Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prenatal maternal and childhood bisphenol a exposure and brain structure and behavior of young children

Environmental Health volume 18, Article number: 85 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bisphenol A (BPA) is commonly used in the manufacture of plastics and epoxy resins. In North America, over 90% of the population has detectable levels of urinary BPA. Human epidemiological studies have reported adverse behavioral outcomes with BPA exposure in children, however, corresponding effects on children’s brain structure have not yet been investigated. The current study examined the association between prenatal maternal and childhood BPA exposure and white matter microstructure in children aged 2 to 5 years, and investigated whether brain structure mediated the association between BPA exposure and child behavior.

Methods

Participants were 98 mother-child pairs who were recruited between January 2009 and December 2012. Total BPA concentrations in spot urine samples obtained from mothers in the second trimester of pregnancy and from children at 3–4 years of age were analyzed. Children participated in a diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at age 2–5 years (3.7 ± 0.8 years). Associations between prenatal maternal and childhood BPA and children’s fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of 10 isolated white matter tracts were investigated, controlling for urinary creatinine, child sex, and age at the time of MRI. Post-hoc analyses examined if alterations in white matter mediated the relationship of BPA and children’s scores on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).

Results

Prenatal maternal urinary BPA was significantly associated with child mean diffusivity in the splenium and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus. Splenium diffusivity mediated the relationship between maternal prenatal BPA levels and children’s internalizing behavior (indirect effect: β = 0.213, CI [0.0167, 0.564]). No significant associations were found between childhood BPA and white matter microstructure.

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence for the neural correlates of BPA exposure in humans. Our findings suggest that prenatal maternal exposure to BPA may lead to alterations in white matter microstructure in preschool aged children, and that such alterations mediate the relationship between early life exposure to BPA and internalizing problems.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neurodevelopment is vulnerable to environmental chemical exposure during pregnancy and early childhood [1]. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (ECDs), including bisphenol A (BPA), are of concern given their presence in food packaging and consumer products (i.e. canned food, personal care products, receipt papers) [2, 3]. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that early life exposure to EDCs may play a role in the increasing prevalence of neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental deficits worldwide [1, 4,5,6,7]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that increasing global understanding of the effects of chemical exposure during pregnancy and childhood be an international research priority [8].

BPA is a synthetic chemical used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins [2]. Human exposure to BPA is globally ubiquitous [9], with over 90% of North Americans having detectable urinary BPA [3, 10]. Of particular concern is the exposure of pregnant women and the developing fetus [11,12,13]. BPA can pass through the placenta [14] and cross the blood brain barrier [15], therefore, the developing fetal brain is likely exposed throughout gestation [11]. Specifically, following exposure, BPA is rapidly metabolized into various conjugates [16] (i.e., glucuronides and sulphates) to allow for efficient renal clearance. However, a small portion of free, estrogenically-active BPA can avoid first-pass metabolism and circulate throughout the body [17,18,19]. BPA conjugates may linger in the fetoplacental compartment and become reactivated through deconjugation within fetal tissue, leading to greater fetal exposure [20, 21]. Biomonitoring studies have also demonstrated continued exposure postnatally, with BPA being detected within urine samples of children [7, 22]. Therefore, there is ample evidence supporting that fetuses, newborn infants, and children are exposed to BPA throughout development.

Exposure to BPA may interfere with the organization of neurochemical and neuroendocrine systems, which could alter typical neurodevelopment and behavior [7, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Previous research has shown that prenatal exposure may program later brain development [30,31,32]. Prenatal exposure to BPA in rodents, at levels below the oral reference dose (maximum acceptable oral intake of a toxic substance) of 50 μg/kg/day set by the U.S. EPA [33], has been associated with long-lasting neurodevelopmental changes, including increased anxiety [25, 34], cognitive deficits [25, 34,35,36], and behavioral alterations [37,38,39,40,41,42,43].

Animal studies also suggest altered brain structure and development with perinatal exposure to BPA [24]. For instance, inhibited oligodendrocyte cell differentiation and de-compacted myelin have been noted with early exposure to BPA [44]. Behavioral findings from animal studies are consistent with human epidemiological studies, which report associations between BPA exposure and adverse behavioral outcomes, such as increased internalizing (i.e., anxiety, depression) and externalizing (i.e., attention) problems in children [4, 5, 7, 45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. There are clear behavioral consequences of BPA exposure; however, the underlying effects on human brain structure are unclear. Rodent studies show that white matter is particularly sensitive to early exposure to BPA [44], suggesting that it is an important avenue to investigate in order to better understand the effects of BPA in humans.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a safe and non-invasive neuroimaging technique that is sensitive to brain white matter microstructure. Given the limited understanding of the neural correlates for BPA exposure in humans, the current study, utilizing DTI, investigated the associations between prenatal maternal and childhood BPA exposure and white matter microstructure in children. We examined these relationships in young children (2 to 5 years), as early childhood is a critical developmental period where considerable white matter development takes place [55]. Additionally, we assessed both prenatal maternal and early childhood BPA exposure to better understand if differences in the time of exposure are related to brain structure. Previous studies have shown that widespread alterations in white matter microstructure are associated with higher scores on internalizing (i.e., anxiety and depression) [56, 57] and externalizing (i.e., attention) [58, 59] behaviors measured using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) [60]. Therefore, we also investigated if altered behavior associated with early life exposure to BPA was related to underling alterations in white matter microstructure. To accomplish this, post-hoc analyses were conducted to investigate whether white matter alterations mediated the associations between BPA exposure and behavior that have been commonly reported in pediatric studies.

Methods

Participants

Participants were recruited from an ongoing prospective birth cohort, the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) study. APrON is a longitudinal study following women and their offspring (n = 2189 mothers, n = 2169 children) [61]. Women were initially recruited during pregnancy between January 2009 to December 2012. Women provided informed consent and completed bio-sampling as well as comprehensive questionnaires. Their children were assessed for this study between December 2013 to December 2016. Children completed bio-sampling, comprehensive neuropsychological testing and a subset also completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Parents provided consent regarding their children’s participation, and children were monitored through regular follow-ups on comfort and state before, during and after data collection.

