Skip to main content

Households' perception of climate change and human health risks: A community perspective



Bangladesh has been identified as one of the most vulnerable countries in the world concerning the adverse effects of climate change (CC). However, little is known about the perception of CC from the community, which is important for developing adaptation strategies.


The study was a cross-sectional survey of respondents from two villages--one from the northern part and the other from the southern part of Bangladesh. A total of 450 households were selected randomly through multistage sampling completed a semi-structure questionnaire. This was supplemented with 12 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 15 key informant interviews (KIIs).


Over 95 percent of the respondents reported that the heat during the summers had increased and 80.2 percent reported that rainfall had decreased, compared to their previous experiences. Approximately 65 percent reported that winters were warmer than in previous years but they still experienced very erratic and severe cold during the winter for about 5-7 days, which restricted their activities with very destructive effect on agricultural production, everyday life and the health of people. FGDs and KIIs also reported that overall winters were warmer. Eighty point two percent, 72.5 percent and 54.7 percent survey respondents perceived that the frequency of water, heat and cold related diseases/health problems, respectively, had increased compared to five to ten years ago. FGDs and KIIs respondents were also reported the same.


Respondents had clear perceptions about changes in heat, cold and rainfall that had occurred over the last five to ten years. Local perceptions of climate variability (CV) included increased heat, overall warmer winters, reduced rainfall and fewer floods. The effects of CV were mostly negative in terms of means of living, human health, agriculture and overall livelihoods. Most local perceptions on CV are consistent with the evidence regarding the vulnerability of Bangladesh to CC. Such findings can be used to formulate appropriate sector programs and interventions. The systematic collection of such information will allow scientists, researchers and policy makers to design and implement appropriate adaptation strategies for CC in countries that are especially vulnerable.

Peer Review reports


Weather and climate affect the key determinants of human health: air, food and water. They also influence the frequency of heat waves, floods and storms as well as the transmission of infectious diseases [1, 2]. The global climate is altering dangerously due to various natural and anthropogenic reasons such as increasing fossil fuel combustion and industrial and agricultural activities, which emit carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases [3]. Worldwide, climate change-related impacts including prolonged flooding, heat waves, drought, sea level rises, salinity, temperature and rainfall variations have become evident [4]. People are directly exposed to changing weather patterns (temperature, precipitation, sea-level rises and more frequent extreme events) and indirectly through changes in the quality of water, air and food in addition to changes in ecosystems, agriculture, industry, human settlements and the economy. These forms of direct and indirect exposure can lead to death, disability and suffering [5, 6]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that globally over 150,000 deaths annually result from changes in the world's climate, relative to the average from the baseline climate of 1961-1990 [7, 8]. The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) clearly states that climate change is contributing to the global burden of disease and premature deaths [9]. Thus, there is a growing need for a better understanding of the multi-faceted and complex linkages between global environmental change and human health as well as the establishment of an international research community to address such issue [10, 11].

Both developed and developing countries are facing the adverse effects of climate change, such as prolonged floods and severe drought in South Asia and Africa, heat waves in Europe, devastating cyclones and tidal surges (e.g. Hurricane Katrina and Rita) along the Atlantic coasts [4]. Compared to developed countries, those that are still developing are more vulnerable to climate change and climate variability [11]. Climate change is projected to increase threats to human health, particularly in lower income populations and tropical/subtropical countries [2, 12]. These effects are compounded by poor socioeconomic conditions and weak health systems. Among the many developing countries, Bangladesh is also highly vulnerable to climate change [4, 6]. According to the Global Climate Risk Index 2009 of GermanWatch, Bangladesh is the most vulnerable country in the world [13]. It has already experienced various climate change-related events such as heat waves, cold waves, flood, drought, salinity intrusion and cyclones in recent years that have caused direct and indirect adverse impacts on human health [14]. The impact of climate change on individuals will vary, according to many factors like age, social class, occupation and gender [15, 16]. Vulnerable groups like the poor and, in particular, poor women will be affected most by the probable impacts of climate change [17]. Women in Bangladesh are generally the poorest of the poor [18] and therefore are expected to be the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change in this region. Further, a high population density, low level of literacy, low per capita income, high level of poverty, subsistence focus, resource poor setting, inadequate infrastructure and long coastal belt have made the climate vulnerability of the country more severe [6].

In Bangladesh, the association between climate variability and hospital visits for non-cholera diarrhea has been studied [19]. Matsuda and De Magny also studied the effect of climate change on the disease of cholera [20]. Furthermore, the probable direct and indirect impacts of climate change on health have also been studied using secondary data [6]. In fact, most of the studies, except one by the Climate Change Cell (CCC) of Bangladesh [11] and the World Bank [21], were based on the use of secondary data. The CCC not only identified climate change and health as a priority issue but also highlighted the possible overall impacts of climate change on health [11, 22]. Likewise, Rahman also emphasized the need to study the health effects of climate change as well as develop responses and possible actions that could be taken to reduce the health impacts of climate change in Bangladesh [5].

Nonetheless, little research to date has been conducted in Bangladesh concerning the perceptions of households and their coping strategies regarding the effect of climate change on their health. Perceptions on climate change and health have already been studied in developing [23, 24] and developed countries [2528]. These studies have been conducted among students, educators, farmers and scientists and have shown that there should be an emphasis on the understanding of local or community responses to climate. However, what still missing is research on climate change perceptions and its effect on human health conducted at the community level. As communities are vulnerable to climate change, their perceptions of climate variability can be used in the development of national adaptation program of actions (NAPAs), climate change strategy papers or sector programs. For example, our respondents mentioned that rainfall was a problem, which strongly suggests that policy makers need to consider irrigation as an intervention in the future data including people's perceptions of climate change and its effect on climate sensitive diseases and health problems are necessary in order to formulate and implement any kind of response or intervention regarding climate vulnerability. The objective of this study was to explore households' perceptions of climate change (changes to heat, cold and rainfall). This study also explored people's knowledge of the effects of climate change on diseases and other health problems in their region.


Perceptions on climate/climate variability were assessed using a mixed methods research design [2931]. Data collection was conducted between September 2010 to March 2011 in two villages; one from the Rajshahi district in the northern part of Bangladesh and the other from the Khulna district in the south. We purposely selected districts from two different climatic zones to obtain a wider range of household perceptions. The northern part of Bangladesh has been categorized as a heat/drought prone area whereas the southern part is defined as a flood-vulnerable area [11]. However, the socio-economic, educational, occupation, demographic and agricultural pattern of the two areas are similar [32, 33]. Multistage sampling was used to select two villages for this observational study. We have selected one Upozila (third level government administrative unit) from each district, one union (local level government administrative unit) from each Upozila and one village from each union randomly. Oral or written consent was obtained from each participant. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Commission of Heidelberg University, Germany. The study was also approved by the research evaluation committee of the Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Data were collected using both quantitative and qualitative instruments. To ensure the validity and reliability of the instruments, we flagged the issues related climate variability in the literature and then consulted with experts while developing each of the items related to heat, cold and rainfall in the questionnaire and interview guide. We also compared the items with those included in other studies. Lastly, we pre-tested and field-tested the instruments, and revised them to produce the final questionnaire and interview guide. The surveys were administered by both female and male interviewers who were involved in the process of developing the data collection tool, which facilitated their understanding of the concepts and questions. All interviewers also received training on rapport building, confidentiality and social and cultural sensitivity during data collection. A senior researcher was present in the field full time to monitor and ensure the quality of the data collected.

For the quantitative part, the survey was administered to 450 (238 male and 212 female participants) randomly selected households of the two villages. The response rate of the survey respondents was 97.82 percent and no respondent dropped out after starting the interview. The national sex ratio was used as reference in selecting the number of male and female respondents for the study [32]. The survey was administered to one person within the randomly selected households. Among males, the household head or eldest member was interviewed. The eldest male and female members were selected for the interviews for the purpose of soliciting perceptions of climate variability changes over time and its effect on agriculture, health, diseases and overall livelihoods. Among females, the eldest member of the household was also interviewed. Lists of all the households (total 2250) in the two villages were prepared and 450 households were selected from the list for interview using probability proportionate sampling.

The survey was a semi-structured questionnaire that assessed demographic characteristics, perceptions of heat, cold and precipitation, perceived effects of heat, cold and rainfall on agriculture, farming and everyday life as well as perceived links to human health problems/diseases. Respondent were asked to report their perceptions of changes in heat, cold and precipitation relative to those events five to ten years ago. There were three sections in the questionnaire. Socio-demographic information of the respondent and their family members was documented at the beginning of the interview. Section 'A' included 45 questions regarding perceptions about heat. Section 'B' included 33 questions on perceptions about cold. Section 'C' included 14 questions regarding perceptions about precipitation, rainfall and flooding. In each section, respondents were also asked to report on the health problems/diseases most frequently associated with that event(s). Background information of the respondents were given in the Table 1. Responses in the Tables 2 and 3 were designed to be reported on a Likert scale ("very low", "low", "normal", "high", "very high"). Rest of the solicited responses in the Tables 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were categorical ("Yes", "No", "Don't know" and "Not Applicable"). Quantitative data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version SPSS-12.0 and SPSS-17.0).

Table 1 Characteristics of the survey participants (n = 450)
Table 2 Perceptions of heat, cold and rainfall changes compared to five to ten years ago (N = 450, male 238, female 212)
Table 3 Perceptions of changes in frequency of disease occurrence attributable to climate variability by sex (N = 450, male 238, female 212)
Table 4 Perceived changes in heat, cold and rainfall compare to five to ten years ago (n = 450)
Table 5 Perceived problems due to extreme heat and cold (n = 450)
Table 6 Perceived diseases/health problems due to changes in heat, cold and rainfall/flood, compared to five to ten years ago (N = 450).
Table 7 Perceived future and current major hazards or disasters due to climate change (N = 450)
Table 8 Sources of perceive changes in heat, cold and rainfall, compared to five to ten years ago (N = 450)

For qualitative methods, twelve focus group discussions (FGDs) (six with females and six with males) and 15 key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted by the research team using an interview guideline on the broad themes of heat, cold and rainfall. Interviews were recorded with the permission of the participants and played back to the respondents. FGD and KII included the same issues and items on climate variability which were used in the survey. Around ten to twelve participants attended every FGD. The participants were selected purposively. FGDs and KIIs participants were senior community members, non-governmental organization officials, village doctors, local political leaders and teachers of a socio-demographic background similar to that of the survey participants from the study areas. All FGDs and KIIs were transcribed and analyzed according to themes (e.g. heat, cold, rainfall and health problems).


A total of 53 per cent of the survey respondents were male and 47 per cent were female (Table 1). The mean age of males was 42 years and 35 years for females. About 27 per cent had no formal education and 24.9 per cent had only primary education. A third (31.1 per cent) of the respondents was farmers and 41.6 per cent of the respondents were homemakers. The mean household income of the lower 50 per cent of the respondents was BDT. 4438.00/month and the median income was BDT 7000.00/month (US$1 = BDT 74.00 in 2011) for a household of 4.15 persons.

Most of the survey respondents perceived that changes in climate variability had occurred compared to five or ten years ago. There were no significant differences between males and females in terms of their perceptions regarding climate variability. Over 95.5 per cent of the respondents reported that the heat during summers had increased and 80.2 per cent reported that rainfall had drastically decreased, compared to five to ten years ago (Table 2). The majority (63.5 per cent) also reported that it was not as cold during the winters. FGD and KII participants also reported that summers were hotter, winters were warmer and that there was less rain during the rainy seasons. However, they also reported experiencing very erratic and severe cold for a period of 5-7 days each winter, which temporarily restricted their activities. They also affirmed that the cold weather had a very destructive effect on agricultural production, their everyday life and health, especially that of children and the elderly. FGD and KII respondents identified climate change as a serious problem for their daily life, crop cultivation, health and overall livelihoods.

Survey respondents were also asked to report their overall perceptions of the frequency of climate variability-induced diseases and health problems in their areas. They perceived that the frequency of climate variability-induced diseases and health problems had increased because of changes in heat, cold and rainfall events, compared to five to ten years ago (Table 3). Eighty per cent and 72 per cent perceived that health problems related to heat and cold, respectively, had also increased. FGD and KII members also reported a rise in climate variability-induced diseases in their areas. They also remarked that treatment facilities had improved but that the number of patients and diseases had also correspondingly increased. For example, a male farmer (FGD participant), from Rajshahi district mentioned that "nowadays new and unknown diseases and outbreaks are often identified among the members of the community".

We also asked survey respondents to give their views on different parameters related to changes in heat, cold and rainfall (Table 4). Included were 13 aspects related to heat, 10 aspects related to cold and nine aspects related to rainfall changes. The response percentages from the survey respondents for each parameter reveal the perceived changes in climate variability and its related aspects compared to five to ten years ago. More than seven types of immediate problems from changes in heat and cold were mentioned (Table 5): health and hygiene, production loss, working hour losses, extra work, poor crop growth, poor crop yield, over irrigation and increased illness incidence. Reoccurring fever/cough/cold, dysentery, headaches, diarrhea, skin diseases, burning sensation, conjunctivitis, jaundice, blisters, asthma, pox, weight loss and pneumonia were the health issues the most frequently reported in relation to extreme and irregular patterns of heat, cold and rainfall (Table 6).

In addition to the issues mentioned in Tables 5 and 6, survey respondents also predicted future environmental problems or hazards they perceived would occur from climate variability (Table 7). Respondents reported that more droughts (97.3 per cent), storms (25.2 per cent), cyclones (30.3 per cent) and salinity issues (34.0 per cent) might occur in the future. Interestingly, in a flood prone country, only 14.8 per cent of the survey respondents predicted that floods might occur in the future.

More than 20 different sources or indications were used by the survey participants to identify perceived changes in heat and cold (Table 8). All the sources, except radio, TV and newspapers, were largely associated with environmental observations (e.g. crop yields) within their locality. Equipment such as thermometers or gauges was not available in respondents' assessments of changes in heat, cold or precipitation.


The majority of the survey respondents were rural people with little formal education whose livelihood is mainly based on agriculture. Nevertheless, they have clear perception of the changes in heat, cold and rainfall that have occurred and its effects on their livelihood and health. According to the majority of respondents, climate variability is perceived to have changed and resulted in an increase in climate variability sensitive diseases, human health issues and agricultural problems [34, 35]. They reported that rainfall has dropped, heat has increased and the longevity of winter has decreased over time. Overall, winters were reported as warmer but erratic, irregular and bitter cold was still experienced for short periods (5-7 days). They have already experienced catastrophic natural disasters and also predicted more natural disasters in the future due to climate variability. All respondents' perceptions of climate variability are largely drawn from proxy indicators like production losses, poor growth of crops, increased sickness as well as the shared experiences of other members of the community. No modern techniques and technologies were available to inform community members about weather forecasts in advance. Instead, members become sick, lose their crops and suffer other losses, which they then attribute to extreme heat or cold events or unprecedented floods or storms. We assume that the participants in this study were not familiar with research on climate variability but their perceptions echo the findings [4, 6, 12] about changes in heat, cold and rainfall [36] reported in the literature.

To our knowledge, the present study is among the first to assess households' perceptions of climate variability in Bangladesh. Other studies regarding perceptions of climate change have been conducted in India, Nepal [36], the USA [27, 28, 37], Canada, Malta [38, 39], Ethiopia [36] and Australia [40]. Respondents in these studies were given a set of factors related to climate change to choose from and the results presented descriptively. In our study, we also used the same approach but added a qualitative aspect to assess the reliability and validity of our quantitative findings. The inclusion of the perceptions of both males and females has also added a new dimension to the existing literature as there is less information regarding gender in relation to climate change, especially in developing countries [16, 17]. These CV-related issues have been validated among a large number of male and female respondents and the reliability of the tools checked in comparisons with those from other studies in other countries [21, 27, 28, 36, 38]. The CV aspects we have used to determine people's perceptions of climate change and its effect on health problems can also be useful for other researchers.

In developed countries perception studies have been conducted mainly to explore mitigation options [27, 28, 3740]. In developing countries, perception studies have been conducted in relation to adaptation options [36] Participants of these studies perceived that the climate had changed and that these changes resulted in a wide range of negative effects on health, agriculture and livelihood. In our study we also aimed to obtain in-depth information from affected people to be used in the development of effective adaptation measures (e.g. NAPA, specific sector programs, climate change adaptation strategies and action plans) for climate vulnerable people, with special focus on the health sector. These findings address an important knowledge gap and provide significant information to policy makers.

Researchers, national and international experts and governments use scientific literature to determine the vulnerability of Bangladesh to climate change [4, 6, 11, 21]. We assume that the community members of this study are not familiar with the scientific literature regarding climate change yet provide an essential perspective on the issue can be useful for policy makers. A better understanding of local knowledge and coping strategies are needed for the successful formulation of adaptation or mitigation measures [4144]. In the development of the National Adaptation Program of Actions (NAPAs) in 2008 for climate change for Bangladesh, the government heavily depended on information from stakeholder meetings, mathematical models and reports [42]. No field studies were available to provide community information for the NAPAs. Thus, communities' understanding and predictions of changes in climate are an important source of information for policy makers looking to develop and implement effective and sustainable adaptation measures for Bangladesh, as well as other countries.

The Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP) presents a 10-year plan to build the capacity and resilience of Bangladesh to meet the challenges of a changing climate. The plan envisions a financial need of about $5 billion during the first five years through 2014 [45, 46]. To combat climate change impacts, the Government of Bangladesh established a climate change fund with a total annual allocation of approximately US$100 million per year starting in 2009-2010 [47]. However, major challenges facing the BCCSAP are the identification of vulnerable sectors, the prioritization of action and the effective and efficient use of funds [48]. Such study findings can help policy makers to select the most vulnerable sectors and prioritize the action needed for the immediate benefit of communities. In addition, based on the information on the frequency of diseases, sickness and health problems, specific and effective health sector programs can be formulated or revised and community level health systems improved for the climate vulnerable [44]. Furthermore, the fourth pillar of the BCCSAP is to use "research and knowledge management to predict the likely scale and timing of climate change impacts on different sectors of the economy and socio-economic groups; to underpin future investment strategies; and to ensure that Bangladesh is networked into the latest global thinking on climate change" [41]. These research findings will also contribute to the process of achieving the fourth pillar of the BCCSAP.

We have surveyed a large number of households in the study but only within two villages, so the findings may be more applicable to an in-depth understanding of these issues. The generalization of these perceptions to other parts of Bangladesh may require further research. Additionally, the issue under study is complicated and difficult to measure. Thus, we had to use different proxy indicators instead of direct measures. Additionally, there might be recall bias, as we also had to depend on the subjective judgments of the respondents' previous experiences.


Study participants had clear perceptions about the changes in heat, cold and rainfall that had occurred over the last five to ten years. Local perceptions of changes in climate variability included increased heat, overall warmer winters, reduced rainfall and fewer floods. They also perceived that the effects of the changes in climate variability were mostly negative on means of living, human health, agriculture and overall livelihoods. Community members described how every aspect of their life was affected by the changing and erratic pattern of heat, cold and rainfall. Increased sickness and health problems due to climate variability were specifically mentioned. Most local perceptions on climate variability were consistent with the scientific evidence regarding the vulnerability of Bangladesh to climate change. Participants also linked climate variability to current problems and identified important future threats to themselves, families and livelihoods. Based on these findings, appropriate health sector programs and interventions can already be formulated. The systematic collection of such information will allow scientists, researchers and policy makers to design and implement appropriate adaptation strategies for climate change in countries that are especially vulnerable.



Climate Change


Focus Group Discussion


Key Informant Interview


Climate Variablity


World Health Organization


The fourth Assesment Report


Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change


Climate Change Cell


National Adaptation Program of Actions


Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP)


United State Dollar


United Nations Population Fund


Erasmus Mundas Mobility in Asia.


  1. World Health O: Protecting Health from Climate change. Global Research Priorities. 2009, Geneva: WHO, 1-32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC: Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1032-

    Google Scholar 

  3. McMichael AJ, Butler CD: Emerging health issues: the widening challenge for population health promotion. Health Promotion International. 2006, 21 (suppl 1): 15-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations Development P: Human Development Report 2007. Background Paper on Risks, Vulnerability and Adaptation in Bangladesh. Edited by: Rahman A, Alam M, Alam SS, Rabi Uzzaman M, Rashid M, Rabbani G. 2007, Dhaka: UNDP, 1-86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman A: Climate change and its impact on health in Bangladesh. Regional Health Forum - Volume 12, Number 1, 2008. 2008, 2 (1): 16-26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shahid S: Probable Impacts of Climate Change on Public Health in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of public Health. 2009, XX (X): 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health O: Health and Environmental Linkage Initiative. Climate Change: deaths from climate change. 2011, 1-2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McMichael AJ, Butler CD: Health Promotion Challenges: Emerging health issues: the widening challenge for population health promotion. Health Promotion International. 2007, 21 (S1): 15-24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. IPCC: Climate Change: Synthesis Report for Policy Makers New York. 2007, 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Earth System Science P: Global Environmental Change and Human Health (2007) Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. Global Environmental Change and Human Health Report No.1. Edited by: Confalonieri U, McMichael A. 2007, 4: 1-94.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Climate Change Cell DoE: Climate Change and Health Impacts in Bangladesh. 2009, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Envirnment and Forest. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1-82.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ebi K, Woodruff R, von Hildebrand A, Corvalan C: Climate Change-related Health Impacts in the Hindu Kushira Himalayas. EcoHealth. 2007, 4 (3): 264-270. 10.1007/s10393-007-0119-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Germanwatch: Global Climate Risk Index 2009. Weather-Related Loss Events and their Impacts on Countries in 2007 and in A Long-Term Comparison. 2009, Bonn: Germanwatch

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alam E, Collins AE: Cyclone disaster vulnerability and response experiences in coastal Bangladesh. Disasters. 2010, 34 (4): 931-954. 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01176.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Organization WH: Gender, Climate Change and Health. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Preet R, Nilsson M, Schumann B, Evengård B: The gender perspective in climate change and global health. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stott R: Population and climate change: moving toward gender equality is the key. Journal of Public Health. 2010, 32 (2): 159-160. 10.1093/pubmed/fdq040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yunus M: Banker to the Poor: The Autobiography of Muhammad Yunus, Founder of Grameen Bank. 2001, USA: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hashizume M, Armstrong B, Hajat S, Wagatsuma Y, Faruque ASG, Hayashi T, Sack DA: Association between climate variability and hospital visits for non-cholera diarrhoea in Bangladesh: effects and vulnerable groups. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007, dym148

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsuda F, Ishimura S, Wagatsuma Y, Higashi T, Hayashi T, Faruque A, Sack D, Nishibuchi M: Prediction of epidemic cholera due to Vibrio cholerae in children younger than 10 years using climate data in Bangladesh. Epidemiology and Infection. 2008, 136 (01): 73-79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bank TW: Public attitudes toward climate change: findings from a multi-country poll. 2010, Washignton: The World Bank, 1-83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of H Family W: Global Climate Change: Health Impacts on Bangladesh. Pocket Book 2009. 2009, Dhaka: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sauerborn R, Adams A, Hien M: Household strategies to cope with the economic costs of illness. Social Science & Medicine. 1996, 43 (3): 291-301. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00375-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Adams AM, Cekan J, Sauerborn R: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Household Coping: Reflections from Rural West Africa. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute. 1998, 68 (2): 263-283. 10.2307/1161281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dolan AHWIJ: Understanding vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change related risks. Journal of Coastal Research. 2003, ((Proceedings of the 8th International Coastal Symposium), pg-pg. Itaja¡), SI 39

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalez LE, da Silveira P: The people's attitudes towards global environmental phenomena: a case study. Climate Research. 1997, 9 (1-2): 95-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leiserowitz AA: American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?. Risk Analysis. 2005, 25 (6): 1433-1442. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gowda MVR, Fox JC, Magelky RD: Students' understanding of climate change: Insights for scientists and educators. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 1997, 78 (10): 2232-2240.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morse MJ, Niehaus L: Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures (Developing Qualitative Inquiry). 2009, Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press

    Google Scholar 

  30. Creswell WJ: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2009, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc, Third:

    Google Scholar 

  31. Creswell WJ: Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2007, New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc, 2:

    Google Scholar 

  32. (BBS) BBoS: Population Census Report. 2001, Dhaka: Ministry of Planning. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Institute of Population R and Macro I: Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007. 2009, Dhaka: NIPORT, Bangladesh and Calverton, Maryland, USA

    Google Scholar 

  34. Emch M, Feldacker C, Yunus M, Streatfield PK, DinhThiem V, Canh DG, Ali M: Local Environmental Predictors of Cholera in Bangladesh and Vietnam. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008, 78 (5): 823-832.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Emch M, Yunus M, Escamilla V, Feldacker C, Ali M: Local population and regional environmental drivers of cholera in Bangladesh. Environmental Health. 2010, 9 (1): 2-10.1186/1476-069X-9-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chaudhary P, Bawa KS: Local perceptions of climate change validated by scientific evidence in the Himalayas. Biology Letters. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  37. Semenza JC, Wilson DJ, Parra J, Bontempo BD, Hart M, Sailor DJ, George LA: Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. Environmental Research. 2008, 107 (3): 401-411. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.03.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Akerlof K, DeBono R, Berry P, Leiserowitz A, Roser-Renouf C, Clarke K-L, Rogaeva A, Nisbet MC, Weathers MR, Maibach EW: Public Perceptions of Climate Change as a Human Health Risk: Surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010, 7 (6): 2559-2606. 10.3390/ijerph7062559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Debono R, Vincenti K, Calleja N: Risk communication: climate change as a human-health threat, a survey of public perceptions in Malta. European journal of public health. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  40. Akter S, Bennett J: Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia. Climatic Change. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  41. Semenza J, Ploubidis G, George L: Climate change and climate variability: personal motivation for adaptation and mitigation. Environmental Health. 2011, 10 (1): 46-10.1186/1476-069X-10-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Forest MoEa: National Adaption Program of Action (NAPA) Dhaka. 2005, 1-63.

    Google Scholar 

  43. UNFCCC: Chronological Evolution of LDC work Programme and Concept of National Adaptation Plan of Actions (NAPA). 2011

    Google Scholar 

  44. Menne B, Ebi KL, Europe WHOROf: Climate change and adaptation strategies for human health: Steinkopff. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bank TW: Bangladesh: Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change Washignton. 2010, 1-130.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Forest MoEa: Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan. 2008, Dhaka: Ministry of Environment and Forests. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1-86.

    Google Scholar 

  47. (DMB) DMB, Division DMaR, Management MoFaD: Bangladesh National Progress Report on the Implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action.,. Dhaka. 2011

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rahman A: Bangladesh's role on Climate Negotiation. Dhaka: The Daily Star, 31-03-2011

Download references


The authors acknowledge the cooperation of the Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Germany, Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, and UNFPA Bangladesh. The authors would also like to thank all the participants in this study as well as Erasmus Mundas Mobility with Asia (EMMA scholarship program) and the Graduate Academy of Heidelberg University for their support of this academic research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Aminul Haque.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MAH designed the study, developed the questionnaire, supervised the data collection, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. SSY contributed to the interpretation of the findings as well as the drafting and writing of the manuscript. AAM contributed to the questionnaire study design and analysis of the data. RS contributed to the development of the overall study concept, design of the study and drafting of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haque, M.A., Yamamoto, S.S., Malik, A.A. et al. Households' perception of climate change and human health risks: A community perspective. Environ Health 11, 1 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: