Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Prospective association between phthalate exposure in childhood and liver function in adolescence: the Ewha Birth and Growth Cohort Study

Environmental Health volume 22, Article number: 3 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phthalate exposure is ubiquitous due to the widespread use of plastic products in daily life, and affects several health outcomes, including metabolic diseases. In this study, we evaluated the effects of phthalate exposure in childhood on liver function in adolescence. 

Methods

Among 164 Ewha Birth and Growth Cohort Study participants followed up during two exposure periods (when the children were aged 3–5 and 7–9 years), 126 were followed up at age 10–15 years. To investigate the relationship between phthalate exposure during the two periods and liver enzyme levels (ALT, AST, γ-GTP) in adolescence, differences between groups and the dose–response relationship were analyzed. In addition, we investigated differences in liver enzymes between groups based on the combined exposure levels (high or low) during the two periods. The interaction effect between phthalates and BMI on liver enzyme levels was evaluated, stratified by sex. 

Results

In the 3–5 year-old exposure period, ALT levels tended to increase as MECPP levels increased, while γ-GTP levels tended to increase as MiBP, MnBP, and ∑DBP levels increased. In addition, the group exposed to consistently high levels of phthalates at both time points had higher liver enzyme levels compared to the group that had lower exposure. In particular, the interaction effect between some phthalate metabolites and BMI in 3–5 year olds affected AST and γ-GTP levels in adolescence only in girls.

Conclusions

Exposure to phthalates in daily life during childhood affects liver enzyme levels in adolescence. Elevated liver enzyme levels are associated with the development of metabolic syndrome, implying that attention should be paid to phthalate exposure during childhood.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Phthalates are plasticizers that are ubiquitous in cosmetics, food packaging, medical supplies, and toys. High-molecular-weight (HMW) phthalates such as di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and butyl benzyl phthalate (BBzP) are mainly used as plasticizers in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride, building materials, and toys. Low-molecular-weight (LMW) phthalates, including di-butyl phthalate (DBP) and diethyl phthalate (DEP), are primarily used in the manufacture of personal-care products such as perfumes, lotions, and cosmetics [1].

During the use of these products, phthalates can be absorbed into the body through the skin, breathing, and food intake [2]. They can disrupt the endocrine system, causing not only diseases related to sex hormones [3] but also respiratory [4] and metabolic diseases [5] such as diabetes and obesity. In particular, children are easily exposed to phthalates, such as by sucking toys, and exposure per body area may be higher than in adults [6]. In addition, as their immune systems are not well-developed, their exposure to endocrine disruptors in daily life must be carefully monitored. It is important to investigate how these public-health problems affect health. Previous studies have reported that phthalate exposure in children causes not only neurodevelopmental problems [7] such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [8] but also metabolic diseases such as hypertension [9] and obesity [10].

The liver plays a major role in primary detoxification of various harmful substances, including phthalates, and increased liver enzyme levels are a predictor of metabolic syndrome [11, 12]. Some studies have suggested that phthalates cause liver damage. In an experimental study, rats exposed to DBP developed oxidative stress and had significantly increased liver enzyme levels [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)] [13]. In a cross-sectional study, urine phthalate metabolite concentrations in American adolescents were significantly related to changes in liver-function-test (LFT) indicators. Previous studies have evaluated the association with exposure to environmental substances using AST, ALT, and gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GTP) as biomarkers of liver injury in children [14,15,16]. A cross-sectional study showed that phthalate exposure had potentially toxic effects on humans and BMI modified the association between phthalate and liver injury in adults [17]. However, prospective research in children is lacking.

In this study, we used data from the Ewha Birth and Growth Cohort Study to determine whether repeated phthalate exposure during childhood (at 3–5 and 7–9 years of age) affected liver enzyme levels at the age of 10–15 years.

Materials and methods

The study subjects consisted of the hospital-based birth cohort of the Ewha Birth and Growth Cohort Study, which enrolled pregnant women in the second trimester (24–28 weeks) who visited the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital between 2001 and 2006, and whose offspring were followed-up (n = 940). Follow-up started in 2005 (see details in [18]). Of the 940 cohort members, the follow-up rates of subjects who visited at least once during the follow-up period were 67% and 59%, respectively. Consent was obtained from all participants and their parents through a written consent form, and the protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Ewha Womans University Hospital (IRB No. SEUMC 2020–07-016).

Blood and urine samples and body measurements were collected from each participant through follow-up observations in each period, and demographic and socioeconomic information were collected through structured questionnaires. Venous blood was collected from the children in the morning after fasting for 8–12 h using a vacuum tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The collected samples were stored at –80 °C in a freezer, and were transported in the frozen state for examination.

In total, 164 participants with measurable phthalate in urine samples participated in the follow-up for two exposure periods (3–5 and 7–9 years of age). Among them, 126 participated in further follow-up examinations at 10–15 years of age, and were included in the analysis.

Exposure assessment: measurement of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations

Urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites in the study subjects were repeatedly measured during both exposure periods (at 3–5 and 7–9 years of age). The measured metabolites were mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP), mono(2-ethyl-5hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP), mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate (MEOHP), monoethyl phthalate (MEP), monoisobutyl phthalate (MiBP), monoisononyl phthalate (MiNP), and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP). ΣDEHP was calculated as the molar sum of MECPP, MEHHP, MEHP, and MEOHP, and ΣDBP was calculated as the molar sum of MnBP and MiBP. The molar sum was calculated by dividing each metabolite concentration by its molar mass and then summing the individual metabolite concentrations (μmol/L).

Stored spot urine samples (≥ 1 mL) were sent to a specialized diagnostic laboratory (Lab Frontier, Korea) to measure phthalate metabolites. After adding 50 µL internal standard solution (200 ng/mL, nine types of phthalate metabolites-13C12), 1 mL 2 M ammonium acetate buffer, and 20 µL β-glucuronidase, the urine samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Thereafter, 4 mL ethyl acetate was added and extracted twice. The extracted samples were gently shaken several times and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 15 min to separate the non-polar fat layer and the organic layer. The upper organic layer, which did not contain non-polar fat, was separated and transferred to a glass tube. The extract was evaporated and dried at 40 °C under a gentle flow of nitrogen, and then re-extracted with 100 µL acetonitrile.

The analysis was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For HPLC tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), Agilent 1200 series and Agilent 6430 Triple Quad liquid chromatograph mass spectrometers (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used. A CAPCELL PAK C18 MG II column (3.0 × 150 mm, 3 μm) (Shiseido Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used for chromatographic separation. The mobile phase was carried out at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min using 0.1% acetic acid in distilled water and 0.1% acetic acid in acetonitrile. MS/MS was analyzed in electrospray negative ion multiple reaction monitoring mode. The accuracy of the analysis was 70–120%, and the coefficients of variation (CVs) were 0.77% (MBzP), 2.27% (MECPP), 1.21% (MEHHP), 2.41% (MEHP), 1.17% (MEOHP), 3.09% (MEP), 0.89% (MiBP), 1.34% (MiNP), and 1.88% (MnBP). In addition, the limits of detection (LODs) were 0.27 μg/L (MBzP), 0.16 μg/L (MECPP), 0.19 μg/L (MEHHP), 0.24 μg/L (MEHP), 0.22 μg/L (MEOHP), 1.0 μg/L (MEP), 0.20 μg/L (MiBP), 0.17 μg/L (MiNP), and 0.26 μg/L (MnBP). To calculate creatinine-adjusted phthalate concentrations, creatinine was measured by the Jaffé method [19], using Olympus AU 680 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) equipment.

Health outcomes: measurement of blood liver enzyme concentrations

The stored blood samples (≥ 1 mL) of the 126 children who completed the follow-up at age 10–15 years were sent to a specialized diagnostic laboratory (Seegene Medical Institute, Korea) for analysis. AST, ALT, and γ-GTP were measured as indicators of liver enzyme levels in the blood. These were measured using Cobas 8000 C702 (Roche, Germany) equipment by the enzymatic method. ASTL, ALTL, and GGT Gen.2 (Roche) reagents were used for AST, ALT, and γ-GTP, respectively. In all of the measured indicators, the CV of accuracy was < 5%.

Covariates

Covariates were considered based on a literature review and directed acyclic graph (DAG) (Figure S1); variables associated with liver enzymes at least once based on p < 0.2 were considered for analysis. All analyses were performed after adjusting for confounding factors such as sex, age, BMI, mother’s education level, household income level, secondhand smoke, and physical inactivity. The BMI was calculated using body measurements obtained during follow-up as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2). Height and weight were measured in 0.1-cm and 0.1-kg units using an automatic height and weight measurement system (DS-102; Dong Sahn Jenix Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), without shoes and in light clothing.

The mothers’ education levels were divided into two categories (graduated from high school or lower and graduated from college or higher) based on the questionnaire responses (graduated from elementary/middle school, high school, college, or above graduate school). Household income was divided into three categories (˂3 million won, 3–5 million won, and ≥ 5 million won) based on the questionnaire responses about monthly average household income (˂1 million won, 1–2 million won, 2–3 million won, 3–5 million won, or ≥ 5 million won). A questionnaire item was used to assess each child’s exposure to secondhand smoke on follow-up at the age of 10–15 years. The level of physical inactivity at age 10–15 years was divided into three categories (< 1 h, ≥ 1 h, and ≥ 2 h) based on the questionnaire items regarding the average time spent sitting in leisure activities such as watching TV and playing games (< 1 h, ≥ 1 h, ≥ 2 h, and almost none).

Statistical analysis

When the concentration of phthalate metabolites in urine (μg/L) was less than the LOD, LOD/√2 was used for analysis [20]. When a subject visited more than once at the age of 10–15 years, liver enzyme levels at the time of the earliest visit were preferentially used for analysis. Continuous and normally distributed data are presented as means and standard deviations, and categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages (%).

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to determine the differences in liver enzyme levels (ALT, AST, and γ-GTP) between groups by dividing phthalate exposure into tertiles at two time points (when the children were 3–5 and 7–9 years of age). To assess the dose–response relationship, a trend analysis was performed based on exposure levels by applying an ordinal variable. We used a restrictive cubic spline (RCS) model to evaluate nonlinear relationships. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to exclude the effects of BMI as a mediator, on determining the results.

Exposure levels were redefined for high and low exposure groups based on the medians for the 3–5 and 7–9 years age groups, to assess the differences between exposure levels at the two exposure periods: low exposure levels in both periods (LL); high at 3–5 years, but low at 7–9 years (HL); low at 3–5 years, but high at 7–9 years (LH); and high in both periods (HH). This was to assess whether there were any differences in the mean liver enzyme levels between groups. If a difference was significant, Bonferroni’s post hoc test was performed.

The relationships between phthalate metabolites and liver enzymes were evaluated using linear regression. Furthermore, the interaction effects of BMI with urinary phthalate according to sex were evaluated using linear regression.

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R Statistical Software (ver. 3.6.2; R Core Team 2019). Statistical significance was tested based on α = 0.05 using two-sided tests.

Results

In a previous study that measured phthalate exposure levels using urine samples from the same subjects as in this study, the geometric means of ΣDEHP and ΣDBP at 3–5 years of age were 377.0 μg/g creatinine and 239.4 μg/g creatinine, respectively. The geometric means of ΣDEHP and ΣDBP at 7–9 years of age were 229.0 μg/g creatinine and 154.7 μg/g creatinine, respectively, and the levels were higher in the 3–5 years age group than in the 7–9 years group [21]. In addition, when the molar sum was calculated by dividing by the molar mass of each metabolic concentration, the geometric means of ΣDEHP and ΣDBP at 3–5 years of age were 1.27 and 1.08 μmol/g creatinine, respectively. The respective geometric means of ΣDEHP and ΣDBP at 7–9 years of age were 0.83 and 0.75 μmol/g creatinine.

There were no differences in basic characteristics (sex, BMI, mother’s education levels, and monthly household income) during childhood (at 3–5 and 7–9 years of age) between those included and not included in the analysis. The distribution of liver enzyme levels in the study population was almost within the normal range, and the children and their mothers never had liver disease or hepatitis.

Table 1 summarizes the descriptive characteristics of the study subjects. Among 164 children whose exposure to phthalates was measured at the ages of 3–5 and 7–9 years, the numbers of boys and girls were similar (50.6% vs. 49.4%). The mothers’ education levels included a high proportion of college graduates or higher. The average BMI was 15.8 and 17.0 kg/m2 for the 3–5 and 7–9 years age groups, respectively. As for monthly household income, those belonging to the middle group accounted for the highest proportion. Of the 164 children, 126 underwent liver enzyme measurements at the age of 10–15 years. The mean AST, ALT, and γ-GTP levels were 18.6, 12.8, and 13.9 IU/L, respectively. In addition, most children were not exposed to secondhand smoke. The time spent sitting in leisure activities, which is an indicator of physical inactivity, was the lowest proportion in within 1 h.

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the study subjects
Full size table

Table 2 shows the urinary phthalate levels, divided into tertiles to evaluate whether there was a difference in enzyme levels at 10–15 years of age among the three groups. At 3–5 years of age, after adjusting for potential confounders, there was a statistically significant difference between tertiles in mean AST and ALT levels of some HMW phthalate metabolites (i.e., ∑DEHP) and in mean γ-GTP levels between some LMW phthalates (MiBP, MnBP, and ∑DBP). In the 7–9 years age group, the differences between tertiles in mean AST and ALT levels for LMW phthalates and in mean γ-GTP levels were significant only for MiNP. To determine the dose–response relationship, we evaluated whether higher urine phthalate exposure levels were associated with higher liver enzyme levels. At 3–5 years of age, γ-GTP levels tended to increase as exposure to LMW phthalates (MiBP, MnBP, and ∑DBP) increased, while at 7–9 years of age, AST and ALT levels tended to increase. There was a tendency for ALT levels to increase as exposure to MECPP increased at the age of 3–5 years (ptrend < 0.05). We also evaluated nonlinear relationships using the RCS model, and U-shaped nonlinear relationships of ΣDEHP at 3–5 years with AST at 10–15 years of age were observed. MEHP at 3–5 years of age showed non-linear relationships with all three liver enzymes. However, phthalate exposure at 7–9 years of age did not show a clear non-linear relationship with liver enzymes (Figures S2 to S7). In addition, the effects of size and direction were similar when sensitivity analysis was performed, excluding BMI, which can affect liver enzyme levels (Table S1).

Table 2 Differences in liver enzymes according to tertiles of urinary phthalate levels
Full size table

Figure 1 shows the difference in enzyme levels between the combined groups based on exposure levels in each exposure period. There were significant differences between the combined groups in the mean AST and ALT levels of some phthalates. In the post hoc test, the mean difference in AST and ALT levels between the combined groups was found mainly in LMW phthalates. For HMW phthalates, only the mean differences in AST between the MECPP combined groups were significant (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.05). In addition, liver enzyme levels were higher in groups with high exposure than in those with low-exposure at 7–9 years of age. In terms of additive interactions, only MEP at both time points had a significant interaction effect on ALT levels (pinteraction = 0.038).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of liver enzyme levels between the four exposure-level (low or high) groups during each exposure period. LL: low concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the ages of 3–5 years and 7–9 years. HL: high concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the age of 3–5 years, but low concentrations at 7–9 years. LH: low concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the age of 3–5 years, but high concentrations at 7–9 years. HH: high concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the ages of 3–5 years and 7–9 years. MECPP [mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate], MEP (monoethyl phthalate), MiBP (monoisobutyl phthalate), MnBP (mono-n-butyl phthalate), ∑DBP (di-n-butyl phthalate) = MiBP and MnBP. AST; aspartate aminotransferase, ALT; alanine aminotransferase, γ-GTP; gamma-glutamyl transferase. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, mother’s education level, monthly household income at 3–5 years of age, second-hand smoke exposure, and physical inactivity level at 10–15 years of age

Full size image

We evaluated whether BMI acted as an effect modifier. MiBP and BMI at the age of 7–9 years had an interaction effect on AST (pinteraction = 0.036). In addition, MBzP and BMI at the age of 3–5 years had an interaction effect on γ-GTP (pinteraction = 0.053). Meanwhile, based on sex, there was an interaction effect only in girls aged 3–5 years (Fig. 2). The interaction effect of LMW phthalate (MnBP) and BMI on AST was significant (pinteraction = 0.041), and that of HMW phthalate (MBzP and MEHP) and BMI on γ-GTP (MBzP, pinteraction = 0.021; MEHP, pinteraction = 0.010) was significant. This can be interpreted as an additional interaction depending on the statistical analysis method used [22].

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of the interaction between phthalate levels and BMI at 3–5 years of age on liver enzyme levels at 10–15 years of age based on sex. MBzP (mono-benzyl phthalate), MEHP [mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate], MnBP (mono-n-butyl phthalate). AST; aspartate aminotransferase, γ-GTP; gamma-glutamyl transferase. Tertiles of Phthalate at 3–5 years of age: MBzP(μg/g creatinine): T1: ≤ 7.26; T3: > 16.80; MEHP(μg/g creatinine): T1: ≤ 17.17; T3: > 31.69;; MnBP(μg/g creatinine): T1: ≤ 102.16; T3: > 182.81. *Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, mother’s education level, monthly household income at 3–5 years of age, second-hand smoke exposure, and physical inactivity level at 10–15 years of age

Full size image

Discussion

We investigated mean differences and the dose–response relationship between liver enzymes and phthalate tertiles. At the age of 3–5 years, ALT levels increased with the exposure to MECPP, an HMW phthalate, while γ-GTP levels tended to increase with increasing exposure to MiBP, MnBP, and ΣDBP, which are LMW phthalates. Meanwhile, AST and ALT levels increased at the age of 7–9 years with increasing exposure to LMW phthalates. We combined the phthalate levels of the two exposure periods to demonstrate that consistently high levels of phthalate exposure increased liver enzyme levels, and that this phenomenon was more prominent with LMW phthalates. The liver enzyme levels tended to be higher when the exposure was higher at 7–9 years than at 3–5 years of age (HL vs. HH), excluding MEP. Therefore, exposure to phthalate metabolites at 7–9 years seems to have had a greater effect on liver function than exposure at 3–5 years of age. We found that the effects of exposure to MBzP phthalate at ages 3–5 for γ-GTP at 10–15 years of age differed depending on the BMI at the same time point. After stratification by sex, this was evident only in girls. In addition, some phthalate metabolites and BMI at 3–5 years of age have been found to act as effect modifiers on teenage AST and γ-GTP levels only in girls. For the AST level, MiBP at the age of 7–9 also had an interaction effect with BMI at the same time point, but it did not show a significant effect when stratified by sex.

In a previous study that measured phthalate metabolite concentrations in the same subjects, the phthalate exposure levels were higher at the age of 3–5 years than at the age of 7–9 years [21]. Other studies have also reported that levels of exposure to phthalate metabolites were inversely related to age [23, 24].

Several studies have reported an association between phthalate exposure and metabolic diseases [6], such as obesity [25, 26], hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance [21]. We considered increased liver enzyme levels to be a possible predictor of the onset of metabolic syndrome, and also reviewed their association with liver-related diseases. In a cross-sectional study of the effects of various levels of phthalate exposure on the liver that included 6,046 adults aged ≥ 20 years in the United States, there was a statistically significant positive relationship between ΣDEHP and changes in ALT, γ-GTP, and ALP levels [17]. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the association between urinary phthalate levels and liver function in American adolescents aged 12–19 years. Linear regression demonstrated a null association between phthalate metabolites and ALT, AST, γ-GTP, ALP, and ALT/AST levels [27]. In an experimental study of the effects of ΣDBP on liver tissues in three generations of rats, liver enzyme levels (ALT and AST) were significantly increased in rats exposed to DBP [13]. In this study, the effect of phthalates on liver enzyme levels differed slightly according to the difference in exposure levels between the ages of 3–5 and 7–9 years of age. We found that, among HMW phthalates, only MECPP tended to increase ALT levels at the age of 3–5 years. The degree of exposure may differ between countries due to differences in government regulations and lifestyles, and associations with health effects may also differ. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a condition that can occur even in children and adolescents. An association between phthalates and NAFLD has been reported in adults [28, 29]. A rodent study of the effects of endocrine disruptors on NAFLD reported that early-life DEHP exposure may have long-term consequences for hepatic metabolic function, and exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may be more detrimental in early life than in adulthood [30]. This study did not consider phthalate co-exposure. In a previous cross-sectional study of 12- to 19-year-olds, there was no association between each phthalate metabolite and liver function, but Bayesian kernel machine regression analysis of a phthalate metabolite mixture had significant positive associations with ALT, AST, and γ-GTP [27]. However, insufficient studies have evaluated the relationship with liver function, particularly prospective studies of children and adolescents.

The effects of phthalate metabolites on liver enzyme levels in children and the possible interaction with BMI remain unclear. A cross-sectional study in adults of the effects of phthalates on liver injury found that the association between only MBP and γ-GTP was significantly modified by BMI (pinteraction = 0.006) [17]. A study of the effects of phthalates on recurrent breast cancer and possible interaction with BMI found that the association between MEOHP and recurrent breast cancer was significantly modified by BMI (pinteraction = 0.042) [31]. Further investigation of the BMI interaction and the relationship to the gender difference is needed.

The biological action of phthalates is similar to that of peroxisome proliferators, which activate a different subtype of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), and the liver is a major target organ for their pleiotropic action [17]. Previous studies on rodents have reported that phthalates cause liver toxicity through PPAR activation [32]. An experimental study on rats found oxidative stress and liver damage in rats exposed to ΣDBP that was caused by changes in transaminase activity [13].

The strength of this study was that birth cohort data were used to assess prospectively the causal relationship between daily phthalate exposure in childhood and liver enzyme levels in adolescence. In addition, degrees of exposure were repeatedly measured to evaluate the effects of exposure level at two ages on liver function. This study addresses the lack of previous prospective studies examining the association between repeatedly measured phthalate exposure levels and liver enzyme concentrations in children. In addition, we investigated the effects of phthalate exposure in childhood on liver function, and found a dose–response relationship in which liver enzyme levels increased as exposure to some metabolites increased. Finally, because this study was performed in children, possible effects of risk factors such as chronic diseases, alcohol use, and smoking, which can all negatively affect liver function, were excluded.

A limitation of this study was that residual confounding variables may still have been present. However, because various confounding factors were considered, this effect is considered to have been small, and similar results were obtained even after excluding obesity. Second, because exposure levels were assessed on the basis of measurements of samples collected once at each follow-up period, there may have been measurement errors. Third, phthalates have a short half-life, but it can be assumed that children are exposed to phthalates continuously in their daily lives [6]. Finally, because this study had a small sample, the statistical power was low in some analyses when stratified by sex.

Conclusion

Exposure to phthalates in daily life during childhood had a dose–response relationship with liver enzyme levels in adolescence. For some phthalate metabolites, levels in the group with relatively high exposure levels had a negative effect on liver enzyme levels compared to the group with low exposure. In particular, interactions between some phthalate metabolites and BMI affected AST and γ-GTP levels in girls, but not in boys. An increase in liver enzyme levels is associated with the onset of metabolic syndrome, implying that daily-life phthalate exposure during childhood requires attention.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HMW:

High-molecular-weight

LMW:

Low-molecular-weight

MBzP:

Mono-benzyl phthalate

MECPP:

Mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate

MEHHP:

Mono(2-ethyl-5hydroxyhexyl) phthalate

MEHP:

Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

MEOHP:

Mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate

MEP:

Monoethyl phthalate

MiBP:

Monoisobutyl phthalate

MiNP:

Monoisononyl phthalate

MnBP:

Mono-n-butyl phthalate

DEHP:

Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

DBP:

Di-butyl phthalate

LFT:

Liver-function-test

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

γ-GTP:

Gamma-glutamyl transferase

LL:

Low concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the ages of 3–5 years and 7–9 years

HL:

High concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the age of 3–5 years, but low concentrations at 7–9 years

LH:

Low concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the age of 3–5 years, but high concentrations at 7–9 years

HH:

High concentrations of phthalate metabolites at the ages of 3–5 years and 7–9 years

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

MS/MS:

Tandem mass spectrometry

DAG:

Directed acyclic graph

CVs:

Coefficients of variation

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

RCS:

Restrictive cubic spline

BMI:

Body mass index

ADHD:

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PPARs:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

References

  1. National Research Council (US) Committee on the Health Risks of Phthalates. Phthalates and Cumulative Risk Assessment: The Tasks Ahead. National Academies Press (US). 2008. https://doi.org/10.17226/12528.

  2. Schettler T. Human exposure to phthalates via consumer products. Int J Androl. 2006;29(1):134–9; discussion 181-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00567.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Swan SH. Environmental phthalate exposure in relation to reproductive outcomes and other health endpoints in humans. Environ Res. 2008;108(2):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evres.2008.08.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoppin JA, Ulmer R, London SJ. Phthalate exposure and pulmonary function. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(5):571–4. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6564.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Radke EG, Galizia A, Thayer KA, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and metabolic effects: a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2019;132:104768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun JM, et al. Phthalate exposure and children’s health. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25(2):247–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1eb6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Radke EG, Braun JM, Nachman RM, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2020;137:105408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105408. Epub 2020 Feb 8. PMID: 32045779; PMCID: PMC8453372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim BN, Cho SC, Kim Y, Shin MS, Yoo HJ, Kim JW, Yang YH, Kim HW, Bhang SY, Hong YC. Phthalates exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(10):958–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trasande L, Sathyanarayana S, Spanier AJ, Trachtman H, Attina TM, Urbina EM. Urinary phthalates are associated with higher blood pressure in childhood. J Pediatr. 2013;163(3):747-53.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.072. Epub 2013 May 24. PMID: 23706605; PMCID: PMC4074773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SH, Park MJ. Phthalate exposure and childhood obesity. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014;19(2):69–75. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2014.19.2.69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanley AJ, Williams K, Festa A, Wagenknecht LE, D’Agostino RB Jr, Haffner SM. Liver markers and development of the metabolic syndrome: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes. 2005;54(11):3140–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sattar N, Scherbakova O, Ford I, et al. Elevated alanine aminotransferase predicts new-onset type 2 diabetes independently of classical risk factors, metabolic syndrome, and C-reactive protein in the west of Scotland coronary prevention study. Diabetes. 2004;53(11):2855–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Radha MJ, Mahaboob BP. Hepatotoxic evaluation of Di-n-butyl phthalate in Wistar rats upon sub-chronic exposure: A multigenerational assessment. Toxicol Rep. 2020;24(7):772–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.06.008. PMID:32637323;PMCID:PMC7327266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Midya V, Colicino E, Conti DV, et al. Association of Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals With Liver Injury in Children. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2220176. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20176. Published 2022 Jul 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stratakis N, Conti DV, Jin R, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Substances Associated With Increased Susceptibility to Liver Injury in Children. Hepatology. 2020;72(5):1758–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31483.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stratakis N, Golden-Mason L, Margetaki K, et al. In Utero Exposure to Mercury Is Associated With Increased Susceptibility to Liver Injury and Inflammation in Childhood. Hepatology. 2021;74(3):1546–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu L, Yang M, Cheng M, Fan L, Wang X, Xu T, Wang B, Chen W. Associations between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and markers of liver injury in the US adult population. Environ Int. 2021;155:106608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106608. Epub 2021 May 6 PMID: 33964644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee HA, Park B, Min J, Choi EJ, Kim UJ, Park HJ, Park EA, Cho SJ, Kim HS, Lee H, Kim YJ, Hong YS, Kim EJ, Ha EH, Park H. Cohort profile: the Ewha Birth and Growth Study. Epidemiol Health. 2021;43:e2021016. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021016. Epub 2021 Feb 22. PMID: 33677859; PMCID: PMC8060523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohira S, Kirk AB, Dasgupta PK. Automated measurement of urinary creatinine by multichannel kinetic spectrophotometry. Anal Biochem. 2009;384(2):238–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Oct 18 PMID: 18977332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5(1):46–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Han H, Lee HA, Park B, Park B, Hong YS, Ha EH, Park H. Associations of phthalate exposure with lipid levels and insulin sensitivity index in children: A prospective cohort study. Sci Total Environ. 2019;20(662):714–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.151. Epub 2019 Jan 16 PMID: 30703729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Knol MJ, van der Tweel I, Grobbee DE, Numans ME, Geerlings MI. Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(5):1111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, Zhu H, Kannan K. A Review of Biomonitoring of Phthalate Exposures. Toxics. 2019;7(2):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics7020021. PMID:30959800;PMCID:PMC6630674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garí M, Koch HM, Pälmke C, Jankowska A, Wesołowska E, Hanke W, Nowak D, Bose-O’Reilly S, Polańska K. Determinants of phthalate exposure and risk assessment in children from Poland. Environ Int. 2019;127:742–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 16 PMID: 31003057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodman M, Lakind JS, Mattison DR. Do phthalates act as obesogens in humans? A systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014;44(2):151–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.860076. Epub 2014 Jan 14 PMID: 24417397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seo MY, Moon S, Kim SH, Park MJ. Associations of Phthalate Metabolites and Bisphenol A Levels with Obesity in Children: The Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2015 to 2017. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022;37(2):249–60. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1235. Epub 2022 Apr 7 PMID: 35385971.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiang S, Dong J, Li X, Li C. Urine Phthalate Levels and Liver Function in US Adolescents: Analyses of NHANES 2007–2016. Front Public Health. 2022;4(10):843971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.843971. PMID:35317511;PMCID:PMC8934389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai S, Fan J, Ye J, Rao X, Li Y. Phthalates exposure is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among US adults. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;224:112665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112665. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34438269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang YJ, Kim T, Hong YP. Urinary Phthalate Levels Associated with the Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults: The Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2012–2014. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116035. PMID:34199698;PMCID:PMC8199983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Treviño LS, Katz TA. Endocrine Disruptors and Developmental Origins of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Endocrinology. 2018;159(1):20–31. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2017-00887. PMID:29126168;PMCID:PMC5761605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang PJ, Hou MF, Ou-Yang F, Hsieh TH, Lee YJ, Tsai EM, Wang TN. Association between recurrent breast cancer and phthalate exposure modified by hormone receptors and body mass index. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2858. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06709-3. PMID:35190574;PMCID:PMC8861041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lapinskas PJ, Brown S, Leesnitzer LM, Blanchard S, Swanson C, Cattley RC, Corton JC. Role of PPARalpha in mediating the effects of phthalates and metabolites in the liver. Toxicology. 2005;207(1):149–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.09.008. PMID: 15590130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(NRF-2020R1F1A1062227).

This research was supported by the BK21 FOUR (Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research) funded by the Ministry of Education(MOE, Korea) and National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-5199990614253, Education Research Center for 4IR-Based Health Care).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 07804, Seoul, Korea

    Seonhwa Lee, Hyejin Han & Hyesook Park

  2. Center of Public Healthcare, National Medical Center, Seoul, 04564, Korea

    Seonhwa Lee

  3. Clinical Trial Center, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, 07985, Korea

    Hye Ah Lee

  4. National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408, Korea

    Bohyun Park

  5. Gangdong Public Healthcare Center, Seoul, 05397, Korea

    Hyejin Han

  6. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 07804, Korea

    Young Sun Hong

  7. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 07804, Korea

    Eun Hee Ha

  8. Graduate Program in System Health Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, 07804, Seoul, Korea

    Eun Hee Ha & Hyesook Park

Authors
  1. Seonhwa Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hye Ah Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bohyun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyejin Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Young Sun Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eun Hee Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hyesook Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Seonhwa Lee: Formal analysis, Resources, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Hye Ah Lee: Methodology, Resources, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Bohyun Park: Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Hyejin Han: Validation, Writing – review & editing. Young Sun Hong: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Eun Hee Ha: Data Curation, Writing – review & editing. Hyesook Park: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyesook Park.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Ewha Womans University Hospital (IRB No. SEUMC 2020–07-016). Consent was obtained from all participants and their parents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Analysis of BMI sensitivity for differences in liver enzymes according to tertiles of urinary phthalate levels. Figure S1. A directed acyclic graph (DAG) depicting the causal relationship between exposure to phthalate metabolites and liver function. Figure S2. Non-linear relationship of aspartate aminotransferase(AST) with urinary phthalate levels at 3-5 years of age. Figure S3. Non-linear relationship of alanine aminotransferase(ALT) with urinary phthalate levels at 3-5 years of age. Figure S4. Non-linear relationship of gamma-glutamyl transferase(γ-GTP) with urinary phthalate levels at 3-5 years of age. Figure S5. Non-linear relationship of aspartate aminotransferase(AST) with urinary phthalate levels at 7-9 years of age. Figure S6. Non-linear relationship of alanine aminotransferase(ALT) with urinary phthalate levels at 7-9 years of age. Figure S7. Non-linear relationship of gamma-glutamyl transferase(γ-GTP) with urinary phthalate levels at 7-9 years of age.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S., Lee, H.A., Park, B. et al. Prospective association between phthalate exposure in childhood and liver function in adolescence: the Ewha Birth and Growth Cohort Study. Environ Health 22, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00953-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00953-w

Keywords

Environmental Health

ISSN: 1476-069X