Mother-child pairs for the current study were selected based on the presence of a maternal (2nd trimester) urine sample and successful child neuroimaging data (n = 98). At the time of the MRI, children ranged in age from 2.47 to 5.99 years (mean age: 3.7 ± 0.8, n = 50 female, n = 48 male). Gestational age at birth ranged from 36 to 41 weeks (mean gestation age: 39 ± 1.26). All children were healthy and free of diagnosed neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders. Of these 98 children, 77 had a urine sample collected between 3.0–4.8 years and 56 had the CBCL completed by their parents within 6 months of the MRI. This study was approved by the University of Calgary Health Research Ethics Board (REB14–1702; REB13–0020).

Urine sample collection and analysis

Total BPA concentrations were analyzed in spot maternal urine samples collected during the 2nd trimester of pregnancy (n = 98, mean gestation: 17 ± 2.1 weeks) and in child spot urine samples collected at 3–4 years of age (n = 77, mean age: 4.2 ± 0.5 years). Detailed information of the collection and analytical methods have been reported previously [27, 62]. In brief, urine was collected in sterile urine cups and was immediately aliquoted into 9 mL cryovials then stored at − 80’C. Quantitative analysis involved deconjugation using a mixture of β-glucuronidase and sulfatase. Total BPA concentrations were then quantified using online solid-phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatography-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (Orbitrap Elite, Thermo, Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). Isotope-labeled BPA (bisphenol-A-(diphenyl-13C12)) was used as internal standard for quantification. Recovery of BPA spiked at two levels (2.5 ng/mL and 12.5 ng/mL) ranged from 95 to 116%, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3–12%. Calibration linearity was valid between 0.5 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL, and regression coefficients of standard curves (6-point curve) were always > 0.99. Urine samples with concentrations above 50 ng/mL were diluted and injected again for accurate quantification within the range of calibration. The limit of detection (LOD) for total BPA in spot urine samples was 0.32 ng/mL. Total BPA concentrations below the LOD were substituted by LOD/ √ 2 for statistical analyses. Finally, potential contamination of target analytes due to sampling and storage was tested using pure water as a surrogate for urine at the time of sample collection, storage and analysis.

Aliquots from the same urine samples were also analyzed for creatinine in the Clinical Trials Laboratory, Alberta Health Services (Edmonton, Alberta), to control for urinary dilution in our models. The LOD of creatinine was 10 mg/dL and the inter-day relative standard deviation of duplicate injections of a reference urine sample over 4 months was 2% (n = 48 reference urine samples sent for creatinine detection).

MRI acquisition

All imaging took place at the Alberta Children Hospital (ACH) on a General Electric 3 T MR750w MRI scanner, using a 32-channel head coil (GE, Waukesha, WI). Children were scanned while watching a movie or naturally asleep; for further details on MRI preparation methods see Thieba and colleagues (2018) [63]. Whole-brain diffusion weighted images were acquired using a single shot spin echo echo-planar imaging protocol, with 30 diffusion encoding gradient directions (b = 750 s/mm2) and 5 non-diffusion-weighted directions (b = 0 s/mm2), TR = 6750 ms, TE = 79 ms, spatial resolution of 1.6 × 1.6 × 2.2 mm3 resampled to 0.78 × 0.78 × 2.2 mm3 on the scanner, total sequence time = 4:03 min.

DTI processing

DTI data was visually inspected prior to processing. Detection and removal of motion-corrupted volumes was performed manually by an investigator blinded to participant demographics. All participants had at least 18 low-motion diffusion-weighted and 3 low-motion non-diffusion-weighted volumes remaining (mean number of total volumes: 31 ± 3.6). Data was then processed through ExploreDTI (V4.8.6) [64] for signal drift, Gibbs free ringing, eddy currents, and motion corrections.

Deterministic semi-automated tractography was performed in ExploreDTI, using a priori information of tract location [65] for 10 major white matter tracts: the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum, the fornix, and the left and right hemisphere tracts for the pyramidal fibers, cingulum, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFO), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior longitudinal fasciculus including arcuate (SLF), and uncinate fasciculus (UF) (Fig. 1; region of interest (ROI) placements for tract extraction [66]). All generated tracts were visualized and manually corrected if necessary. Averaged values of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were extracted for each tract (left and right separately), resulting in 32 diffusion measurements (FA and MD for 16 total white matter tracts). FA and MD provide indirect measures of white matter tract microstructure and are sensitive to microscopic features such as various axonal properties (i.e., myelination, diameter, density, coherence) [67]. For instance, increased FA and decreased MD may reflect more coherent fibers, increased myelination and/or increased fiber density [68, 69].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Isolated white matter tracts. Diffusion measures were calculated for 10 unique white matter tracts; a) dark green: genu of corpus callosum, lime green: body of corpus callosum, mint green: splenium of corpus callosum, dark blue: left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFO), light blue: left inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF); b) pink: left pyramidal, silver: left superior longitudinal fasciculus including the arcuate fasciculus (SLF), red: left uncinate fasciculus (UF); c) orange: left cingulum bundle, yellow: fornix. Tracts are shown on a T1-weighted image from a male 3.7 years of age

Full size image

Behavioral outcomes

Of the 98 children who underwent MRI, 56 had the CBCL [60] completed by their parents within 6 months of the MRI. The CBCL is a parent report that provides a reliable measure [70] of children’s internalizing (i.e., anxious, depressive) and externalizing (i.e., aggressive, hyperactive, noncompliant) behaviors and has been utilized in various studies examining the relationship between BPA and child behavior [71, 72]. Higher scores on this measure indicate more behavioral problems. Lastly, internalizing and externalizing behaviors are predictors of later disorders (i.e., depression) as well as a heightened risk for substance use and criminal behavior [73, 74].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted in SPSS (IBM Statistics V22.0.0, https://www.software.ibm.com). Prenatal maternal and childhood total BPA and urinary creatinine concentrations were natural log transformed.

BPA exposure and childhood brain structure

The primary analyses included a series of linear regressions that examined the relationship between BPA concentrations and FA and MD, separately for each tract and time point (prenatal maternal or childhood). Covariates included child sex and age at scan, as well as urinary creatinine levels (maternal or child, as relevant). A follow-up prenatal maternal BPA analysis was conducted, controlling for childhood BPA levels, with all other covariates remaining the same as the model above. Additionally, child sex and age were tested as moderators to examine potential interaction effects using PROCESS75 (V2.16.3). We report results uncorrected and corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate (FDR).

BPA, brain structure and behavior

Linear regressions examined the relationship between CBCL internalizing and externalizing behavior scores and BPA, as well as between CBCL scores and white matter tracts identified as being significantly related to BPA exposure in the primary analysis above. Covariates included child sex and age at scan, as well as maternal creatinine and child BPA levels (as relevant).

Mediation analyses

Based on the results of the above regressions, additional post-hoc analyses were run to investigate whether alterations in white matter microstructure mediated the relationship between BPA exposure and internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems. Within PROCESS (V2.16.3) [75], a mediation analysis (using the bootstrapping method to test significance of total and indirect effects) was conducted, with BPA as the predictor (X), CBCL score as the outcome (Y), tract diffusion measure as the mediator, and creatinine, child sex, and age at scan as covariates; the bootstrapping method is recommended for small sample sizes with temporal distance between the independent and dependent variables [76,77,78,79].

Results

Participant age and sex, as well as mean BPA and CBCL T-scores are shown in Table 1. Child sex, CBCL Internalizing and CBCL Externalizing scores, as well as average maternal prenatal and child BPA were not significantly different in the subsample of participants (n = 56), with both an MRI and completed CBCL compared to the all of the children with MRI (n = 98). However, children in the subsample were significantly older (n = 56) (p = 0.003).

Table 1 Characteristics of children with MRI compared to those with both MRI and completed CBCLs
Full size table

Child CBCL Internalizing T-Scores ranged from 29 to 78, with a mean of 47.57 ± 9.71; Externalizing T-Scores ranged from 28 to 67, with a mean of 47.86 ± 10.02. These mean T-scores were in the normal range for this standardized measure (M = 50; SD = 10).

BPA was detectable in 89% of maternal urine samples (Geometric Mean (GM) 1.4 ng/mL) and 91% of childhood urine samples (GM 1.0 ng/mL). Average BPA concentrations (Table 2) were similar to those reported in Canadian national biomonitoring data (i.e., Canadian Health Measures Survey: 1.1 μg/mL, ranging from 0.9–1.4 μg/mL for adults aged 20–39 years; 1.2 μg/mL, ranging from 1.0–1.4 μg/mL for children aged 3–5 years) [3, 80]. In the same spot urine samples, average maternal creatinine levels were 103.3 ± 645 mg/dL, whereas average child creatinine levels were 64.1 ± 266 mg/dL.

Table 2 Total BPA geometric means, percentiles, and maximum concentrations in maternal and child urine samples
Full size table

In models adjusted for child sex and child age at scan, and maternal urinary creatinine, prenatal maternal urinary BPA concentrations were significantly associated with MD of the splenium (p = 0.046, β = 0.238, [CI: 0.005 0.471]) and the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (p = 0.017, β = 0.249, [CI: 0.046, 0.452]). When controlling for childhood urinary BPA, associations remained significant (p < 0.05). MD and FA of all remaining white matter pathways were not significantly related to prenatal maternal BPA concentrations (p > 0.05) (see Table 3 for regression coefficients). Results did not withstand FDR correction for multiple comparisons.

Table 3 Associations between prenatal maternal urinary BPA and white matter tract parameters by child sex
Full size table

A significant interaction of child sex with prenatal X maternal urinary BPA for left uncinate MD was observed (p = 0.01); no other sex interaction effects were noted. A significant interaction of child age and prenatal maternal urinary BPA was observed for fornix FA (p = 0.04). Age did not significantly modify any other associations between white matter tract parameters and maternal urinary BPA levels (see Tables 3 and 4 for results of regression models, and models stratified by child sex or median age).

Table 4 Associations between prenatal maternal urinary BPA and white matter tract parameters by child age
Full size table

Post-hoc regressions adjusting for child sex and age at scan, maternal urinary creatinine, and child urinary BPA levels, showed a significant relationship between prenatal maternal BPA concentrations and internalizing (p = 0.009, β = 0.356, [CI: 0.095, 0.652]), but not externalizing (p > 0.1) CBCL scores (see Table 5 for results of unadjusted and adjusted models). FA and MD of the splenium were significantly associated with both internalizing (FA: p = 0.011, β = − 0.345, [CI: − 0.601, − 0.082]; MD: p = 0.010, β = 0.356, [CI: 0.087, 0.599]) and externalizing (FA: p = 0.006, β = − 0.365, [CI: − 0.617, − 0.107]; MD: p = 0.006, β = 0.377, [CI: 0.111, 0.615]) CBCL scores. In contrast, FA of the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus was significantly associated to externalizing (p = 0.032, β = − 0.300, [CI: − 0.569, − 0.027]), but not internalizing (p > 0.1) CBCL scores; MD of the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus was not significantly associated to internalizing or externalizing behavior (p > 0.1) (see Table 6 for results of unadjusted and adjusted models).

Table 5 Association between prenatal maternal urinary BPA and child CBCL scores for internalizing and externalizing behaviors
Full size table
Table 6 Association between CBCL scores and white matter tract parameters for tracts identified as associated with prenatal maternal urinary BPA levels
Full size table

A mediation model adjusted for child sex and age at scan, as well as maternal urinary creatinine showed a significant total effect for prenatal maternal BPA and splenium MD (path a: p = 0.003, β = 0.539, [CI: 0.190, 0.888]), as well as splenium MD and CBCL internalizing behavior (path b: p = 0.004, β = 0.396, [CI: 0.134, 0.657]). The direct effect of prenatal maternal BPA and child internalizing behavior was not significant (path c’: p = 0.836, β = 0.037, [CI: − 0.317, 0.391]). Finally, splenium MD significantly mediated the relationship of prenatal maternal BPA and internalizing behavior, as demonstrated by a significant indirect effect (path ab: β = 0.213, [CI: 0.017, 0.564]) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mediation model showing associations between prenatal BPA levels, child white matter microstructure of splenium and child internalizing behavior. Standardized beta coefficients, and standard errors in brackets, are reported; **p ≤ 0.01. Note that the final model was adjusted for child sex and age at scan, as well as maternal urinary creatinine

Full size image

No significant associations were observed between childhood urinary BPA concentrations and FA or MD for any of the isolated white matter tracts (p > 0.05).

Discussion

In this first human study of BPA exposure and brain structure, higher prenatal maternal BPA levels were related to higher diffusivity in the splenium and right inferior-longitudinal fasciculus of young children. These relationships suggest that children who were prenatally exposed to higher doses of BPA during the second trimester of pregnancy may have less developed white matter in inferior and posterior brain regions compared to children exposed to lower doses of BPA.

Animal studies show that perinatal BPA exposure alters brain structure and development [24], inducing precocious neurogenesis [81], altering synaptic transmission and arrangement [36, 82], and inhibiting oligodendrocyte cell differentiation and de-compacted myelin [44]. Animal studies also report negative effects of BPA on behavior, including increased anxiety and deficits in learning, memory, and social behavior [83, 84]. Although inconsistent, similar behavioral outcomes have been associated with prenatal maternal BPA exposure in human studies [7]. Here, we show evidence of altered white matter microstructure in young children exposed to greater BPA levels prenatally.

Anisotropy (i.e., FA) and diffusivity (i.e., MD) are related to microscopic (i.e., axonal myelination, density, and diameter) and macroscopic features (i.e., consistency of axonal direction and volume of white matter within a voxel) of brain white matter [67]. Our findings of higher MD within the splenium and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus in children exposed to higher prenatal maternal BPA, are likely related to decreased axon packing, myelination, and/or fiber coherence. FA increases and MD decreases with age in typically developing children [85], so higher MD may suggest that white matter is less developed in children who experienced higher prenatal maternal BPA exposure. Significant changes of diffusivity without accompanying changes of anisotropy, may indicate that structural characteristics (i.e., fiber density) affected by prenatal maternal BPA exposure are altering overall water movement, while preserving anisotropy [86].

The inferior longitudinal fasciculus has been associated with anxiety, depression and attention [87,88,89]. Additionally, both splenium and inferior longitudinal fasciculus white matter microstructure are associated with visual processing skills [90, 91]. Previous research has noted deficits in executive functioning [5], as well as increased internalizing (i.e., anxiety, depression) and externalizing (i.e., attention) behavior in children exposed to BPA prenatally [7, 92, 93]. Findings from the current study, specifically the mediation analysis, provides support for the hypothesis that underlying alterations in white matter microstructure may be a mechanism by which early life exposure to BPA induces negative behavioral outcomes.

We found limited evidence of sex dependent effects on the relationships between BPA exposure and brain white matter microstructure. Sex differences in the prevalence of internalizing and externalizing problems have been demonstrated in studies using the CBCL [94]. Additionally, previous research has noted inconsistent findings regarding the influence of sex on the relationship between BPA exposure and behavioral outcomes in children [7]. The fact that few sex effects were noted in the present study may suggest that maternal prenatal exposure to BPA affects white matter microstructure similarly in both female and male children at this young age. It is possible that sex differences in brain structure may emerge later in development, as internalizing problems worsen [94].

Brain development begins early in gestation, with myelination beginning in the second trimester [95, 96]. White matter development and myelination continue into young adulthood [96,97,98]. This rapid development may leave the brain vulnerable to both prenatal and postnatal neurotoxicant exposure [99, 100]. Our findings of associations between prenatal maternal BPA levels and white matter structure, but the lack of similar findings with childhood exposure, suggest that the prenatal period is more sensitive to BPA exposure.

Animal literature has explored the molecular mechanisms by which BPA may alter white matter structure, demonstrating that BPA disrupts gene expression during development [84, 101]. Early exposure to BPA dysregulates gene expression that is critical to the proliferation and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, and it decreases the expression of genes and proteins critical to myelination [81]. White matter development during the second and third trimesters is highly dependent on intrinsic (i.e., transcriptional regulation) and extrinsic (i.e., extracellular ligands, secreted molecules) signaling mechanisms [102]. Therefore, exposure to BPA during this time may alter the establishment (i.e., bundle fasciculation), organization (i.e., pre-myelination) [103], and myelination of white matter through epigenetic modifications of early gene expression. Such alterations may prenatally program the fetus for different trajectories of later brain development [104,105,106].

Although animal studies have consistently reported findings regarding the disrupting effects of BPA exposure on white matter structure and development (i.e., altered neurogenesis, transmission, myelination etc.), the limited associations between BPA and white matter microstructure observed in the present study may be due, at least in part, to differences between human exposure levels and exposure levels noted within the animal literature. Average human BPA intake is estimated to be 40–80 ng/kg/day, based on national biomonitoring data from Canada [3] and the United States [80]. BPA levels in the current study were similar to Canadian national biomonitoring data [3, 80], with few participants above average exposure levels. Animal studies often employ a wide range of doses that are not necessarily equivalent to human exposures. Thus, it is likely that the effects of BPA on humans are subtler than those observed in animals at very high doses. Imaging studies, which oversample children at the high end of BPA exposure levels, may be able to better elucidate the relationship of BPA exposure and brain structure.

This study has several limitations. Human exposure and excretion patterns show temporal variability, and in the current study, BPA concentrations were taken from a single spot urine sample. Although previous literature has supported moderate sensitivity of single-spot sample collection [107] and suggests that single-spot sampling may adequately reflect average exposure of the population [108], recent literature encourages repeated biospecimen collection [109]. Future studies monitoring for cumulative BPA exposure with more frequent measurements (i.e., during each gestational period and postnatal year) and with multiple specimens per participant, will be able to better determine relationships between BPA exposure and white matter throughout different stages of development. The two significant results seen here did not survive multiple comparison correction. It may be that we are underpowered due to a small sample size or that this relationship may be more clearly observed with higher exposures. Alternatively, findings may reflect a skewed sample and/or other confounding factors. Therefore, future studies are necessary to determine the validity of these findings. Finally, given that childhood is a period of rapid structural brain development [110, 111], longitudinal studies will be critical for determining whether prenatal and/or postnatal BPA exposure are associated with altered trajectories of brain maturation.

Conclusions

Here, in the first human study of brain structure and early-life BPA exposure, higher maternal BPA concentrations during the second trimester of pregnancy were associated with microstructural alterations in inferior and posterior white matter tracts of young children. Further, these white matter alterations mediated the relationship between prenatal BPA and child internalizing behavior problems. Therefore, our results suggest that alterations to brain structure may be a mechanism by which prenatal BPA exposure affects behavior in young children. This study provides important new information about the potential effects of prenatal BPA exposure on human brain development and lays the foundation for future studies evaluating exposure at different times in pregnancy, as well as the effects of cumulative exposure across pregnancy and/or early childhood.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

APrON:

Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition

BPA:

Bisphenol A

CBCL:

Child Behavior Checklist

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

ECDs:

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals

FA:

Fractional anisotropy

FDR:

False discovery rate

LOD:

Limit of Detection

MD:

Mean diffusivity

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

ROI:

Region of Interest

RSD:

Relative standard deviation

References

  1. 1.

    Grandjean P, Landrigan PJ. Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(3):330–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol a (BPA). Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24(2):139–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Health Canada. Fourth report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada: results of the Canadian health measures survey cycle 4 (2014–2015); 2017. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/reports-publications/environmental-contaminants/fourth-report-human-biomonitoring-environmental-chemicals-canada.html

  4. 4.

    Braun JM, Yolton K, Dietrich KN, Hornung R, Ye X, Calafat AM, Lanphear BP. Prenatal bisphenol a exposure and early childhood behavior. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(12):1945–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Ye X, Dietrich KN, Lanphear BP. Impact of early-life bisphenol a exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):873–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Atladottir HO, Gyllenberg D, Langridge A, Sandin S, Hansen SN, Leonard H, et al. The increasing prevalence of reported diagnoses of childhood psychiatric disorders: a descriptive multinational comparison. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;24(2):173–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ejaredar M, Lee Y, Roberts DJ, Sauve R, Dewey D. Bisphenol a exposure and children’s behavior: a systematic review. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017;27(2):175–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    World Health Organization. Global plan of action for children’s health and the environment; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, Schoenfelder G. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol a. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(8):1055–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    LaKind JS, Naiman DQ. Temporal trends in bisphenol a exposure in the United States from 2003-2012 and factors associated with BPA exposure: spot samples and urine dilution complicate data interpretation. Environ Res. 2015;142:84–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schönfelder G, Wittfoht W, Hopp H, Talsness CE, Paul M, Chahoud I. Parent bisphenol a accumulation in the human maternal-fetal-placental unit. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(11):A703–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Padmanabhan V, Siefert K, Ransom S, Johnson T, Pinkerton J, Anderson L, et al. Maternal bisphenol-a levels at delivery: a looming problem? J Perinatol. 2008;28(4):258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Callan AC, Hinwood AL, Heffernan A, Eaglesham G, Mueller J, Odland JØ. Urinary bisphenol a concentrations in pregnant women. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013;216(6):641–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Balakrishnan B, Henare K, Thorstensen EB, Ponnampalam AP, Mitchell MD. Transfer of bisphenol a across the human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(4):393.e1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cheng CY, Wong EW, Lie PP, Li MW, Mruk DD, Yan HH, et al. Regulation of blood-testis barrier dynamics by desmosome, gap junction, hemidesmosome and polarity proteins: an unexpected turn of events. Spermatogenesis. 2011;1(2):105–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kubo K, Arai O, Omura M, Watanabe R, Ogata R, Aou S. Low dose effects of bisphenol a on sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior in rats. Neurosci Res. 2003;45(3):345–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Palanza P, Gioiosa L, Vom Saal FS, Parmigiani S. Effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol a on brain and behavior in mice. Environ Res. 2008;108(2):150–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Poimenova A, Markaki E, Rahiotis C, Kitraki E. Corticosterone-regulated actions in the rat brain are affected by perinatal exposure to low dose of bisphenol a. Neuroscience. 2010;167(3):741–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chevrier J, Gunier RB, Bradman A, Holland NT, Calafat AM, Eskenazi B, Harley KG. Maternal urinary bisphenol a during pregnancy and maternal and neonatal thyroid function in the CHAMACOS study. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(1):138–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Corbel T, Perdu E, Gayrard V, Puel S, Lacroix MZ, Viguie C, et al. Conjugation and deconjugation reactions within the feto-placental compartment in a sheep model: a key factor determining bisphenol a fetal exposure. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(4):467–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Liu J, Li J, Wu Y, Zhao Y, Luo F, Li S, et al. Bisphenol a metabolites and bisphenol S in paired maternal and cord serum. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(4):2456–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mendonca K, Hauser R, Calafat AM, Arbuckle TE, Duty SM. Bisphenol a concentrations in maternal breast milk and infant urine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(1):13–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kubo K, Arai O, Omura M, Watanabe R, Ogata R, Aou S. Low dose effects of bisphenol a on sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior in rats. Neurosci Res. 2003;45(3):345–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Palanza P, Gioiosa L, Vom Saal FS, Parmigiani S. Effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol a on brain and behavior in mice. Environ Res. 2008;108(2):150–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Poimenova A, Markaki E, Rahiotis C, Kitraki E. Corticosterone-regulated actions in the rat brain are affected by perinatal exposure to low dose of bisphenol a. Neuroscience. 2010;167(3):741–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chevrier J, Gunier RB, Bradman A, Holland NT, Calafat AM, Eskenazi B, Harley KG. Maternal urinary bisphenol a during pregnancy and maternal and neonatal thyroid function in the CHAMACOS study. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(1):138–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Giesbrecht GF, Liu J, Ejaredar M, Dewey D, Letourneau N, Campbell T, Martin JW. Urinary bisphenol a is associated with dysregulation of HPA-axis function in pregnant women: findings from the APrON cohort study. Environ Res. 2016;151:689–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ellahi M, ur Rashid M. The toxic effects BPA on fetuses, infants, and children. Bisphenol A exposure and health risks. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68896.

  29. 29.

    Szymanska K, Gonkowski S. Bisphenol A-induced changes in the enteric nervous system of the porcine duodenum. Neurotoxicology. 2018;66:78–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Treit S, Lebel C, Baugh L, Rasmussen C, Andrew G, Beaulieu C. Longitudinal MRI reveals altered trajectory of brain development during childhood and adolescence in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J Neurosci. 2013;33(24):10098–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gautam P, Nuñez SC, Narr KL, Kan EC, Sowell ER. Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on the development of white matter volume and change in executive function. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;5:19–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jansson T, Powell TL. Role of the placenta in fetal programming: underlying mechanisms and potential interventional approaches. Clin Sci. 2007;113(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated risk information system (CASRN 80–05-7) oral RfD assessment: bisphenol A. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tian YH, Baek JH, Lee SY, Jang CG. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to bisphenol a induces anxiolytic behaviors and cognitive deficits in mice. Synapse. 2010;64(6):432–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Xu XH, Zhang J, Wang YM, Ye YP, Luo QQ. Perinatal exposure to bisphenol-a impairs learning-memory by concomitant down-regulation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors of hippocampus in male offspring mice. Horm Behav. 2010;58(2):326–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Xu X, Liu X, Zhang Q, Zhang G, Lu Y, Ruan Q, et al. Sex-specific effects of bisphenol-a on memory and synaptic structural modification in hippocampus of adult mice. Horm Behav. 2013;63(5):766–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Farabollini F, Porrini S. Dessı̀-Fulgheri F. perinatal exposure to the estrogenic pollutant bisphenol a affects behavior in male and female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999;64(4):687–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kubo K, Arai O, Ogata R, Omura M, Hori T, Aou S. Exposure to bisphenol a during the fetal and suckling periods disrupts sexual differentiation of the locus coeruleus and of behavior in the rat. Neurosci Lett. 2001;304(1):73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dessì-Fulgheri F, Porrini S, Farabollini F. Effects of perinatal exposure to bisphenol a on play behavior of female and male juvenile rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 3):403–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Farabollini F, Porrini S, Della SD, Bianchi F, Dessì-Fulgheri F. Effects of perinatal exposure to bisphenol a on sociosexual behavior of female and male rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 3):409–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kawai K, Nozaki T, Nishikata H, Aou S, Takii M, Kubo C. Aggressive behavior and serum testosterone concentration during the maturation process of male mice: the effects of fetal exposure to bisphenol a. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(2):175–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Porrini S, Belloni V, Seta DD, Farabollini F, Giannelli G, Dessì-Fulgheri F. Early exposure to a low dose of bisphenol a affects socio-sexual behavior of juvenile female rats. Brain Res Bull. 2005;65(3):261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Seta DD, Minder I, Dessì-Fulgheri F, Farabollini F. Bisphenol-a exposure during pregnancy and lactation affects maternal behavior in rats. Brain Res Bull. 2005;65(3):255–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tiwari SK, Agarwal S, Chauhan LKS, Mishra VN, Chaturvedi RK. Bisphenol-a impairs myelination potential during development in the hippocampus of the rat brain. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;51(3):1395–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Miodovnik A, Engel SM, Zhu C, Ye X, Soorya LV, Silva MJ, et al. Endocrine disruptors and childhood social impairment. Neurotoxicology. 2011;32(2):261–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yolton K, Xu Y, Strauss D, Altaye M, Calafat AM, Khoury J. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol a and phthalates and infant neurobehavior. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2011;33(5):558–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Perera F, Vishnevetsky J, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Xiong W, Rauh V, et al. Prenatal bisphenol a exposure and child behavior in an inner-city cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(8):1190–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Harley KG, Gunier RG, Kogut K, Johnson C, Bradman A, Calafat AM, et al. Prenatal and early childhood bisphenol a concentrations and behavior in school-aged children. Environ Res. 2013;126:43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hong SB, Hong YC, Kim JW, Park EJ, Shin MS, Kim BN, et al. Bisphenol a in relation to behavior and learning of school-age children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54(8):890–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Just AC, Yolton K, Calafat AM, Sjödin A, et al. Gestational exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and reciprocal social, repetitive, and stereotypic behaviors in 4- and 5-year-old children: the HOME study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(5):513–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Evans SF, Kobrosly RW, Barrett ES, Thurston SW, Calafat AM, Weiss B, et al. Prenatal bisphenol a exposure and maternally reported behavior in boys and girls. Neurotoxicology. 2014;45:91–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Roen EL, Wang Y, Calafat AM, Wang S, Margolis A, Herbstman J, et al. Bisphenol a exposure and behavioral problems among inner city children at 7–9 years of age. Environ Res. 2015;142:739–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Stein TP, Schluter MD, Steer RA, Guo L, Ming X. Bisphenol a exposure in children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2015;8(3):272–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Perera F, Nolte ELR, Wang Y, Margolis AE, Calafat AM, Wang S, et al. Bisphenol a exposure and symptoms of anxiety and depression among inner city children at 10–12 years of age. Environ Res. 2016;151:195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):718–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Albaugh MD, Ducharme S, Karama S, Watts R, Lewis JD, Orr C, et al. Anxious/depressed symptoms are related to microstructural maturation of white matter in typically developing youths. Dev Psychopathol. 2017;29(3):751–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bahn GH, Hong M, Lee KM, Lee C, Ryu CW, Lee JA, et al. The relationship between microstructural alterations of the brain and clinical measurements in children and adolescents with hair pulling disorder. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018;12(2):477–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Loe IM, Lee ES, Feldman HM. Attention and internalizing behaviors in relation to white matter in children born preterm. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(3):156–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    de Zeeuw P, Mandl RC, Hulshoff Pol HE, van Engeland H, Durston S. Decreased frontostriatal microstructural organization in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(8):1941–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Kaplan BJ, Giesbrecht GF, Leung BMY, Field CJ, Dewey D, Bell RC, et al. The Alberta pregnancy outcomes and nutrition (APrON) cohort study: rationale and methods. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(1):44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Liu J, Wattar N, Field CJ, Dinu I, Dewey D, Martin JW. Exposure and dietary sources of bisphenol a (BPA) and BPA-alternatives among mothers in the APrON cohort study. Environ Int. 2018;119:319–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Thieba C, Frayne A, Walton M, Mah A, Benischek A, Dewey D, et al. Factors associated with successful MRI scanning in unsedated young children. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Leemans AJ, Jeurissen B, Sijbers J, Jones DK. ExploreDTI: A graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. Proc Int Soc Mag Reson Med. 2009;17:3537.

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wakana S, Jiang H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, van Zijl PCM, Mori S. Fiber tract–based atlas of human white matter anatomy. Radiology. 2004;230(1):77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Reynolds J. Grohs M. Lebel, C. White matter tractography guides. Figsare. 2019. Retrieved from https://figshare.com/articles/White _Matter_Tractography_Guides/7603271/1

  67. 67.

    Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system - a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002;15(7–8):435–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Qiu A, Mori S, Miller MI. Diffusion tensor imaging for understanding brain development in early life. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:853–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Lebel C, Deoni S. The development of brain white matter microstructure. Neuroimage. 2018;182:207–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Warnick EM, Bracken MB, Kasl S. Screening efficiency of the child behavior checklist and strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a systematic review. Child Adoles Ment Health. 2008;13(3):140–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Perera F, Vishnevetsky J, Herbstman JB, Calafat AM, Xiong W, Rauh V, et al. Prenatal bisphenol a exposure and child behavior in an inner-city cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(8):1190–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Roen EL, WangY CAM, Wang S, Margolis A, Herbstman J, et al. Bisphenol a exposure and behavioral problems among inner city children at 7-9 years of age. Environ Res. 2015;142:739–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sterba SK, Prinstein MJ, Cox MJ. Trajectories of internalizing problems across childhood: heterogeneity, external validity, and gender differences. Dev Psychopathol. 2007;19(2):345–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Miettunen J, Murray GK, Jones PB, Mäki P, Ebeling H, Taanila A, et al. Longitudinal associations between childhood and adulthood externalizing and internalizing psychopathology and adolescent substance use. Psychol Med. 2014;44(8):1727–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hayes AF. Introduction to mediciation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Fairchild AJ, MacKinnon DP. A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prev Sci. 2009;10(2):87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consum Res. 2010;37(2):197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(4):422–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lakind JS, Levesque J, Dumas P, Bryan S, Clarke J, Naiman DQ. Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: bisphenol a intake as a case study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(3):219–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kinch CD, Ibhazehiebo K, Jeong JH, Habibi HR, Kurrasch DM. Low-dose exposure to bisphenol a and replacement bisphenol S induces precocious hypothalamic neurogenesis in embryonic zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(5):1475–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Iwakura T, Iwafuchi M, Muraoka D, Yokosuka M, Shiga T, Watanabe C, et al. In vitro effects of bisphenol a on developing hypothalamic neurons. Toxicology. 2010;272(1):52–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Kundakovic M, Champagne FA. Epigenetic perspective on the developmental effects of bisphenol a. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25(6):1084–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Wolstenholme JT, Rissman EF, Connelly JJ. The role of bisphenol a in shaping the brain, epigenome and behavior. Horm Behav. 2011;59(3):296–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lebel C, Treit S, Beaulieu C. A review of diffusion MRI of typical white matter development from early childhood to young adulthood. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(4):e3778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Scholz J, Tomassini V, Johansen-Berg H. Individual differences in white matter microstructure in the healthy brain. In: Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TEJ, editors. Diffusion MRI: from quantitative measurement to in vivo neuroanatomy. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 301–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Nagel BJ, Bathula D, Herting M, Schmitt C, Kroenke CD, Fair D, et al. Altered white matter microstructure in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(3):283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Loe IM, Lee ES, Feldman HM. Attention and internalizing behaviors in relation to white matter in children born preterm. J Dev Behavioral Pediatr. 2013;34(3):156–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Aghajani M, Veer IM, van Lang ND, Meens PH, van den Bulk BG, Rombouts SA, et al. Altered white-matter architecture in treatment-naive adolescents with clinical depression. Psychol Med. 2014;44(11):2287–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ortibus E, Verhoeven J, Sunaert S, Casteels I, de Cock P, Lagae L. Integrity of the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and impaired object recognition in children: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(1):38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Knyazeva MG. Splenium of corpus callosum: patterns of interhemispheric interaction in children and adults. Neural Plast. 2013;639430.

  92. 92.

    Meeker JD. Exposure to environmental endocrine disruptors and child development. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(10):952–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Bellinger DC. Prenatal exposures to environmental chemicals and children’s neurodevelopment: an update. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Mesman J, Bongers IL, Koot HM. Preschool developmental pathways to preadolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001;42(5):679–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Huang H, Xue R, Zhang J, Ren T, Richards LJ, Yarowsky P, et al. Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 2009;29(13):4263–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Dubois J, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Kulikova S, Poupon C, Hüppi PS, Hertz-Pannier L. The early development of brain white matter: a review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience. 2014;276:48–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Lebel C, Beaulieu C. Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. J Neurosci. 2011;31(30):10937–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Sampaio RC, Truwit CL. Myelination in the developing human brain. In: Collins ML, Nelson CA, editors. Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. p. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Rodier PM. Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl 6):73–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Miodovnik A. Environmental neurotoxicants and developing brain. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(1):58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Negri-Cesi P. Bisphenol a interaction with brain development and functions. Dose Response. 2015;13(2):1559325815590394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Emery B. Regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination. Science. 2010;330(6005):779–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Budday S, Steinmann P, Kuhl E. Physical biology of human brain development. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Mallozzi M, Bordi G, Garo C, Caserta D. The effect of maternal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals on fetal and neonatal development: a review on the major concerns. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2016;108(3):224–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Sandman CA, Davis EP, Buss C, Glynn LM. Exposure to prenatal psychobiological stress exerts programming influences on the mother and her fetus. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95(1):7–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Jansson T, Powell TL. Role of the placenta in fetal programming: underlying mechanisms and potential interventional approaches. Clinical Sci (Lond). 2007;113(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Mahalingaiah S, Meeker JD, Pearson KR, Calafat AM, Ye X, Petrozza J, et al. Temporal variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol a concentrations in men and women. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(2):173–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ye X, Wong LY, Bishop AM, Calafat AM. Variability of urinary concentrations of bisphenol a in spot samples, first morning voids, and 24-hour collections. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(7):983–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Perrier F, Giorgis-Allemand L, Slama R, Philippat C. Within-subject pooling of biological samples to reduce exposure misclassification in biomarker-based studies. Epidemiology. 2016;27(3):378–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Dean DC, O’Muircheartaigh J, Dirks H, Waskiewicz N, Walker L, Doernberg E, et al. Characterizing longitudinal white matter development during early childhood. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220(4):1921–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Reynolds JE, Grohs MN, Dewey D, Lebel C. Global and regional white matter development in early childhood. Neuroimage. 2019;196:49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Gillian England-Mason for her guidance in the statistical analyses. We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study.

The authors also acknowledge the contributions of the APrON Study Team whose individual members include Bonnie J. Kaplan, Catherine J. Field, Deborah Dewey, Rhonda C. Bell, Francois P. Bernier, Marja Cantell, Linda M. Casey, Misha Eliasziw, Anna Farmer, Lisa Gagnon, Gerald F. Giesbrecht, Laksiri Goonewardene, David W. Johnston, Libbe Kooistra, Nicole Letourneau, Donna P. Manca, Jonathan W. Martin, Linda J. McCargar, Maeve O’Beirne, Victor J. Pop, and Nalini Singhal.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (IHD-134090; MOP-123535; MOP-136797), the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Exploration/Development Grant 1R21ES021295-01R21), and the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation. Funding to establish the APrON cohort was provided by a grant from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions (AIHS). MNG salary support was provided by a University of Calgary Queen Elizabeth-II Graduate Studentship, Vi Riddell Pediatric Rehabilitation Graduate Studentship, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute Studentship and an Alberta Children’s Hospital Department of Pediatrics Studentship. Additional salary support included a University of Calgary Eyes High Postdoctoral award, T. Chen Fong Postdoctoral Fellowship in Medical Imaging Science, and a CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship (MFE-164703) (JER), an Owerko Fellowship (TP), an Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions scholarship and a Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta Medical Science Graduate Program scholarship (JL) and a CIHR New Investigator Award (CL).

The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. D. Dewey and C. Lebel contributed equally as senior authors to this paper.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Melody N. Grohs

  2. Owerko Centre, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Melody N. Grohs, Jess E. Reynolds, Tyler Pollock, Catherine Lebel & Deborah Dewey

  3. Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Jess E. Reynolds, Tyler Pollock & Catherine Lebel

  4. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Jiaying Liu & Jonathan W. Martin

  5. Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jonathan W. Martin

  6. Department of Medical Genetics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Tyler Pollock

  7. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Catherine Lebel & Deborah Dewey

  8. Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Deborah Dewey

  9. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Deborah Dewey

  10. University of Calgary, #397 Owerko Center, Child Development Centre 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada

    Deborah Dewey

Authors
  1. Melody N. Grohs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jess E. Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiaying Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan W. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tyler Pollock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Catherine Lebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Deborah Dewey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the APrON Study Team

  • Bonnie J. Kaplan
  • , Catherine J. Field
  • , Deborah Dewey
  • , Rhonda C. Bell
  • , Francois P. Bernier
  • , Marja Cantell
  • , Linda M. Casey
  • , Misha Eliasziw
  • , Anna Farmer
  • , Lisa Gagnon
  • , Gerald F. Giesbrecht
  • , Laksiri Goonewardene
  • , David W. Johnston
  • , Libbe Kooistra
  • , Nicole Letourneau
  • , Donna P. Manca
  • , Jonathan W. Martin
  • , Linda J. McCargar
  • , Maeve O’Beirne
  • , Victor J. Pop
  •  & Nalini Singhal

Contributions

Study concept and design: MG, JR, JL, JM, CL, DD. Acquisition, analysis, and/or interpretation of data: MG, JR, JL, JM, CL, DD. Drafting of the manuscript: MG. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: JR, JL, JM, TP, CL, DD. Statistical analysis: MG. Obtained funding: JM, CL, DD. Administrative, technical, or material support: MG, JR, JL, JM, TP, CL, DD. Study supervision: JM, CL, DD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Dewey.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the University of Calgary Health Research Ethics Board (REB14–1702; REB13–0020).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Competing interests

CL’s spouse is an employee of General Electric Healthcare. All other authors declare no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grohs, M.N., Reynolds, J.E., Liu, J. et al. Prenatal maternal and childhood bisphenol a exposure and brain structure and behavior of young children. Environ Health 18, 85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0528-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0528-9

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • White matter
  • Brain development
  • Bisphenol a
  • Behavior
  • Child Behavior Checklist

Environmental Health

ISSN: 1476-069X