Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pesticide exposure assessed through agricultural crop proximity and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

  • Marco Vinceti1, 2Email author,
  • Tommaso Filippini1,
  • Federica Violi1,
  • Kenneth J. Rothman2, 3,
  • Sofia Costanzini4,
  • Carlotta Malagoli1,
  • Lauren A. Wise2,
  • Anna Odone5,
  • Carlo Signorelli5, 6,
  • Laura Iacuzio1,
  • Elisa Arcolin1,
  • Jessica Mandrioli7,
  • Nicola Fini7,
  • Francesco Patti8,
  • Salvatore Lo Fermo9,
  • Vladimiro Pietrini10,
  • Sergio Teggi4,
  • Grazia Ghermandi4,
  • Renato Scillieri11,
  • Caterina Ledda8,
  • Cristina Mauceri8,
  • Salvatore Sciacca8,
  • Maria Fiore8 and
  • Margherita Ferrante8
Environmental Health201716:91

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-017-0297-2

Received: 18 February 2017

Accepted: 14 August 2017

Published: 29 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Epidemiologic studies have raised the possibility that some pesticide compounds induce the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), though the available evidence is not entirely consistent.

Methods

We conducted a population-based case-control study in two Italian populations to assess the extent to which residence in the vicinity of agricultural crops associated with the application of neurotoxic pesticides is a risk factor for ALS, using crop acreage in proximity to the residence as an index of exposure.

Results

Based on 703 cases and 2737 controls, we computed an ALS odds ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.09) for those in proximity to agricultural land. Results were not substantially different when using alternative exposure categories or when analyzing specific crop types, with the exception of a higher risk related to exposure to citrus orchards and olive groves in Southern Italy, though based on few exposed subjects (N = 89 and 8, respectively). There was little evidence of any dose-response relation between crop proximity and ALS risk, and using long-term residence instead of current residence did not substantially change our estimates.

Conclusions

Though our index of exposure is indirect and subject to considerable misclassification, our results offer little support for the hypothesis that neurotoxic pesticide exposure increases ALS risk.

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Pesticides Case-control study Epidemiology Risk

Background

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by a rapidly progressive degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons [1, 2]. ALS is traditionally classified into familial and sporadic forms, the latter being much more common. Its incidence in Europe is two to three cases per 100,000 person-years, with heterogeneous distribution worldwide [1, 3].

The etiology of ALS is largely unknown. As with any disease, there is presumed to be an interaction between genes and environmental factors [4]. Although recent genetic studies have improved our understanding of both familial and sporadic forms of the disease, the contribution of environmental factors has been much more difficult to assess [2, 59]. Among the proposed environmental risk factors, there are hypotheses relating to neurotoxic chemicals such as heavy metals, the metalloid selenium, and some pesticide categories [6, 1012]. Pesticides, in particular, have been extensively investigated in epidemiologic studies [13, 14]. Some of these studies reported evidence of an association, but results were inconsistent and subject to possible selection bias, differential recall, confounding and exposure misclassification [1517]. Most studies have focused on occupational pesticide exposure; thus, little is known about the role of non-occupational exposure, which may occur through ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation. Non-occupational exposure may come from drift while applying pesticides to agricultural fields as well as from their volatilization after application [1825], depending on the specific pesticides used and the meteorological conditions [2628]. Residential ‘passive’ exposure to pesticides occurring proximal to agricultural areas, measured by estimating crop acreage around a residence through remote sensing, land cover maps and geographical information systems [21, 29, 30], has received considerable attention in epidemiologic research in relation to various diseases [3135]. In the present population-based case-control study, we assessed the extent to which residential proximity to agricultural land in general, and to specific crop types, could be a risk factors for ALS. The study was conducted in two Italian regions, one from the North and the other from the South of the country.

Methods

Study population

Following approval of the Ethics Committees of the Modena and the Catania provinces, we designed a population-based case-control study to investigate the role of environmental risk factors in ALS etiology [36]. We attempted to identify all cases of ALS newly-diagnosed during 1998-2011 among residents in three provinces, Parma, Reggio Emilia and Modena, of the Emilia-Romagna region in Northern Italy, and in Catania, a province in Sicily. These provinces encompass an overall population of around 3,000,000 and have, as far as the three Emilia-Romagna provinces are concerned, very similar orography, land use patterns and percentage of population employed in agriculture [37]. In fact, at the last Agricultural General Census carried out in 2010, percentage of agricultural land use was 42.2, 44.1 and 44.6 in Parma, Reggio Emilia and Modena, respectively, while the corresponding percentage of employees in agriculture was 9.0, 9.7 and 11.6 [37]. We used several available administrative data sources to identify patients diagnosed in these provinces, known to have rather similar ALS incidence rates [38, 39]: the ALS Emilia-Romagna Registry (established in 2009), the hospital discharge records for the entire study period released by the Emilia-Romagna and Sicily regions, the drug prescription directories and the death certificate files. Only ‘definite’ and ‘probable’ ALS cases, as defined by using El Escorial revised criteria [40], were included in the study. For each enrolled patient, we randomly selected four controls from the database of National Health Service directory, to which all Italian residents are included. Controls were individually matched to patients by sex, year of birth, and province of residence, and in the Reggio Emilia province, by calendar year. Matching by calendar year was not feasible in the other provinces.

Exposure assessment

To assess non-occupational pesticide exposure, we used the proxy variable of land use and specifically crop density close to the subject’s home. This measure is premised on the evidence that direct pesticide drift and the aerial volatilization and spreading of these compounds following their applications in fields leads to residential exposure. The aerial transport of a pollutant from its source to a point of exposition is usually assessed using atmospheric dispersion models [41, 42]. However, in the present study the complexity of the sources (hundreds of fields with pesticides emission rate not quantifiable) prevented the use of such models. We therefore assessed exposure using a methodology based on remote sensing, land use, and residential history within a geographical information system [29, 43], as recently described in detail on a study on pesticide exposure and childhood leukemia risk in the proximity of agricultural applications [34]. We ascertained the residential address of cases at the date of diagnosis and of matched controls as well as their oldest ascertainable residence for which exposure data were also available (‘historical residence’), provided that such residence was subsequently stable for at least two years (otherwise the subject was excluded from the analysis). We used the Ministry of Finance Revenue Agency database to abstract this historical residence, which was as of December 1979 for the Modena, Reggio Emilia and Parma residents, and as of December 1989 for Catania (no information about land use in Sicily was available before that year). We also abstracted, from the Ministry of Finance database, information about any agricultural business activity since 1979 engaged in by the participants in Modena and Reggio Emilia. We geocoded participants’ addresses using the database available at the Province Authorities of Modena, Reggio Emilia and Parma, which had been already validated in previous studies [44, 45]. For addresses that could not be retrieved in these databases (around 10%), we used Google Earth to geocode, and for the few participants for whom the address could still not be retrieved (N = 120), we directly geocoded it in loco using a portable GPS device (Garmin GPSmap 60CSx, Garmin Int. Corp., Olathe, KS). We included all geocoded addresses in a Geographical Information System, using ARC-GIS software (version 10, ESRI, Redlands, CA 2010).

We also obtained data on land use from aerial photos made available by the Department of Agriculture of the Emilia-Romagna and Sicily Regions. For the land within a circular 100-m zone around each participant’s residence, we determined the proportion classified as urban, rural, or wetlands, as well as the specific crop types according to a detailed classification [46]. Since aerial photos of the regions were taken and the related land cover map made available only about once in each decade or even less, we used the 2003 photo and map for Emilia-Romagna and the 2009 photo and map for Sicily to assess ‘recent exposure,’ i.e. that linked to the 1998-2011 period of disease diagnosis of the ALS cases, and the oldest ones available to assess long-term antecedent (‘historical’) exposure, i.e. that for 1976 for Emilia-Romagna and for 1989 for Sicily. Using these land use maps, we determined the crop density for overall agricultural land and for the categories of vineyards, orchards, arable crops (cereals grown by arable farming) and vegetable crops. For Catania, we also added olive groves among the crops investigated. There were some inconsistencies in the land use classification: the crop types ‘arable’ and ‘vegetable’ were not split in the historical exposure for Sicily, and no information about citrus orchards (a Sicily-specific crop type) was available for the recent period. Finally, and consistent with other studies in this field, we also recalculated exposures using a zone of 1000 m around the subject’s residence, instead of 100 m, and an Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method:
$$ E=\frac{\sum_i{w}_i{a}_i}{\sum_i{w}_i} $$
where E is the exposure, a i is the area of the i-th field inside the exposition circle (1000 m) and w i a weighting factor based on the inverse of the subject-field distance.

In the Geographical Information System, we also considered the geocoded data of the pesticide-free farms of the Emilia-Romagna and Sicily regions [47], removing from the area considered as ‘agricultural’ the corresponding area.

We collected information about the specific pesticides or pesticide categories that were generally used for each crop type. To do that, we obtained a list of all compounds used for the different crop types of the regional territory from the Department of Agriculture of the Emilia-Romagna and Sicily Regions. We then validated the real use of these pesticide categories for the most common crop types with the help of technicians of Emilia-Romagna Department of Agriculture, who assessed actual pesticide use in a sample of 118 farms in 2003, by scrutinizing the ‘Registers of treatment,’ completed according to the Italian legislation from each farm. This register included details of type, timing, and amount of pesticide application. Finally, we assessed the literature for data on the neurotoxicity of the compounds used for the crop types identified in the study area [4853]. In Table 1, we report the results of such a search, listing the pesticide categories associated with each crop type and which were characterized by neurotoxicity effects according to literature data [4853].
Table 1

Pesticides with neurotoxic properties used for the crops identified from land use map in the study area (I = insecticides; H = herbicides; F = fungicides)

Crops

Pesticides

Vineyards

organophosphates (I/H); triazoles (F); phenilamides (F)

Orchards

organophosphates (I/H); triazoles (F); phenilamides (F); neonicotinoids (I)

Citrus orchards

organophosphates (I/H); neonicotinoids (I);

Arable crops

2,4D (H); MCPA (H); dicamba (H); azatrine (H); pyrethroids (I); glyphosate (H)

Vegetables crops

neonicotinoids (I); pyrethroids (I); phenilamides (F)

Olive groves

organophosphates (I/H); neonicotinoids (I); glyphosate (H)

Data analysis

We estimated the crude and pooled odds ratio for ALS associated with exposure to pesticides, using Episheet [54]. We also used conditional logistic regression using dichotomous exposure categorization (>0 crop type in the vicinity vs. 0), continuous data (for 20% increase in crop percentage), tertiles of exposure and three a priori defined crop percentage-based categories: <10%; 10%-30%; and >30%. Given that many subjects had no rural land use within the 100 m zone around their residence, tertiles were computed temporarily excluding those with zero exposure and then adding those with zero exposure back into the lowest category. We also carried out stratified analyses by age group and by region, and using a zone of 1000 m and the IDW algorithm instead of 100 m around each subject’s home.

Results

We identified 703 cases of ALS diagnosed during the study period 1998-2011, 499 in Emilia-Romagna and 204 in Sicily. We then identified 2814 matched controls, but we could not include all of them in the analysis, due to erroneous personal data or lack of effective residence in the province at the date of interest. Ultimately, 2737 matched controls (1935 in Emilia-Romagna and 802 in Sicily) were included. 537 cases and 2049 controls were found to be resident in the study area in 1976 for the Emilia-Romagna region and in 1989 for Sicily, and therefore could be retained in the historical analysis. 52% of study subjects were male, and most of them (97.8%) were born in Italy. The mean age at disease onset was 65.9 years, with values of 62.9 years and 67.2 years in Sicily and Emilia-Romagna region, respectively. The distribution of sex, age, province of residence, and country of birth of study participants is reported in Table 2.
Table 2

Characteristics of study participants. Number (%) are presented

 

Cases

Controls

Total

Sex

 Male

365 (51.6)

1413 (51.9)

1778 (51.7)

 Female

337 (48.4)

1324 (48.1)

1662 (48.3)

Age

 Mean (SD)

65.9 (12.0)

66.0 (11.9)

66.0 (11.9)

  < 65 years

281 (40.0)

1088 (39.7)

1369 (39.8)

  ≥ 65 years

422 (60.0)

1649 (60.3)

2071 (60.2)

Region

Emilia Romagna

499 (71.0)

1935 (70.7)

2434 (70.8)

 Parma

112 (15.9)

431 (15.7)

543 (15.8)

 Reggio Emilia

152 (21.6)

599 (21.9)

751 (21.8)

 Modena

235 (33.4)

905 (33.1)

1140 (33.1)

Sicily (Catania)

204 (29.0)

802 (29.3)

1006 (29.2)

Birth country

 Italian

682 (97.0)

2681 (98.0)

3363 (97.8)

 Foreign

21 (3.0)

56 (2.0)

77 (2.2)

Total

703

2737

3440

Overall, there were 290 cases (41.3%) and 1184 controls (43.3%) who had some agricultural crops in the vicinity (≤ 100 m) of their homes. Distribution of matched case-control sets by recent and historical exposure to total agricultural land is reported in Table 3. There was little association between ALS risk and proximity to any agricultural land in the overall study area (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09) and within each region (Table 4). The same was true when specific crop types were considered, except for a statistically unstable increased risk linked to vegetable crops in both study regions, which was based on only 8 exposed subjects, and an association seen just for Sicily with respect to vineyards, orchards and olive groves. The latter effect estimates, however, were statistically unstable except for orchards, to which 121 subjects (37 cases and 84 controls) were exposed, while the corresponding figures for vineyards, vegetable crops and olive groves were 5, 2 and 17, respectively. In continuous analysis, the OR associated with 20% increase in acreage was close to unity in the overall study area for total agricultural land and for most crop types, except for the imprecise estimates for proximity to vegetable crops (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.25-63.95). In area-specific analysis, an increase of 20% of acreage was strongly associated with excess ALS risk only for vegetable crops exposure in the Emilia-Romagna region, and for total agricultural land, orchards and particularly olive groves (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.05-23.97) in Sicily.
Table 3

Distribution of individually matched case-control sets according to the number of matched controls and the exposure of the case and the matched controls to agricultural land

Matching ratio

 

Exposed controls

 

0

1

2

3

4

1:2

Case exposed

1

1

0

-

-

 

Case unexposed

1

1

0

-

-

1:3

Case exposed

3

15

12

0

-

 

Case unexposed

8

16

11

2

-

1:4

Case exposed

21

82

89

59

7

 

Case unexposed

42

126

128

60

18

Table 4

Odds ratios (OR) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with current proximity to any agricultural land or specific crop type within 100 m from residence (A), and with 20% continuous increase of any agricultural land or specific crop type (B)a

 

Cases

Controls

Total (N = 3440)

Cases

Controls

Emilia-Romagna (N = 2434)

Cases

Controls

Sicily (N = 1006)

Crops

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

(A)

 Total agricultural land

290/413

1184/1553

0.92

(0.78, 1.09)

205/294

858/1077

0.88

(0.72, 1.07)

85/119

326/476

1.04

(0.76, 1.42)

 Vineyards

27/676

91/2646

1.16

(0.75, 1.80)

25/474

88/1847

1.11

(0.70, 1.75)

2/202

3/799

2.64

(0.44, 15.89)

 Orchards

46/657

181/2556

0.99

(0.71, 1.38)

9/490

97/1838

0.35

(0.17, 0.69)

37/167

84/718

1.89

(1.24, 2.89)

 Arable crops

203/500

826/1911

0.94

(0.78, 1.13)

191/308

756/1179

0.97

(0.79, 1.18)

12/192

70/732

0.65

(0.35, 1.23)

 Vegetable crops

3/700

5/2732

2.35

(0.56, 9.82)

2/497

4/1931

1.94

(0.35, 10.64)

1/203

1/801

3.95

(0.25, 63.36)

 Olive groves

        

6/198

11/791

2.18

(0.80, 5.96)

(B)

 Total agricultural land

  

1.01

(0.94, 1.09)

  

0.96

(0.88, 1.04)

  

1.35

(1.13, 1.63)

 Vineyards

  

1.15

(0.86, 1.54)

  

1.12

(0.83, 1.51)

  

Too high

 Orchards

  

0.93

(0.70, 1.24)

  

0.12

(0.02, 0.82)

  

1.52

(1.08, 2.13)

 Arable crops

  

0.98

(0.89, 1.08)

  

0.98

(0.89, 1.08)

  

1.01

(0.63, 1.61)

 Vegetable crops

  

4.00

(0.25, 63.9)

  

4.00

(0.25, 63.95)

  

-

 

 Olive groves

          

5.01

(1.05, 23.97)

aResults for dichotomous analysis expressed as crude OR for matched sets, and for continuous analysis using a conditional logistic regression model. Some estimates could not be computed because of too few exposed subjects

When we categorized exposure into tertiles (Table 5), in the overall population, recent exposure to vineyards was associated with an increased risk in the intermediate category, but with a decreased risk in the highest category. No other crop type in this analysis was associated with any meaningful trend in risk, including vegetable crops. A similar picture was observed when limiting the analysis to the Emilia-Romagna region, while for Sicily a higher and statistically unstable effect estimate for the top exposure category was observed for total agricultural land, vineyards, orchards, and olive groves, although only orchards showed a dose-response relation. Results did not differ much within age or sex categories, or when the 100 m zone was replaced with the 1000 m zone, or when the IDW method or a priori defined exposure categories were used (data not shown).
Table 5

Odds ratio (OR) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for current proximity to agricultural fields in tertiles of current exposurea

 

Total

Emilia-Romagna

Sicily

 

I

II

III

I

II

III

I

II

III

Total agricultural land

 Cut off (%)

<12.2

12.2-38.8

>38.8

<17.2

17.2-44.6

>44.6

<6.3

6.3-21.6

>21.6

 Cases/Controls

487/1949

113/394

103/394

354/1363

80/286

65/286

138/586

25/108

41/108

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.15

(0.91, 1.45)

1.04

(0.82, 1.33)

1.00

1.08

(0.82, 1.43)

0.88

(0.65, 1.18)

1.00

0.97

(0.60, 1.57)

1.57

(1.06, 2.34)

Vineyards

 Cut off (%)

<9.7

9.7-31.1

>31.1

<9.8

9.8-31.5

>31.5

<2.8

2.8-9.4

>9.4

 Cases/Controls

683/2677

11/30

9/30

480/1877

11/29

8/29

203/800

0/1

1/1

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.46

(0.72, 2.95)

1.19

(0.55, 2.54)

1.00

1.51

(0.74, 3.07)

1.10

(0.49, 2.44)

1.00

-

 

3.47

(0.22, 55.83)

Orchards

 Cut off (%)

<7.8

7.8-26.4

>26.4

<9.6

9.6-28.9

>28.9

<7.5

7.5-23.4

>23.4

 Cases/Controls

675/2618

15/59

13/60

497/1871

1/33

1/31

179/746

12/29

13/27

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

0.98

(0.55, 1.74)

0.85

(0.46, 1.57)

1.00

0.11

(0.02, 0.82)

0.11

(0.02, 0.84)

1.00

1.74

(0.86, 3.49)

1.94

(1.00, 3.77)

Arable crops

 Cut off (%)

<13.1

13.1-38.7

>38.7

<14.9

14.9-40.9

>40.9

<3.9

3.9-17.1

>17.1

 Cases/Controls

551/2187

89/275

63/275

359/1431

82/252

58/252

196/756

2/23

6/23

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.29

(0.99, 1.69)

0.91

(0.68, 1.22)

1.00

1.31

(0.99, 1.73)

0.91

(0.67, 1.24)

1.00

0.35

(0.08, 1.48)

1.01

(0.40, 2.54)

Vegetable crops

 Cut off (%)

<6.4

6.4-20.9

>20.9

<8.1

8.1-20.9

>20.9

<4.8

-

>4.8

 Cases/Controls

701/2734

1/2

1/1

498/1933

0/1

1/1

203/801

0/0

1/1

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.81

(0.16, 20.08)

4.00

(0.25, 63.95)

1.00

-

 

4.00

(0.25, 63.95)

1.00

-

 

3.46

(0.22, 55.78)

Olive groves

 Cut off (%)

          

<2.9

2.9-9.1

>9.1

 Cases/Controls

          

199/795

0/4

5/3

 OR (95% CI)

          

1.00

-

 

6.44

(1.54, 26.98)

aTertile cutpoints based on exposure of subjects having proximity to crops >0, with subjects having exposure = 0 included in the bottom tertile. OR computed using a conditional logistic regression model. Some estimates could not be computed because of too few exposed subjects

Results of corresponding analyses for historical exposure are reported in Tables 6 and 7. Exposure to agricultural land considered as a dichotomous variable had a near null relation (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.83-1.32), also seen in the area-specific analysis for Sicily but not for Emilia-Romagna (Table 6). Exposure to orchards was moderately associated with an excess risk in the overall study population, entirely due to citrus orchards in Sicily (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.84-2.32 in dichotomous analysis). Exposure to vegetables crops in Emilia-Romagna region was associated with a statistically unstable excess risk, based on 5 exposed subjects only, and this was also true for exposure to olive groves in Sicily, based on 8 exposed subjects. Results were substantially confirmed in the analysis based on 20% continuous increase in exposure. In tertile-specific analyses (Table 7), there was substantially no evidence of dose-response relations both in the entire study population and in area-specific analyses, and the excess risk found in Sicily for citrus orchards and for olive groves was entirely confined to the highest tertile of exposure, based on 33 and 4 exposed subjects, respectively. These results did not change substantially when we limited the analyses to subjects who had been residing at the same address since 1979 (for Emilia-Romagna) or 1989 (for Sicily) until the date of diagnosis (for cases) or the corresponding calendar year (for matched controls).
Table 6

Odds ratios (OR) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with historical proximity to any agricultural land or specific crop type within 100 m from residence (A), and with 20% increase of crop type (B)a

 

Cases

Controls

Total (N = 2235)

Cases

Controls

Emilia-Romagna (N = 1363)

Cases

Controls

Sicily (N = 872)

Crops

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

Exp/Unexp

Exp/Unexp

OR

(95% CI)

(A)

 Total agricultural land

258/271

772/934

1.05

(0.83, 1.32)

224/119

661/359

1.02

(0.77, 1.33)

34/152

111/575

1.15

(0.75, 1.77)

 Vineyards

28/501

122/1584

0.64

(0.41, 0.99)

28/315

121/899

0.64

(0.41, 0.99)

0/186

1/685

-

 

 All Orchards

40/489

124/1582

1.06

(0.72, 1.55)

16/327

55/965

0.82

(0.46, 1.47)

24/162

69/617

1.31

(0.79, 2.18)

 Orchards (not citrus)

16/513

59/1647

0.77

(0.43, 1.38)

16/327

55/965

0.82

(0.46, 1.47)

0/186

4/682

-

 

 Citrus orchards

        

24/162

65/621

1.40

(0.84, 2.32)

 Arable and Veg. crops

213/316

627/1079

1.04

(0.80, 1.35)

213/130

613/407

1.11

(0.85, 1.44)

0/186

14/672

-

 

 Arable crops

    

211/132

611/409

1.08

(0.83, 1.41)

    

 Vegetables crops

    

2/341

3/1017

2.67

(0.45, 15.96)

    

 Olive groves

        

3/183

5/681

2.23

(0.53, 9.35)

(B)

 Total agricultural land

  

1.05

(0.98, 1.12)

  

1.02

(0.94, 1.10)

  

1.18

(1.02, 1.36)

 Vineyards

  

0.85

(0.60, 1.20)

  

0.86

(0.60, 1.23)

  

-

 

 All Orchards

  

1.13

(0.96, 1.34)

  

0.91

(0.60, 1.37)

  

1.20

(1.00, 1.44)

 Orchards (not citrus)

      

0.91

(0.60, 1.37)

  

-

 

 Citrus orchards

          

1.23

(1.02, 1.48)

 Arable and Veg. crops

  

1.03

(0.95, 1.12)

  

1.04

(0.95, 1.13)

  

-

 

 Arable crops

      

1.03

(0.94, 1.12)

    

 Vegetables crops

      

-

     

 Olive groves

          

Too high

aResults for dichotomous analysis expressed as crude OR for matched sets, and for continuous analysis using a conditional logistic regression model. Some estimates could not be computed because of too few exposed subjects

Table 7

Odds ratios (OR) of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for historical proximity to agricultural fields in tertiles of current exposurea

 

Total

Emilia-Romagna

Sicliy

 

I

II

III

I

II

III

I

II

III

Total agricultural land

 Cut off (%)

<28.1

28.1-77.8

>77.8

<30.8

30.8-78.4

78.4

<11.2

11.2-74.7

>74.7

 Cases/Controls

339/1192

98/257

92/257

190/580

78/220

75/220

156/612

15/37

15/37

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.27

(0.96, 1.69)

1.20

(0.91, 1.60)

1.00

1.09

(0.80, 1.50)

1.04

(0.76, 1.42)

1.00

1.51

(0.81, 2.82)

1.60

(0.86, 2.99)

Vineyards

               

 Cut off (%)

<12.4

12.4-25.1

>25.1

<12.4

12.4-24.0

>24.0

<0.1

0.1-99.9

>99.9

 Cases/Controls

507/1625

12/41

10/40

321/940

11/40

11/40

186/685

0/1

0/0

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

0.79

(0.40, 1.55)

0.77

(0.38, 1.56)

1.00

0.76

(0.38, 1.54)

0.81

(0.41, 1.61)

-

    

All Orchards

 Cut off (%)

<8.2

8.2-41.0

>41.0

<5.4

5.4-32.5

>32.5

<13.7

13.7-63.5

>63.5

 Cases/Controls

499/1624

14/41

16/41

332/985

8/17

3/18

168/640

6/23

12/23

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.00

(0.54, 1.88)

1.41

(0.78, 2.53)

1.00

1.16

(0.49, 2.74)

0.50

 

1.00

0.91

(0.36, 2.30)

1.99

(0.97, 4.07)

Orchards (not citrus)

 Cut off (%)

>6.8

6.8-36.6

>36.6

<6.8

6.8-34.8

>34.8

<13.7

13.7-99.9

>99.9

 Cases/Controls

518/1667

8/20

3/19

332/985

8/17

3/18

186/684

0/2

0/0

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

1.01

(0.44, 2.34)

0.49

(0.14, 1.67)

1.00

1.16

(0.49, 2.74)

0.50

(0.15, 1.74)

-

    

Citrus orchards

 Cut off (%)

          

<14.6

14.6-63.5

>63.5

 Cases/Controls

          

168/643

6/22

12/21

 OR (95% CI)

          

1.00

0.94

(0.37, 2.39)

2.19

(1.05, 4.54)

Arable and Veg. crops

 Cut off (%)

<25.7

25.7-65.7

>65.7

 

<27.3

27.3-65.9

>65.9

<7.1

7.1-24.6

>24.6

 Cases/Controls

381/1288

67/210

81/208

196/613

66/203

81/204

186/677

0/5

0/4

 OR (95% CI)

1.00

0.99

(0.72, 1.37)

1.21

(0.88, 1.66)

1.00

1.03

(0.74, 1.42)

1.26

(0.92, 1.76)

-

    

Arable crops

 Cut off (%)

     

<27.3

27.3-65.9

>65.9

     

 Cases/Controls

     

196/614

66/203

81/203

     

 OR (95% CI)

     

1.00

1.03

(0.74, 1.42)

1.27

(0.92, 1.74)

     

Vegetables crops

 Cut off (%)

     

<11.2

11.2-23.3

>23.3

     

 Cases/Controls

     

342/1018

1/1

0/1

     

 OR (95% CI)

     

1.00

4.01

(0.25, 64.11)

-

      

Olive groves

 Cut off (%)

          

<8.5

8.5-18.6

>18.6

 Cases/Controls

          

183/683

0/2

 

3/1

 OR (95% CI)

          

1.00

-

 

12.01

(1.25, 115.45)

aTertile cutpoints based on exposure of subjects having proximity to crops >0, with subjects having exposure = 0 included in the bottom tertile. OR computed using a conditional logistic regression model. Some estimates could not be computed because of too few exposed subjects

We also repeated all the above-mentioned analyses after restricting the study population to males and then to females, and to Reggio Emilia province, which was the only one for which we could sample controls from resident databases that were calendar-year-specific, allowing matching to cases. No evidence of substantial changes in effect estimates compared with the overall analysis emerged (data not shown).

Discussion

Our study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that residence near agricultural land, with presumed increased exposure to pesticides, is associated with an increased risk of ALS. Evidence of an association between pesticide exposure and ALS risk comes from human studies, including case reports [5557] as well as epidemiologic studies, mainly of occupational exposure [1, 6, 7, 1517, 58, 59]. In three epidemiologic investigations carried out in one of the regions included in the present study, Emilia-Romagna, we found an excess risk associated with pesticide exposure as assessed though a simple indicator of rural residence [60] or occupational pesticide exposure [61], but not when pesticide content in cerebrospinal fluid was used as biomarker of exposure [62]. Moreover, laboratory evidence on the relation between pesticides and ALS offers some biological plausibility for an association, through mechanisms such as altered protein synthesis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction [17, 53, 63, 64].

Both environmental and biomonitoring studies indicate that residential proximity to agricultural fields increased exposure to various pesticide categories [18, 22, 6567]. Residential proximity to specific crops might be even more relevant than usual diet and other sources in increasing the body burden of these contaminants [23], though the evidence is equivocal [19, 68].

Overall, we found little evidence that residence near agricultural land characterized by crop types for which pesticides, some of which with established neurotoxic properties, are used was associated with higher risk of ALS. This finding is consistent with there being little or no effect on ALS risk of pesticide and pesticide mixture drift in close proximity of the crops to which they are applied. Results were similar when we used either continuous indicators of crop use, tertiles or pre-set categories. In addition, it made little difference when we replaced the indicator of recent exposure, i.e. the crop acreage near home at time of diagnosis, with an indicator of historical exposure, under the hypothesis that passive exposure to neurotoxic pesticides and ALS development needs long induction and latent periods. The latter analysis also addresses exposure to pesticides that are no longer in use. Furthermore, results did not change substantially in the sensitivity analyses restricted to males or females (the latter being more likely to spend time at home), to residentially stable subjects, and to residents of the only province for which we could choose controls from calendar-year specific resident databases.

A partial exception to the overall null findings are some statistically imprecise excess risks associated with two crops in Sicily, citrus orchards and olive groves, though driven by a small number of exposed cases particularly for the latter crop type. These estimates of excess risk were the drivers of the estimate of excess risk associated with historical exposure to total agricultural land, which was almost entirely due to the increased risk in Sicily. Specific data for citrus orchards, a crop found only in Sicily in the present study, were available only for historical exposure, though the indication of an excess risk for overall orchards in the most recent period in the same population was most likely associated with such crop, given the large prevalence of this type of cultivation in Southern Italy. Regarding the excess risks associated with other crops, proximity to vineyards was not characterized by dose-response effects and was essentially null for historical exposure, while the excess risk associated with vegetable crops was based on a few subjects, only 2 cases and 3 controls. All of these crops were characterized by the use of neurotoxic pesticides such as organophosphates, triazoles and phenilamides for vineyards, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids and phenilamides for vegetables crops, and organophosphates and neonicotinoids for olive groves (in addition to glyphosate) and citrus orchards. However, some pesticides are commonly used for other crops, for which no increased risk was found, so these slight indications of an association are difficult to interpret. These excess risks were based on few exposed subjects and therefore had wide confidence intervals, except for orchards, for which there was limited evidence of a dose-response relation, particularly for long-term exposure.

Our largely null results might also indicate that the amount of exposure occurring ≤100 m from the points of pesticide application was too low to trigger disease onset and etiology. However, available data about pesticide environmental and biological monitoring in the proximity of agricultural fields indicate higher exposures of non-occupationally exposed subjects living in proximity, even at a larger distance than what we studied. Such sources of exposure, including dermal contact and consumption of locally-produced foods, may add to occupational exposure and broader dietary exposure. Factors such as time and length of application, meteorological conditions, time spent at home and in its immediate vicinity, and type of crops and applied pesticides, may have a major effect in modifying actual pesticide residential exposure in proximity to agricultural fields. In addition, although we could not collect specific occupational data for the study subjects, we expect that a much higher percentage of subjects living in the vicinity of agricultural land are occupationally involved in farming activity than those who live more distant from an agricultural field, and thus have a greater chance for occupational pesticide exposure [18, 69]. This expectation was confirmed by the data we collected for the subset of our study population that resided in Modena and Reggio Emilia provinces, which showed that percentage of ‘registered’ farmers was 11.1% and 2.5%, respectively, among the study subjects having and not having any agricultural land in the proximity of their residence. Consequently, the actual contrast in exposure between exposed and unexposed subjects in the present study was likely larger than what was estimated from our model. More accurate information about occupational exposure of study subjects was not available, due to the study design, which did not include the collection of direct information from participants, and due to the lack of availability of data from the National Social Insurance Agency.

To locate participants, we used the ‘official’ home address, which in some cases may differ from the actual address. Residential mobility in Italy, however, is much lower than some other countries [70]. In addition to exposure misclassification, the study may have been affected by unmeasured confounding. We were unable to control for socioeconomic or occupational status of our study subjects. The limited knowledge regarding the potential environmental, lifestyle, and genetic risk factors of ALS, particularly for the sporadic form, complicates the elimination of residual confounding. Conversely, there was evidence that the variables we used in the study for control sampling and data analyses were not important confounders. In fact, when we computed with the Episheet software a pooled OR of the matched sets conditioned on the matching factors the result was 0.92, and the crude result was also 0.92, indicating that collectively all the matching factors were uncorrelated with exposure and were therefore not confounders in this study.

Strengths of this study include inclusion of two different agricultural areas of Italy, characterized by different lifestyle and environmental characteristics, though with ALS rates comparable with those of other areas of Italy as well as US regions for which population-based data are available [38, 7176]. The Northern Italy area we investigated experiences air pollution due to motorized traffic and other sources [77], while the area of Southern Italy included is generally characterized by a lower environmental pollution and by consumption of the well-known and healthy ‘Mediterranean diet’ [78]. Our results tended to be consistent across both areas. In addition, we used validated indicators of pesticide exposure, based on ad hoc surveys in a large number of farms in the study area, thus expecting a good reliability of the specific pesticide categories identified in the study areas. We were also able to take into account long-term antecedent pesticide exposure, even decades before disease onset, thus allowing for a long induction and latent period between exposure and ALS diagnosis. Finally, we avoided some selection bias, in that we did not have to obtain subjects’ consent to participate, as we used only information in the public domain.

We used a narrow zone of 100-m radius from each study subject’s home to define exposure status for study subjects according to the crop acreage near their residences. The narrow zone produced a more specific exposure classification than a wider zone would have done, at the price of some sensitivity [26, 7982]. Larger exposure buffers in 250-1250 m range have been suggested and validated in other studies, taking into account pesticide drift and their volatilization from crops and soil after application [23, 25, 8385]. Our choice was influenced by methods used to apply pesticides in the study area, which never include aerial sources such as in the US but only land-based devices. However, when we performed a supplementary analysis taking into account a larger buffer from the subjects’ residences, i.e. a 1000 m, results did not substantially change (data not shown).

Conclusion

Overall, using a rough index of environmental exposure based on proximity of residence to agricultural land in two areas of Northern and Southern Italy, we found little association between this index and risk of ALS. Two specific crops, citrus orchards and olive groves, and their related pesticides, appear to deserve further investigation.

Abbreviations

ALS: 

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

CI: 

Confidence interval

GPS: 

Global positioning system

IDW: 

Inverse distance weighting

OR: 

Odds ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the invaluable help in pesticide exposure assessment and in case ascertainment of: Drs. Floriano Mazzini, Rossana Rossi, Roberta Nannini and Massimo Fornaciari of the Phytosanitary Service of the Emilia-Romagna Region; Drs. Marina Guermandi, Francesca Staffilani, Nazaria Marchi of the Geologic and Soil Agency of the Emilia-Romagna Region; Dr. Stefano Corticelli of the Statistics and Information Service of the Emilia-Romagna Region; Dr. Giuseppe Marano of the Phytosanitary Service of the Sicily region; Dr. Marina Ienna of Private Hospitals Office, ASP Catania, Catania; Dr. Adriana Cuspulici, Garibaldi Hospital, Catania; Dr. Annamaria Longhitano, Canizzaro Hospital, Catania; Drs. Giusi Belastro and Enzo Battiato, Municipality of Catania, Catania; Dr. Salvatore Cirone, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Sicily Region, Palermo.

Funding

This work was supported by AISLA (The Italian Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association) and by the National Health Service – Local Health Unit of Reggio Emilia.

Availability of data and materials

To carry out the study we used confidential information for identification of patients and controls and for reconstructing their residential history according the allowances and prescriptions issued by the local Ethics Committees which authorized this study, and in line with the Italian rules for data privacy in epidemiologic and biomedical research. Data on land use were available from institutional website of Emilia-Romagna Region (https://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it) and Sicily Region (http://www.sitr.regione.sicilia.it/geoportale).

Authors’ contributions

MV, CaM, MF, MF, SS, CS and AO designed the original study, and with TF, FV, KJR and LAW analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted the article. SC, ST, and GG managed the Geographical Information System. JM, NF, FP, SLF, and VP, recruited and validated the clinical records of ALS cases. CaM, TF, FV, LI, EA, RS, CL, and CrM extracted the eligible population controls, and collected and geocoded the residential information of both cases and controls. CaM, TF, and EA collected and validated the pesticide information. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Modena and the Catania provinces Ethics Committees in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. According to the Ethics Committee prescriptions, subjects’ consent to participate in the study was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Environmental, Genetic, and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center - CREAGEN, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health
(3)
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park
(4)
Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
(5)
Department of Biomedical, Biotechnological, and Translational Sciences, University of Parma
(6)
School of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele
(7)
Department of Neuroscience, S. Agostino-Estense Hospital, and University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
(8)
Department of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies “G.F. Ingrassia”, University of Catania
(9)
Neurologic Unit, AOU Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele, University of Catania
(10)
Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, University of Parma
(11)
Department of Prevention, Catania Local Health Unit

References

  1. Couratier P, Corcia P, Lautrette G, Nicol M, Preux PM, Marin B. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review of literature. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016;172:37–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zufiria M, Gil-Bea FJ, Fernandez-Torron R, Poza JJ, Munoz-Blanco JL, Rojas-Garcia R, et al. ALS: a bucket of genes, environment, metabolism and unknown ingredients. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;142:104–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Marin B, Boumediene F, Logroscino G, Couratier P, Babron MC, Leutenegger AL, et al. Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:57–74.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Chalabi A, Hardiman O. The epidemiology of ALS: a conspiracy of genes, environment and time. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:617–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Vinceti M, Fiore M, Signorelli C, Odone A, Tesauro M, Consonni M, et al. Environmental risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: methodological issues in epidemiologic studies. Ann Ig. 2012;24:407–15.Google Scholar
  6. Ingre C, Roos PM, Piehl F, Kamel F, Fang F. Risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:181–93.Google Scholar
  7. Bozzoni V, Pansarasa O, Diamanti L, Nosari G, Cereda C, Ceroni M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and environmental factors. Funct Neurol. 2016;31:7–19.Google Scholar
  8. Cragg JJ, Cudkowicz ME, Weisskopf MG. The role of environmental toxins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:779–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tesauro M, Consonni M, Filippini T, Mazzini L, Pisano F, Chio A, et al. Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the province of Novara, Italy, and possible role of environmental pollution. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017:1–7.Google Scholar
  10. Su FC, Goutman SA, Chernyak S, Mukherjee B, Callaghan BC, Batterman S, et al. Association of environmental toxins with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:803–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Andrew AS, Caller TA, Tandan R, Duell EJ, Henegan PL, Field NC, et al. Environmental and occupational exposures and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in New England. Neurodegener Dis. 2017;17:110–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vinceti M, Filippini T, Mandrioli J, Violi F, Bargellini A, Weuve J, et al. Lead, cadmium and mercury in cerebrospinal fluid and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case-control study. J Trace Elem Biol. 2017;43:121–5.Google Scholar
  13. Cassereau J, Ferre M, Chevrollier A, Codron P, Verny C, Homedan C, et al. Neurotoxicity of insecticides. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24. in press.Google Scholar
  14. Krewski D, Barakat-Haddad C, Donnan J, Martino R, Pringsheim T, Tremlett H, et al. Determinants of neurological disease: synthesis of systematic reviews. Neurotoxicology. 2017; in press.Google Scholar
  15. Kamel F, Umbach DM, Bedlack RS, Richards M, Watson M, Alavanja MC, et al. Pesticide exposure and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33:457–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Malek AM, Barchowsky A, Bowser R, Youk A, Talbott EO. Pesticide exposure as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies: pesticide exposure as a risk factor for ALS. Environ Res. 2012;117:112–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Vinceti M, Bottecchi I, Fan A, Finkelstein Y, Mandrioli J. Are environmental exposures to selenium, heavy metals, and pesticides risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Rev Environ Health. 2012;27:19–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu C, Fenske RA, Simcox NJ, Kalman D. Pesticide exposure of children in an agricultural community: evidence of household proximity to farmland and take home exposure pathways. Environ Res. 2000;84:290–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bouvier G, Seta N, Vigouroux-Villard A, Blanchard O, Momas I. Insecticide urinary metabolites in nonoccupationally exposed populations. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2005;8:485–512.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Weppner S, Elgethun K, Lu C, Hebert V, Yost MG, Fenske RA. The Washington aerial spray drift study: children's exposure to methamidophos in an agricultural community following fixed-wing aircraft applications. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006;16:387–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ritz B, Rull RP. Assessment of environmental exposures from agricultural pesticides in childhood leukaemia studies: challenges and opportunities. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;132:148–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bradman A, Castorina R, Barr DB, Chevrier J, Harnly ME, Eisen EA, et al. Determinants of organophosphorus pesticide urinary metabolite levels in young children living in an agricultural community. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:1061–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chevrier C, Serrano T, Lecerf R, Limon G, Petit C, Monfort C, et al. Environmental determinants of the urinary concentrations of herbicides during pregnancy: the PELAGIE mother-child cohort (France). Environ Int. 2014;63:11–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Deziel NC, Friesen MC, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Thomas K, Freeman LE. A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:515–24.Google Scholar
  25. Deziel NC, Beane Freeman LE, Graubard BI, Jones RR, Hoppin JA, Thomas K, et al. Relative contributions of agricultural drift, Para-occupational, and residential use exposure pathways to house dust pesticide concentrations: meta-regression of published data. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125:296–305.Google Scholar
  26. Ravier I, Haouisee E, Clement M, Seux R, Briand O. Field experiments for the evaluation of pesticide spray-drift on arable crops. Pest Manag Sci. 2005;61:728–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Houbraken M, van den Berg F, Butler Ellis CM, Dekeyser D, Nuyttens D, De Schampheleire M, et al. Volatilisation of pesticides under field conditions: inverse modelling and pesticide fate models. Pest Manag Sci. 2016;72:1309–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. van den Berg F, Jacobs CM, Butler Ellis MC, Spanoghe P, Doan Ngoc K, Fragkoulis G. Modelling exposure of workers, residents and bystanders to vapour of plant protection products after application to crops. Sci Total Environ. 2016;573:1010–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Brody JG, Vorhees DJ, Melly SJ, Swedis SR, Drivas PJ, Rudel RA. Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12:64–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Warren JL, Luben TJ, Sanders AP, Brownstein NC, Herring AH, Meyer RE. An evaluation of metrics for assessing maternal exposure to agricultural pesticides. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014;24:497–503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Costello S, Cockburn M, Bronstein J, Zhang X, Ritz B. Parkinson's disease and residential exposure to maneb and paraquat from agricultural applications in the central valley of California. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:919–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones RR, Yu CL, Nuckols JR, Cerhan JR, Airola M, Ross JA, et al. Farm residence and lymphohematopoietic cancers in the Iowa Women's health study. Environ Res. 2014;133:353–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gomez-Barroso D, Garcia-Perez J, Lopez-Abente G, Tamayo-Uria I, Morales-Piga A, Pardo Romaguera E, et al. Agricultural crop exposure and risk of childhood cancer: new findings from a case-control study in Spain. Int J Health Geogr. 2016;15:18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Malagoli C, Costanzini S, Heck JE, Malavolti M, De Girolamo G, Oleari P, et al. Passive exposure to agricultural pesticides and risk of childhood leukemia in an Italian community. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016;219:742–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rappazzo KM, Warren JL, Meyer RE, Herring AH, Sanders AP, Brownstein NC, et al. Maternal residential exposure to agricultural pesticides and birth defects in a 2003 to 2005 North Carolina birth cohort. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016;106:240–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Vinceti M, Malagoli C, Fabbi S, Kheifets L, Violi F, Poli M, et al. Magnetic fields exposure from high-voltage power lines and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in two Italian populations. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017:1–7.Google Scholar
  37. Regione Emilia Romagna. E-R Statistica. Censimenti. [http://statistica.regione.emilia-romagna.it/servizi-online/censimenti]. Accessed 5 May 2017.
  38. Mandrioli J, Biguzzi S, Guidi C, Venturini E, Sette E, Terlizzi E, et al. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Emilia Romagna region (Italy): a population based study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15:262–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicoletti A, Vasta R, Venti V, Mostile G, Lo Fermo S, Patti F, et al. The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Mount Etna region: a possible pathogenic role of volcanogenic metals. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:964–72.Google Scholar
  40. Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL, World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron D. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000;1:293–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ghermandi G, Teggi S, Fabbi S, Bigi A, Zaccanti MM. Tri-generation power plant and conventional boilers: pollutant flow rate and atmospheric impact of stack emissions. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;12:693–704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Ghermandi G, Fabbi S, Zaccanti M, Bigi A, Teggi S. Micro-scale simulation of atmospheric emissions from power-plant stacks in the Po Valley. Atmos Pollut Res. 2015;6:382–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Ritz B, Costello S. Geographic model and biomarker-derived measures of pesticide exposure and Parkinson's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1076:378–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Malagoli C, Fabbi S, Teggi S, Calzari M, Poli M, Ballotti E, et al. Risk of hematological malignancies associated with magnetic fields exposure from power lines: a case-control study in two municipalities of northern Italy. Environ Health. 2010;9:16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Vinceti M, Rothman KJ, Crespi CM, Sterni A, Cherubini A, Guerra L, et al. Leukemia risk in children exposed to benzene and PM10 from vehicular traffic: a case-control study in an Italian population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27:781–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Regione Emilia Romagna. E-R Geoportale. Uso del suolo. [http://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it/it/download/dati-e-prodotti-cartografici-preconfezionati/pianificazione-e-catasto/uso-del-suolo-1]. Accessed 5 May 2017.
  47. Bioagricert. Le aziende certificate bioagricert. [www.trasparente-check.com/protetta2/index.htm]. Accessed 5 May 2017.
  48. Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. Health effects of chronic pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:155–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Keifer MC, Firestone J. Neurotoxicity of pesticides. J Agromedicine. 2007;12:17–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Costa LG, Giordano G, Guizzetti M, Vitalone A. Neurotoxicity of pesticides: a brief review. Front Biosci. 2008;13:1240–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Casida JE. Pest toxicology: the primary mechanisms of pesticide action. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:609–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson FO, Atchison W. The role of environmental mercury, lead and pesticide exposure in development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:761–5.Google Scholar
  53. Choi J, Polcher A, Joas A. Systematic literature review on Parkinson's disease and childhood leukaemia and mode of actions for pesticides. European Food Safety Authority Supporting Publications. 2016;13:EN–955.Google Scholar
  54. Rothman JK. Episheet. [www.krothman.org/episheet.xls]. Accessed 5 May 2017.
  55. Fonseca RG, Resende LA, Silva MD, Camargo A. Chronic motor neuron disease possibly related to intoxication with organochlorine insecticides. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993;88:56–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Kanavouras K, Tzatzarakis MN, Mastorodemos V, Plaitakis A, Tsatsakis AM. A case report of motor neuron disease in a patient showing significant level of DDTs, HCHs and organophosphate metabolites in hair as well as levels of hexane and toluene in blood. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;256:399–404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Franchignoni F, Mora G, Giordano A, Volanti P, Chio A. Evidence of multidimensionality in the ALSFRS-R scale: a critical appraisal on its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1340–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Kang H, Cha ES, Choi GJ, Lee WJ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and agricultural environments: a systematic review. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29:1610–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang MD, Little J, Gomes J, Cashman NR, Krewski D. Identification of risk factors associated with onset and progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurotoxicology. 2016; in press.Google Scholar
  60. Mandrioli J, Faglioni P, Merelli E, Sola P. The epidemiology of ALS in Modena, Italy. Neurology. 2003;60:683–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Bonvicini F, Marcello N, Mandrioli J, Pietrini V, Vinceti M. Exposure to pesticides and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based case-control study. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46:284–7.Google Scholar
  62. Vinceti M, Violi F, Tzatzarakis M, Mandrioli J, Malagoli C, Hatch EE, et al. Pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cerebrospinal fluid of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a case-control study. Environ Res. 2017;155:261–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Bjorling-Poulsen M, Andersen HR, Grandjean P. Potential developmental neurotoxicity of pesticides used in Europe. Environ Health. 2008;7:50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Sanchez-Santed F, Colomina MT, Herrero HE. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodegeneration. Cortex. 2016;74:417–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Fenske RA, Lu C, Curl CL, Shirai JH, Kissel JC. Biologic monitoring to characterize organophosphorus pesticide exposure among children and workers: an analysis of recent studies in Washington state. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1651–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ward MH, Lubin J, Giglierano J, Colt JS, Wolter C, Bekiroglu N, et al. Proximity to crops and residential exposure to agricultural herbicides in iowa. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:893–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Curwin BD, Hein MJ, Sanderson WT, Striley C, Heederik D, Kromhout H, et al. Urinary pesticide concentrations among children, mothers and fathers living in farm and non-farm households in iowa. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51:53–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Koch D, Lu C, Fisker-Andersen J, Jolley L, Fenske RA. Temporal association of children's pesticide exposure and agricultural spraying: report of a longitudinal biological monitoring study. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:829–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith MN, Workman T, McDonald KM, Vredevoogd MA, Vigoren EM, Griffith WC, et al. Seasonal and occupational trends of five organophosphate pesticides in house dust. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2017;27:372–8.Google Scholar
  70. Hanada T, Weitzer S, Mair B, Bernreuther C, Wainger BJ, Ichida J, et al. CLP1 links tRNA metabolism to progressive motor-neuron loss. Nature. 2013;495:474–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Migliaretti G, Berchialla P, Dalmasso P, Cavallo F, Chio A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in piedmont (Italy): a Bayesian spatial analysis of the incident cases. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14:58–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Caller TA, Andrews A, Field NC, Henegan PL, Stommel EW. The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in New Hampshire, USA, 2004-2007. Neurodegener Dis. 2015;15:202–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Harper CJ, Sorenson EJ, Mandrekar J. Epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Minnesota: a year-long population based study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16:520–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Scialo C, Novi G, Bandettini di Poggio M, Canosa A, Sormani MP, Mandich P, et al. Clinical epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Liguria, Italy: an update of LIGALS register. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17:535–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Talbott EO, Malek AM, Lacomis D. The epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;138:225–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Brayne C, Beghi E, van den Berg LH, Chio A, et al. The changing picture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: lessons from European registers. J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:557–63.Google Scholar
  77. EEA. Air quality in Europe — 2015 report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency; 2015.Google Scholar
  78. Vasto S, Buscemi S, Barera A, Di Carlo M, Accardi G, Caruso C. Mediterranean diet and healthy ageing: a Sicilian perspective. Gerontology. 2014;60:508–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Wittich KP, Siebers J. Aerial short-range dispersion of volatilized pesticides from an area source. Int J Biometeorol. 2002;46:126–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Siebers J, Binner R, Wittich KP. Investigation on downwind short-range transport of pesticides after application in agricultural crops. Chemosphere. 2003;51:397–407.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Kawahara J, Horikoshi R, Yamaguchi T, Kumagai K, Yanagisawa Y. Air pollution and young children's inhalation exposure to organophosphorus pesticide in an agricultural community in Japan. Environ Int. 2005;31:1123–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Felsot AS, Unsworth JB, Linders JB, Roberts G, Rautman D, Harris C, et al. Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation--a review. J Environ Sci Health B. 2011;46:1–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Lambert WE, Lasarev M, Muniz J, Scherer J, Rothlein J, Santana J, et al. Variation in organophosphate pesticide metabolites in urine of children living in agricultural communities. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:504–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Coronado GD, Holte S, Vigoren E, Griffith WC, Barr DB, Faustman E, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and residential proximity to nearby fields: evidence for the drift pathway. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53:884–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Gunier RB, Ward MH, Airola M, Bell EM, Colt J, Nishioka M, et al. Determinants of agricultural pesticide concentrations in carpet dust. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:970–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement