, Chambers BD, et al. Occurrence of fatal police violence during pregnancy and hazard of preterm birth in California. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021;35:469–78.
Article
Google Scholar
Sampson RJ, Winter AS. The racial ecology of lead poisoning: toxic inequality in Chicago neighborhoods, 1995-2013. Du Bois Rev. 2016;13(2):261–83.
Article
Google Scholar
Senier L, Brown P, Shostak S, Hanna B. The socio-exposome: advancing exposure science and environmental justice in a postgenomic era. Environ Sociol. 2017;3(2):107–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Hertzberg R, Choudhury H, Rice G, Cogliano J, Mukerjee D, Teuschler L. Supplementary guidance for conducting health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. In: Washington, DC, risk assessment forum technical panel: 2000; 2000.
Google Scholar
Committee ES, More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou SH, Bragard C, et al. Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. EFSA J. 2019;17(3):e05634.
Google Scholar
Jones-Otazo HA, Clarke JP, Diamond ML, Archbold JA, Ferguson G, Harner T, et al. Is house dust the missing exposure pathway for PBDEs? An analysis of the urban fate and human exposure to PBDEs. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(14):5121–30.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Stapleton HM, Kelly SM, Allen JG, McClean MD, Webster TF. Measurement of polybrominated diphenyl ethers on hand wipes: estimating exposure from hand-to-mouth contact. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(9):3329–34.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Varshavsky J, Smith A, Wang A, Hom E, Izano M, Huang H, et al. Heightened susceptibility: a review of how pregnancy and chemical exposures influence maternal health. Reprod Toxicol. 2020;92:14–56.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
US EPA. Exposure factors handbook, vol. 1. OH, USA: United States Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati; 1997.
Google Scholar
NRC. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. In: Edited by Committee on toxicity testing and assessment of environmental agents BoESaT, Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, division on earth and life studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies; 2007.
Google Scholar
Demeneix B, Vandenberg LN, Ivell R, Zoeller RT. Thresholds and endocrine disruptors: an Endocrine Society policy perspective. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(10):bvaa085.
Article
Google Scholar
US EPA. Choosing a percentile of acute dietary exposure as a threshold of regulatory concern. In: Edited by Office of Pesticide Programs USEPA, Washington, D.C. 20460; 2000. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/trac2b054_0.pdf.
Google Scholar
Executive Office of the President. Methods and leading practices for advancing equity and support for underserved communities through government. In: Edited by Office of Management and Budget, vol. 86 FR 24029. Federal Register: National Archives; 2021. p. 24029–32.
Google Scholar
Reams MA, Irving JK. Applying community resilience theory to engagement with residents facing cumulative environmental exposure risks: lessons from Louisiana's industrial corridor. Rev Environ Health. 2019;34(3):235–44.
Article
Google Scholar
Richard AM, Judson RS, Houck KA, Grulke CM, Volarath P, Thillainadarajah I, et al. ToxCast chemical landscape: paving the road to 21st century toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;29(8):1225–51.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Wambaugh JF, Setzer RW, Reif DM, Gangwal S, Mitchell-Blackwood J, Arnot JA, et al. High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(15):8479–88.
CAS
Google Scholar
Butler LJ, Scammell MK, Benson EB. The Flint, Michigan, water crisis: a case study in regulatory failure and environmental injustice. Environ Justice. 2016;9(4):93–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Bullard RD, Johnson GS, Wright BH. Confronting environmental injustice: It's the right thing to do. Race Gender Class. 1997;5(1):63–79.
Google Scholar
Diaz RS. Getting to the root of environmental injustice: evaluating claims, causes, and solutions. Geo Envtl L Rev. 2016;29:767.
Google Scholar
Sullivan J, Parady K. “Keep working for environmental justice no matter how bleak things look. Don’t give up. Don’t just go away”: an interview with Wilma Subra. New Solut. 2018;28(3):487–500.
Article
Google Scholar
Campbell C, Greenberg R, Mankikar D, Ross RD. A case study of environmental injustice: the failure in Flint. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(10):951.
Article
Google Scholar
Sullivan J, Croisant S, Howarth M, Subra W, Orr M, Elferink C. Implications of the GC-HARMS Fishermen’s citizen science network: issues raised, lessons learned, and next steps for the network and citizen science. New Solut. 2019;28(4):570–98.
Article
Google Scholar