Skip to main content

Potential benefits of joint hypothetical interventions on diet, lead, and cadmium on mortality in US adults



Previous studies reported associations between high blood lead levels (BLLs) and urinary cadmium (UCd) concentrations and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. It is hypothesized that these associations are mediated by inflammation; therefore, adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet may mitigate these effects. We sought to estimate the potential effects of joint hypothetical interventions on metals levels and adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet or fruits and vegetables (FV) intake on the expected mortality distributions.


We used data on 14,311 adults aged ≥ 20 years enrolled in the NHANES-III between 1988 and 1994 and followed up through Dec 31, 2015. We estimated daily FV servings and adherence to the dietary inflammatory index at baseline using 24-hour dietary recalls. Mortality was determined from the National Death Index records. We used the parametric g-formula with pooled logistic regression models to estimate the absolute risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality under different hypothetical interventions compared to the natural course (no intervention).


Overall, we observed a decreased mortality risk when intervening to lower metals levels or increasing adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet or the daily FV servings. The joint intervention to lower BLLs and UCd and increase the adherence to the anti-inflammatory diet had the strongest impact on cancer mortality risk (risk difference [RD] = -1.50% (-2.52% to -0.62%)) compared to the joint intervention only on metals levels RD= -0.97% (-1.89 to 0.70). The same pattern of associations was observed for the joint intervention to lower both metals and increased daily FV servings and cardiovascular diseases mortality risk.


Higher diet quality may constitute a complementary approach to the interventions to reduce exposures to cadmium and lead to further minimize their effects on mortality. A paradigm shift is required from a pollutant-focused only to a combination with a human-focused approach for primary prevention against these metals.

Peer Review reports


Lead and cadmium are among the most common environmental and occupational pollutants and represent a significant public health issue. Conventional public health approaches are (1) avoidance of exposure sources and (2) strict regulations based on risk assessment. For example, recently, significant investments have been made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the removal of lead service lines through regulatory and statutory. As a result of these public health measures, in recent decades, lead and cadmium exposures have declined sharply in the United States [1, 2] which led to reductions in mortality, especially from cardiovascular disease in US adults [3]. We recently showed that interventions to reduce blood lead levels (BLLs) and creatinine-corrected urinary cadmium levels (UCd) from the 95th percentile to the 5th percentile of their distribution in our study population were associated with a lower risk of mortality, especially from cardiovascular and cancer diseases [4]. However, with the lower current levels of metals in the general population, it has become harder to further reduce these levels only through regulations due to the diverse, often ubiquitous, sources of exposure. Thus, a paradigm shift is required from a pollutant-only focused approach to a human-focused approach for health protection against these metals. The human-focused approach can be seen as methods (1) to decrease the body’s burden of pollutants by increasing their excretion from the body and (2) to mitigate early harmful effects of pollutants at cellular levels by the activation of repair and self-recovery systems [5].

While there are many postulated mechanisms through which these metals may act; inflammation and oxidative stress are likely the most important pathways. Lead and cadmium exposures have been positively associated with the systemic inflammation markers alkaline phosphatase, C-reactive protein, and gamma-glutamyl transferase, a known marker of oxidative stress in population studies [6]. On the other side, it is well known that diet is one of the main lifestyle-related factors which can modulate inflammatory processes [7,8,9].

Observational and experimental studies showed that fruits and vegetables’ antioxidant natural products and bioactive compounds have beneficial effects on several health outcomes by reducing oxidative stress and mitigating inflammation [10, 11]. Interestingly, the role of specific nutrients, food groups, and/or overall dietary quality in the pollutants-induced hazards was recently identified [10, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. A U.S. cohort study showed that adherence to the Mediterranean diet reduces cardiovascular disease mortality risk related to long-term exposure to air pollutants [14]. In US older adults, we recently reported that adherence to an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory diet may mitigate adverse cognitive effects associated with blood metals including lead and cadmium [13]. Little is known, however, about interventions on a diet that could constitute an efficient and complementary approach to the conventional approaches to further minimize the effects of cadmium and lead exposures. It is unlikely that large-scale and long-term dietary trials will be conducted for the prevention of cadmium and/or lead-induced mortality. Therefore, we used observational data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the potential effects of joint hypothetical interventions on dietary intake of fruits and vegetables (FV) or adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet and metals exposures levels on the expected all-cause and specific causes of mortality distributions.

Materials and methods

Design and participants

The NHANES is an ongoing survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that uses a representative sample of non-institutionalized civilians in the US; selected by a complex, multistage, stratified, clustered probability design. Information on participants was collected through interviews and physical examinations. The interview includes background information such as socio-demographic, dietary, and health-related questions. The examination component consists of medical and physiological measurements, as well as laboratory tests. The National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board approved all NHANES protocols, and all survey participants completed a consent form. The detailed protocol on NHANES methodology and data collection are available at For this study, we included adults aged ≥ 20 years enrolled in the NHANES-III between 1988 and 1994, with data on blood lead and urinary cadmium concentrations (n = 16,040). Then we excluded participants with missing data on mortality and covariates (n = 1,729). The final study population included 14,311.

Measurements of blood lead and urinary cadmium

Blood and urine samples were collected during the medical examination. The laboratory methods for the processing of these samples are described in detail elsewhere [21]. Briefly, the blood and urine specimens were frozen (− 30 °C and − 20 °C; respectively), stored, and shipped for analysis to the Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia (USA). Lead (µg/dL) concentration was measured in whole blood using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Urinary cadmium was measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption with Zeeman background correction using the CDC and Prevention modification [21] of the method proposed by Pruszkowska et al. [22]. Specimens were analyzed in duplicate, and the average of the two measurements was reported. The detection limits (LOD) were 1.0 µg/dL (0.048 µmol/L) and 0.03 µg/L for BLLs and UCd; respectively. For study participants (n = 1217; 8.5%) who had BLLs below the LOD, a value of \(\frac{\text{L}\text{O}\text{D}}{\sqrt{2}}\)(0.7 µg/dL) was imputed. Urinary creatinine measured using the Jaffe reaction with a Beckman Synchron AS/ASTRA Clinical Analyzer (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Brea, CA), was used to account for between-participant differences in urine dilution.

Mortality data

A full description of mortality linkage methods is available from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) [23]. Briefly, the de-identified and anonymized data of the NHANES III participants were linked to National Death Index mortality files based on 12 identifiers for each participant (e.g., Social Security number, sex, and date of birth) with a probabilistic matching algorithm to determine mortality status. The NCHS public-use linked mortality file provides mortality follow-up data from the date of NHANES III survey participation until December 31, 2015 (1988–2015). Participants with no matched death record at this date were assumed to be alive during the entire follow-up period. In a validation study using mortality-linked data from the first NHANES study (NHANES-I; 1971–75), 96% of deceased participants and 99% of those still alive were classified correctly [24]. The underlying cause of death was recorded in the public-use linked mortality files using the following ICD-10 codes: cardiovascular diseases including heart diseases (I00-I09, I11, I13, I20-I51) and cerebrovascular diseases (I60-I69) and malignant neoplasms (C00-C97).

Dietary inflammatory index and daily fruit and vegetable servings

Dietary intake was collected using 24-hour dietary recalls. The 24-hour recall interview was conducted at a Mobile Examination Center using a standard set of measuring guides to assist in estimating portion sizes. The main fruit and vegetable variable used in these analyses was the seven-digit food coding scheme developed by the United States Department of Agriculture for NHANES III, which categorized items by food group and subgroup. If the main ingredient of a mixed dish was a fruit or vegetable, the item was categorized according to the main fruit or vegetable. Sweets containing fruits where the fruit was not the main ingredient were excluded from the analysis. Serving sizes for each recorded fruit and vegetable were determined using serving size estimations from USDA/U.S. Department of Health and Human Services dietary guidelines. The adapted Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) was derived from the mean daily intakes of foods/beverages, energy, and nutrients of the 24-hour dietary recalls. We constructed the adapted DII to measure the inflammatory potential of the diet [25]. Briefly, we used the DII index proposed by Woudenberg et al. [26] in combination with the updated dietary components inflammatory weights designed by Shivappa et al. [27] instead of the weights proposed by Cavicchia et al. [28]. These updated inflammatory weights, based on three additional years of published data (2008–2010, inclusive), resulted in a doubling of the total number of articles scored. The DII was based on a nutritional rationale: first, the inflammatory weights of dietary components are multiplied by the standardized energy-adjusted intake, which acts to reduce between-person variation; second, the intakes of all components are standardized; third, the DII calculation did not include alcoholic beverages such as beer, wine, and liquor, total fat, and energy, to avoid overestimation of the inflammatory effects of ethanol, fat, and energy. A total of 24 of the 35 possible dietary components were used for the DII calculation (carbohydrates, proteins, alcohol, fibers, cholesterol, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, omega 3, omega 6, niacin, thiamin, riboflavin, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, iron, magnesium, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, folic acid, beta carotene, and caffeine). A positive DII score indicates an anti-inflammatory diet and negative values correspond to a pro-inflammatory diet.


Baseline covariates were collected when individuals participated in a household interview and demographic information—including sex (male/female), age (continuous; years), ethnicity (Mexican-American, other Hispanic, not Hispanic), income to poverty ratio (categorized in tertiles), the number of years of education attended and completed (continuous; years), area of residence (metro and nonmetro counties), and smoking status (current, former and never) was obtained. Information on body-mass index ([BMI] continuous; kg/m2), and physical activity (None, 1 to 14 times, 15 or more times; per month) was obtained during the medical examination. Final models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, income to poverty ratio, educational level, area of residence, smoking status, BMI, and physical activity. Metals concentrations were mutually adjusted. The selection of potential confounders was done between what was available in NHANES using a priori knowledge ensuring adjustment only for confounders and avoiding over-adjustment for potential mediators, colliders, or instrumental variables.

Hypothetical interventions

For each of the following interventions, we used the parametric g-formula (see details below) to estimate the 27-year mortality risk. There are different policy levers to intervene to reduce or increase metals exposure levels and adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet. Regardless of the policy or action considered, all participants were considered to follow the prescribed intervention beginning at the start of follow-up.

  1. 1.

    Lower BLLs and UCd to the 25th percentile for each metal separately.

  2. 2.

    Lower BLLs and UCd to the 25th percentile for both metals.

  3. 3.

    Increase the dietary inflammatory index to a level corresponding to a more anti-inflammatory (e.g. 75th percentile), or increase the fruit and vegetable daily servings to the number of 5 servings/day as recommended by many nutritional guidelines.

  4. 4.

    Best case scenario: Combining interventions 2 and 3; lower BLLs and UCd and increase the dietary inflammatory index or fruit and vegetable daily servings.

  5. 5.

    Worst case scenario: Increase BLLs and UCd to a level corresponding to the 75th percentile for each metal and lower the DII score to the 25th percentile value of the observed distribution (corresponding to an adherence to a pro-inflammatory diet) or fruit and vegetable daily servings (e.g. number of daily servings < 2).

Statistical analysis

First, we describe the overall sample BLLs and UCd using geometric means and geometric standard errors (SE) by population characteristics. BLLs and UCd were log2-transformed to limit the influence of outliers. We used the parametric g-computation to estimate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences (RD) of all-cause and specific causes of mortality under the above-described hypothetical interventions. In recent years, there have been substantial advances in the application of these methods, and have been used to evaluate hypothetical interventions on sources of lead exposure on BLLs [29]. The parametric g-formula is a generalization of the standardization method, proposed by Robins, [30, 31] and allows for flexibly simulating and estimating the effect of any form of hypothetical intervention. A more detailed discussion of this method is presented elsewhere [32, 33]. Briefly, we first fitted a pooled logistic regression model conditional on covariates and follow-up time, after arranging the data into a person-time structure. We included interaction terms between metal concentrations and dietary exposures in the outcome model. The discrete-time hazards of all-cause and specific causes of mortality for each two-fold increase in the baseline dietary exposure and metals concentrations (log2-transformed to reduce skewness) were then estimated. This estimated risk was used to predict the mortality risk under the hypothetical interventions described above. We then compared the estimated risk of 27-year mortality had all participants followed the prescribed interventions with the estimated risk of mortality under (1) no intervention (natural course) and (2) the worst case scenario (Scenario 5).

All analyses were weighted by the provided sample weights to account for the unequal probabilities of inclusion and response rates. We estimated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the RR and the RD using non-parametric bootstrap (M = 200) and used the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles as the lower and upper confidence interval limits, respectively.

Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.0.4 and the Statistical Analysis System software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


A total of 14,311 participants were included (mean age 48.0 ± 18.1) for this analysis. BLLs ranged from 0.70 µg/dL to 56.0 µg/dL, with a geometric mean (GM) of 2.97 µg/dL (geometric standard error [GSE] = 0.02). BLLs were higher in older, male, and current and former smoker participants and those who are in the categories of less healthy dietary indices and low poverty to income ratio (Table 1). The urinary creatinine corrected cadmium concentrations (UCd) ranged from 0.002 µg/g to 23.35 µg/g, with a GM of 0.36 µg/g (GSE = 0.003). Participants who had higher UCd were older, and more likely to be female, to be current and former smokers, and to be in the categories of less physical activity. There were no major differences in other participant characteristics (Table 1).

Table 1 Blood lead and urinary cadmium geometric means and standard errors by study population baseline characteristics

During a median follow-up of 22.5 years (IQR 16.3–24.7), 5,167 (36%) participants died with 1,550 (30%) and 1,135 (22%) attributable to cardiovascular disease and cancer, respectively. Table 2 presents the results of the interventions on metals concentrations and the DII. Comparing the estimated 27-year risk under each of the single interventions with the estimated risk under no intervention (natural course), lowering lead concentrations to the 25th percentile [RR: 0.59 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.81)], lowering cadmium concentrations to the 25th percentile [RR: 0.56 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.8)] and increasing DII to a more anti-inflammatory diet [RR: 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99)] were all associated with all-cause mortality risk. The joint intervention on metals alone or metals and DII had the strongest impact on all-cause mortality risk with a RR of 0.35 (0.22 to 0.64) and 0.96 0.32 (0.20 to 0.61); respectively. The corresponding RD of these joint intervention on metals alone or metals and DII were − 5.4% (-7.3% to -2.6%)] and − 5.5% (-7.5% to -3.1%); respectively.

When comparing the best-case scenario (lower BLLs and UCd and increase DII score to correspond to an anti-inflammatory diet) to the worst-case scenario (increase BLLs and UCd and lower the DII score to correspond to a pro-inflammatory diet), the RD for all-cause mortality was − 11.5% (-17.8 to -7.2). The same pattern of associations was observed for cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality, except for the single intervention on UCd that was not associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality (Table 2).

Table 2 The adjusted risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality under individual and joint interventions on BLLs, UCd, and DII, using parametric g-formula with pooled logistic regression modelsa

Table 3 presents the results of the interventions on metals concentrations and FV daily servings. Compared to the natural course, the single intervention to set all participants to a 5 FV serving/day was associated with a slightly lower risk of all-cause [RR: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.00)], cancer [RR: 0.95 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.00)] and cardiovascular diseases mortality [(RR: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.99)]. The joint intervention on metals and daily FV servings was associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular diseases mortality risk with a RD of -5.47% (-7.71% to -3.41%)] and − 2.05% (-3.24% to -0.99%); respectively. We did not observe any difference in cancer mortality [RD: +0.86% (-0.41 to 2.63)]. When comparing the best-case scenario (lower BLLs and UCd and increase daily FV servings to 5, the minimum recommended by the US dietary guidelines) to the worst-case scenario (increase BLLs and UCd and lower the daily FV servings to correspond to less than 2), the mortality RDs ranged between − 12.64% (-19.16 to -7.73) for all-cause mortality and − 3.13% (-6.17 to -0.52) for cardiovascular diseases mortality (Table 3).

Table 3 The adjusted risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality under individual and joint interventions on BLLs, UCd, and fruits and vegetables daily servings, using parametric g-formula with pooled logistic regression modelsa


Using a large nationally representative sample of US adults, we found that joint interventions on lead and cadmium were more beneficial than individual interventions to reduce mortality. Additionally, we found that such synergistic effects were higher for cancer and cardiovascular diseases mortality. Intervening to increase adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet and decrease lead or cadmium exposure levels showed a higher decreased risk of cancer mortality compared with individual interventions on diet and lead or cadmium.

The metals examined here had been previously evaluated for their potential effects on mortality. Two studies reported that chronic low concentrations of lead exposure were associated with premature death, especially from cardiovascular disease [34, 35]. Several epidemiological studies have examined prospectively the associations of cadmium exposure to the risk of all-causes [36,37,38,39,40,41,42], cancer [37, 43,44,45] and cardiovascular disease mortality [37,38,39,40, 43]. Most studies have reported a positive association between urinary cadmium concentrations and mortality, except one study for cardiovascular [38], two studies for cancer [37, 43] and all-cause mortality [36, 38]. We recently showed that interventions to reduce BLLs and UCd were associated with a lower risk of deaths from cardiovascular diseases and cancers [4]. We are not aware of any study that has explored this hypothesis to directly compare our results, although some studies have provided evidence that a healthier diet was an effective protective modulator of environmental toxicant-induced inflammation and human disease [13, 14, 16].

Metals exhibit human toxicity and disease through inflammation and oxidative stress. Thus, it is conceivable that nutrients that can contribute to cellular oxidative stress also can exacerbate or amplify environmental toxicity. On the other hand, nutrients that have antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity could reduce or prevent compromised health or disease induction from environmental pollutants. Multiple studies have investigated the decreased toxicities of environmental pollutants due to bioactive nutrients of fruits and vegetables such as flavonoids, but many of these studies rely on in vitro assays that lack the complexity of a human organismal approach. Importantly, emerging classes of bioactive food components such as polyphenols also have been shown to modulate the pro-inflammatory effects of environmental toxicants. Studies have shown that a wide array of phenolic compounds such as curcumin and quercetin can decrease toxicant-induced oxidative stress and.

inflammation in multiple cell types and tissues [46, 47]. Bioactive food components also have proved to be effective against cadmium and lead toxicity in both human and animal studies [48, 49]. For example, a protective role for flavonoids and other polyphenols has been suggested through the induction of antioxidant enzyme pathways and increased fecal excretion rates [50, 51]. In addition, antioxidants such as vitamin C supplementation in lead-exposed animals significantly reduced blood, liver, and renal lead levels and associated biochemical changes [52]. The main hypothesis is that bioactive food components such as polyphenols and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may scavenge the reactive oxygen species and free radicals before they can activate pathways in the pathogenesis of diseases and prevent or decrease toxicant-induced inflammation [53].

This study used the NHANES III dataset, a large, national survey whose findings are generalizable to the U.S. adult non-institutionalized population. Although there are strengths to this study including its large sample size and random sampling, the mutual adjustment between lead and cadmium metals, and most importantly, we used a statistical approach that relaxes the proportional hazard assumption (as previously reported, the risk associated with exposure to lead and cadmium vary throughout the follow-up) and most importantly, we considered the dietary intervention on specific food groups, biomarkers of these food groups and an overall dietary scores. There are also important limitations to note. The key limitation is that for lead we relied on blood concentrations; therefore the cumulative chronic or long-term exposure was not accounted for. In addition, covariates data were only available at baseline. Thus, we could not account for time-varying confounding in this study. Another limitation is that we relied on death certificates for the underlying cause of death, but they are imperfect [54]. Most importantly, although the main potential confounding factors were accounted for, there could be residual confounding due to other genetic and/or environmental factors that were either not measured (e.g. proximity to industrial sources that may release other types of pollutants, paint abatement, superfund sites) or measured inadequately, which may have influenced our findings. Finally, because internal dose metrics cannot define correctly the complete history of exposure and duration, the timing that correlates most strongly with the observed health effect is typically unknown or highly uncertain.

This study focused only on hypothetical interventions related to lead and cadmium exposures and dietary intake to simulate what would have been the benefits of their joint interventions. We recommend that future studies explore other interventions based on, for example, lifestyle factors such as physical activity, which may be another complementary approach to the pollutant and diet-based interventions.


In conclusion, our findings suggest that higher adherence to an anti-inflammatory diet or fruits and vegetable intake may constitute an efficient, and complementary approach to the measures to reduce exposures to cadmium and lead to further minimize their effects on mortality, especially from cancer and cardiovascular diseases. If confirmed, a paradigm shift is required from a pollutant-focused only to a combination with a human-focused approach for primary prevention against these metals.

Data Availability

A full list of data sets supporting the results in this research article can be found at:


  1. Dignam T, Kaufmann RB, LeStourgeon L, Brown MJ. Control of Lead Sources in the United States, 1970–2017: Public Health Progress and Current Challenges to Eliminating Lead Exposure. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25 Suppl 1, Lead Poisoning Prevention:S13-S22.

  2. Duan W, Xu C, Liu Q, Xu J, Weng Z, Zhang X, et al. Levels of a mixture of heavy metals in blood and urine and all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality: A population-based cohort study. Environ Pollut. 2020;263(Pt A):114630.

  3. Ruiz-Hernandez A, Navas-Acien A, Pastor-Barriuso R, Crainiceanu CM, Redon J, Guallar E, et al. Declining exposures to lead and cadmium contribute to explaining the reduction of cardiovascular mortality in the US population, 1988–2004. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1903–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laouali N, Benmarhnia T, Oulhote Y. Associations between blood lead and urinary cadmium concentrations and all-cause and specific causes of mortality: estimating intervention effects using the parametric g-formula. (Preprint, DOI: 10.21203/

  5. Lee DH, Jacobs DR. Jr. New approaches to cope with possible harms of low-dose environmental chemicals. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(3):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin YS, Rathod D, Ho WC, Caffrey JJ. Cadmium exposure is associated with elevated blood C-reactive protein and fibrinogen in the U. S. population: the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994). Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(8):592-6.

  7. Laugerette F, Furet JP, Debard C, Daira P, Loizon E, Geloen A, et al. Oil composition of high-fat diet affects metabolic inflammation differently in connection with endotoxin receptors in mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302(3):E374-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smidowicz A, Regula J. Effect of nutritional status and dietary patterns on human serum C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 concentrations. Adv Nutr. 2015;6(6):738–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharifi-Rad M, Anil Kumar NV, Zucca P, Varoni EM, Dini L, Panzarini E, et al. Lifestyle, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Back and Forth in the Pathophysiology of Chronic Diseases. Front Physiol. 2020;11:694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. GutiErrez-Grijalva EP, Ambriz-Pere DL, Leyva-Lopez N, Castillo-Lopez RI, Heiedia JB. Review: dietary phenolic compounds, health benefits and bioaccessibility. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2016;66(2):87–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudrapal M, Khairnar SJ, Khan J, Dukhyil AB, Ansari MA, Alomary MN, et al. Dietary Polyphenols and Their Role in Oxidative Stress-Induced Human Diseases: Insights Into Protective Effects, Antioxidant Potentials and Mechanism(s) of Action. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:806470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oulhote Y, Lanphear B, Braun JM, Webster GM, Arbuckle TE, Etzel T, et al. Gestational Exposures to Phthalates and Folic Acid, and Autistic Traits in Canadian Children. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(2):27004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laouali N, Benmarhnia T, Lanphear BP, Weuve J, Mascari M, Boutron-Ruault MC, et al. Association between blood metals mixtures concentrations and cognitive performance, and effect modification by diet in older US adults. Environ Epidemiol. 2022;6(1):e192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim CC, Hayes RB, Ahn J, Shao Y, Silverman DT, Jones RR, et al. Mediterranean Diet and the Association Between Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Risk. Circulation. 2019;139(15):1766–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peter S, Holguin F, Wood LG, Clougherty JE, Raederstorff D, Antal M, et al. Nutritional Solutions to Reduce Risks of Negative Health Impacts of Air Pollution. Nutrients. 2015;7(12):10398–416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hennig B, Petriello MC, Gamble MV, Surh YJ, Kresty LA, Frank N, et al. The role of nutrition in influencing mechanisms involved in environmentally mediated diseases. Rev Environ Health. 2018;33(1):87–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barchitta M, Maugeri A, Quattrocchi A, Barone G, Mazzoleni P, Catalfo A, et al. Mediterranean Diet and Particulate Matter Exposure Are Associated With LINE-1 Methylation: Results From a Cross-Sectional Study in Women. Front Genet. 2018;9:514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Petriello MC, Newsome B, Hennig B. Influence of nutrition in PCB-induced vascular inflammation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(10):6410–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Soleimanifar N, Nicknam MH, Bidad K, Jamshidi AR, Mahmoudi M, Mostafaei S, et al. Effect of food intake and ambient air pollution exposure on ankylosing spondylitis disease activity. Adv Rheumatol. 2019;59(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz AJ, Mentz GB, Sampson NR, Dvonch JT, Reyes AG, Izumi B. Effects of particulate matter and antioxidant dietary intake on blood pressure. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(6):1254–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gunter EWLB, Koncikowski SM. Laboratory procedures used for the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994.; 1996.

  22. Pruszkowska E, Carnrick GR, Slavin W. Direct determination of cadmium in urine with use of a stabilized temperature platform furnace and Zeeman background correction. Clin Chem. 1983;29(3):477–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. (NCHS) CfDCaPCNCfHS. NCHS Data Linked to NDI Mortality Files.

  24. Statistics UDoHaHSfDCaPCfH. NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Survey (NHEFS): calibration sample for NDI matching methodology. 2009.

  25. Laouali N, Mancini FR, Hajji-Louati M, El Fatouhi D, Balkau B, Boutron-Ruault MC, et al. Dietary inflammatory index and type 2 diabetes risk in a prospective cohort of 70,991 women followed for 20 years: the mediating role of BMI. Diabetologia. 2019;62(12):2222–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Woudenbergh GJ, Theofylaktopoulou D, Kuijsten A, Ferreira I, van Greevenbroek MM, van der Kallen CJ, et al. Adapted dietary inflammatory index and its association with a summary score for low-grade inflammation and markers of glucose metabolism: the Cohort study on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht (CODAM) and the Hoorn study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(6):1533–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shivappa N, Steck SE, Hurley TG, Hussey JR, Hebert JR. Designing and developing a literature-derived, population-based dietary inflammatory index. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(8):1689–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cavicchia PP, Steck SE, Hurley TG, Hussey JR, Ma Y, Ockene IS, et al. A new dietary inflammatory index predicts interval changes in serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. J Nutr. 2009;139(12):2365–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oulhote Y, Le Bot B, Poupon J, Lucas JP, Mandin C, Etchevers A, et al. Identification of sources of lead exposure in French children by lead isotope analysis: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2011;10:75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. JM R. A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Math modelling. 1986;17:1393–512.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hernan MA, Robins JM. Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(7):578–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Breskin A, Edmonds A, Cole SR, Westreich D, Cocohoba J, Cohen MH, et al. G-computation for policy-relevant effects of interventions on time-to-event outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;49(6):2021–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Keil AP, Edwards JK, Richardson DB, Naimi AI, Cole SR. The parametric g-formula for time-to-event data: intuition and a worked example. Epidemiology. 2014;25(6):889–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lanphear BP, Rauch S, Auinger P, Allen RW, Hornung RW. Low-level lead exposure and mortality in US adults: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(4):e177-e84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Menke A, Muntner P, Batuman V, Silbergeld EK, Guallar E. Blood lead below 0.48 micromol/L (10 microg/dL) and mortality among US adults. Circulation. 2006;114(13):1388–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakagawa H, Nishijo M, Morikawa Y, Miura K, Tawara K, Kuriwaki J, et al. Urinary cadmium and mortality among inhabitants of a cadmium-polluted area in Japan. Environ Res. 2006;100(3):323–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nawrot TS, Van Hecke E, Thijs L, Richart T, Kuznetsova T, Jin Y, et al. Cadmium-related mortality and long-term secular trends in the cadmium body burden of an environmentally exposed population. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(12):1620–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Menke A, Muntner P, Silbergeld EK, Platz EA, Guallar E. Cadmium levels in urine and mortality among U.S. adults. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(2):190–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tellez-Plaza M, Navas-Acien A, Menke A, Crainiceanu CM, Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E. Cadmium exposure and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the U.S. general population. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(7):1017–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tellez-Plaza M, Guallar E, Howard BV, Umans JG, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, et al. Cadmium exposure and incident cardiovascular disease. Epidemiology. 2013;24(3):421–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Suwazono Y, Nogawa K, Morikawa Y, Nishijo M, Kobayashi E, Kido T, et al. Impact of urinary cadmium on mortality in the Japanese general population in cadmium non-polluted areas. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014;217(8):807–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Suwazono Y, Nogawa K, Morikawa Y, Nishijo M, Kobayashi E, Kido T, et al. All-cause mortality increased by environmental cadmium exposure in the Japanese general population in cadmium non-polluted areas. J Appl Toxicol. 2015;35(7):817–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Q, Nishijo M, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y, Sakurai M, Nakamura K, et al. Relationship between urinary cadmium and mortality in habitants of a cadmium-polluted area: a 22-year follow-up study in Japan. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011;124(21):3504–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin YS, Caffrey JL, Lin JW, Bayliss D, Faramawi MF, Bateson TF, et al. Increased risk of cancer mortality associated with cadmium exposures in older Americans with low zinc intake. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2013;76(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Garcia-Esquinas E, Pollan M, Tellez-Plaza M, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, Guallar E, et al. Cadmium exposure and cancer mortality in a prospective cohort: the strong heart study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(4):363–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Slim R, Toborek M, Robertson LW, Hennig B. Antioxidant protection against PCB-mediated endothelial cell activation. Toxicol Sci. 1999;52(2):232–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Choi YJ, Arzuaga X, Kluemper CT, Caraballo A, Toborek M, Hennig B. Quercetin blocks caveolae-dependent pro-inflammatory responses induced by co-planar PCBs. Environ Int. 2010;36(8):931–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhai Q, Narbad A, Chen W. Dietary strategies for the treatment of cadmium and lead toxicity. Nutrients. 2015;7(1):552–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rendon-Ramirez AL, Maldonado-Vega M, Quintanar-Escorza MA, Hernandez G, Arevalo-Rivas BI, Zentella-Dehesa A, et al. Effect of vitamin E and C supplementation on oxidative damage and total antioxidant capacity in lead-exposed workers. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;37(1):45–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Morita K, Matsueda T, Iida T. [Effect of green tea (matcha) on gastrointestinal tract absorption of polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in rats]. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 1997;88(5):162–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen L, Mo H, Zhao L, Gao W, Wang S, Cromie MM, et al. Therapeutic properties of green tea against environmental insults. J Nutr Biochem. 2017;40:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shalan MG, Mostafa MS, Hassouna MM, El-Nabi SE, El-Refaie A. Amelioration of lead toxicity on rat liver with Vitamin C and silymarin supplements. Toxicology. 2005;206(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Auten RL, Davis JM. Oxygen toxicity and reactive oxygen species: the devil is in the details. Pediatr Res. 2009;66(2):121–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. McGivern L, Shulman L, Carney JK, Shapiro S, Bundock E. Death Certification Errors and the Effect on Mortality Statistics. Public Health Rep. 2017;132(6):669–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Philippe Foundation for its contribution to and ongoing support of scientific and medical activities and research by facilitating Franco-American exchanges.


The authors received no external funding for this research study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



NL, TB, and YO conceived and designed the study. NL performed the statistical analysis and drafted the original manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data discussed in the manuscript, revised the manuscript, and approved its final version to be published. NL is the guarantor of this work and, as such, has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasser Laouali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics declarations

Health information collected in the NHANES is kept in strictest confidence. During the informed consent process, survey participants were assured that data collected will be used only for stated purposes and will not be disclosed or released to others without the consent of the individual or the establishment in accordance with Sect. 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 242 m).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Participants in this study agreed to consent for publication in accordance with Sect. 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 242 m).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laouali, N., Benmarhnia, T. & Oulhote, Y. Potential benefits of joint hypothetical interventions on diet, lead, and cadmium on mortality in US adults. Environ Health 21, 93 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: